• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.299-308
• /
• 2009

In this paper, we have developed an evaluation model of technology green index(TGI) which includes 3 evaluation factors and 13 indicators. Furthermore, as presenting the degree of relative importance among evaluation factors and indicators for all R&D evaluation stages and all green technology areas, and applying the proposed model to 5 defense projects, we have found applicability of the model to evaluation of defense R&D projects. The results of evaluation using this model can be used to monitor the performance of project life cycle and develop R&D investment strategy of green technology using portfolio analysis.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.149-177
• /
• 2009

최근의 전쟁양상은 과거의 전쟁과는 확연히 구분되어 첨단 정보 과학전 능력이 전쟁의 승패를 결정짓는다. 전쟁양상의 변화에 따라 각 국가들이 국방력 강화를 위해 추구해야할 요소들 또한 변화되었다. 또한, 북한을 비롯한 중국과 일본의 첨단 군사력 증강은 동북아 지역의 패권 경쟁을 예고하고 있으며 향후 우리 안보정세에 있어서의 심각한 위협 요인으로 대두되고 있다. 따라서 미래 전에 대비한 첨단 기술소요를 선별하여 전략적 차원에서 집중 개발함으로써 신기술, 신개념의 미래첨단 무기 개발능력을 확보하여 자주국방을 수립하기 위한 기반을 시급하다. 이를 위해, 본 연구에서는 국방연구개발 역량 강화하여 핵심기술의 개발 및 선진기술 추격을 위한 전략적 R&D 거버넌스를 구축하고자 한다. 본 연구는 크게 세 가지로 나누어 볼 수 있는데, 첫 번째로 기술 추격형 국방연구개발 사업의 R&D 거버넌스모형 수립을 위한 기존 거버넌스에 관한 이론연구이다. 기존 거버넌스 연구는 공통문제 해결 기제로서의 거버넌스, 정부 관련 공통문제 해결기제로서의 거버넌스, 신 거버넌스의 측면으로 나누어 살펴보았다. 두 번째는 국방연구개발 전략 수립을 위한 R&D 거버넌스 핵심 프로세스를 통한 전략제시이다. 이는 전략적 의지를 통한 국방연구개발 사업 결정, 핵심기술 지식기반 확충, 개방형 국방연구개발을 위한 유기적인 조직체계 구축, 국방연구개발 프로젝트관리 방안 측면에서 분석해보았다. 세 번째는 R&D 거버넌스 전략모형과 T-50 사례분석이다. T-50 사례는 기초연구 단계, 탐색개발 단계, 체계개발 단계 별로 본 연구에서 제시하는 R&D 거버넌스 전략모형에 비추어 사례분석을 실시하였다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권44호
• /
• pp.177-212
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this article is to examine the 'Discussion of maritime defense' which began to be discussed from the late Goryeo dynasty to the early Joseon dynasty and the process of establishing a maritime defense system. Also it can identify changes in the aspects of the naval ship operation and their strategic tactics during the reign of King Sejong. Japanese raiders began a full-scale invasion from 1350 at the late Goryeo Dynasty, So the government realized the need to raise the 'Sea power' and to organize the maritime defense system for defending enemy invasion. for example, the reinforcement of naval forces, construction of warships, develoment of weapon systems and so on. which have achieved remarkable growth while continuing, have also been used to carry out a three-time 'Conquest of Daemado' in 1389, 1396, 1419. Until then, however, it is difficult to interpret that the naval forces had a systematic and organizational combat operation system. According to fighting patterns on combat reports before the early days of King Sejong's reign, Our naval forces had no advantage over the Japanese raiders in terms of their capabilities and tactics. Then, the period of King Sejong marked a watershed in maritime defense history. Based on accumulated experience of naval battles and force Projections, The paradigm shift of the naval strategic tactics for maritime defense has occurred. First, the capability of the naval vessels has improved. for example, ship speed, durability, and weather resistance. Through these efforts, navy forces were able to pursue and attack, destroy enemy's ships by taking advantage of the 'Ship speed superiority'. This has led to tactical shifts from defensive to offensive. Second, purpose to support offensive tactics, the government put a strategic plan into practice that is the forward depolyment of naval bases from the inland to the coast, considering the 'sea environment' and 'threat'. By doing so, Joseon dynasty was able to secure 'the command of the sea'. This may be a little different from the perception of the so-called 'peace period' that King Sejong's era. We need to remember that Joseon dynasty was working hard for its defense. When studying history of maritime defense, these strategic and tactical elements must be fully considered. Only then we can have a coherent understanding of the many naval battles in the past, including the Imjin War(1592-1598).

