• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.95-102
• /
• 2010

목적 : 삼중음성 유방암은 국소재발 및 원격전이가 흔하고 예후가 불량한 유방암이다. 이의 자기공명영상 소견과 임상적, 병리학적 소견이 비삼중음성 유방암과 차이가 있는지 알아보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 2007년부터 2008년까지 수술로 확진된 231명의 유방암 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 자기공명영상 소견에서 대표 병변을 Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)에 따라 후향적으로 분석하였고 삼중음성 유방암의 소견이 비삼중음성 유방암과 차이가 있는지 알아보았다. 또한 나이, 조직학적 형태, 분화도, 표피 성장인자 수용체, p53, Ki 67의 발현 정도가 두 군간에 차이가 있는지 분석하였다. 결과 : 총 231명 중 43명 (18.6%)이 삼중음성 유방암이었다. 삼중음성 유방암 중 40개 (93%)가 자기공명영상에 서 종괴병변 이었다. 삼중음성 유방암은 비삼중음성 유방암에 비해 원형, 난원형 또는 소엽성 모양 (p=0.006), 변연 조영증강 (p=0.004) 소견이 많았다. 반면 불규칙 모양(p=0.006)과 침상경계(p=0.032)는 비삼중음성 유방암에 유의하게 많았다. 고령 (p=0.019), 높은 조직 분화도 (p < 0.0001), 표피성장인자 수용체 양성(p < 0.0001), p53 (p=0.038)과 Ki 67 (< 0.0001) 과발현이 삼중음성 유방암과 관련이 있었다. 결론 : 자기공명영상 소견은 삼중음성 유방암과 비삼중음성 유방암을 구분하는데 도움이 된다.

• 대한핵의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한핵의학회 2002년도 제41차 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.7-8
• /
• 2002

• 대한두경부종양학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한두경부종양학회 2009년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.196-200
• /
• 2009

• 대한자기공명의과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한자기공명의과학회 2000년도 제5차 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.76-78
• /
• 2000

• 대한핵의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한핵의학회 1996년도 제35차 춘계학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.158-158
• /
• 1996

• 대한핵의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한핵의학회 2001년도 제40차 추계학술대회 및 총회
• /
• pp.7-8
• /
• 2001

• 대한두경부종양학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한두경부종양학회 2006년도 제11차 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.65-66
• /
• 2006

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제22권9호
• /
• pp.1475-1480
• /
• 2021

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권11호
• /
• pp.4805-4811
• /
• 2016

Background: Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) less than 2 cm in diameter generally demonstrate a good outcome after curative therapy. However, the diagnosis of small HCC can be problematic and requires one or more dynamic imaging modalities. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and agreement between CT and MRI for the diagnosis of small HCCs. Methods: CT and/or MRI scans of HCCs (1-2 cm) diagnosed by histopathology or typical vascular pattern according to the 2005 AASLD criteria were blindly reviewed by an abdominal radiologist. The reports were defined as conclusive/typical when arterial enhancement and washout during the portal/delayed phases were observed and as inconclusive when typical vascular patterns were not observed. The sensitivity and Cohen's kappa (k) for agreement were calculated. Results: In 27 patients, 27 HCC nodules (1-2 cm) were included. Diagnosis with a single-imaging modality (CT or MRI) was 81 % versus 48 % (p = 0.01). The CT sensitivity was significantly higher than MRI (78 % versus 52 %, p = 0.04). Among 27 nodules that underwent both CT and MRI, a discordance in typical enhancement patterns was found (k = 0.319, p = 0.05). In cases with inconclusive CT results, MRI gave only an additional 3.7 % sensitivity to reach a diagnosis. In contrast, further CT imaging following inconclusive MRI results gave an additional 29.6 % sensitivity.Conclusions: A single typical imaging modality is sufficient to diagnose small HCCs. Compared with MRI, multiphasic CT has a higher sensitivity. The limitations of MRI could be explained by the greater need for patient cooperation and the types of MRI contrast agent.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.305-309
• /
• 2020

Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common comorbidity in breast cancer survivors. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to evaluate therapeutic response of patients with various medical conditions, it is not routinely used to evaluate lymphedema patients. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies on the use of MRI to evaluate therapy for BCRL. We hypothesized that MRI could provide information otherwise not possible through other examinations. On October 21, 2019, we conducted a systematic review on the PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases, without time frame or language limitations, to identify studies on the use of MRI to evaluate therapy for BCRL. We excluded studies that investigated other applications of MRI, such as lymphedema diagnosis and surgical planning. Of 63 potential articles identified with the search, three case series fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In total, 53 patients with BCRL were included and quantitatively evaluated with MRI before and after manual lymphatic drainage. Authors used MRI or MR lymphagiography to investigate factors such as lymphatic vessel cross-sectional area, tissue water relaxation time (T₂), and chemical exchange saturation transfer. The only study that compared MRI measurement with standard examinations reported that MRI added information to the therapy evaluation. MRI seems to be a promising tool for quantitative measurement of therapeutic response in patients with BCRL. However, the identified studies focused on only manual lymphatic drainage and were limited by the small numbers of patients. More studies are necessary to shed light on the topic.