• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this stuffy is to derive critical success factors for ERP system implementation by integrating managerial, technical. human resource and organizational culture factors welch have been proposed as influencing factors for the performance of ERP system implementation in previous studios. Especially, this stuffy divides ERP system implementation process into preparation stave, implement stage and settle-down and stabilization stave, and then derives critical success factors in each stage. The data for empirical analysis of the research model are collected from 64 companies and the respondents for questionnaire consist of ERP system implementation project managers and user department managers in companies which have already operated it after ERP system installation. The main results of this study are as follows. First, it derives 27 success factors through comprehensive review of various factors which may affect ERP system implementation performance, and categorizes them into one of three stapes preparation stave, implement stage, and settle-down and stabilization stage. Second, the relationship between many success factors at each stave (preparation stave, implement stage, and settle-down and stabilization stave) and performance variables is tested. As a result, the significant correlations between many success factors at each stage and ERP system implementation performance are found, and the difference among success factors in the degree of influencing the system performance is significantly shown. finally, the relationship between process-oriented performance variables and result-oriented performance ones is tested. As a result, it is found that there is significant correlation between process-oriented performance variables except for one variable-project resource management appropriateness - and result-oriented performance ones. The theoretical contribution of this study is to derive a comprehensive model of critical success factors for implementing ERP system project from the system deve1opment life cycle perspective, and empirically test it through field survey with a wide range of data collection. And, the practical implication of this study is to present the desirable guidelines for performing ERP system implementation project successfully.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.315-336
• /
• 2005

본 논문의 목적은 기존의 연구에서 ERP 시스템 구축성과에 영향을 미치는 요인들로 제시되었던 관리적, 기술적, 인적자원 및 조직문화적 요인 등 제반 영향요인들을 통합하여, ERP시스템 구축의 주요성공 요인을 도출하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 주요 결과로서는, 첫째, 기존의 연구에서 ERP시스템 구축성과에 영향을 미치는 제반 요인들을 종합적으로 고찰한 결과 33가지 성공요인을 도출하였다 또한, 도출된 성공요인을 사전 준비단계, 구현단계, 정착 안정화단계별로 구분하여 제시하였다. 둘째, ERP시스템 구축단계별 성공요인들이 ERP시스템 구축전략 유형에 따라서 시스템 구축성과와 상이한 상관관계를 갖는지를 검증하였다. 그 결과 BPR실시시기에 따라 일부 성공요인들이 성과변수와 상이한 상관관계를 나타냈다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제2권4호
• /
• pp.71-90
• /
• 2000

This study proposes strategical, practical guide to build up ERP system through several case studies to large company and comparative analysis of success and fail factors. Key words in paper .is in summary of previous BPR and ERP studies, try to clarify relationship between BPR and ERP, derivative seeking of practical key success factors through several real cases studies to build up ERP system which is in-house development or customization of commercial package.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.215-236
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences in the critical success factors for ERP adoption suggested by the system managers and the ERP consultants. The survey results indicated the following findings. First, there was no significant difference in the relative importance of the critical success factors between the system managers and the ERP consultants. Both groups agree that 'top manager's concern and support' is the most critical factor and that 'user involvement' is the second. However, the system managers tend to think 'training and education of end users' and 'cooperations among the project participants' more important than the consultants do. Second, both groups agree that the most important ERP contribution should be 'improvements in the business processes.' They also agree that the least important aspect is 'ERP's contribution to the individual's productivity.' In overall, the ordered lists of ERP evaluation criteria according to their importances were of no significant difference between the groups. Third the two groups showed differences when they were asked to evaluate the importance of the critical success factors for each of the ERP evaluation criterion. In general, the system managers tend to put more emphasis on 'training and education of end users' and 'adaptation of end users to the changed processes,' whereas the consultants tend to emphasize more on 'top managers' interest and supports' and 'project manager's capabilities and performance.' The differences in the critical success factors presented by the two groups indicated that more efforts need to be devoted to understanding other participant's interests and concerns in an ERP project team. Better coordinations based on the mutual understandings could improve the chance of achieving a success in adopting ERP packages.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.153-171
• /
• 2006

The objective of this research project is empirically investigating factors influencing EPP system implementation based on the degree of volatility of business environment. The results show that computes with low volatility have successfully implement ERP system compared to companies with high volatility. This research project also identified success factors of each phased chartering phase, executive participation sound assessment of business condition, good understanding of ERP system and carefully constructed case are identified as success factors. During project expenditures, participation of various groups, technical resources, prefect and change management are found to be important for successful construction. Trained users, integration of systems, well-designed process and technical and human resource are found to be success factors during shakedown phase. Managers commitment technical infrastructure, system flexibility, and adequate resource for maintenance and renewing system are identified as success factors of onward and upward phase.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.169-181
• /
• 2016

