• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.119-125
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the marginal gap of all-ceramic crowns fabricated by CEREC$^{(R)}$ in-office CAD/CAM system. Methods: The mandibular first molar was selected as the abutment for the experiments. Thirty working models were prepared. VITA Mark II(VM) and VITA Enamic(VE), LAVA Ultimate(LU) blocks were milled using CEREC MCXL with CEREC 3D system to construct 10 crowns for each groups. To measure marginal gap, milled restorations were examined under digital microscope with scale under 160x magnifications. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test(${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: There was no significant difference in the marginal gap regarding to ceramic materials(p>0.05). Conclusion: Single crowns fabricated using CEREC in-office CAD/CAM system provided clinically acceptable marginal gap. This confirmed that the type of ceramic material used does not determine the precision of fit of a prosthesis.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.121-128
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and accuracy of measurements in digital models(CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC) compared to stone models. Methods: A master model(500B-1, Nissin Dental Product, Japan) with the prepared upper full arch tooth was used. Conventional impression and then stone model(n=10) were produced from this master model, and on the other hands, digital impressions were made with the CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC intra-oral scanner(n=10). One examiner measured two times the intercanine, intermolar distance, dental arch length. The stone model were measured using a digital caliper. The t-student test for paired samples and intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) were used for statistical analysis. Results: The measurement of two methods showed very good reliability. At the intra-examiner reliability of measurement, ICC at the stone and CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC model were 0.81 and 0.94. The mean difference between measurements made directly on the stone models and those made on the CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC model was 0.20~0.28mm, and was statistically significant(P=0.001). Conclusion: These in vitro studies show that accuracy of the digital impression is similar to that of the conventional impression. These results will have to be confirmed in further clinical studies.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.211-218
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of the study was a quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression procedure using CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC system. Methods: Two-hundreds digital impression data comprising 174 inlays, 26 onlays by CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC in-office CAD/CAM system were obtained from a dental clinic. One evaluator assessed errors of the digital impression data and divided into five categories of errors: inappropriate scanner positioning (ISP), improper handling with a scanner (IHS), irregular powder arrangement (IPA), improper cavity preparation (ICP), and insufficient scanned data (ISD). Results: The most common errors were IPA(21%), and ISP and ISD were followed by 17% respectively. IHS was found in 14.5% of all digital impression data. ICP comprising only 6.5% was the rarest. Conclusion: Most errors were due to inaccurate manipulation with an intraoral scanner or improper cavity preparation for scanning. A deliberate manipulation to prevent common errors mentioned may deliver an optimal result in the digital impression procedure.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.269-279
• /
• 2008

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Recently, various all-ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM systems have come into wide use in dental clinic. However, there are only few domestic studies on CAD/CAM restorations. PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to compare the fidelity (absolute marginal discrepancy and internal gap) between various cores fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems (Procera system, Lava system, Cerec inLab system) and conventional metal cast core. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 cores per each system were fabricated. The absolute marginal discrepancies were measured using measuring microscope and digital counter. The internal gaps were calculated using a silicone paste. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: Within the limits of this study the results were as follows. 1. The absolute marginal discrepancies were $32.5{\pm}3.7\;{\mu}m$ for metal cast core, $72.2{\pm}7.0\;{\mu}m$ for Procera core, $40.8{\pm}5.4\;{\mu}m$ for Lava core, and $55.3{\pm}8.7\;{\mu}m$ for Cerec inLab core. The internal gaps were $38.4{\pm}5.7\;{\mu}m$ for metal cast core, $71.4{\pm}5.3\;{\mu}m$ for Procera core, $45.9{\pm}7.3\;{\mu}m$ for Lava core, and $51.8{\pm}6.2\;{\mu}m$ for Cerec inLab core. 2. The fidelity of metal cast core showed the smallest gaps, followed by Lava core, Cerec inLab core, and Procera core. CONCLUSION: The fidelities of 4 core groups were all within the clinically acceptable range ($120\;{\mu}m$).

