• 한국지역지리학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.427-449
• /
• 2015

네트워크 거버넌스란 시민사회를 중심으로 정부와 시장과의 네트워크를 통해 새로운 사회정치적 질서를 구축하고자 하는 참여와 협력의 과정이며, 이러한 점에서 협력적 거버넌스라는 용어가 사용될 수 있다. 특히 지방(정부) 간 협력적 거버넌스는 이중적 협력관계, 즉 지방정부들 간 협력과 각 지방 내 정부기관과 시민사회 간 협력을 전제로 한다. 그러나 협력적 거버넌스의 핵심 요소인 협력은 신뢰와 호혜성을 전제로 한 규범성이 아니라 경쟁과 대립에 바탕을 둔 전략으로 이해된다. 또한 협력적 거버넌스의 모형은 이러한 협력의 구조적 배경에 대한 분석과 절차적 과정 및 실재적 과정에 관한 고려도 포함시켜야 한다. 협력적 거버넌스에 내재된 규범성은 실제 거버넌스의 구축에는 제대로 반영되지 않을 뿐만 아니라 신자유주의적 전략을 위한 명분으로 동원되는 경향이 있다. 이러한 점을 해소하기 위하여, 협력적 거버넌스의 개념을 재구성할 필요가 있다. 즉 그람시적 관점에서 협력적 거버넌스는 '정부+시민사회'에서 동의와 저항이 동시에 작동하는 헤게모니적 거버넌스로 이해될 수 있다. 또한 오스트롬의 이론의 급진화에 바탕을 두고, 협력적 거버넌스는 자율적 의사결정 주체들의 다중심성을 만들어나가는 다중심적 거버넌스로 이해될 수 있다. 뿐만 아니라 지방들 간 협력적 거버넌스는 단지 담론적 과정이라기보다 물질적 토대를 전제로 한다는 점에서 지역들 간 연계성을 강화시킬 수 있는 경제적 상호보완성과 물적 인프라의 구축을 요구한다.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.71-82
• /
• 2016

This paper explores, explains and describes a framework for analyzing collaborative governance, decent work and innovation as fundamental elements of sustainable workplaces through case study of Philippine science and technology (S & T) parks. Rules, or the legal infrastructure, are particularly significant considerations that facilitate or hinder collaboration. Industrial relations/human resource (IR/HR) practices are essential to collaboration and decent work. Employee consultation and labor-management council or committee are examples of IR/HR practices that might contribute to collaboration and decent work in firms and workplaces in S & T parks as they are team approaches to production, too. Collaboration and decent work enhance the capacity to innovate. In the long run, collaborative governance, decent work and innovation tend to converge in the concept of sustainable development. The interdependencies and interactions among collaborative governance, decent work and capacity to innovate in firms operating in S & T parks make possible new solutions to new problems (i.e., innovation) and, thus, sustainable workplaces.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2015

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are very popular governance practices, as they enable the private partner to engage in business and have profits while the public partner improves the provision of public services. PPPs are organizational arrangements with a sector-crossing or sector-blurring nature, and are modes of governance - governance by partnerships or collaborative governance (Schuppert 2011). New models and applications of PPPs have been developed over time. Collaborative governance entails information exchange, action or movement harmonization, resource sharing, and capacity enhancement among the partners (Sale 2011; 2012a). As the national university, the University of the Philippines (UP) serves as a research university in various fields of expertise and specialization by conducting basic and applied research and development, and promoting research in various colleges and universities, and contributing to the dissemination and application of knowledge, among other purposes. (Republic Act 9500) It is the site of two (2) science and technology parks (Sale 2012b), one of which is the UP - Ayala Land Technohub. A collaboration between industry and the academe, the Technohub is envisioned as an integrated community of science and technology companies building a dynamic learning and entrepreneurial laboratory (UP-AyalaLand Technohub). This paper takes a closer look at the UP - Ayala Land Technohub as an example of a PPP or collaborative governance in science and technology parks. Have information exchange, action or movement harmonization, resource sharing, and capacity enhancement taken place in the Technohub? What are some significant outcomes of, and issues arising from, the PPP? What assessment indicators may be used? Is a governance instrument needed?

