• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.28-40
• /
• 2018

Purpose: The purpose is to understand the perception of medical providers at tertiary hospitals in Seoul on the importance-performance of the reform on a doctor-designation system, and to provide the policy suggestion of the perception on such a system. Methodology: To achieve the purpose, this study utilized structured survey tools to conduct a questionnaire survey of nursing, administrative and medical technology professionals at six tertiary hospitals in Seoul. An importance-performance analysis was utilized for an analysis that showed the perception of the reform on a doctor-designation system. Findings: First, it was identified that those medical providers had the highest perception of the importance about the performance of the reform on a doctor-designation system. Second, according to the result of action grid of an importance-performance analysis (IPA), it can be identified that in the 2nd stage of 'Concentrate here' included are the items as to design and effect of medical care quality and subsidies & patient infection and safety and control fees, effect of income security of the method for compensating for loss established by the government and offering sufficient information on general medical services and doctor-designation medical services. In the 1st stage of 'Keep up the Good Work', and the 2nd stage of 'Concentrate here' included is the item as to the performance of patients of the reform on a doctor designation system. Practical Implications: There could be identified the effect of the reform bill on the perception of medical providers. It is expected that a better environment would be provided for patients to use a hospital and for medical providers to offer medical services, if the goverment makes efforts to improve methods for compensating for loss and continuous monitoring of the performance of patients.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.385-396
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 부산시민을 대상으로 선택진료제도에 대한 인식도와 선택진료의 경험이 있는 의료소비자에게 제도 인식율과 만족도 결과에 따른 개선방안을 도출하여 효과적인 선택진료 제도 운영에 필요한 기초자료 제공을 위하여 만 20세 이상 부산시민들을 연구대상자로 설문조사를 실시하여 분석한 결과, 여성, 20대, 대졸이상, 학생과 서비스직종, 월 평균소득은 200~299만원에서 가장 많은 분포를 보였다. 선택진료를 인지하고 있는 사람은 27.7%이고, 선택진료 경험자에 의한 인지율은 23.7%였다. 선택진료제도의 규칙에 대한 실제 인식율(정답율)은 전체 평균 66.3%이며 제도를 알게 된 경로는 대중매체를 통해서(31.9%)이며, 전문성이 높은 진료(57.5%)이기 때문에 선택진료를 이용하였다. 이들 대상자들은 재이용할 의사가 있다(76.3%)는 의견을 보였고 사유는 고급의료를 제공(35.2%)받기 때문이라는 결과를 보였다. 선택진료경험자의 만족도 전체 평균은 2.96점으로 만족도가 대체로 높지 않은 결과를 보였으며, 선택진료제도 개선을 위해서는 홍보강화(91.2%), 환자가 보기 쉬운 곳에 안내문 비치(96.7%), 선택진료비용 줄임(85.7%), 진료약관설명을 상세히할 것(65.4%)을 제시하여 효과적인 제도운영을 위해서는 지속적인 홍보를 통한 환자의 인식율 제고와 아울러 환자의 의료비 부담을 경감시킬 수 있는 제도적 전환이 필요할 것이다.

• 지역사회간호학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.278-291
• /
• 2015

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine differences in health care utilization and related costs between before and after the introduction of the designated doctor system, and to find out factors making the differences. Methods: Data were collected from 200 medical aid beneficiaries having one or more chronic diseases, registered in the designated doctor system during the year of 2012, and the relationship between the use of health services and claimed medical expenses was analyzed through paired t-test and multiple regression analysis using the SPSS 18.0 program. Results: There was a decrease in the number of total benefit days and the number of outpatient and medication days, but some cases showed an increase after the designation of medical institution. In general, hospital stay increased after the introduction of the system. However, the number of medical institutions utilized was reduced in most cases after designation. Conversely, medical expenses increased in most cases after the designation of medical institution. Conclusion: These results suggest that a detailed scheme to designate medical institutions should be made in consideration of the seriousness of illness and classification of medical institutions not only for the beneficiaries' enhanced health but for the effective management of medical aid fund.