• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.950-965
• /
• 2017

This present study proposed a newly developed test method to evaluate the dexterity and mobility of a firefighter's protective gloves. The first step evaluated the mobility and dexterity of the current type of fire protective gloves and three new types of protective gloves using Don-doff test, ASTM dexterity, Minnesota dexterity, Bennett hand tool test, and ASTM torque test. Three firefighters ($47.3{\pm}5.0yr$ in age, $178.6{\pm}2.9cm$ in height) participated in a series of experiments. The second step was to design and suggest an integrated test method based on the results of the first experiment. As a result of the first experiment, we concluded that 1) the mobility and dexterity tests for firefighting gloves should include both wet and dry tests, 2) The three kinds of dexterity tests could be integrated into one test, and 3) The don-doff test and the torque test should be independent from the newly developed integrated test. In summary, we suggested a simplified test method that combined ASTM dexterity, Minnesota dexterity, and Bennett hand tool test. The integrated system can reduce total time spent on dexterity tests and improve the validity of the test in terms of firefighters' manual work.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제40권5호
• /
• pp.921-935
• /
• 2016

This research analyzed the manual performance of firefighting protective gloves on global markets in order to suggest an evaluation method for firefighting protective gloves wearing comfort. We collected 13 types of firefighting gloves from domestic and international markets (7 types from Korea, 3 types form Europe, 2 types from the U.S and 1 type from Japan). We set the Don-Doff test as a basal requirement for moving toward to further manual performance tests that consist of: ASTM dexterity test, Minnesota dexterity test, Bennett hand tool test and ASTM torque test. All gloves were evaluated in dry and wet conditions, we included eight current male firefighters ($43.4{\pm}7.0yr$ in age, $173.1{\pm}4.4cm$ in height, $79.9{\pm}9.2kg$ in body mass) for the tests. Four gloves (1 Korea, 1 U.S, 1 Germany, and 1 Japan) out of thirteen firefighting gloves passed the Don-Doff test and had great subject preferences. There was no significant difference between dry and wet conditions on the ASTM dexterity test, Minnesota dexterity test, Bennett hand tool test and ASTM torque test. However, Japanese gloves had the greatest score and showed 3-4 times faster completion time on the ASTM dexterity test (p<.05), 1.2-1.5 times faster on the Minnesota dexterity test (p<.05), as fast as the bare hand on Bennett hand tool test (p<.05), and greater performance on the ASTM torque test compared to bare hand. In conclusion, Don-Doff test in wet conditions should be the first step for a mobility evaluation of domestic firefighting protective gloves; subsequently, a comprehensive test assorting ASTM, Minnesota, and Bennett test should be developed as a second step. The current ASTM torque test can be adopted as a third step. This three-step-method for evaluating firefighting protective glove mobility can be expected to expand into surveys of other safety gloves in Korea.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제11권5호
• /
• pp.353-361
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 신종감염병 대응 전담요원의 개인보호구 착탈의 융합 교육 효과를 확인하고자 시도되었다. Level D 개인보호구 착용 기준에 적합한 28명의 비의료인 신종감염병 대응 전담요원을 대상으로 2018년 3차에 걸쳐 교육 후 개인보호구 착탈의 점수를 수집하였으며 프리드만 검정(Friedman)과 윌콕슨 부호순위 검정(Wilcoxon's Signed-Ranks Test)으로 분석하였다. 연구결과, 교육횟수에 따른 분석에서 착의점수는 유의하게 상승하였고 탈의 점수는 유의한 차이를 보였다. 교육차수별 분석에서는 착의 점수는 1차보다 3차에서 유의하게 상승하였으며 탈의 점수는 1차보다 3차에서 점수가 상승하였으나 유의 하지 않았다. 본 연구의 대상자들은 비의료인이기 때문에 지식이 부족하지만 감염병에 접촉할 확률이 크기 때문에 교육이 필요한 점에서 의미가 크며 본 연구결과를 통하여 개인보호구 탈의 교육의 효과가 상대적으로 낮아 교육회수의 증가 혹은 주기적인 교육의 필요성이 중요하다고 파악되었다.