• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제55권1호
• /
• pp.238-247
• /
• 2023

The present work represents a technical guideline for decommissioning a disused teletherapy machine model Theratron-780 and contains category one ⁶⁰Co radioactive source. The first section predicts the dose rate from the source in case of normal and radiological emergency situations via FLUKA-MC simulation code. Moreover, the dose assessment for the occupational during the whole process is calculated and compared to the measured values. A suggested cordoned area for safety and security in a radiological emergency is simulated. The second section lists the whole process's technical procedures, including (preview, dismantle, securing, transport and storage) of the disused teletherapy machine. Results show that the maximum obtained accumulated dose for occupational were found to be 24.5 ± 4.9 μSv in the dismantle and securing process in addition to 3.5 ± 1.8 μSv during loading on the transport vehicle and unloading at the storage facility. It was found that the measured accumulated dose for workers is in good agreement with the estimated one by uncertainty not exceeding 5% in normal operating conditions.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.11-14
• /
• 2012

목 적: Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA)는 Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) 알고리즘에 비하여 2차선과 조직 불 균질에 대한 영향에 보다 더 정확한 선량계산을 제공한다. 본 연구는 유방암 접선조사 치료계획에서 PBC 알고리즘과 AAA의 선량계산 알고리즘에 따른 선량분포의 차이를 분석하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 선형가속기(CL-6EX, VARIAN, USA)의 6 MV 에너지를 이용한 유방암 환자 10명을 대상으로 Eclipse treatment planning system (Version 8.9, VARIAN, USA)을 사용하여 전산화 치료계획을 수립하였다. Conventional Radiation Therapy plan(Conventional plan)과 Field-in-Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plan (FiF plan)을 PBC 알고리즘을 이용하여 치료계획을 수립한 후 Monitor Unit (MU)를 고정시키고 AAA로 변경하여 선량계산하고, Dose Volume Histogram (DVH)을 이용하여 치료계획을 비교 분석하였다. 결 과: 첫 번째, Conventional plan의 PBC 알고리즘과 AAA에 따른 차이를 평가한 결과 치료용적에 대한 평균 Conformity Index (CI) 값의 차이는 PBC 알고리즘에서 0.295 높게 평가 되었다. 동측 폐에 대한 선량을 평가한 결과 $V_{47Gy}$과 $V_{45Gy}$는 PBC알고리즘에서 각각 5.83%, 4.04% 높게 평가되었고, Mean dose, $V_{20Gy}$, $V_{5Gy}$, $V_{3Gy}$는 AAA에서 각각 0.6%, 0.29%, 6.35%, 10.23%높게 평가되었다. 두 번째, FiF plan의 경우 치료용적에 대한 평균 CI 값의 차이는 PBC 알고리즘에서 0.165 높게 평가 되었고, 동측 폐에 대한 선량은 $V_{47Gy}$, $V_{45Gy}$, Mean dose는 PBC 알고리즘에서 각각 6.17%, 3.80%, 0.15% 높게 평가되었고, $V_{20Gy}$, $V_{5Gy}$, $V_{3Gy}$는 AAA에서 각각 0.14%, 4.07%, 4.35% 높게 평가되었다. 결 론: 유방암 접선조사에서 AAA로 계산했을 때, PBC 알고리즘에 비해 치료용적에 대한 Conformity가 Conventional plan, FiF plan 각각 0.295, 0.165 낮게 평가 되며, 동측 폐의 고 선량 영역의 선량은 적게 나타나며, 저 선량 영역의 선량은 많게 나타므로 폐에 대한 선량을 평가하는 데 선량계산 알고리즘에 따른 특징을 고려해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권13호
• /
• pp.5259-5264
• /
• 2014

