• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.148-153
• /
• 2012

Various biceps tenodesis techniques being used, make it difficult to compare the result of reports. First, the biceps tenodesis could be classified according to being performed by open incision or by the arthroscopic procedure. Second, it could be classified as a soft tissue and bony tenodesis according to the tissue which the long head of biceps is fixed with. Third, it could be classified as a proximal and distal tenodesis according to the location which the long head of biceps is fixed with. Fourth, it could be classified according to the implant (interference screw, suture anchor, knotless suture anchor). A decision should be suspended until an appropriate strength of tenodesis is revealed.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.82-86
• /
• 2023

Intraoperative periprosthetic humeral fractures are a rare but debilitating complication of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and can occur during multiple stages of the procedure. Prior biceps tenodesis has been found to reduce cortical humeral strength and predispose the patient to humeral fracture. We present a case of a 68-year-old female with a previous history of biceps tenodesis due to an irreparable rotator cuff tear. Months later, and after symptoms persisted, a reverse shoulder arthroplasty was performed. During the surgery and while performing final reduction, a fracture line was observed involving the hole used for the previous tenodesis procedure. The fracture was repaired, and the patient reported favorable outcomes. We report several factors that might have contributed to sustenance of this intraoperative fracture including prior biceps tenodesis, use of a press fit humeral stem, and the sex of the patient. Level of evidence: V.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2009.03a
• /
• pp.83-84
• /
• 2009

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2001.03a
• /
• pp.123-128
• /
• 2001

in young, active, strenuous patients $\blacksquare$ stabilization for unstable SLAP lesion $\blacksquare$ tenodesis for ruptured biceps tendon above the groove $\blacksquare$ repair for ruptured biceps tendon below the groove $\blacksquare$ relocation for biceps instability in old, inactive patients $\blacksquare$ no need stabilization for unstable SLAP lesion $\blacksquare$ debride/tenotomy for partial ruptured biceps tendon $\blacksquare$ leave alone/trimming of stump for complete ruptured biceps tendon $\blacksquare$ tenodesis/in-site fixation for biceps instability

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.7-13
• /
• 2010

Purpose: Our purpose was to retrospectively analyze clinical results of subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon using an interference screw. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 23 cases of patients receiving tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon between January 2008 and January 2009 for whom we had follow-up data for at least 1 year. Twenty-three cases were operated on using subpectoral tenodesis; 16 of these cases had a rotator cuff tear. The results were judged using a visual analog scale (VAS), ASES, tenderness on the biceps groove, fixation failure and the degree of deformity (BAD). Results: VAS and ASES scores were significantly improved in all patients by the time of the final observation. There were no significant complications or fixation failures. The patients without a tear of the rotator cuff had a better result than patients with a tear of the rotator cuff, but the difference between the two groups was not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: In patients with pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii, benefits of subpectoral interference screw tenodesis include pain relief, maintenance of functional biceps, muscle strength, and cosmesis. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis using interference screw fixation appears to be a promising, reproducible, reliable technique for addressing anterior shoulder pain related to pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.24-29
• /
• 2012

Purpose: To evaluate follow-up after the clinical results of arthroscopic assisted tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon using an interference screw. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 30 cases of patients receiving tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon between January, 2008 and January, 2010 who treated with arthroscope. The results were judged by VAS, ASES, tenderness in the biceps groove, fixation failure and the degree of deformity. Results: VAS, ASES scores increased by a statistically significant during the final observation in all patients than before surgery (p<0.05). For those with rotator cuff tear had low ASES results (p<0.05), respectively. But, tenderness in the biceps groove was 17% (5 cases), pepeye deformity and incresead BAD (biceps apex distance) were 10% (3 cases). Conclusion: Arthroscopic tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon using an interference screw to patients with proximal lesion in their biceps tendon, can achieve good results, but it is possible to groove tenderness and popeye deformity.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.64-71
• /
• 2010

Purpose: To evaluate pathologic patterns and outcomes of treatment of a biceps tendon lesion associated with a rotator cuff tear. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 92 patients (i) who underwent surgery for a cuff tear, (ii) for whom the biceps lesion could be observed retrospectively, and (iii) had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The pathology of biceps tendon was classified into 4 types: tenosynovitis, fraying or hypertrophy, tear, and instability. All but the 4 with massive cuff tears were repaired. The biceps lesions were treated with debridement in 30, tenotomy in 10, tenodesis in 8, and recentering in 4. UCLA scoring was used for clinical results. Results: Seventy patients had a biceps lesion, 19 tenosynovitis, 22 fraying or hypertrophy, 21 a tear, and 8 instability. A biceps lesion was observed in 63% of cases of cuff tears below the medium size, and in 88% of cases with cuff tears above the large size. UCLA scores according to the pathology of the biceps lesion were 29.6 in the absence of a biceps lesion, and 28.3 in its presence. UCLA scores in patients with tenotomy or tenodesis for associated biceps tendon lesions were 28.2. Conclusion: There is a greater incidence and severity of a biceps lesion with a larger cuff tear. Therefore, the cause of a biceps lesion might be related to the cause of the cuff tear. Among the several options of treatment for biceps lesion, tenotomy or tenodesis may be particularly effective in providing pain relief.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.101-105
• /
• 2022

Background: Rotator cuff tears cause pathologies of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). One of the surgical treatments for such a tear is LHBT tenodesis to the humerus. This study aims to compare simultaneous rotator cuff repair and LHBT tenodesis with or without detachment of the proximal end of the LHBT (PELHBT) from its site of adhesion to the glenoid. Methods: This retrospective study involved patients affected by LHBT pathology with rotator cuff tear. The patients were divided into two groups, with or without PELHBT detachment from the glenoid. Therapeutic outcomes were investigated by evaluation of patient satisfaction, pain based on visual analog scale, shoulder function based on Constant score and simple shoulder test, and biceps muscle strength based on the manual muscle testing grading system before surgery, at 6 months, and at the final visit after surgery. Results: Groups 1 and 2 comprised 23 and 26 patients, respectively, who showed no significant differences in demographic characteristics (p>0.05). Shoulder function, biceps muscle strength, pain, and satisfaction rate improved over time (p<0.05) but were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). No post-surgical complication was found in either group. Conclusions: There was no difference in final outcomes of tenodesis with or without detachment of the PELHBT from the supraglenoid tubercle. Such tendon detachment is not necessary.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.94-99
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic biceps long head suprapectoral tenodesis using an interference screw. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the cases of 30 patients who underwent arthroscopic biceps long head suprapectoral tenodesis using an interference screw between January 2008 and January 2010. The minimum follow up period was one year. Twenty patients had rotator cuff tears. The results were analyzed by VAS, ASES, tenderness in the bicipital groove, fixation failure, and the degree of deformity. Results: VAS, ASES scores showed a statistically significant increase during the final observation in all patients, compared with those before surgery. However, five patients (17%) had anterior shoulder pain and tenderness in the biceps groove, and three patients (10%) had Popeye deformity. Better results were achieved in patients without rotator cuff tear than in patients with rotator cuff tear (p<0.05). Conclusion: Arthroscopic biceps long head tenodesis above the pectoralis major using an interference screw in patients with a pathologic lesion of the proximal biceps tendon showed good results at the last follow up. However, further study for tenderness in the biceps groove in 17% of patients is needed.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2004.03a
• /
• pp.67-73
• /
• 2004