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제54권1호
• /
• pp.184-205
• /
• 2021

사회 운영 및 공공 정책 관리의 새로운 개념과 원리로서 거버넌스가 중시되고 영향력도 점차 강화·확산되고 있다. 다양한 거버넌스 이론과 사례 분석 연구가 활성화되는 가운데 여러 거버넌스 개념을 포용하면서 참여와 타협을 넘어 상호의존성과 책임감을 높이고 최적화된 사회적 조정 양식을 혼합·활용하여 새로운 공공 가치를 창조하는 협력적 거버넌스 개념이 주목받고 있다. 문화재 분야에서도 공공 정책 집행의 효율성과 지속가능성, 공공 서비스 확장성을 위해 거버넌스 관련 연구가 이어지고 있다. 본 연구는 협력적 거버넌스의 정부 역할론(촉진·중재·여건조성)에 주목하면서 문화재 분야 협력적 거버넌스의 운영 체계를 파악하고자 '문화재지킴이' 정책을 연구 대상으로 삼았다. 문화재 분야 거버넌스 정책의 흐름 속에서 문화재지킴이 정책의 도입과 전개 과정, 운영 방식 등을 통해 문화재지킴이 정책의 위상과 역할, 특징을 조명해보았고 협력적 거버넌스 관점에서 전반적인 참여 주체와 협력 구조, 협력 방식과 상호작용, 정책적 특징의 분석과 함께 문화재지킴이 정책의 파트너십 부문은 안셀·개쉬(Ansell & Gash) 모형의 분석틀로 활용하여 세부적인 협력 체계와 작동 방식을 확인하였다. 문화재지킴이 정책의 특징과 분석 결과를 보면 문화재 분야에서 민간 주도 또는 수평적 민관 협력의 협력적 거버넌스로 본격화된 정책적 대표성을 갖는 점, 민간 모델의 정책 도입과 연대 및 전담 조직과 전문 인력이 주요한 성공 요인으로 작용한 점, 그리고 모형 분석에서는 자원·지식의 불균형과 협력 선례 등이 참여 유인 증가의 배경이 되고 다자간 협력 지향의 개방성과 포괄성, 전담 조직의 공공 리더형 리더십과 참여기관의 오너십 확장, 협력 과정의 순서 재배열 등을 확인할 수 있었다. 한편 정책 운영의 환경과 조직, 협력 방식에서 한계를 가져 협력 중심의 포괄적인 법률적 안정성 구축, 전담 조직의 전략적 개편, 중간 지원 조직의 역량 강화와 지원, 분야별로 개별적·다자간 협의체 운영 등의 활성화 방안을 제시하였다.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.153-174
• /
• 2019

South Korea's energy policy has been historically established through an energy production structure that relies on thermal and nuclear power generation in relation to a centralized 'Hard Energy System'. However, climate change issues are forcing the transition to renewable energy, and it is crucial for local governments to enable this. This study analyses Seoul city's local energy governance, which is known as One Less Nuclear Power Plant Initiative, by applying the collaborative governance framework inspired by Ansell and Gash (2008) and the Reflexivity framework of Confucianism. It is considered that the local energy governance model of Seoul city can be used as a model by other local governments, and it will eventually lead to a decentralized energy system in this era of energy transition.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제51권6호
• /
• pp.703-719
• /
• 2021

Purpose: We aimed to identify collaborative disaster governance through the demand and supply analysis of resources recognized by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We used a descriptive study design with an online survey technique for data collection. The survey questions were developed based on focus group interviews with nurses responding to COVID-19 and expert validity testing. A 42-question online survey focusing on disaster governance was sent to nurses working in COVID-19 designated hospitals, public health offices, and schools. A total of 630 nurses participated in the survey. Demand and supply analysis was used to identify the specific components of disaster governance during a pandemic situation and analyze priority areas in disaster governance, as reported by nurses. Results: Demand and supply analysis showed that supplies procurement, cooperation, education, and environment factors clustered in the high demand and supply quadrant while labor condition, advocacy, emotional support, and workload adjustment factors clustered in the high demand but low supply quadrant, indicating a strong need in those areas of disaster governance among nurses. The nurses practicing at the public health offices and schools showed major components of disaster governance plotted in the second quadrant, indicating weak collaborative disaster governance. Conclusion: These findings show that there is an unbalanced distribution among nurses, resulting in major challenges in collaborative disaster governance during COVID-19. In the future and current pandemic, collaborative disaster governance, through improved distribution, will be useful for helping nurses to access more required resources and achieve effective pandemic response.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제1권3호
• /
• pp.192-205
• /
• 2012

