• Title/Summary/Keyword: CTMD

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Control of Bending Behavior of Simple Beams Using CTMD (CTMD의 질량비에 따른 단순보의 휨거동 제어효과)

  • Heo, Gwang-Hee;Seo, Sang-Gu;Kim, Chung-Gil;Jeon, Seung-Gon;Kim, Min-Ki
    • Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
    • /
    • v.25 no.6
    • /
    • pp.12-18
    • /
    • 2021
  • The purpose of this study is to effectively mitigate the bending displacement that occurs in the bridge due to forced vibration. We developed CTMD (Combine Tuned Mass Damper) that combines the relationship between spring and mass to control the bending behavior of simple beams. The experiment was conducted to confirm the control effect according to the change in the mass ratio of the developed CTMD. The developed CTMD is designed and manufactured so that the mass ratio can be adjusted according to the characteristics of the bridge. The maximum load of the spring applied to CTMD was fixed at 33.15 N. In order to evaluate the performance of the developed CTMD, a simple beam composed of hinges and rollers as boundary conditions was fabricated. In the experimental method, a CTMD was installed in the center of a simple beam and the deflection displacement according to the mass ratio was measured. The shaking condition was shaken at 3 Hz to induce the maximum bending behavior of the simple beam. As a result of the experiment, it was confirmed that when the optimal mass ratio was 2.1, the damping rate of the bending behavior displacement was about 71.2 %, indicating the best control effect.

New Vibration Control Approach of Adjacent Twin Structures using Connecting Tuned Mass Damper (연결 동조질량감쇠기를 이용한 인접한 쌍둥이 구조물의 새로운 진동제어)

  • Ok, Seung-Yong;Kim, Seung-Min
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
    • /
    • v.32 no.2
    • /
    • pp.92-97
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study deals with new application method of the connecting tuned mass damper (CTMD) system for efficient vibration control of adjacent twin structures which have the same dynamic properties such as natural frequency and damping characteristics to each other. In the existing research, the vibration control of the twin structures has a limit to the application of the conventional damper-connection method of the twin structures. Due to the same frequency characteristics leading to the equally vibrating behaviors, it is impossible to apply the conventional connection method of the adjacent structures. In order to overcome these limitations induced by the symmetry of the dynamic characteristics, we propose a new CTMD-based control system that adopts the conventional connection configuration but unbalances the symmetric system by arranging the control device asymmetrically and then can finally achieve the efficient control performance. In order to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed system, numerical simulations of the optimally designed proposed system have been performed in comparison with the optimal design results of the existing independent single tuned mass damper (STMD) control system and the another optimal control system previously proposed by the same author, hereafter called CTMD-OsTMD. The comparative results of the control performances among STMD, CTMD-OsTMD and the proposed CTMD systems verified that the newly proposed control system can be a control-efficient and cost-effective system for vibration suppression of the two adjacent twin structures.

Comparison of deck-anchored damper and clipped tuned mass damper on cable vibration reduction

  • Wu, W.J.;Cai, C.S.
    • Structural Engineering and Mechanics
    • /
    • v.32 no.6
    • /
    • pp.741-754
    • /
    • 2009
  • Excessive cable vibrations are detrimental to cable-stayed bridges. Increasing the system damping of cables is a key solution to resolve this severe problem. Equations representing the dynamic characteristics of an inclined cable with a Deck-Anchored Damper (DAD) or with a Clipped Tuned Mass Dampers (CTMD) are reviewed. A theoretical comparison on the performance of cable vibration reduction between the cable-DAD system and the cable-CTMD systems is thoroughly discussed. Optimal system modal damping for the free vibration and transfer functions for the forced vibration for the two cabledamper systems are addressed and compared in detail. Design examples for these two different dampers are also provided.