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.223-244
• /
• 2009

Defense R&D is an essential investment for the national security. Recently our nation has also begun to initiate a number of defense R&D projects. As a lot of fund and resources are allocated to these projects, we need to identify which projects to initiate and then how to manage these projects well. Though there have been a number of studies on R&D projects in commercial sector, there are only a few studies in defense R&D sector. Moreover, these existing defense R&D studies mainly deal with the former issues, which are occurring at the stage of project planing. We are more concerned with project management issues, such as how to manage projects that had already been evaluated to undertake at the planning stage. Specifically our study aims to identify project management factors leading to the success of defense R&D projects. Results of the empirical analysis indicate that management support, user-driven requirements management, and project planning capability are key elements for project performance.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권44호
• /
• pp.54-78
• /
• 2018

The core of the current constitutional amendment pursued by the Abe administration depends on the status of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces, which include the right to engage in war, in the legal and regular military positions. This is an important turning point for the Abe administration, which aims to become a normal country for Japan, and it is a series of steps that followed in the revision of the U.S. and Japan guidelines in 2015 and the overhaul of the security law in 2016. In this paper, we propose building "A navy Attractive to Alliances" as a way to secure Korea's maritime security under the current security environment. The term "attraction" refers to the alliance "first priority" especially in the United States. The way to do this is to transform the paradigm of the ROK-U.S. alliance into a naval hub in the vast seas, which will allow us to strengthen our national defense and even deter threats from neighboring countries. To this end, our navy needs to have a more active approach to U.S. East Asian strategy. If we can convince the United States to be a nation that contributes more to its East Asian strategy, it will only lead to a strengthening of the status of its alliance and expansion of its unilateral support and military capability against Japan, thus minimizing Japan's influence.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권8호
• /
• pp.239-270
• /
• 2010

This thesis is to make an appropriate national defense policy of Republic of Korea through studying the Hegemony Strategy of United States. I searched the theory of hegemony. The hegemony was differently defined by the point of time and region. The strong power nations with the hegemony have been making efforts to maintain their hegemony everytime. I have conclusion that the presence of hegemony once emerged, it brought regional stability in place whether it is coercive or beneficial. The stability and instability of international order IS not exclusively dependent on hegemony. Even if the safety of hegemony cannot guarantee absolute stability of international order, there IS on doubt that the hegemony has enormous impact on that. According to the hegemonic theory, the history of mankind equals to the history of rising and falling hegemony. The international order was changed as the hegemony changes. The United States has been making efforts to maintain her global hegemony during the post cold-war era as well. Taking all these into consideration, relevant military strategy direction able to pursue national interest is that to make up for the relative weakness in the strategic environment. South Korea have to prepare security policy response as following. First, South Korea should build the military force equipped with advanced weapons in military technology sector and solidify military diplomatic relation able to form cooperative relation in wartime. Second, South Korea should make solid Alliance of Korea and U.S. Third, develop and maintain multilateral security cooperation of East Asia. Forth, we could realize that there are means that can neutralize opponent's strong point by seeking one or two and more asymmetry in the aspect of strategy, tactics, and means through asymmetric strategy. Than the military force of South Korea should develop into a force that is able to overcome to the traditional North Korea's threat and new type of conflicts. And the force should have sufficient strength and be deployed to effectively defend the Korean Peninsula. So, we need to establish a denial and defense system against any hostile neighboring country. Therefore, ROK military forces preparing for the future should try to construct a future military power to gradually establish enough strength for self-defense to prepare for a uncertain security environment and when the Korean Peninsula is unified in a future.