Background: CT based brachytherapy allows 3-dimensional (3D) assessment of organs at risk (OAR) doses with dose volume histograms (DVHs). The purpose of this study was to compare computed tomography (CT) based volumetric calculations and International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference-point estimates of radiation doses to the bladder and rectum in patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). Materials and Methods: Between March 2011 and May 2012, 20 patients were treated with 55 fractions of brachytherapy using tandem and ovoids and underwent post-implant CT scans. The external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose was 48.6Gy in 27 fractions. HDR brachytherapy was delivered to a dose of 21 Gy in three fractions. The ICRU bladder and rectum point doses along with 4 additional rectal points were recorded. The maximum dose ($D_{Max}$) to rectum was the highest recorded dose at one of these five points. Using the HDRplus 2.6 brachyhtherapy treatment planning system, the bladder and rectum were retrospectively contoured on the 55 CT datasets. The DVHs for rectum and bladder were calculated and the minimum doses to the highest irradiated 2cc area of rectum and bladder were recorded ($D_{2cc}$) for all individual fractions. The mean $D_{2cc}$ of rectum was compared to the means of ICRU rectal point and rectal $D_{Max}$ using the Student's t-test. The mean $D_{2cc}$ of bladder was compared with the mean ICRU bladder point using the same statistical test. The total dose, combining EBRT and HDR brachytherapy, were biologically normalized to the conventional 2 Gy/fraction using the linear-quadratic model. (${\alpha}/{\beta}$ value of 10 Gy for target, 3 Gy for organs at risk). Results: The total prescribed dose was $77.5Gy{\alpha}/{\beta}10$. The mean dose to the rectum was $4.58{\pm}1.22Gy$ for $D_{2cc}$, $3.76{\pm}0.65Gy$ at $D_{ICRU}$ and $4.75{\pm}1.01Gy$ at $D_{Max}$. The mean rectal $D_{2cc}$ dose differed significantly from the mean dose calculated at the ICRU reference point (p<0.005); the mean difference was 0.82 Gy (0.48-1.19Gy). The mean EQD2 was $68.52{\pm}7.24Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ for $D_{2cc}$, $61.71{\pm}2.77Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ at $D_{ICRU}$ and $69.24{\pm}6.02Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ at $D_{Max}$. The mean ratio of $D_{2cc}$ rectum to $D_{ICRU}$ rectum was 1.25 and the mean ratio of $D_{2cc}$ rectum to $D_{Max}$ rectum was 0.98 for all individual fractions. The mean dose to the bladder was $6.00{\pm}1.90Gy$ for $D_{2cc}$ and $5.10{\pm}2.03Gy$ at $D_{ICRU}$. However, the mean $D_{2cc}$ dose did not differ significantly from the mean dose calculated at the ICRU reference point (p=0.307); the mean difference was 0.90 Gy (0.49-1.25Gy). The mean EQD2 was $81.85{\pm}13.03Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ for $D_{2cc}$ and $74.11{\pm}19.39Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ at $D_{ICRU}$. The mean ratio of $D_{2cc}$ bladder to $D_{ICRU}$ bladder was 1.24. In the majority of applications, the maximum dose point was not the ICRU point. On average, the rectum received 77% and bladder received 92% of the prescribed dose. Conclusions: OARs doses assessed by DVH criteria were higher than ICRU point doses. Our data suggest that the estimated dose to the ICRU bladder point may be a reasonable surrogate for the $D_{2cc}$ and rectal $D_{Max}$ for $D_{2cc}$. However, the dose to the ICRU rectal point does not appear to be a reasonable surrogate for the $D_{2cc}$.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제30권1_2호
• /
• pp.117-128
• /
• 2018

목 적 : iDMS(Integrated Database Management System, 통합 데이터베이스 관리 시스템) 내 TOMOTHERAPY 치료 계획을 ACCURAY $Precision^{TM}$ 1.1.1.1을 이용하여 본원의 TOMO HDA와 Radixact 장비 간 Transfer하였고 선량학적 차이를 분석하였으며, 이를 통해 치료 계획 Transfer의 유용성을 평가하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 두경부암 두 부위와 전립선암 두 부위의 치료를 가정하여 4개의 서로 다른 치료 계획을 세웠다. 각 치료 계획은 95 % 처방선량(Prescription dose)이 표적 체적의 99 % 이상 조사되도록 설계하였고, 정상장기 선량은 SMC tolerance dose protocol을 기준으로 하였다. 수립된 치료 계획은 각 장비로 Transfer 시켰으며 Transfer된 치료 계획의 DVH(Dose Volume Histogram) 분석을 통해 선량학적 차이를 비교 평가하였다. 결 과 : Transfer된 치료 계획에서 CTV 및 GTV의 Mean Dose는 증가 및 감소하였으나 유의할 만한 차이는 보이지 않았다. CTV 및 GTV 처방 선량의 Target Coverage는 HDA에서 Radixact로 Trasnfer 시 전부 감소하였으며, CTV에 대한 CI 및 HI 변화도 0.1 이내였다. Normal Organ Dose는 두 치료 계획 모두 HDA에서 Radixact로 Transfer 시 대부분의 항목에서 선량이 증가하였다. 결 론 : 본 실험의 결과에 따르면 Radixact에서 HDA 장비로 치료 계획 Transfer 시 Target Coverage는 기준 이상이었으며 Normal Organ Dose 또한 대부분 같거나 감소하였다. HDA에서 Radixact로 치료 계획 Transfer 시 Target의 Coverage는 감소하는 경향을 보였고, Normal Organ Dose는 Optic Chiasm($D_{max}$ 1.38 Gy 증가), Bladder($D_{max}$ 3.07 Gy 증가), Penile Bulb($D_{max}$ 1.14 Gy 증가) 등 부작용(side effects)을 일으킬 수 있는 장기에서 선량이 증가였다. 이에 따라 치료 계획 Transfer 시 선량 변화에 주의해야 하며 장비 점검으로 인한 일회성 Transfer는 효율적인 방사선 치료를 위해 유용할 것이나, Transfer된 치료 계획으로 치료가 수회간 이어질 경우 치료 계획을 다시 세워 진행해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.54-60
• /
• 2017

