• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.67-114
• /
• 2004

This study attempts to integrate causal model with competitiveness evaluation model, both of which have developed independently of each other, in connection with many studies on PMES (performance measurement and evaluation system) including the BSC (balanced scorecard) of Kaplan and Norton (1992, 1996). For this attempt, this study is composed of four analyses : First, this study develops a structural model for evaluating and diagnosing corporate ‘comprehensive’ competitiveness including quality competitiveness, derive CCI (comprehensive competitiveness index) and QCI (quality competitiveness index) ; Second, this study analyzes the determinants of quality competitiveness, the impacts of quality competitiveness, on product design and product reliability, and the impacts of product design and product reliability on quality competitiveness in the comprehensive competitiveness evaluation model of this study. Third, this study empirically identifies the positioning of product design in the quality competitiveness evaluation model of this study and the functional relationship between product design and other functions : product development, manufacturing, marketing, and marketing, and sales in the same comprehensive competitiveness evaluation model, estimate the determinants of product design and its impacts, thereby providing some empirical findings for the foundation of design management theory, and Fourth, this study identifies the positioning of product reliability in the same quality competitiveness evaluation model, estimate the reliability function and the functional relationship between product reliability and other dimensions of product quality, and tests the hypotheses on the causality of product reliability.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 7th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Summit Forum on Sustainable Construction and Management
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2017

Korea's domestic construction market and overseas construction order environment are experiencing a decreasing trend, and this trend is expected to continue. Therefore, domestic construction companies are seeking to enter the global construction market. This study analyzes the global construction market and the global competitiveness for global construction companies and provides the results. To this end, this study has developed a model to evaluate the global construction competitiveness level and to evaluated global construction competitiveness in 2016. The evaluation of global construction competitiveness was analyzed based on the competitiveness of construction infrastructure by country, and the evaluation results of competitiveness of construction companies. These assessments were based on 20 detailed international statistics (ENR, Global Insight, Compass, etc.). The evaluation results are as follows. First, in regard to the comprehensive global construction competitiveness by country, America ranked first among 20 countries, followed by China. European countries like Spain, Germany and the Netherlands ranked third to fifth, respectively. Korea ranked sixth, one rank higher than that of the previous year. America and European countries remain strong. Second, in regard to the comprehensive building infrastructure competitiveness by country, America ranked first followed by Germany. Korea ranked twelfth, which is the same rank as that of the previous year. When it comes to stability in the construction market, China ranked first and Korea eighth. For construction systems, Sweden ranked first and Korea thirteenth, and for infrastructure, Japan ranked first and Korea tenth. Third, according to the construction company's capability evaluation by country, America ranked first followed by China. Korea ranked fourth, two ranks higher than that of the previous year because of its building competitiveness (fifth → fourth) and design competitiveness (eleventh → eighth) which has improved. When it comes to building competitiveness, China ranked first and Korea fourth. For design competitiveness, America ranked first and Korea eighth, and for price competitiveness, India ranked first and Korea seventh. However, Korea is still in the middle of the pack rank among the 20 countries considered when it comes to design competitiveness. It is ranked eleventh for design productivity and thirteenth for foreign sales against the total sales (internationalization). Thus, Korea needs to improve technical power and tap into new markets for improved competitiveness, including increased productivity. To do so, more R&D investment is required.

• 한국디자인학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디자인학회 2001년도 Bulletin of The 5th Asian Design Conference International Symposium on Design Science
• /
• pp.80.2-80
• /
• 2001

