• 대한설비공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한설비공학회 2009년도 하계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1197-1202
• /
• 2009

Cost allocation on cogeneration is a methodology dividing the input of common cost to electricity cost and heat cost. In the cost allocation methodology of the electricity and heat on a cogeneration, there are energy method, work method, proportional method, benefit distribution method, reversible work method, various exergetic methods, and so on. In previous study, various cost allocation methodologies have been applied and analyzed on a gas-turbine cogeneration producing the 33.1 MW of electricity and the 32.2 Gcal/h of heat, a steam-turbine cogeneration producing the 22.2 MW of electricity and the 44.3 Gcal/h of heat, and combined-cycle cogeneration producing the 314.1 MW of electricity and the 279.4 Gcal/h of heat. In this study, we integrately analyze the results of previous studies and examine the generality and rationality each methodology. Additionally, a new point of view on the values of alternative electricity efficiency and alternative heat efficiency in the previous methodologies was proposed. As the integrated result, we conclude that reversible work method of various common cost allocation methodologies is most rational.

• 설비공학논문집
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.201-208
• /
• 2009

Our government will make a plan regulating the cooling limit temperature of the summer season to 26 degree and the heating limit temperature of the winter season to 20 degree for energy saving. Where, the key point of this politic pursuit can be the charge system on heating and cooling cost. We have suggested new cost allocation methodology as a worth evaluation method in the precedent study, and preformed the worth evaluation and cost allocation on four kind of warm air produced from a heating system as an example. In this study, we applied the suggested method to four kind of cool air, and preformed the worth evaluation and cost allocation on each cool air. As a result, similarly to the precedent study, the more energy a customer saved, the more cooling unit cost decreased, and the more energy a customer consumed, the more cooling unit cost increased. From this analysis, we hope that the suggested methodology can offer a theoretical basis to the energy charge policy of government, and induce the spontaneous energy saving of consumers.

• 대한설비공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한설비공학회 2008년도 동계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.499-504
• /
• 2008

Our government will make a plan regulating the cooling limit temperature of the summer season to 26 degree and the heating limit temperature of the winter season to 20 degree for energy saving. Where, the key point of this politic pursuit can be the charge system on heating and cooling cost. We have suggested new cost allocation methodology as a worth evaluation method in the precedent study, and preformed the worth evaluation and cost allocation on four kind of warm air produced from a heating system as an example. In this study, we applied the suggested method to four kind of cooling air as an example, and preformed the worth evaluation and cost allocation on each cooling air. As a result, similarly to the precedent study, the more energy a customer saved, the more heating unit cost decreased, and the more energy a customer consumed, the more heating unit cost increased. From this analysis, we hope that the suggested methodology can offer a theoretical basis to the politic pursuit of government, and induce the spontaneous energy saving of consumers.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.220-227
• /
• 2018

The cooperative game theory consists of a set of players and utility function that has positive values for a subset of players, called coalition, in the game. The purpose of cost allocation method is to allocate the relevant cost among game players in a fair and rational way. Therefore, cost allocation method based on cooperative game theory has been applied in many areas for fair and reasonable cost allocation. On the other hand, the desirable characteristics of the cost allocation method are Pareto optimality, rationality, and marginality. Pareto optimality means that costs are entirely paid by participating players. Rationality means that by joining the grand coalition, players do not pay more than they would if they chose to be part of any smaller coalition of players. Marginality means that players are charged at least enough to cover their marginal costs. If these characteristics are all met, the solution of cost allocation method exists in the core. In this study, proportional method is applied to EOQ inventory game and EPQ inventory game with shortage. Proportional method is a method that allocates costs proportionally to a certain allocator. This method has been applied to a variety of problems because of its convenience and simple calculations. However, depending on what the allocator is used for, the proportional method has a weakness that its solution may not exist in the core. Three allocators such as demand, marginal cost, and cost are considered. We prove that the solution of the proportional method to demand and the proportional method to marginal cost for EOQ game and EPQ game with shortage is in the core. The counterexample also shows that the solution of the proportional method to cost does not exist in the core.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.142-148
• /
• 2004

The objective of bridge construction cost allocation is to distribute in a fair and rational manner the bridge construction costs among those vehicles using the bridge. In most bridge construction cost allocation studies, bridge construction costs are mainly distributed according to traffic load(gross vehicle weight), without any consideration of bridge capacity requirements(the number of lanes). In this paper, a bridge cost allocation method for considering both traffic capacity and traffic loads is developed. The proposed method is based on cooperative game theory, particularly two concepts known as the Aumann-Shapley (A-S) value and Shapley value. This method can help to analyze the impact of traffic capacity costs. By applying the proposed method to an example, traffic capacity cost is found to be high so that traffic capacity should be considered to allocate the bridge construction costs to vehicle classes in a more equitable manner.