This study was designed to measure transit dose with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in eight patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and to verify the accuracy of dose delivery to patients. The calculated dose map of the treatment planning system (TPS) was compared with the EPID based dose measured on the same plane with a gamma index method. The plan for each patient was verified prior to treatment with a diode array (MapCHECK) and portal dose image prediction (PDIP). To simulate possible patient positioning errors during treatment, outcomes were evaluated after an anthropomorphic phantom was displaced 5 and 10 mm in various directions. Based on 3%/3 mm criteria, the $mean{\pm}SD$ passing rates of MapCHECK, PDIP (pre-treatment QA) for 47 IMRT were $99.8{\pm}0.1%$, $99.0{\pm}0.7%$, and, respectively. Besides, passing rates using transit dosimetry was $90.0{\pm}1.5%$ for the same condition. Setup errors of 5 and 10 mm reduced the mean passing rates by 1.3% and 3.0% (inferior to superior), 2.2% and 4.3% (superior to inferior), 5.9% and 10.9% (left to right), and 8.9% and 16.3% (right to left), respectively. These findings suggest that the transit dose-based IMRT verification method using EPID, in which the transit dose from patients is compared with the dose map calculated from the TPS, may be useful in verifying various errors including setup and/or patient positioning error, inhomogeneity and target motions.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.145-154
• /
• 2003

By optimizing the radiation protection the collective dose and individual dose could be reduced during YGN #4 $5^{th}$ outage in 2001. The collective doses for the two high radiation jobs decreased to 85% and 65% of expected doses. The proportion of workers with low dose (below 1mSv) exposure increased 4% while the proportion of workers with over 3mSv and 5mSv exposure are decreased to 2%, 1% respectively. But none is exposed over 8mSv for the annual dose. To aid decision of utilizing the robot, cost- benefit analysis was performed and reasonable point was proposed to use the robot. For the first time job, repeated ALARA meeting and mock up training were implemented to set up working procedure by identifying the trouble. To easily set up standard procedure, mockup process was videotaped and reviewed during ALARA meeting. Monitoring is a good approach to chase radiological working condition such as working time, dose rate. behavior of workers, especially for high radiation work. Those data were estimated and adjusted from the stage of work planning to mock up. At the stage of actual work the monitoring data were compared to the estimation and recorded to database. This database will not only be used as a powerful tool for dose optimization at the following outage but also as a guideline to dose constraint set up for optimization for each specific situation.

• Journal of the Korean Physical Society
• /
• 제73권10호
• /
• pp.1571-1576
• /
• 2018

We developed and evaluated an algorithm to calculate the target radiation dose in cancer patients by measuring the transmitted dose during 3D conformal radiation treatment (3D-CRT) treatment. The patient target doses were calculated from the transit dose, which was measured using a glass dosimeter positioned 150 cm from the source. The accuracy of the transit dose algorithm was evaluated using a solid water phantom for five patient treatment plans. We performed transit dose-based patient dose verification during the actual treatment of 34 patients who underwent 3D-CRT. These included 17 patients with breast cancer, 11 with pelvic cancer, and 6 with other cancers. In the solid water phantom study, the difference between the transit dosimetry algorithm with the treatment planning system (TPS) and the measurement was $-0.10{\pm}1.93%$. In the clinical study, this difference was $0.94{\pm}4.13%$ for the patients with 17 breast cancers, $-0.11{\pm}3.50%$ for the eight with rectal cancer, $0.51{\pm}5.10%$ for the four with bone cancer, and $0.91{\pm}3.69%$ for the other five. These results suggest that transit-dosimetry-based in-room patient dose verification is a useful application for 3D-CRT. We expect that this technique will be widely applicable for patient safety in the treatment room through improvements in the transit dosimetry algorithm for complicated treatment techniques (including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.75-80
• /
• 2006