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.279-298
• /
• 2015

디자인산업은 국가 경쟁력의 근간이 되지만, 현재 그 성장 동력에는 한계가 나타나고 있다. 이러한 이유는 정성적 가치기반의 디자인산업의 특성으로 객관적이지 못한 평가방식이 원인이며, 이로 인하여 디자인산업의 근간이라 할 수 있는 디자인전문기업의 산업적 경쟁력을 약화시켰다. 그래서 본 연구에서는 디자인의 정성적 가치 체계를 보강하고, 디자인의 산업적 경쟁력 강화를 위하여, 디자인에 대한 객관적인 가치평가 요인을 도출하고 이러한 요인들이 디자인전문기업의 해외 경쟁력과 어떠한 관계를 가지는 지를 규명하여 우리나라 디자인산업의 독자적인 경쟁력 강화방향을 모색해 보고자 하였다. 먼저 본 연구에서는 디자인에 대한 객관적인 평가요인을 측정 평가의 계량화, 프로세스의 일관성, 프로젝트의 정합성, 논리적 설득성으로 정의하였고, 디자인전문기업의 경쟁력요인을 기업의 신뢰도와 서비스 품질로 정의하였고, 연구모형을 설정하였다. 검증 결과 대부분의 가설은 채택되었으나, 평가의 계량화는 디자인전문기업의 서비스품질에 직접적인 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 파악되었다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.185-187
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to develop and apply the oversea construction competitiveness evaluation model which measures the competitiveness of construction companies in global construction market. This model consists of the design and construction competitiveness indexes by ENR statistic data and provides the oversea construction competitiveness index based on the evaluation model.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2018년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.288-289
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to provide the basic data of government policy by evaluating the capacity of construction companies by country. As a result, Korea ranked 7th in construction competitiveness, 13th in design competitiveness, and 7th in price competitiveness among the 20 countries to be compared. As a result of evaluating the competitiveness of construction companies by country, Korea ranked 7th overall.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2019년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.220-221
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to provide the basic data of government policy by evaluating the capacity of construction companies by country. As a result, Korea ranked 13th in construction competitiveness, 20th in design competitiveness, and 7th in price competitiveness among the 20 countries to be compared. As a result of evaluating the competitiveness of construction companies by country, Korea ranked 15th overall.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제23권7호
• /
• pp.64-82
• /
• 2019

Purpose - This study's the ultimate goal is to analyze competitiveness improvement on multinational enterprises as firstly providing which factors are to strengthen or weaken competitiveness, secondly investigating if hypotheses development and research design is correct and thirdly finding significant implications for research and practices across country specific advantage. Design/methodology - Using feedback data provided by 250 firms, we extracted variable factors and hypotheses, which were empirically carried out by reliability and validity testing, correlation analysis, path analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis to prove which factors are to make the positive effect on the improvement of overseas subsidiaries' management performance and competitiveness. Findings - Through proceeding empirical analysis study, we found out that technology management capability, knowledge management capability, and local management capability had a statistically significant effect on the improvement of overseas subsidiaries' competitiveness, while linked activity capability revealed a negative effect. Originality/value - During business globalization, overseas investments and establishment of overseas subsidiaries have been essential. It is anticipated that this study results would be meaningful for analysis on multinational enterprises' competitiveness and helpful in promoting their entry into Korean market and enhancing their competitiveness. This paper would also help Korea government develops new FDI model and induce more investment from global major companies to Korea region.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.201-208
• /
• 2002

This study suggests a new paradigm to build the identity of railway culture design, since it plays a critical role in enhancing competitiveness of culture and design. It is considered to be a valuable factor to improve users' satisfaction and to have a new effect on the railway industry. This study is focused on systematic study on the culture ＆ design and competitiveness for railway industry, that emphasizing on making necessary strategic scenarios accordingly. Consequently, it is going to make higher added values to secure a footing and advanced images of railway industry.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2002년도 추계학술대회 논문집(I)
• /
• pp.326-334
• /
• 2002

This study suggests a new paradigm to build the identity of railway culture design, since it plays a critical role in enhancing competitiveness of culture and design. It is considered to be a valuable factor to improve users' satisfaction and to have a new effect on the railway industry. This study is focused on systematic study on the culture and design, conditions and competitiveness for railway culture design, that emphasizing on making necessary strategic scenarios accordingly. Consequently, it is going to make higher added values to secure a footing and advanced images of railway industry.