• 해양안보
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.61-92
• /
• 2020

본 논문은 중국의 시기별 해군전략의 전략운용 목표, 범위, 방식을 살펴보고, 시진핑 시기 해군전략의 목표와 특징, 전략적 함의를 분석해 보는 데 그 목적이 있다. 신(新)중국 성립 이후 해군은 현재까지 총 네 번에 걸쳐 전략변화를 구사하였다. 현재 시진핑 시기 중국의 해군전략은 근해적극방어전략이 결합된 원해호위전략이다. 현재 중국의 해군전략은 공격성 무기체계로 인해 공격적 전략으로 전환되고 있고, 최신식 함정의 비중이 높아지고 있으며, 운용범위는 연안과 근해를 벗어나 전 세계 해양이 대상이 되었다. 중국의 해군전략이 전환됨에 따라 중국 해군은 해양주도권 확보를 전략적 목표로 설정하고 외부 세력의 개입과 침입에 적극 대응하기 위한 공세적 전략을 실행할 것이다. 이에 중국 해군은 원거리 지역 해상 분쟁지역에서 분쟁당사국들을 더욱 압박하기 위해 억제전력과 기동전력을 향상시킬 것이다. 또한 중국의 해군전략은 '차단'에서 '신속대응'이라는 운용 방식으로 점차 전환될 것으로 전망한다.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.83-93
• /
• 2024

러시아-우크라이나 전쟁으로 글로벌 방위산업 시장의 패러다임이 변화하면서 한국의 첨단 재래식 무기체계가 전 세계의 주목을 받고 있다. 2023년 한국은 세계 무기수출 9위를 기록했으며, 2027년까지 세계 4위의 방산수출국 도약을 목표로 방위산업 혁신을 추진 중이다. 방위산업은 오랜 시간과 막대한 예산이 필요한 국가 전략산업이며 방산기술은 국방선진화와 국가경제에 큰 영향을 미치는 핵심기술이다. 최근 5년간 한국은 첨단기술의 해외 유출로 인해 약 25조원 규모의 경제적 손실을 입었으며, 방산기술의 유출 방지를 위한 제도적 개선이 시급한 상황이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 인도-태평양 지역의 핵심 행위자인 미국, 중국, 일본 3국이 방위산업의 기술 보호를 위해 추진하고 있는 법과 제도를 고찰하여 한국의 방위산업 기술보호를 위한 발전전략을 제시하였다. 방위산업을 한국의 유망한 미래산업으로 육성해 나가기 위해서는 기술주권의 확보와 연계하여 빠르게 진화하고 있는 첨단 과학기술의 발전속도에 대응하고, 관련 법과 제도의 개선을 통해 국가 핵심기술인 방위산업기술을 보호해야 한다.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2022년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.66-68
• /
• 2022

데이터 활용이 점점 중요해짐에 따라 민간 기업뿐만 아니라 공공기관에서도 데이터 활용 활성화를 위해 많은 노력을 기울이고 있다. 그 중에서도 데이터책임관 제도는 데이터 정책을 담당하는 조직의 각 부서의 기능을 조정하여 정책 목표를 달성해 나가는 추진체계인 데이터 거버넌스의 핵심 요소이다. 데이터기반행정 법이 시행됨에 따라 국방부를 포함한 모든 공공기관이 데이터책임관을 지정하였지만, 아직 도입 초기임에 따라 실질적인 역할을 하기에는 역부족이다. 본 연구에서는 현재 국방부에서 추진 중인 국방데이터책임관 제도 운영 현황을 점검해보고, 실질적인 역할을 하기 위한 발전방안을 제시한다.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제14권10호
• /
• pp.4157-4175
• /
• 2020

Moving target defense, as a 'game-changing' security technique for network warfare, realizes proactive defense by increasing network dynamics, uncertainty and redundancy. How to select the best countermeasure from the candidate countermeasures to maximize defense payoff becomes one of the core issues. In order to improve the dynamic analysis for existing decision-making, a novel approach of selecting the optimal countermeasure using game theory is proposed. Based on the signal game theory, a multi-stage adversary model for dynamic defense is established. Afterwards, the payoffs of candidate attack-defense strategies are quantified from the viewpoint of attack surface transfer. Then the perfect Bayesian equilibrium is calculated. The inference of attacker type is presented through signal reception and recognition. Finally the countermeasure for selecting optimal defense strategy is designed on the tradeoff between defense cost and benefit for dynamic network. A case study of attack-defense confrontation in small-scale LAN shows that the proposed approach is correct and efficient.