Globalization has fuelled the desire for simplicity and flexibility in rules and processes within nations. de Soto (2000) calls for the simplification of rules to enable people to join the formal economy. Friedman (2005) echoes the need for simpler rules, to attract business and capital. Market-based approaches to governing have been adopted in many nations due to globalization. Recent developments demonstrate that such approaches fail. Globalization may lead to impoverishment in the absence of proper forms of governance (Cooney 2000). That is why it has the tendency to become a "race to the bottom." Regulatory measures can be costly, and the costs of doing business are uneven across nations. This unevenness is being used as a comparative advantage. Others call this regulatory competition (Smith-Bozek 2007) or competitive governance (Schachtel and Sahmel 2000), which is similar to the model of Charles Tiebout. Collaborative governance is an approach that governments could use in lieu of the competitive method. Mechanisms that enable stakeholders to exchange information, harmonize activities, share resources, and enhance capacities (Himmelman 2002) are needed. Philippine public policy encourages a shift in modes of realizing labor market governance outcomes from command to collaboration (Sale and Bool 2010B; Sale 2011). Is labor market governance and regional development in the Philippines collaborative? Or is the opposite - competitive governance (Tiebout model) - more evident? What is the dominant approach? This preliminary research tackles these questions by looking at recent data on average and minimum wages, wage differentials, trade union density, collective bargaining coverage, small and bigger enterprises, employment, unemployment and underemployment, inflation, poverty incidence, labor productivity, family income, among others, across regions of the country. The issue is studied in the context of legal origins. Cultural explanations are broached.

• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.200-216
• /
• 2020

Many studies conducted in Kenya regarding water resource governance have focused on the mandate of Water Resource Users Associations (WRUAs) with less attention being accorded to their effectiveness in conservation of wetlands. This study assessed the effectiveness of WRUA committees, and challenges faced in conservation of Rwamuthambi Sub-catchment. The study employed exploratory descriptive research design. Data was collected through questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, observations and review of secondary data. Chi square and descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. The survey results revealed that only 15% of WRUA committee understood water resources management while 35% were aware of relevant legislations. Factors of wetland degradation showed significant association with existence of WRUA (χ2 (4, N=180) = 20.46, p< .01) where (χ2- chi square (degrees of freedom, N = sample size) = chi-square statistic value, p = p value), although WRUA contributions were perceived differently per agro-ecological zone (χ2 (8, N=147) = 15.51, p>.05). Challenges unearthed were inadequate financial and human resources, lack of understanding, ineffective collaborative governance, poor support from county government and private ownership of riparian land reserve. There is need for WRUAs to embrace collaborative governance for effective conservation of wetlands. Integration of sub catchment management plan with county land use plans and policy review is also required.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.310-321
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 탈북자 정착지원 협력적 거버넌스 구축을 위한 참여주체인 중앙정부, 지방자치단체, 민간단체의 구체적 역할을 논의하기 위해 수행되었다. 중앙정부는 현재 통일부, 행정안전부, 고용노동부, 교육과학기술부, 보건복지부 등 다양한 차원에서 수행되고 있는 기능에 대한 정책조정 기능이 취약하므로 총괄 부서를 지명하고 정책기획, 예산확보 및 배정, 사후평가 및 책임성확보를 담당해야 한다. 지방자치단체는 실질적 서비스를 전달하기 위한 네트워크를 구축하고 관리하는 기능을 담당하기 위해서 의사소통 체널을 확보하고 관계망을 형성하며 다양한 주체들의 집행업무를 조정하는 역할을 담당해야 한다. 민간단체는 전문성을 바탕으로 서비스 개발하고 지역의 자원을 발굴하며 밀착서비스 제공하는 것이 바람직할 것이다.

• 국토계획
• /
• 제54권4호
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to understand the perceptions of stakeholders in environmental conflicts. The private rental housing project in Busan Sasang-gu Jurye 3 District, which took place in 2017 is one of many cases of environmental conflicts between developers and local residents. The case is considered as a typical failure of collaborative governance that has consequently caused negative impacts to both local residents and government. To understand why local residents could not come to consensus even though the majority of them were against the development project, we analyzed residents' perceptions and subjective opinions towards environmental conflicts. This study adopted 'Q methodology' to investigate human subjectivity. The results showed three distinguished types of subjectivity structures. Each type was named as 'collaborative governance advocates', 'public administration distrusters', and 'current local government supporters' based on their characteristics. Participants in all three types showed opposition to environmental damages that can be caused by the private rental housing development, but they revealed different perspectives on the importance of public participation and institutional responsibility in the process of decision-making. This study makes better understand what makes it difficult to build collaborative governance as a means of overcoming environmental conflicts.