• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.244-259
• /
• 2015

환경영향평가법 개정으로 전략환경영향평가가 도입되어 대상계획을 15개 정책계획과 86개 개발기본계획 체계로 개편하여 시행하였지만 최근 평가 대상계획의 확대에 대한 논의가 국가 환경영향평가 정책의 중요한 이슈이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 각국의 법령이나 지침에 제시된 전략환경평가 대상계획을 비교하여 대상계획에 포함되어야 하는 계획들을 제안하고자 한다. 총 10개국의 전략환경평가 대상계획을 조사하였으며, 대상계획이 법령이나 지침에 명시되어 있는 독일, 프랑스, 이탈리아, 영국 및 네덜란드의 사례들을 우리나라 전략환경영향평가 대상계획과 비교하였다. 본 연구를 통해 다수 국가의 연방수준 계획에 포함되어 있으며 환경에 상당한 영향을 미칠 것으로 예상되는 도시계획 분야와 에너지계획 분야의 상위계획 중 광역도시계획, 도시 군 기본계획, 에너지기본계획, 전력수급기본계획들을 전략환경영향평가 대상계획에 포함할 것을 제안하였다.

• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.91-104
• /
• 2008

환경평가에 생물다양성 손실을 최소화하기 위한 가이드라인을 적용하고자 하는 노력이 외국에서 진행 중이지만 국내에서는 고려의 대상이 거의 되지 못하고 있다. 이러한 상황이 지속되면 우리나라의 생물다양성이 급격히 감소할 것이다. 따라서 우리도 생물다양성의 손실을 최소화하도록 지침을 준비하는 것이 시급한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 현재 환경영향평가 시스템의 잠정적인 문제를 평가하고, 현재 시스템에 생물다양성/생태계 항목을 어떻게 도입할 것인가에 대한 정보를 제공하기 위해 고속도로 건설사업에 대한 32개의 환경영향평가서를 분석하였다. 평가서의 분석에서 서식지 및 생물다양성을 다루는 경우는 드물었고 생물다양성 이슈들의 평가가 거의 없는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 현재 시스템의 현황조사와 영향예측 및 상응하는 저감대책에 생물다양성 이슈들을 고려하도록 개선할 필요가 있다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.113-124
• /
• 2008

A worldwide trend of permitting system for industrial installation to achieve a high level of protection of the environment has been moved from single media to multimedia in approach. The Council of the European Community issued the Directive 96/61/EC, the IPPC Directive, concerning integrated pollution prevention and control in 1996. The IPPC Directive is one of the most ambitious legal measures that the European Union (EU) has initiated with a view to applying the prevention principle for industrial activities. The IPPC aims to achieve the integrated prevention and reduction of environmental pollution emitted by those industrial installations with a higher potential of emissions to the environment. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recommended on Environmental Performance Reviews of Korea in 2006 that IPPC permitting concept should be considered for large stationary sources at the national and regional levels. Any Korean law doesn't provide for integrated pollution control with a single process covering all pollution from economic activities. However, one exception might be the "environmentally-friendly companies" certification scheme, introduced in 1995, in which participants agree to meet targets beyond the legal emission limit values in exchange for government technical and financial support to operate environmental management systems. The other exception might be Environmental impact assessment (EIA) of projects, in 1977, which has been strengthened and reinforced to be more preventive through development of the prior environmental review system (PERS) in 1999. The aim of this work is to introduce the contents of IPPC Directive at the viewpoint of Korea policy and to survey the integrated approaching concept of Environmentally-Friendly Companies (EFC) Certification Scheme and EIA policy of Korea. The study will be helpful in the future to prepare the infrastructure of integrated permitting system and to enforce the integrated permit which the authorities of local government issues on industrial activities. It can be said that the data calculated through both EFC Certification Scheme and EIA will be discussed as worthful information to determine Korean BAT reference notes for integrated permitting process.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.61-74
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 해양에서 진행되는 개발사업으로 인하여 해양환경에 미치는 영향을 효율적으로 판단할 수 있는 평가지수들을 비교·검토하였다. 해양수질 분야에는 수질평가지수(WQI), 해양저질 분야에는 유해화학물질 정화지수(CIHC), 부영양화 정화지수(CIET), 농축계수(EF), 해양저서생물 분야에는 저서건강도지수(BHI), 저서오염지수(BPI)를 선정하였다. 개발사업에서 관측된 자료를 각각의 평가지수에 적용하여 평가지수의 특성 및 효용성을 파악하였다. 수질평가지수, 유해화학물질 정화지수, 저서건강도지수가 평가방법 및 평가기준이 명확히 정의되어 있으며, 통합적인 환경영향 분석이 가능하였다. 동 연구에서 제시된 지수이외에도 해양환경을 평가하는 다양한 지수가 있으며, 사업별 특성에 따라 적합한 지수를 활용하는 것도 중요하다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.400-412
• /
• 2019

