• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.8
• /
• pp.29-37
• /
• 2012

Defamation is one of the most frequently occurring daily legal violation because it can easily be done by words. In the internet generation with flooding internet forum websites and social network services, internet defamation is becoming one of the most serious problems in many leading IT countries including Korea and the United States. Being such a critical issue that can lead to a suicide, Korean policy makers has undertaken efforts to prevent the internet defamation by defining the liabilities of internet users and internet service providers. Many of the policies and laws including "the Telecommunication Information Usage Promotion and Security Protection Act of 2007" are modeled after that of the United States. Thus, the study aims to explore American defamation law and internet defamation law analyzing "the Communications Decency Act of 1996" and a recently decided precedent, "Brodie" case, in Maryland state court.

• Informatization Policy
• /
• v.29 no.3
• /
• pp.48-60
• /
• 2022

This research analyzes the potential reform of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act through the new institutionalist approach. The immunity provision of the Section 230, which has developed the U.S. Internet content regulation regime and protected big tech firms, is facing a significant change today. The chambers of Congress have attempted to limit the immunity shield for platforms with bipartisanship. As a result of analysis through the perspective of historical institutionalism, a critical change could come from external events including fake news controversies and data privacy scandals, as well as endogenous factors such as conflicts among actors. The discussion deals with the possible direction of Internet content regulation reforms in Korea.