목 적: 방사선치료에 있어 종양조직이나 정상조직의 정확한 선량계산은 치료의 성패를 좌우하는 가장 큰 요인이다. 이로 인해 방사선치료계획은 컴퓨터 단층 영상의 재구성을 통한 불균질 조직에 선흡수계수를 밀도로 변환하여 CT 번호에 의한 선량 보정이 유효하게 이루어지고 있다. 대상 및 방법: 이에 본 연구는 불균질 조직등가 팬톰을 제작하여 현재 사용 중인 방사선 치료 계획시스템을 이용한 CT 번호의 측정과 질량밀도를 계산하여 물을 기준으로 상대값을 구하였다. 또한 실제 방사선 조사 시 측정된 선량(nC)과 CT영상을 이용한 치료계획 시 선량(PDD)을 상대적으로 비교함으로써 실제 CT 번호를 이용한 불균질 조직의 보정에 대한 유용성과 정확성을 평가하고자 한다. 결 과: 측정결과 CT 번호를 이용하여 계산된 조직등가물질의 질량밀도와 실제 질량밀도는 $0.005{\sim}0.069g/cm^3$의 차이를 보였으며, 방사선 치료계획 시 심부선량(PDD)과 방사선 치료 장치로 조사하여 측정된 선량의 상대오차는 $-2.8{\sim}+1.06%$로 3% 이내의 유효범위이내의 결과를 얻었다. 결 론: 본 실험은 CT 영상을 이용한 불균질 조직의 보정에 대한 유용성을 확인할 수 있었고, 방사선 치료 계획 장치의 정도 관리(Quality Assurance; QA)의 기본 틀을 제공할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권10호
• /
• pp.5989-5993
• /
• 2013

Background: Radiation therapy is the mainstay of treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Importance of tumor coverage and challenges posed by its unique and critical location are well evident. Therefore we aimed to evaluate our radiation treatment plan through dose volume histograms (DVHs) to find planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage and factors affecting it. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study covered 45 histologically proven nasopharyngeal cancer patients who were treated with definitive 3D-CRT and chemotherapy between Feb 2006 to March 2013 at the Department of Oncology, Section Radiation Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. DVH was evaluated to find numbers of shrinking field (phases), PTV volume in different phases and its coverage by the 95% isodose lines, along with influencing factors. Results: There were 36 males (80%) and 9 females (20%) in the age range of 12-84 years. Stage IVA (46.7%) was the most common stage followed by stage III (31.1). Eighty six point six-percent received induction, 95.5% received concurrent and 22.2% received adjuvant chemotherapy. The prescribed median radiation dose was 70Gy to primary, 60Gy to clinically positive neck nodes and 50Gy to clinically negative neck regions. Mean dose to spinal cord was 44.2Gy and to optic chiasma was 52Gy. Thirty seven point eight-percent patients completed their treatment in three phases while 62.2% required four to five phases. Mean volume for PTV3 was $247.8cm^3$ (50-644.3), PTV4 $173.8cm^3$ (26.5-345.1) and PTV5 $119.6cm^3$ (18.9-246.1) and PTV volume coverage by 95% isodose lines were 74.4%, 85.7% and 100% respectively. Advanced T stage, intracranial extension and tumor volume > $200cm^3$ were found to be important factors associated with decreased PTV coverage by 95% isodose line. Conclusions: 3D CRT results in adequate PTV dose coverage by 95% isodose line. However advanced T stage, intracranial extension and large target volume require more advanced techniques like IMRT for appropriate PTV coverage.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.481-487
• /
• 2023

본 연구에서는 15 MV를 이용한 전립샘암의 세기조절방사선치료 시 빔의 개수에 따른 광중성자선량의 부작용 발생률을 분석하고자 한다. 전립샘암 세기조절방사선치료의 방사선치료계획설계는 1회 처방선량 220 cGy, 전체 치료 횟수는 33회로 총 7260 cGy로 수립하였다. 실험에 사용된 선형가속기는 Varian의 True Beam STx(Varian, USA)이며, 계획용 표적체적(Planning target volume; PTV)에 15 MV로 광중성자 선량이 발생되도록 하였다. 치료계획의 설계는 Eclipse System (Varian Ver 10.0, USA)을 사용하여 세기조절방사선치료 5, 7, 9 portals로 하였다. 광중성자 선량 측정을 위해 광자극발광선량계 (Optically stimulated luminescence albedo neutron dosimeter, Landauer Inc., USA)를 사용하였다. 세기조절방사선치료 5 portals 시 1,000명당 1.7명, 7 portals 시 1,000명당 1.8명, 9 portals 시 1,000명당 2.0명이 광중성자 선량으로 인하여, 갑상샘에 부작용을 나타낼 확률임을 산출하였다. 본 연구는 세기조절방사선치료 시 2차 피폭선량의 위험성을 연구하여, 향후 방사선의 확률적 영향과 관련된 의미 있는 자료로 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.