• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 1999.08a
• /
• pp.235-240
• /
• 1999

본 논문에서는 우리나라 연구지원기관에서 기구축한 연구과제 데이타베이스 기술요소를 분석하여 CERIF(Common European Research Information Format)를 준용한 국내 연구과제정보 교환을 위한 데이타 포맷(KRIF)을 정의하였다. KRIF에서는 국내에 기구축된 연구과제정보 기술항목의 특성을 고려하여 CERIF를 확장 적용하였으며, 각 엔티티에 로컬정의 필드를 두어 교환이 불필요한 데이타요소를 로컬이 재량껏 정의할 수 있도록 설계하였다. 또한 본 논문에서는 이를 바탕으로 국내에 기구축된 이형의 연구정보를 단일 창구고 검색할 수 있는 국내통합연구현황정보 데이타베이스 구축 모형을 제안하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.169-191
• /
• 2010

This study aimed at developing preservation metadata elements and its applications for research information which is considered as a valuable digital resource these days. Specifically, the developed preservation metadata intends to provide a basis for the research information of the government-funded research institutes in economic and social science fields which are major knowledge producers of national policy. To ensure the interoperability of the research information across various departments and organizations, this study compared the elements from the CERIF(European Standard) and those from the PREMIS Data Dictionary which is based on OAIS reference model (ISO 14721). Based on this comparative analysis, this study developed complementary preservation metadata elements based on the two standards' characteristics. Consequently, this study suggested a new preservation metadata elements and its applications that are compatible between the two systems and can be implemented in practice.

• Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2006

It has lately been difficult to share the research outcomes information due to the information system not being compatible with one another. To solve this problem, it is believed that a meta data standard needs to be developed for all the institutions to follow. This paper shows how to make the research outcome of Science and Technology R&D project a standard metadata. We first classified all the research outcome into the following seven groups: Report, Journal article, Presentation material, Book, Dissertation, Industrial rights, and Technology development. We then identified three components that constitute a standard metadata. We employed the Dublin Core Metadata Set and CERIF(Common European Research Information Format) for worldwide interoperability. This Standard can be applied in the following areas: 1) Developing a standard architecture to manage research result within the organization. 2) Designing a conceptual/logical database to measure and evaluate the research outcome. 3) Developing a metadata system for research outcome as a subsystem of an Industrial Technology MDR (Metadata Registry) System.