• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.145-156
• /
• 2007

This paper is to propose model classification and evaluation of measurement uncertainty. In order to obtain type A and B uncertainty, variety of measurement mathematical models are illustrated by example. The four steps to evaluate expanded uncertainty are indicated as following; First, to get type A standard uncertainty, measurement mathematical models of single, double, multiple, design of experiment and serial autocorrelation are shown. Second, to solve type B standard uncertainty measurement mathematical models of empirical probability distributions and multivariate are presented. Third, type A and B combined uncertainty, considering sensitivity coefficient, linearity and correlation are discussed. Lastly, expanded uncertainty, considering degree of freedom for type A, B uncertainty and coverage factor are presented with uncertainty budget. SPC control chart to control expanded uncertainty is shown.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2003년도 추계학술대회 논문집(III)
• /
• pp.301-306
• /
• 2003

Recently, uncertainty of measurement became a major concern for the people working on the laboratory evaluation and accreditation. 'uncertainty of measurement is a parameter associated with the result of a measurement that characteristics the dispersion of the value that could reasonably be attributed to the measured.' This study analysed how to estimate uncertainty of measurement in mechanical characteristic exam for Plastic material. its uncertainty was estimated according to International Organization for Standardization(ISO), they were named to A type uncertainty, B type uncertainty, combined standard uncertainty, and expanded uncertainty. We obtained that the combined standard uncertainty was 0.96697 MPa and the expanded uncertainty was 2.291MPa.

• 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국소음진동공학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.1675-1680
• /
• 2000

Recently the uncertainty has been made rapid progress in various fields of industry but the uncertainty measurement method of acoustical test (i.e. Insertion loss, Absorption ratio, Transmission loss etc,) hasn't been established. In this study, the uncertainty of measurement method for ducted silencers is carried out according to ISO 7235. The standard uncertainty factors are composed of sound pressure level, microphone sensitivity and pistonphone calibration in this measurement. Sound pressure level is type A evaluation of uncertainty, microphone sensitivity and pistonphone calibration are type B evaluation of uncertainty. The combined standard uncertainty is calculated by two type evaluation. The expanded uncertainty is expressed by the combined standard uncertainty multiply k value which is yield the effective degree of freedom.

• Corrosion Science and Technology
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.193-196
• /
• 2009

For the estimation of uncertainty in potentiodynamic polarization resistance measurement, the type A uncertainty was measured using type 316 stainless steel in an acidified NaCl solution. Sensitivity coefficients were determined for measurand such as scan rate of potential, temperature of solution, concentration of NaCl, concentration of HCl, surface roughness of specimen and flow rate of purging gas. Sensitivity coefficients were large for the measurand such as the scan rate of potential, temperature of solution and roughness of specimen. However, the sensitivity coefficients were not the major factors influencing the combined standard uncertainty of polarization resistance due to the low values of uncertainty in measurements of the measurands. A major influencing factor was the concentration of NaCl. The value of type A uncertainty was 1.1 times the value of type B uncertainty, and the combined standard uncertainty was 10.5 % of the average value of polarization resistance.

• 대한수의학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.139-145
• /
• 2007

Measurement uncertainty could play an important role in the assessment of test results in laboratories and industries. We investigated measurement uncertainties possibly included in determination of flubendazole, a benzimidazole anthelmintic, in pork by HPLC. The concentration of flubendazole was 62.69 ng/g in a sample of pork. Uncertainty was estimated in the analytical procedure of flubendazole. A model equation was made for determination of flubendazole in pork. The four uncertainty components such as weight of sample, volume of sample, calibration curve, and recovery were selected to estimate measurement uncertainties. Standard uncertainty was calculated for each component and all the standard uncertainties were combined. The combined standard uncertainty was expanded to a sample population as an expanded uncertainty. The expanded uncertainty was calculated using k value on Student's t-table and effective degrees of freedom from Welch-Satterthwaite formula. The expanded uncertainty was calculated as 3.45 with the combined standard uncertainty, 1.584 6 and the k value, 2.18. The final expression can be ($62.69{\pm}3.45$) ng/g (confidence level 95%, k = 2.18). The uncertainty value might be estimated differently depending on the selection of the uncertainty components. It is difficult to estimate all the uncertainty factors. Therefore, it is better to take several big effecting components instead of many small effecting components.

• 대한기계학회논문집B
• /
• 제24권10호
• /
• pp.1388-1398
• /
• 2000

A pipe prover is a flowmeter calibrator used in flow measurement field. Gravimetric and volumetric methods were applied to determine the basic volume of the pipe prover. Uncertainty of its basic volume measurement was evaluated in accordance with the procedure recommended by International Organization for Standardization. The combined standard uncertainty of determining the basic volume was estimated from the sensitivity coefficient and the standard uncertainty of independent variables. It was found that the uncertainties of the weighing and volume measurements have dominant influence on that of the basic volume determination. With the quantitative analysis of the sensitivity coefficient, the contribution of the each variable uncertainty to the combined standard uncertainty of the basic volume is shown clearly.

• 한국진공학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.7-15
• /
• 2003

스피닝 로터 게이지는 표준기관의 고진공 국제비교에 전달표준기로 상용되고 있으며, 고진공 국가표준기인 동적교정장치를 이용하여 스피닝 로터 게이지를 교정하였다. 교정 결과의 불확도를 국제표준화기구에서 권고한 A형 불확도, B형 불확도, 합성표준불확도, 확장불확도 등으로 구분하여 평가하는 방법을 제시하였다. 이 방법에 따라 평가한 스피닝 로터 게이지의 합성표준불확도는 $1.8007\times10^{-5}$ Pa ~$4.8422\times10^{-5}$ Pa 이었다.

• 대한기계학회논문집B
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.561-571
• /
• 2001

The standard uncertainty of flowrate measurement is obtained by combining that of independent variables. Gravimetric and volumetric method were applied to determine the flowrate and the standard uncertainties of flowrate measurement by both methods were evaluated in accordance with the procedure recommended by International Organization for Standardization. The combined standard uncertainties of determining the flowrate were estimated from the sensitivity coefficient and the standard uncertainty of independent variables. For practical application, the methods for evaluating and expressing uncertainty in flow measurement were discussed. It was found that the uncertainties of the weighing and time measurement in gravimetric method, the volume and time measurement in volumetric method have dominant influence on that of flowrate measurement. With the quantitative analysis of the sensitivity coefficient, the contribution of the each variable uncertainty to the combined standard uncertainty of flowrate measurement is shown clearly.

• 한국진공학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.173-181
• /
• 2001

1,333 Pa 용량의 용량형진공계를 저진공 국가표준기인 초음파간섭 수은주압력계(ultrasonic interferometer manometer)를 이용하여 교정하였다. 이 결과의 불확도를 국제표준화기구의 권고안의 A형 불확도, B형 불확도, 합성표준불확도, 확장불확도 등으로 구분하여 평가하였다. 표준압력 1.76 Pa~1.31$\times$$10^3$Pa에서의 합성표준불확도는 $1.38 \times10^{-2}\; Pa\sim3.03 \times10^{-1} $Pa이었으며, 상대불확도(합성표준불확도/표준압력)는 $2.3 \times 10^{-4}\;Pa\sim7.9 X\times10^{-3} $Pa 이었다.

• 한국초전도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국초전도학회 2008년도 High Temperature Superconductivity Vol.XVIII
• /
• pp.42-42
• /
• 2008