• Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association
• /
• v.15 no.8
• /
• pp.269-278
• /
• 2021

This study was conducted to develop a learning competency scales customized for learning programs conducted by Center for Teaching & Learning at A University. To achieve this purpose, a preliminary study was set up, which consists of three competency groups (basic competency, intensity competency, application competency) and 13 learning competency factors through a review of previous studies. In order to verify the reliability and validity of the provisional learning competency scales, an online survey was conducted on A university students in September 2020, The collected questionnaire data were organized and exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted. As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 13 learning competency was reduced to 10 as the three competency groups were maintained. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the model was found to be good, Also, as a result of analyzing the reliability of the confirmed learning competency factors, all 10 factors showed a good level of .7 or more. The learning competency scales developed through this study can be used as basic data for performance evaluation and development of new programs of CTL learning program.

• Journal of Practical Engineering Education
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.49-59
• /
• 2022

This study was conducted to develop a teaching competency scales customized for teaching programs conducted by Center for Teaching & Learning at A University. To achieve this purpose, a preliminary study was set up, which consists of three competency groups (basic competency, practice competency, innovation competency) and 26 learning competency factors through a review of previous studies. In order to verify the reliability and validity of the provisional teaching competency scales, an online survey was conducted on A university teachers in September 2020, The collected questionnaire data were organized and exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted. As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 26 teaching competency was reduced to 17. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the model was found to be good, Also, as a result of analyzing the construct reliability and AVE of the confirmed teaching competency factors, all 17 factors showed a good level of .7 or more. The teaching competency scales developed through this study can be used as basic data for performance evaluation and development of new programs of CTL teaching program.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.14 no.12
• /
• pp.6163-6172
• /
• 2013

This study examined the job competence of the staff at the center for teaching and learning(CTL) in university and to find out the level of job competence, which has been asked to the staff of the CTL. For that, the factor of the job competence, which is required of the staff of the CTL, was inquired through a literature review. Based on the job competence, this study examined the required job competence of the staff in Daejeon city and Chungnam province. The result suggests that the job competence required of staff are the basic job competence, planning-analysis job competence, management job competence for the project, and evaluation job competence. The first factor in basic job competence is the attitude to change and innovation. In the planning-analysis job competence, the first factor is an analysis and consultation of instruction. In managing the job competence for the project, the first factor is the management of human resources, and the first factor in evaluating the job competence is an evaluation of the effectiveness of the media. Therefore, to revitalize the CTL, there is a need to organize an expert pool, plan and support program that is suitable for professional development.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.11
• /
• pp.795-803
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to verify the differences in learning capability according to the demand of learning programs. The participants of this study included 1,738 S University students. The results of the study are as follows. First, in learning capability according to participation in learning programs, we found statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality. Second, there were no statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality in participating in learning programs. Third, there were statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality in not participating in learning programs. Fourth, there were statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality in experiencing difficulties in learning. Fifth, learning capabilities in specific areas that students wanted to improve had no statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness. However, there were statistically significant differences in self-improvement and sociality.