• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.430-440
• /
• 2001

Orally administered chloral hydrate is often used, because of it's wide margin of safety and relatively few sideeffects. Hydroxyzine is an antihistamine with sedative and anti-emetic properties. It has been used in conjunction with chloral hydrate to reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting. But, it's therapeutic drug concentration has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the sedative effect and physiologic parameter of hydroxyzine of different doses in sedating young pediatric dental patients. Fifty uncooperative children, mean age 33.2 months, who needed at least four separate restorative visits, requiring local anesthesia participated in this study. On every visit, one of the following 4 different sedative regimen was given (1) 70mg/kg CH (2) 70mg/kg CH and 1mg/kg HD (3) 70mg/kg CH and 2mg/kg HD (4) 70mg/kg CH and 3mg/kg HD. Physiologic parameter was recorded and behavior was videotaped and rated using Ohio State University Behavior Rating Scale by one investigator, blind to the dose. The analyzed sedative effect of combined oral administration of 70mg/kg chloral hydrate and 2mg/kg hydroxyzine was superior to the other regimens. Evidence of adverse effect was not detected or reported during and/or after the procedures.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.29 no.3
• /
• pp.455-462
• /
• 2002

Currently, the ages of the patients visiting dental hospital for dental care are becoming younger and the interest in the treatment for the handicapped and incapable of cooperation children increases. As a method for treatment of these patients, the sedation treatment is considered. A dental sedation using chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine of them were used widely and for a long time. In this study, the samples were consisted of incapable of cooperation or very young children required treatment of restoration under local anesthesia. Then, the vital signs were accessed in pediatric dental sedation using the combination of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine. As a result of this study, the vital signs were little different in pediatric dental sedation using the combination of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine. Simply, the respiration rate and pulse rate decreased according to sleeping of patients. Therefore, the sedation using the combination of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine induced to appropriate sedation in incapable of cooperation or very young children with little effects of vital signs.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.489-497
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical sedation effect of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine combination with and without nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation when young children were sedated for dental treatment. The uncooperative 20 children aged, 21 to 47 months of age(ASA Class I), participated in the study. The author examined 20 children(male 12, female 8). Each patient was assigned to receive chloral hydrate(50mg/kg) and hydroxyzine(25mg). Next appointment, each patient was assigned to receive $N_2O-O_2$, choral hydrate and hydroxyzine. Sleep, crying, movement, and overall behavior response were evaluated, and the sedative effects were evaluated by Houpt's rating scale. Pulse rate and peripheral oxygen saturation were also measured for monitoring the sedated patients during treatment period by pulse oximeter. The result were as follows : 1. In the evaluation of sleep scores, crying scores, and movement scores, chloral $hydrate/hydroxyzine/N_2O-O_2$ combination group was significantly rated high(p<0.05). 2. In the evaluation of overall behavior scores, chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine/$N_2O-O_2$ combination group was significantly rated high(p<0.05). 3. In the evaluation of overall behavior evaluation scores(by Houpt), 93.3% in chloral $hydrate/hydroxyzine/N_2O-O_2$ combination group and 63.3% in chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination group were rated "good" or "very good". 4. There was no adverse side effect(i.e. respiratory depression) in both group.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.811-824
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical sedation effect of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine combination, midazolam, triazolam when young children were sedated for dental treatment. The uncooperative 22 children aged, 25 to 52 months of age(ASA class I) and weighting between 11 and 17kg, participated in the study. Each patient was assigned randomly to receive chloral hydrate(50mg/kg) and hydroxyzine HCl(25mg), midazolam(0.5mg/kg), and triazolam(0.25mg) oral administration : alternative regimens were administered at next appointment. According to rating scale, sleep, crying, movement, and overall behavior response were checked for evaluation of the clinical sedation effect. Pulse rate and oxygen saturation were also measured for monitoring the patients during treatment period by pulse oximeter. The results were as follows: 1. In the evaluation of sedation effect, 90.9% in chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine combination and midazolam, and 77.3% in triazolam were rated "good" or "very good". 2. Sleep was demonstrated to be statistically significant increase in chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine combination group. Despite the fact that chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine group was in a deeper state of sleep, all the children were easily aroused. 3. There were no statistically significance among the three regimens with regard to cry ing, movement, overall behavior. 4. The adverse side effect was vomiting in one patient of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine combination. There were no clinical sign of respiratory depression.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.262-269
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and complications of two oral sedative regimens, chloral hydrate (60mg/kg)/hydroxyzine(25mg) versus midazolam(1mg/kg)/meperidine(1mg/kg) for the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Fifteen patients(mean age 36.2months, range 24-47months), ASA Class I or II, who needed at least two restorative dental procedures were selected in this double-blind, randomized study. All subjects were randomly assigned to receive either chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine or midazolam/meperidine and 50% $N_2O/O_2$ was administered at each appointment. Behavior assessment(sleep, movement, crying, overall behavior) was made using Houpt Sedation Rating Scale and physiologic parameters(pulse rate, oxygen saturation) were monitored using pulse oximeter. The incidence of hypoxia($SpO_2$ 90% or less, at least 10s duration) and vomiting was recorded. Patients sedated with chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine showed significantly better overall behavior score than patients sedated with midazolam/meperidine. There was no clinically significant difference in the incidence of hypoxia and vomiting. It was concluded that oral administration of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine is more effective than midazolam/meperidine for the sedation of pediatric dental patients.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.280-292
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study was to assess the sedative effect of three kinds of medication for management of the uncooperative 60 children aged from 16 months to 87 months required extensive treatment. The patients were given randomly a dose of 75mg/kg of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine 25mg orally or 0.5mg/kg of midazolam orally or 0.3mg/kg of midazolam intranasally. All the children were restrained in a Pediwrap and were monitored with Pulse oximeter for assessing the safety of patients. According to rating scale, sleep, crying, movement, and overall behavior were checked for evaluation of the clinical sedative effect. The results were as follows: 1. In the evaluation of sleep, rating scale of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine was superior to the other group(p<0.05). 2. In the evaluation of crying and movement at beginning of treatment, rating scale of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine was superior to the other group(p<0.05), but during the treatment, rating scale of each group was not significantly different (p>0.05). 3. In the evaluation of overall behavior, 80% children of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine were rated good or very good. With the oral and intranasal midazolam, 60% children were rated good or very good respectively. 4. There were no clinical signs of significant cyanosis and respiratory depression. Clinically, chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine was proved to be more effective sedation than any other sedative method. Oral and intranasal midazolam were also safe and effective sedation in young children undergoing pediatric dental procedures.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.337-344
• /
• 2001