환경 가치 및 환경 영향의 평가과정은 주관적이고 예측에 의존하기 때문에 과학적 합리성의 확보가 제한된다. 그러므로 정보공개를 통한 절차적 합리성의 확보가 필요하다. 본 연구는 환경영향평가의 절차적 합리성 확보를 위한 방안으로, 평가 과정의 정보공개 강화 방안을 모색하고자 한다. 오르후스 협약은 대중의 환경 정보에 대한 접근과 의사결정에 참여할 수 있는 권리를 규정하는 국제 협약이다. 본 연구는 오르후스 협약에서 제시하는 정보공개에 관한 조항을 토대로 10개 지표를 도출하여 우리나라의 환경영향평가 정보공개 제도를 평가하였다. 평가 결과, 정보공개 방향성 및 제공 기반 마련 측면에서 5개 지표를 만족하여 긍정적 결과를 나타냈다. 그리고 정보 활용 근거 및 제공 과정에 대한 4개 지표에서 세부적인 규정 보완이 필요함을 확인하였다. 마지막으로 대중의 이해 가능성 지표를 통해 전문성 비대칭 문제 및 환경영향평가 제도의 정책 수용성 연구의 필요성을 도출하였다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.194-202
• /
• 2018

국내 법적인 건강영향평가로서 환경영향평가 내 위생 공중보건 항목의 평가는 특정 개발 사업에서 배출되는 유해대기오염물질 배출량 및 주변 주요 지점의 노출농도 산정, 이를 활용한 위해성 평가로 진행되고 있다. 하지만 개발 사업부지 주변의 노출 가능한 인구집단 규모를 고려하지 못하는 등 개발 사업부지 주변의 수용체 특성은 해당 위해성 평가에서 제대로 반영되지 못하고 있다. 본 논문의 목적은 개발 사업부지 주변의 노출 가능한 인구수를 산정 반영한 위해성 평가를 위해 잠재노출 인구수의 산정 및 이를 실제 위생 공중보건 항목 작성 시 활용하는 방안을 제안하는 것이다. 개발 사업부지 주변의 인구수 산정 관련한 국내 자료 현황을 파악하고 이를 고려한 잠재노출 인구수 산정 알고리즘을 제안하였다. 나아가 산업단지 개발 시 유해대기오염물질 배출을 가정한 사례 분석을 수행하였다. 잠재노출 인구수를 활용한 위해성 평가는 인구집단 위해도 개념이 적용되어야 함을 제시하였으며, 향후 연구로 평가결과에 대한 건강영향 여부의 판단기준 설정이 요구됨을 제안하였다. 또한 본 논문의 잠재노출 인구수 산정방법을 통해 개발사업의 입지제한 도구로의 활용가능성을 제안하였다. 이번 논문은 위생 공중보건 항목 작성 시 개발 사업부지 주변의 수용체 특성을 반영한 위해성 평가를 수행하는 방안을 제시했다는 것에 의미가 있다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.125-135
• /
• 2004

Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) in Korea has been used to improve environmental conservation and decision-making. Since environmental impact statement(EIS) was introduced in 1981 with the promulgation of the Environmental Preservation Act in 1977, which replaced the Pollution Control Act legislated in 1963. With a rapid growth of environmental perception as well as the diversification of development activities, however, it has recently bring about a strong demand for a new assessment process related to the strategic level of policies, plan, programs. Method of this study includes analyses of the situation of local EIA and its problematic issues through survey and analysis of information and data, analysis of the level of environmental awareness of professionals and case studies including analysis of foreign strategic environmental assessment. Accordingly, I have elicited a concept of SEA. In addition, I have studied on costs of environmental assessment, and efficiency of internalization of HIA. The survey was carried between September and November 2003, and 177 professionals were asks to complete a questionnaire. As a result of questionnaire survey of environmental pundits, it revealed that 83.8% of participants were in favor of introduction of strategic assessment. This result demonstrated more or less higher approval rate than those of awareness survey done by the Ministry of Environment, i.e. 86.0% ayes, and 14.0% nays. 22.8% of participants agreed to the opinion; "For introduction of this system, earlier is better," 50% reported having an opinion such as, "Will introduce this system in an earliest possible time after correcting problems," 26.3% reported having an opinion such as, "Let's decide the time for introduction of this system after correcting problems first,' and 0.9% reported having an opinion, "it's too early to introduce this system." Specifically, the ratio of ayes on introduction of the system marked 72.8%, and it revealed that a majority of respondents have an opinion such as, "Will introduce this system in an earliest possible time after correcting problems." As means of solutions for the problem regarding the limits of applications that existed in SEA System, factors, such as collecting a wide variety of opinions, securing experts, and faithful implementation, etc. were reported important, and in addition to these factors, respondents revealed having opinions such as, consistent research and development, reflection of public interest, establishment of professional organization, enforcement of after-management service, expanding investments in large, systemizing reference materials, and encouraging public participation, etc. To improve problems involving with present EIA system, it has been identified through this study that SEA is efficient and useful. In order to have SEA introduced successfully, it has been cleared that internalization of effectiveness of environmental cost together with HIA must be accomplished.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 1995

In former times the protection of our environment didn't play an important role due to the fact that emissions and effluents were not considered as serious impacts. However, opinions and scientific measurements meanwhile confirmed that the impacts are more serious than expected. Thus measures to protect our earth has to be taken into consideration. A part of these measures in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). One of the most important parts of the EIA is the collection of basic datas and the following evaluation. Experience out of the daily business of Gerling Consulting Group shows that the content of the EIA has to be revised and enlarged in certain fields. The historical development demonstrated that in areas in which the population and the industrial activities reached high concentration there is a high necessity to develop strict environmental laws and regulations. Maximum values of the concentration of hazardous materials were fixed concerning the emission into and water. Companies not following these regulations were punished. The total amount of environmental offences increased rapidly during the last decade, at least in Germany. During this development the public consciousness concerning environmental affairs increased as well in the industrialized countries. But it could clearly be seen that the development in the field of environmental protection went into the wrong direction. The technologies to protect the environment became more and more sophisticated and terms as: "state of the art" guided more and more to lower emissions, Filtertechnologies and wastewater treatment for example reached a high technical level-but all these sophisticated technologies has one and the same characteristic: they were end-of-the pipe solutions. A second effect was that this kind of environmental protection costs a lot of money. High investments are necessary to reduce the dust emission by another ppm! Could this be the correct way? In Germany the discussion started that the environmental laws reduce the attractivity to invest or to enlarge existing investments within the country. Other countries seem to be not so strict with controlling the environmental laws which means it's simply cheaper to produce in Portugal or Greece. Everybody however knows that this is not the correct way and does not solve the environmental problems. Meanwhile the general picture changes a little bit and we think it changes into the correct direction "End-of-the-pipe" solutions are still necessary but this word received a real negative touch and nobody wants to be brought into connection with this word received a real negative touch and nobody wants to be brought into connection with this word especially in connection with environmental management and safety. Modern actual environmental management starts in a different way. Thoughts about emissions start in the very beginning of the production, they start with the design of the product and modification of traditional modes of production. Basis of these ideas are detailed analyses of products and processes. Due to the above mentioned facts that the public environmental consciousness changed dramatically a continous environmental improvement of each single production plant has to be guarantied. This question is already an important question of the EIA. But it was never really checked in a wholistic approach. Environmental risks have to be taken into considerations during the execution of an EIA. This means that the environmental risks have to be reduced down to a capable risk-level. Environmental risks have to be considered within the phase of planning, during the operation of a plant and after shut down. The experience shows that most of the environmental relevant accidents were and caused by human fault. Even in highly protected plants the human risk-factor can not be excluded during evaluation of the risk-potential. Thus the approach of an EIA has to regard technical evaluations as well as organizational thoughts and the human factor. An environmental risk is a threat to the environment. An analysis of the risk concerning the organizational and human aspect however never was properly executed during an EIA. A possible solution could be to use an instrument as the actual EMAS (Environmental Management System) of the EC for more accurate evaluation of the impact to the environment during an EIA. Organizations or investors could demonstrate by an approved EMAS or even by showing their installment of EMAS that not only the technical level of the planned investment meets the requested standards but as well the actual or planned management is able to reduce the environmental impact down to a bearable level.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.130-141
• /
• 2009

