• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.387-399
• /
• 2015

Recently collaboration network is generated to find out experts in their field as potential collaborators in health care sector. In this paper, the co-author network of a National Cancer Center researcher was generated for identifying each researcher's role and collaborative research pattern. The co-author network of 2,437 authors was extracted from 1,194 SCI(E) publications from 2000 to 2010 and author's role was analyzed by author's centrality value. Centrality reflecting only the number of papers and centrality weighted by the paper number, impact factor, and authorship contribution was evaluated. On the comparison with simple degree centrality value and the weighted degree centrality, difference of value was statistically significant(t=11.66, p=0.00). Co-author network considering various variables of the paper provides more objective figure of researcher's role. This suggests that co-author network could be more effective in identifying potential collaborators.

• Health Policy and Management
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.86-106
• /
• 2008

This research analyzed. knowledge structure and its effect factor by analysis of co-author and keyword network in Korea's health policy and administration sector. The data was extracted from 339 articles listed in the Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration, and was transformed into a co-author and keyword matrix. In this matrix the existence of a link was defined by impact factors which were calculated by the weight value of what the role was and the rate of how many authors contributed. We demonstrated that the research achievement was dependent on the author's status and network index. Analysis methods were neighborhood degree, correspondence analysis, multiple regression and the difference of weight distribution by research fields. Co-author networks were developed as closeness centrality as well as degree centrality by a few high productivity researchers. In particular, power law distribution was discovered in impact factor and research productivity. The effect of the author's role was significant in both the impact factor calculated by the participatory rate and the number of listed articles. Especially, this journal shared its major researchers who had a licensed physician with the Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. Therefore, social scientists were likely to be small co-author network differently from natural scientists. It was so called 'two cultures' phenomenon. This study showed how can we verified academic research structure existed in the unit of journal like as citation networks. The co-author networks in the field of health policy and administration had more differentiated and clustered than preventive medicine and epidemiology fields.

• 한국체육학회지인문사회과학편
• /
• v.57 no.2
• /
• pp.279-289
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to investigate features of leisure and recreation scholarship study in The Korean Journal of physical education based on co-authors network and topic modeling through using Word Cloud and LDA Topic Modeling(Latent Dirichlet Allocation). The data collected for this study are 2,697 papers published online from January 2008 to March 2017 on the Korean journal of physical education. Respectively ordered analysis targets are the major author, author of correspondence, co-author 1, co-author 2, co-author n in related document to explore studies' trends using the 369 documents. As a result, the co-author network analysis result found that 451 were linked to the research network, on average researchers had 1.52 relationships and the average distance between researchers was 2.33. The Representative author's concentration of connection was ranked high in the order of the following, Lee. K. M., Hwang. S. H., H., Lee. C. S., and proximity centers were shown in Seo K. B., Han. J. H., Kim. K. J. Finally, parameter-centric features appeared in order of Lee. C. W. and Seo. K. B. was most actively connected between the researchers of the leisure-related academic papers. Future research needs discussions among scholars regarding the trend and direction of future leisure research.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.8 no.9
• /
• pp.199-209
• /
• 2017

This study was carried out to confirm a convergent research pattern and researchers' role in stem cell sector by social network analysis. Articles were extracted from 1996 to 2012 in PubMed, 515 authors of 270 embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell articles and 1,515 authors of 580 adult stem cell and mesenchymal stem cell articles. Degree(D) and betweenness(B) centrality was measured and co-author network was generated for researcher's role. As a result, Core researcher and Intermediary researcher was identified in co-author network. Core researcher had high D. centrality, otherwise high B. centrality or not. Intermediary researcher for convergent research had high B. centrality and low D. centrality. Conclusively, co-author network will be used as objective data not only to find core researchers in subject area for improving achievement but also to select experts for research project evaluation.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1259-1270
• /
• 2011

This study analyzed an aspect of co-author relationship in papers published in the Korean Journal of Applied Statistics by social network analysis. The data were extracted from 664 papers in the journal from 2000 to 2010. Authors at center of the network are detected by a network centrality analysis. Sub-network analysis found distinguishable research groups from the point of view of their topics or affiliations. The significance of affiliations to co-author relationship was examined by logistic regression analysis.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.295-301
• /
• 2018