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.148-155
• /
• 2009

연구목적: 최근에는 금속도재관의 심미적 문제로 심미성과 강도가 개선된 코아용 도재 및 지르코니아를 이용한 전부도재관 시스템에 관심이 증가되고 있다. 특히 금속과 유사한 강도를 가지면서 금속의 비심미성을 극복할 수 있는 지르코니아를 이용한 보철물의 제작이 국내외에서 많이 이뤄지고 있다. 하지만 CAD/CAM 시스템으로 제작되는 여러 종류의 지르코니아를 이용한 전부도재관의 적합도에 대한 임상 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 다양한 CAD/CAM 시스템 중 Procera, Cerec inLab, Lava에 의해 제작된 지르코니아를 이용한 전부도재관의 변연 적합도와 내면 적합도를 측정하여 이를 전통적인 방식으로 주조된 금속 도재관의 적합도와 비교 평가해 봄으로써 임상 적용에 참고 자료로 활용하고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 본 연구를 위해 하악 우측 제2소구치에 해당하는 레진치를 삭제하여 인상채득 후, 금속 주모형을 제작하였다. 금속 주모형의 40개의 인상을 채득 후 각 시스템마다 10개씩 총 40개의 crown을 제작하였다. 금속도재관은 전통적인 방식으로 제작하였고 Procera, Lava, Cerec inLab crown은 zirconia core를 이용하여 CAD/CAM 시스템으로 제작하였다. 수직 변연 오차와 내면 간격을 각 그룹마다 금속 주모형에 시멘트 접착 없이 측정하였다. 그 결과는 oneway ANOVA와 Tukey's HSD test로 통계 내었다. 결과: 수직 변연 오차는 금속도재관이 $50.6{\pm}13.9{\mu}m$, Procera crown이 $62.3{\pm}15.7{\mu}m$, Lava crown이 $45.3{\pm}7.9{\mu}m$, Cerec inLab crown은 $71.2{\pm}2.0{\mu}m$로 측정되었다. 내면 간격은 금속도재관이 $52.6{\pm}10.1{\mu}m$, Procera crown이$161.7{\pm}18.5{\mu}m$, Lava crown이 $63.0{\pm}10.2{\mu}m$, Cerec inLab crown이 $73.7{\pm}10.7{\mu}m$로 측정되었다. 변연 적합도 측면에서 볼 때 Procera crown, Lava crown, Cerec inLab 그리고 전통적인 금속도재관은 임상적으로 받아들일 수 있는 적합도 범위($120{\mu}m$) 내에 있었다. 내면 적합도 측면에서 볼 때 Procera crown을 제외한 Lava crown, Cerec inLab, 금속도재관은 임상적으로 받아들일 수 있는 적합도 범위($140{\mu}m$) 내에 있었다.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.251-257
• /
• 2006

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.165-172
• /
• 2008

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.7-9
• /
• 1989

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.119-128
• /
• 2007

Although there are many different ways that restorations can be made, it can be said that the biocompatibility of abutment and crown is very important in this experiment. When placed in the actual oral cavity, the differences were obvious. Compared to In-ceram Aluminium, the structure that is obtained after firing reveals a particularly homogeneous distribution of the crystal and glass phase. The In-ceram aluminium system had many problems, such as having weak tensile strength, and having low bonding strength due to the shrinking that occurs after firing. Because of the opaque finish of the metal frame, the two may look similar from the outside, but it is evident that there are differences between using a metal frame and In-ceram. VITA VM9 has been designed as a special ceramic featuring a fine structure or stabilized Zro2 substructures, and so the VITA VM9 excels in its light refraction and reflection behavior, which is similar to natural teeth. It also has outstanding chemical balance, which presents advantages such as considerably reduced accumulation of plaque on the ceramic surface.? This ultimately results in easier care and cleaning for the patient.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.243-249
• /
• 2001

Statement of the problem. The interest in all-ceramic restorations has increased as more techniques have become available. With the introduction of machinable dental ceramics and CAD/CAM systems or Copy-milling systems there is a need for evaluating the quality levels of these new fabrication techniques. Purpose. This study was to evaluate the fitting accuracy of machined all-ceramic crowns made out of an industrially prefabricated feldspathic porcelain. Material and Methods. Three master models with different cutting depth (0.8mm/1.0mm/1.2mm)were produced using a palladium-silver alloy. A total of 36 working dies, 12 of each form, was used for the modellation of prototype resin copings and 36 additional crowns, 12 of each cutting depth, were produced by using the $CEREC^{(R)}2$ system for all crowns. The maginal fit of all 72 crowns was then evaluated on their respective master die at 54 circularly staggered points of measurement per crown under a fixation pressure of 30 N by using a computerized video image system. Results. The medians of the copy-milled $CELAY^{(R)}$ crowns ranged from 29 to $36{\mu}m$. The highest value for the marginal gap was found in group B (cutting depth 1.0mm) at $107{\mu}m$. The median for the $CEREC^{(R)}2$ crowns was found between 43.5 and $70{\mu}m$. The maximum values for all three groups ranged from $181{\mu}m$ to $286{\mu}m$. With $286{\mu}m$ the highest value for marginal gap was found in group C. the Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple comparisons analysis procedure revealed a significant influence of the production technique on the marginal fit in all three groups (p<0,02). Conclusion. 1. The $CELAY^{(R)}$ system is capable to produce all-ceramic crowns with a significantly better marginal fit than the $CEREC^{(R)}2$ system. 2. As far as premolar crowns produced with the $CEREC^{(R)}2$ system are concerned, the cutting depth has a significant influence on fitting accuracy. 3. The production of crowns with an acceptable marginal fit is possible with both systems. However, adhesive luting is recommended for milled feldspathic porcelain crowns.