DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mobility Evaluation of Popular Firefighting Protective Gloves in Domestic and Foreign Countries -Don-Doff Test, Dexterity Test, and Torque Test-

국내외 보급형 소방용 보호장갑의 동작성 평가 -착탈 시험, 기민성 시험, 회전력 시험을 중심으로-

  • Kim, Dami (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion design, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Inseong (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Joo-Young (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion design, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University/Research Institute of Human Ecology, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
  • 김다미 (서울대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 이인성 (이화여자대학교 의류산업학과) ;
  • 이주영 (서울대학교 의류학과/서울대학교 생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2016.07.13
  • Accepted : 2016.08.10
  • Published : 2016.10.31

Abstract

This research analyzed the manual performance of firefighting protective gloves on global markets in order to suggest an evaluation method for firefighting protective gloves wearing comfort. We collected 13 types of firefighting gloves from domestic and international markets (7 types from Korea, 3 types form Europe, 2 types from the U.S and 1 type from Japan). We set the Don-Doff test as a basal requirement for moving toward to further manual performance tests that consist of: ASTM dexterity test, Minnesota dexterity test, Bennett hand tool test and ASTM torque test. All gloves were evaluated in dry and wet conditions, we included eight current male firefighters ($43.4{\pm}7.0yr$ in age, $173.1{\pm}4.4cm$ in height, $79.9{\pm}9.2kg$ in body mass) for the tests. Four gloves (1 Korea, 1 U.S, 1 Germany, and 1 Japan) out of thirteen firefighting gloves passed the Don-Doff test and had great subject preferences. There was no significant difference between dry and wet conditions on the ASTM dexterity test, Minnesota dexterity test, Bennett hand tool test and ASTM torque test. However, Japanese gloves had the greatest score and showed 3-4 times faster completion time on the ASTM dexterity test (p<.05), 1.2-1.5 times faster on the Minnesota dexterity test (p<.05), as fast as the bare hand on Bennett hand tool test (p<.05), and greater performance on the ASTM torque test compared to bare hand. In conclusion, Don-Doff test in wet conditions should be the first step for a mobility evaluation of domestic firefighting protective gloves; subsequently, a comprehensive test assorting ASTM, Minnesota, and Bennett test should be developed as a second step. The current ASTM torque test can be adopted as a third step. This three-step-method for evaluating firefighting protective glove mobility can be expected to expand into surveys of other safety gloves in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander, B. M., & Baxter, C. S. (2014). Plasticizer contamination of firefighter personal protective clothing - a potential factor in increased health risks in firefighters. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 11(5), D43−D48. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.877142
  2. ASTM International. (2010). ASTM F2010/F2010M - Standard test method for evaluation of glove effects on wearer hand dexterity using a modified pegboard test. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
  3. ASTM International. (2015). ASTM F2961 - 15 Standard test method for characterizing gripping performance of gloves using a torque meter. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
  4. Bang, C. H., Lee, J. H., & Yea, Y. T. (2002). An experimental study on the thermal characteristics of the working uniform exposed to the radiation heat. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 17(3), 56−60.
  5. Bennett, G. K. (1981). Hand-tool dexterity test. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.
  6. Choi, S. Y., Park, I. G., Kong, I. C., & Rie, D. H. (2013). The change in temperature . humidity . perspiration of fire suit when applying phased intensive exercises to fire fighter wearing fire suit. Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, 15(4), 97−103. doi:10.12812/ksms.2013.15.4.97
  7. Desrosiers, J., Rochette, A., Hebert, R., & Bravo, G. (1997). The minnesota manual dexterity test: Reliability, validity and reference values studies with healthy elderly people. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(5), 270−276. doi:10.1177/000841749706400504
  8. Fu, M., Weng, W. G., & Yuan, H. Y. (2014). Quantitative assessment of the relationship between radiant heat exposure and protective performance of multilayer thermal protective clothing during dry and wet conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 276, 383−392. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.056
  9. Huh, M. D., & Bang, C. H. (2010). Effect of weight of fireprotective equipment for physical activity ability. Journal of Korean Institute of Fire Science & Engineering, 24(1), 128−133.
  10. ISO. (2001). ISO 15383:2001 Protective gloves for firefighters -- Laboratory test methods and performance requirements. Geneva: Author.
  11. ISO. (2002). ISO 6942:2002 Protective clothing -- Protection against heat and fire - Method of test: Evaluation of materials and material assemblies when exposed to a source of radiant heat. Geneva: Author.
  12. Kahn, S. A., Woods, J., Sipes, J. C., Toscano, N., & Bell, D. E. (2014). Firefighter safety: Rampant unsafe practives as documented in mainstream media. Journal of Burn Care & Research: Official Publication of the American Burn Association, 35(5), 426−430. doi:10.1097/BCR.0000000000000016
  13. Kim, D., & Shim, H. (2008). A study on the durability change of fire fighter's protective cloth (I)-Protective cloth worn in the domestic fire extinguishing field-. Textile Science and Engineering, 45(6), 395−400.
  14. Kim, H. (2014, May 29). 현직소방관 "소방장갑을 왜 직접 사냐구요?" [Current firefighter "Why do we buy firefighting gloves by ourselves?"]. JoongAng Ilbo. Retrieved July 11, 2016, from http://news.joins.com/article/14818586
  15. Kim, J. H., Coca, A., Williams, W. J., & Roberge, R. J. (2011). Effects of liquid cooling garments on recovery and performance time in individuals performing strenuous work wearing a firefighter ensemble. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 8(7), 409−416. doi:10.1080/15459624.2011.584840
  16. Korea Fire Institute. (2014, July 14). 소방용 안전장갑의 KFI인 정기준 [KFI standards for firefighting protective gloves]. Yongin: Author.
  17. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. (2010). 6차 인체치수조사 [The 6th Size Korea 3D scan & measurement technology report]. Size Korea. Retrieved March 14, 2014, from https://sizekorea.kats.go.kr/03_report/6th.asp
  18. Lee, J. K., Bang, Y. J., Bang, C. H., & Kwon, J. S. (2014). Study on the thermal protective performance measurements of fire fighter's protective clothing for low level radiant heat exposures. Fire Science and Engineering, 28(2), 1−8. https://doi.org/10.7731/KIFSE.2014.28.2.001
  19. Lee, J. Y. (2005). A study on the body surface area of Korean adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  20. Lee, J. Y., Kim, S., Jang, Y. J., Baek, Y. J., & Park, J. (2014). Component contribution of personal protective equipment to the alleviation of physiological strain in firefighters during work and recovery. Ergonomics, 57(7), 1068−1077. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.907449
  21. NFPA. (2013) NFPA 1971: Standard of protective ensembles for structural fire fighting and proximity fire fighting, 2013 edition. Quincy, MA: Author.
  22. Ross, K., Barker, R., Watkins, J., & Deaton, A. S. (2012). Methods for measuring the grip performance of structural firefighting gloves. Performance of Protective Clothing and Equipment: Emerging Issues and Technologies, 371−391. doi:10.1520/STP104482
  23. Shin, H. S. (2014, October 10). [국감] 사비로 구입하는 소방장갑, 알고보니 구조용 [[inspection of the administration] Firefighting gloves, actually it is for rescue]. Fire Prevention News. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://fpn119.co.kr/sub_read.html?uid=28167§ion=sc72
  24. Syn, H. Y., & Lee, I. S. (2015). A study on deriving design requirements of firefighters' safety gloves in accordance with work situations. Journal of the Korean Society Design Culture, 21(4), 339−349. https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2015.08.21.3.339