• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제49권
• /
• pp.545-566
• /
• 2011

This paper study on the effect of the removal or reduction of the tariff on Korea-India trade by CEPA between Korea & India and then examines the effects of increased exports & imports to Korea on India. Despite the analysis is based on data over a short period of time, this paper shows that CEPA between Korea & India has substantially increased Korean exports(42.7%) and imports(37%) to India in 2010. It is also shown that CEPA between Korea & India has had a considerable impact on market. As a result can be summarized as follows. The potential fields of expanding the trade between the two countries due to the tariff concessions of the removal or reduction. Consequently the effect of the removal or reduction of tariff will be low our expectation but CEPA between Korea & India would have a positive effect on Korea's exports to India in the long term. This paper has examined the impact of CEPA between Korea & India on general economy. It needs a further study to estimate trade diversion effect of CEPA and to find out the impacts on specific industry.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.107-129
• /
• 2010

본고는 국내 1,000개 중소기업에 대한 설문조사 자료를 바탕으로 한-인도 CEPA에 대한 관심도, 그 영향, 대인도 진출 가능성 등에 대한 국내 중소기업들의 인식도를 로짓 모형을 사용하여 분석해 보았다. 분석결과 국내 중소기업들은 근로자 수가 많을수록, 그리고 매출규모가 작을수록 한-인도 CEPA에 대하여 관심을 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 대인도 사업을 하고 있는 기업들이 대인도 사업을 하고 있지 않는 기업들보다 더 높은 관심을 보이면서 한-인도 CEPA 체결의 긍정적인 영향을 기대하는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만, 대인도 사업을 하고 있는 기업들은 한-인도 CEPA의 발효에도 불구하고 향후 대인도 사업을 확대해 나갈 의사가 상대적으로 적은 것으로 분석되었다. 이는 한-인도 CEPA 체결이 기업경영에 실질적인 영향을 미칠 가능성이 높지 않다고 국내 중소기업들은 평가하고 있기 때문인 것으로 분석된다. 따라서 국내 기업들의 CEPA에 대한 인식을 긍정적으로 바꾸고 한-인도 CEPA의 영향을 극대화하기 위해서는 정책 당국의 적극적인 정책적, 제도적 지원이 뒤따라야 할 것으로 보인다. 이를 위한 방법으로는 한-인도 CEPA에 대한 적극적 홍보, 국내 기업들에게 인도에 대한 정보 제공, 한-인도 양국 간 협력체제 구축을 통한 무역장벽 제거 노력 등을 들 수 있다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제48권
• /
• pp.101-125
• /
• 2010

CEPA(Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, hereinafter CEPA) between India and Korea may influence some changes on Korean pharmaceutical industry which shows less competitive advantages than Indian industry in many regards. So the purpose of this paper remains on suggesting the way of enhancing international competitiveness for Korean industry on the basis of double diamond model. Through the comprehensive and deep analysis, our findings on recommendable business strategies for Korea are as follows ; in terms of factor conditions, first, cooperative strategy in R&D for developing generics will be required. Second, Introduction of CMO business can be considered. In terms of demand condition, Korean firms should find out the chance for demand creation in Indian market which has future market potential and American market exploration, as soon as possible. With regards to strategy, structure and competition, trying M&A with leading Indian companies and utilizing well organized medical professionals in India will be considered. In the points of related and supportive parts, lastly, Korean government should try to make so called "National Strategic R&D committee" for pharmaceuticals and bring u-healthcare service to Korea in the first place. If Korean pharmaceutical industry implement above-mentioned strategies, CEPA can be turned into business opportunities from the crisis. As a result, Korean firms shall have more powerful global competitiveness eventually.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.391-412
• /
• 2010

As traditional import regulations have decreased all over the world in recent decades, the usage of "unconventional" trade protection measures has grown in the developing countries. In particular, antidumping investigations have risen rapidly and have growing in India and China. Therefore, this thesis aims to provide countermeasures to our government and Korean exporting companies by studying characteristics of antidumping. India is one of the most frequent initiators of antidumping cases by protecting their industries and impeding imports from FTA. This year, economic exchanges of Korea and India will be increasing by the conclusion of CEPA. This will lead to the increase of dispute by import regulations. Under such circumstances, to decrease Indian antidumping cases Korea will respond as follows. i)If antidumping laws, system and practice of India have injustice or are different from WTO rules, our government will have to indicate injustice and actively urge Indian government to make corrections. For example, they are continuous bilateral contact about the problems, fallacy of calculation of dumping margin, and intense investigations into cause and effect relationship and losses in dumping market, ect. ii)Our government should give more support to the small and medium exporting company which have difficulties in dealing with trade conflicts, counseling, arbitrating a lawyer. iii)Our government which is in control of domestic trade relief system should strengthen its investigation ability about new regulations and moniter import regulations of India. Over the long time, Korean companies need to export competitive advantage items of a higher value-added business and build solidarity by technology transfer. Accordingly, that will result in the decrease of trade dispute in India.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제55권
• /
• pp.265-290
• /
• 2012

CEPA (Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement) between India and Korea may vitalize Korean economy more and more. Currently most of Korean firms have entered into manufacturing industries like electronics and automobiles. But only a few Korean companies are trying to penetrate into Indian green industry so this paper suggest how to enter into Indian green industry, especially renewable energy sectors. First, Exporting main shaft, tower-flange and polysilicon products can be considered, as a first step of entry mode. Second, entry mode based on contract like technology licensing, strategic alliance and joint venture establishment can be also one of options. For example, Korean solar energy industry which show more competitiveness than that of Indians should try to make technological licensing on PV modules. In addition to this, they should also try to make joint ventures with right Indian partners and build up 'Solar City' nearby regions like Gurgaon in India where many Korean firms are located. Korean shipbuilding firms like Hyundai Engineering which keep on developing wind turbo engines can also try to make strategic alliance with Indian firms like Suzlon which has strong competitiveness. After that, they should explore Korean and Indian wind sector markets together. Third, brownfield investment can be last and final option as a entry mode as we consider the peculiar characteristics of renewable energy industry. Lastly, Korean government which are rush to indulge into green business should formulate more proper and realistic policies to give big incentives the concerned firms which are trying to open international green market so government should make Korean green firms not to lose good market opportunities related to green industry like renewable energy sectors. Renewable energy sectors are basically regarded as infrastructures so close contact to Indian central government as well as state government will be also required.