In various disciplines, researchers, not single researchers, tend to cooperate to study the same topic. There are many studies to analyze the collaborative form of various researchers through the social network analysis method, but there are few such studies in the computer field. In this paper, we analyze the characteristics of network and various groups of researchers through the social network analysis technique of the co-authors of the Journal of Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, and analyze the degree centrality, the between centrality and edge weight. As a result of the analysis, many groups were extracted from the co-author's network, but the top 20 groups accounted for more than 50% of the total, also, we could find a pair of researchers who do joint research with a very high frequency. These Co-author networks are expected to be the basis for in-depth research on the subject and direction of research through future researches.

• Korean System Dynamics Review
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.31-50
• /
• 2016

This study examines the basic conditions of joint authorship research activities in the Korean System Dynamics Review and points out the structural co-author network characteristics among co-authored papers based on the social network analysis(SNA) techniques. In specific, this study identifies the cooperative relationship of research papers in the Korean System Dynamics Review, knowledge formation, and knowledge propagation paths. The study results imply that Korean System Dynamics Review has exhibited the typical 'Steven's power law,' which is repeatedly observed among complex systems, and that knowledge structure centered upon and propagated around couples of researchers. Additionally, the study results present that there have been active personal exchanges among major researchers. In contrast, personal contacts among research groups and within groups seem relatively weak.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2008

Objectives : This study evaluated knowledge structure and its effect factor by analysis of co-author and keyword networks in Korea's preventive medicine sector. Methods : The data was extracted from 873 papers listed in the Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, and was transformed into a co-author and keyword matrix where the existence of a 'link' was judged by impact factors calculated by the weight value of the role and rate of author participation. Research achievement was dependent upon the author's status and networking index, as analyzed by neighborhood degree, multidimensional scaling, correspondence analysis, and multiple regression. Results : Co-author networks developed as randomness network in the center of a few high-productivity researchers. In particular, closeness centrality was more developed than degree centrality. Also, power law distribution was discovered in impact factor and research productivity by college affiliation. In multiple regression, the effect of the author's role was significant in both the impact factor calculated by the participatory rate and the number of listed articles. However, the number of listed articles varied by sex. Conclusions : This study shows that the small world phenomenon exists in co-author and keyword networks in a journal, as in citation networks. However, the differentiation of knowledge structure in the field of preventive medicine was relatively restricted by specialization.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• v.10 no.spc
• /
• pp.12-24
• /
• 2022

This study attempted to investigate changes in collaboration structure for each stage of national Research and Development (R&D) in the artificial intelligence (AI) field through analysis of a co-author network for papers written under national R&D projects. For this, author information was extracted from national R&D outcomes in AI from 2014 to 2019. For such R&D outcomes, NTIS (National Science & Technology Information Service) information from the KISTI (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) was utilized. In research collaboration in AI, power function structure, in which research efforts are led by some influential researchers, is found. In other words, less than 30 percent is linked to the largest cluster, and a segmented network pattern in which small groups are primarily developed is observed. This means a large research group with high connectivity and a small group are connected with each other, and a sporadic link is found. However, the largest cluster grew larger and denser over time, which means that as research became more intensified, new researchers joined a mainstream network, expanding a scope of collaboration. Such research intensification has expanded the scale of a collaborative researcher group and increased the number of large studies. Instead of maintaining conventional collaborative relationships, in addition, the number of new researchers has risen, forming new relationships over time.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.22 no.7
• /
• pp.18-29
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this exploratory study is to examine the intellectual structure of data science. For this purpose, this research examined a total of 17,997 bibliographies on data science indexed in Web of Science(WoS) of Clarivate Analytics from 2012 to 2021. This research applied methods such as descriptive analysis, citation analysis, co-author network analysis, co-occurrence network analysis, bibliographic coupling analysis, and co-citation analysis. This research contributes to finding the research directions of future data science topics.