The combination of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine is one of the safest and most commonly used drug regimens for sedating young, uncooperative pediatric dental patients. The continuous monitoring of respiratory function and early recognition of respiratory difficulties are essential for the successful management of sedated dental patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success rate of the sedation and the hypoxia through monitoring the oxygen desaturation in the pulse oximeter in pediatric dental patients sedated with 60mg/kg chloral hydrate and 25mg hydroxyzine. The following results were obtained : 1. The success rate of the sedation was 69.6% and there was no statistically significant difference among the groups based on the ages, weight and duration of the operative time. 2. Forty two percentage of the sedated patients showed the temporary hypoxia state and there was no statistically significant difference based on the ages and weights of the patients. But there was a statistically significant difference on the duration of the operative time.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.29 no.3
• /
• pp.304-312
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to assess the sedative effects of four kinds of medication for management in the uncooperative 64 children aged from 18 to 92 months(ASA class I) and weighting between 10 and 32 kg. They were given randomly a dose of chloral hydrate 75mg/kg and hydroxyzine 25mg orally(group 1), midazolam 0.1mg/kg intramuscularly and $N_2O$(group 2), group 1 with additional $N_2O$(group 3) and group 1 with additional midazolam 0.5cc intranasally(group 4), respectively. According to rating scale, sleep, crying, movement and overall behavior were checked for evaluation of the clinical sedative effects. They were restraind with Pediwrap and were monitored by pulse oximeter for safety during treatment period. The results were as follows : 1. In the evaluation of sleep, rating scale of chloral hydrate and hydroyzine combination group was superior to midazolam and $N_2O$ combination group(p<0.001), but there was no significant difference between chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and $N_2O$ combination group and chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and midazolam combination group. 2. In the evaluation of crying, movement and overall behavior, there were significant differences between chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine combination group and midazolam and $N_2O$ combination group(p<0.05), but no significant difference between chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and $N_2O$ combination group and chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and midazolam combination group. 3. In the evaluation of overall behavior, the mean score of chloral hydrate and hydroyzine combination group was 2.94, midazolam and $N_2O$ combination group 2.07, chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and $N_2O$ combination group 2.47 and chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and midazolam combination group 2.24, respectively. 4. Evidence of adverse effect was not detected or reported during and/or after dental treatment.

• Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.6-12
• /
• 2007

배경: 소아 진정 치료 시 서로 다른 용량의 chloral hydrate와 hydroxyzine을 복용 후 midazolam을 구강 점막 하 주사했을 때 행동 반응을 비교하였다. 방법: 총 32회 진정법을 통해 치과치료를 받은 30명의 나이 24-72개월, 체중 20 kg 미만의 미국 마취과학회 신체등급 I의 건강하지만 겁이 많고 협조가 안 되는 소아 환자를 대상으로 2개 치아이상의 보존 치료 및 발치를 필요로 하는 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 호흡기 질환이 있는 아이들은 이 연구에서 제외되었다. 연구 계획은 이대 목동 병원의 임상 실험 심사 위원회에 제출되었다. 1군은 chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg와 hydroxyzine 1 mg/kg 복용 후 점막 하 midazolam 0.2 mg/kg을 추가 투여했고 2군은 chloral hydrate 60 mg/kg와 hydroxyzine 1 mg/kg 복용 후 점막 하 midazolam 0.1 mg/kg을 주사 받았다. 50% nitrous oxide는 치료 중 두 군 모두 유지되었다. 전날 수면 시간과 약물 복용 태도를 기록하였으며 모든 치료 과정은 비디오로 촬영되었다. 맥박 산소 계측기를 이용하여 경피적 산소 포화도와 맥박수를 기록하였고 행동 반응은 Houpt scale을 이용하여 매 2분마다 40분 동안 기록되었다. 전반적인 행동 반응은 Houpt scale를 이용하여 평가되었다. 모든 자료는 SPSS 통계 프로그램을 이용하여 two sample independent t-test를 사용하였다. P 값은 0.05 미만인 경우를 통계학적으로 유의하다고 보았다. 결과: 두 군 간의 경피적 산소 포화도와 맥박수는 모두 정상 범위이며 유의한 차이가 없었다. 행동 반응 비교에서는 치료 처음 10분 동안 2군이 1군에 비해 점수가 높게 나왔으며(P < 0.05), 그 외에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 전날 총 수면 시간과 약물을 복용하는 태도는 수면 치료 중의 행동 반응에 영향을 주지 않았다. 결론: Chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg 복용과 점막 하 midazolam 0.2 mg/kg은 chloral hydrate 60 mg/kg 복용과 점막 하 midazolam 0.1 mg/kg과 비교할 때 두 약물의 조합은 모두 소아 환자 수면 치료시 안전하고 효과적인 용량이다. Overall behavior와 Q (quiet)의 분포를 비교해 볼 때 두 군 모두 성공적인 진정효과를 기대할 수 있다.

• Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.16-21
• /
• 2008

Recently combining regimen of minimal doses of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and midazolam is good in sedation of children. Midazoalm, water soluble benzdiazepine, has rapid onset and relatively short duration of action. And midazolam has prospective amnesic effect. With these advantages midazolam is popular in conscious sedation for children. This study was to reveal the dose-dependency of behavior and physiologic effects of sublingual midazolam. Sedation records were surveyed retrospectively, of which the patients admitted from April, 2005 to July, 2007. we assigned three groups according the dose of midazolam, 0.1 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively and the behavioral evaluation was analyzed with Houpt scale statistically. Combined sublingual midazolam increased the success rate in sedation and the vital signs were stable during sedation.