The spatial range of EIA is mainly related to landscape ecological factors such as topography, geology, animals, and plants. Problems were detected involved land, soil, noise, oscillation, the atmosphere, animals, and plants in the natural-environment. First of all, the current EIA lacks explicit spatial ranges and sections in terms of scientific exactitude and objectivity for assessment. Secondly, there are overlapping influence-area problems resulting in cumulative impacts of unit developments that accumulate. Finally, some developments have no regard for ecological and conservational value in relation to determining which effect ecological stability, and which should be regarded as Regional Ecological Resources. Therefore, this study suggests that EIA should be improved in the following manner. First, the standard classification of landscape unit for analysis should be established 10 regulate each spatial range on a wide-landscape scale. Secondly, the impacts resulting from the interaction of overlapping influence-area developments between individual development should be assessed. Third, Minimization of the of the environmental effects is needed by applying the cumulative effects to the influence-area where developments occur in the same time or in a sequence. Fourth, individual characteristics of landscape elements such as roads, rivers, and green networks need to be considered separately in the analysis. Finally, regional ecological habitats should be included in the analysis in order to achieve stable ecosystems.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 1993

Most developing countries are experiencing rapid urbanization and the associated growth of industry and services. Cities are currently absorbing two-thirds of the total population in the developing world. Korea has about 85 percent of urban dwellers. World population will shift from being predominantly rural to predominantly urban around the turn of the century. Although cities play a key role in development process and make more than a proportionate contribution to national economic growth, especially cities are also the main catalysts of economic growth in developing countries, they can also be unhealthy, inefficient, and inequitable places to live. Most developing countries are increasingly unable to provide basic environmental infrastructure and services, whether in the megacities or in secondary urban centers. Of particular concern is the strain on natural resources brought by the increasing number of people, cars, and factories. They are generating ever greater amounts of urban wastes and emissions. They also exceed the capacity of regulatory authorities to control them and of nature to assimilate them. The environmental consequences are translated into direct negative impacts on human health, the quality of life, the productivity of the city, and the surrounding ecosystems. Environmental degradation threatens the long tenn availability and quality of natural resources critical to economic growth. Cities, with their higher and growing per capita energy use for domestic, industrial, and transport purpose also contribute a disproportionate share of the emission leading to global warming and acid rain. An important priority is to develop strategic approaches for managing the urban environment. The design of appropriate and lasting strategic responses requires first an understanding of the underlying causes of urban environmental deterioration, it is necessary that longer tenn objectives should be set for urban area to avoid irreversible ecological damage and to ensure lasting economic development. As a means to the preventive policies against the adverse effect, environmental impact assessment (EIA) serve to identify a project's possible environmental consequences early enough to allow their being taken into consideration in the decision making process for urban planning. This paper describes some considerations of EIA for urban planning-scoping, assessment process, measurement and prediction of impacts, pollution controls and supervision, and system planning for environmental preservation.