• 대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A
• /
• 제54권10호
• /
• pp.496-499
• /
• 2005

In many parts of the world, the electric power industry is undergoing unprecedented changes. Therefore, in order to reform the electric power industry efficiently and minimize the confusion of this restructuring, the systematic studies related to transmission pricing and transmission cost allocation issues are required essentially. However, even now, the basis of transmission cost allocation rate is not equipped so that the regulation body has determined the allocating rate under the common practice. In this paper, we demonstrate that the decision of transmission cost allocation rate is the regulation body's own right. For this analysis, we apply game theory to the procedure determining this rate and the competition to determine this rate between gencos and distcos is modeled as the arbitration game.

• KIEE International Transactions on Power Engineering
• /
• 제5A권1호
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2005

In the operation of distribution systems, DGs (Distributed Generations) are installed as an alternative to extension and the establishment of substations, transmission and distribution lines according to the increasing power demand. In the operation planning of DGs, determining optimal capacity and allocation achieves economical profitability and improves the reliability of power distribution systems. This paper proposes a determining method for the optimal number, size and allocation of DGs in order to minimize the operation costs of distribution systems. Capacity and allocation of DGs for economical operation planning duration are determined to minimize total cost composed with power buying cost, operation cost of DGs, loss cost and outage cost using the GA (Genetic Algorithm).

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제10권8호
• /
• pp.91-96
• /
• 2012

본 연구의 목적은 공공서비스의 한 분야인 별정우체국의 원가산정 방법론에 대하여 고찰해 보고자 하는 것이다. 본 논문은 이러한 산정방법을 어떻게 적용할 것인가에 대한 방향을 설정하고자 하였다. 왜냐하면 이러한 기간산업을 육성하고 합리적인 방향으로 이끌어 가는데 있어서 올바른 원가산정은 매우 중요하기 때문이다. 바람직한 원가산정 방법으로는 별정우체국 1국마다 평당 임차료를 산정해서 별정우체국의 전체 임차료를 산정하고 별정우체국의 위치에 따라서 기준경비율, 표준감가상각비를 이용하여 인원별, 면적별 등으로 단위당 원가를 산정하여 총원가를 산정한 다음 이를 서비스별로 배분하면 적절한 원가가 산정될 것으로 판단된다.

• 설비공학논문집
• /
• 제20권9호
• /
• pp.624-630
• /
• 2008

When various kinds of outputs are produced from a single energy system, the methodology which allocates the common cost to each output cost is very important because it is directly related with the profit and loss of producers and purchasers. In the cost allocation methodology of the heat and the electricity on a cogeneration, there are energy method, work method, proportional method, benefit distribution method, exergetic methods, and so on. On the other hand, we have proposed a worth method which can be applied to any system. The definition of this methodology is that the unit cost of a product is proportion to the worth. Where, worth is a certain evaluating basis that can equalize the worth of products. In this study, we applied worth method to a steam-turbine cogeneration which produces 22.2 MW of electricity and 44.4 Gcal/h of heat, and then we allocated 2,578 $/h of common cost to electricity cost and heat cost. Also, we compared with various cost allocation methods. As the result, we conclude that exergy of various kinds of worth basis evaluates the worth of heat and electricity most reasonably on this system.

• 한국국방경영분석학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.31-45
• /
• 2009

시스템의 성능과 안전성을 보장하기 위해서는 개발 초기부터 신뢰도에 대한 연구가 이루어져야 한다. 시스템의 목표 신뢰도를 수립하고, 이를 달성하기 위하여 하부시스템 및 부분품에 신뢰도를 할당해야 한다. 시스템의 획득 및 개발에 있어서 성능이 우수하고 비용이 저렴하더라도 고장이 빈번하게 발생한다면 원활한 임무 수행에 많은 영향을 미치고, 막대한 운영유지비용이 소요될 것이다. 본 연구에서는 신뢰도 할당 모형과 운영 유지비용과의 관계를 알아보기 위하여 기존의 알려진 신뢰도 할당 모형들을 검토 및 평가하였다. 신뢰도 할당모형의 평가는 차기 개발 함정용 디젤 엔진을 대상으로 하였으며, 다양한 신뢰도 할당 모형에 목표 신뢰도를 고려하여 신뢰도를 할당하고, 현재 운영하는 함정용 디젤 엔진의 자료를 바탕으로 시뮬레이션을 수행하여 운영유지비용을 최소화하는 신뢰도 할당 모형을 선정하였다.