Organizations in some industries are still hesitant to adopt the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system due to its high risk of failures. This study examined how industry classification affects the successful implementation of the ERP system. To achieve this goal, we reinvestigated the existing ERP Success Model that was developed by Chung with the data from various industry sectors, since Chung validated the model only in the engineering and construction industries. In order to test to see if the Chung model can be applicable outside the engineering and construction industries, the relationships between the ERP success indicators and the critical success factors in the Chung model and those in the sample data collected from ten different industry sectors were compared and investigated. The ten industry sectors were selected based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). We found that the impact of success factors on the success of implementing an ERP system varied across industry sectors. This means that the success of ERP system implementation can be industry-specific. Thus, industry classification should be considered as another factor to help IT decision makers or top-management avoid ERP system failures when they plan to implement a new ERP system.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.69-81
• /
• 2012

본 논문은 한국 기업 2개와 중국 기업 2개를 선정하여 ERP 시스템적 요인별로 성과 분석을 실시한 후 성공적인 ERP 시스템 구축을 위한 전략을 제시하였다. 이와 같은 목적을 달성하기 위하여 본 논문에서는 ERP 시스템의 편의성, ERP 시스템의 유연성, ERP 시스템의 활용성 요인별로 문헌연구 및 실증분석을 하였으며, 또한 한국과 중국 기업 간에 ERP 시스템적 요인별로 비교분석을 하였다. 이를 토대로 본 논문에서는 3개의 ERP 시스템적 요인별로 성공적인 ERP 시스템 구축을 위한 전략을 제시하였다.

• 서비스연구
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.35-45
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 선행연구에서 제시된 ERP시스템의 운영단계의 성공요인들에 대해서 전문가 그룹의 면담과 의견 수렴과정을 거쳐 중요 핵심 성공요인을 도출하고, 도출된 성공요인들을 계층화 의사결정법(AHP)을 이용하여 각 요인들에 대한 상대적인 중요도를 분석하였다. 1차 계층의 성공 요인들에 대한 중요도 분석에서는 조직/인력 요인의 중요도가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 2차 계층의 성공요인을 1차 계층의 중요도를 고려한 가중치 분석에서는 경영진의 지원과 관심이 가장 중요한 요인으로 분석되었고, 그 다음으로 프로세스 최적화, 변화관리, 운영조직의 지원, 프로세스 혁신조직 유지 순으로 분석되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 ERP 시스템의 운영단계에서 ERP 시스템의 도입 성과를 극대화하기 위해서는 경영진의 지속적인 지원과 관심뿐만 아니라 ERP 시스템의 도입으로 인한 내부 환경 변화에 대한 적절한 변화관리가 요구되며, ERP 시스템을 전담하는 운영조직의 지원과 프로세스에 대한 지속적인 혁신을 위한 별도의 조직을 갖추어야 할 것이라는 연구결과를 제시할 수 있었다.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2006년도 추계공동학술대회
• /
• pp.279-286
• /
• 2006

Since 1990's, many enterprises have implemented ERP System. Especially, they want to become an advanced company use ERP implementation. Already, ERP system come to high level which is stabilized and support independent business process of many industry sectors. Although most companies had previous good plans, but those are not satisfied. Because of failed to change management and had many problem about Project team operation. Therefore, important success factors for ERP project are change management and organization activation for Project team. The purpose of this study is suggest to improve method about team activation through analysis the Project team member's individual personality as a factor that makes the success of Project team. This paper studied success factors of project team and plan for organization activation. The results of this study can be used for a successful implementation of the ERP system as make of Project team consider of individual personality and administer a Project team.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.35-47
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the success factors of ERP system in corporations and to know what is different in the factors depending on organizational culture and size. Considering there are various results from introduction of the same information technology(IT), it is implied that organizational characteristics make a difference. In this thesis we did factor analysis and multiple regression about the factors based on the previous studies and analyzed the priorities depending on organizational culture and size. The results show that mechanistic organization has key success factors of work process change, project team abilities, and determination of CEO while organic organization has those of work process change and project team abilities. Plus bigger sized organization has success factors of work process change, project team abilities, and determination of CEO while small sized organization has those of work process change and project team abilities.