• Title/Summary/Keyword: Bibliographic description area

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

A Study on the Description Elements of the Colophon in Chinese Books (중국의 도서 판권기 기술요소 고찰)

  • Lee, Myoung-Gyu
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.44 no.3
    • /
    • pp.359-378
    • /
    • 2013
  • This study arranged the function and role of colophon and looked around the history, relevant laws, and description elements of books issued in China. According to the colophon of books issued from China, all colophon have copyrights and description elements in common. Colophon is that we recorded the bibliographic area of the proper book in special place, namely the inside of the cover. Besides, the colophon additionally includes necessary bibliographic areas depending on the development of publishing technology and transition of publishing environment. This colophon is offered as useful sources of information when librarians want to make up the catalog in the library.

A Study on the Descriptive Cataloging Rules of Looseleaf Publications - Focussed on CRLP2 Analysis- (가제식출판물의 기술목록규칙 연구 -CRDLP2분석을 중심으로-)

  • Yun Hee-Ynn
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.20
    • /
    • pp.437-472
    • /
    • 1991
  • Looseleaf publications are truly a unique type of library material, partaking simultaneously of the nature of serials and monographs. Therefors, two disparate methods of cataloging looseleaf publications coexist today. But the decision to catalog looseleaf publications as serials as monographs affects the acquisition, budget allocation, receipt, record maintenance, and user access. In view of these aspects, this study analyzed the sources of information and seven areas of description (title and statement of responsibility ; edition ; publication, distribution, etc. ; physical description; series ; note ; standard number and terms of availability) of CRDLP2 as the exclusive cataloging rules of looseleaf publications. The results of the analysis were summarized in chapter 4 in detail. Finally, it is desirable that looseleaf publications for updationg are cataloged as monographs since the bibliographic description applied to looseleaf publications follows so colosely that of monographs. And, the cataloger must pay partioular attention to describe the physical description area because of numerous changes of the bibliographic records accompanied by frequent revisions or updates of the publications.

  • PDF

A Study on the Improvement of the Descriptive Form of the Edition and Impression in the Korean Cataloguing Rule (한국목록규칙에서 판과 쇄의 서지요소 기술형식 개선안 연구)

  • Lee, Myounggyu
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.52 no.3
    • /
    • pp.217-238
    • /
    • 2021
  • The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of describing bibliographic elements such as edition, impression, and year of publication in the current Cataloging Rules, and to present improvements to the KCR and the KORMARC Format. According to changes in the information technology environment in the library, the level and scope of the cataloging that can be provided to users should be adjusted. As data is diversified and descriptive method of metadata develops, the development of bibliographic elements and the change of the descriptive method are changing the framework of the existing standardization. As a research method, we will examine the concept of edition and impression, examine the transition process of description of edition and impression targeting KCR. And we would like to present the methods of bibliographic description to be added or modified through cataloging examples, and examine the format reflected in KORMARC. This study is intended to be limited to the descriptive form of books. The bibliographic elements of the entry in the library must be fully consistent with the bibliographic elements of the material to be catalogued. This study suggests an improvement to the cataloging rules. First, the edition of the cataloging rules shall describe the edition statement and the impression statement. In addition, the description of the year of publication describes the latest year, not the first year of publication of the edition of the material to be catalogued. The descriptive scope of the year of publication is extended to the month of publication. Second, in the KORMARC format, the description of impression in edition statement is given to the identifier in the 250 field, and is numerically described as the second impression. When presenting the month and year of publication, one identifier in the field 260 describes the year of publication and the other identifier describes the month of publication. The description for the month and year of publication is stated the latest month and year on the title page and the colophon of the publication.

A Comparative Study on the Edition Statement in Bibliographic Description (서지기술에 있어 판사항에 관한 비교연구)

  • Kim Jeong-Hyen
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.38 no.4
    • /
    • pp.149-166
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study make comparative analysis of the cataloging rules on the edition area included in the KCR4, NCR(2001), AACR2R, ISBD(M), and ISBD(ER). There is a delicate difference between the cataloging rules. The main features on the edition are as the follows. (1) In the bibliography description the concept of the edition is a general application. That is to say, the edition construct the new edition and the impression. The former comes the purview of a change content, the size, and a printing type. The latter publish newly- (2) The requisite for description of the edition area consists of a edition statement, statements of responsibility relating to the edition, additional edition statement, and statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement. Voluntary rules transcribe the parallel edition statement. (3) In the case of the electronic materials special versions on content and Auction indicates as the edition, but the environment of software does not indicate as it. (4) Parallel statement of responsibility relating to the edition, parallel additional edition statements, and parallel statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement are voluntary rules or not transcribed in the edition area.

A Study on the Characteristics and Considerations of Bibliographic Description of ISBD Consolidated edition 2011 (ISBD 통합판의 서지기술 특징 및 고려사항에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Mihwa
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.46 no.4
    • /
    • pp.169-188
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of the bibliographic description of ISBD Consolidated edition published in 2011 and to grasp the considerations in applying the rules of ISBD consolidated edition to KCR4. For achieving this, the four aspects were analyzed such as the description area and data elements, the resource types, the punctuation, and the order of the elements of ISBD Consolidated edition(2011). The characteristics of ISBD Consolidated edition are as follows. First, the content form and the media type area are added in new 0 area and elements are designated by mandatory to confirm to FRBR. Second, content form, content qualification and media type replaced GMD in title and statement of responsibility area. Third, the prescribed punctuations were retained even when this results in double punctuation, and individual square brackets were preferred than entire square brackets when using square brackets to all elements in same area. Fourth, the order of elements in description was set out by patterns of data elements in areas, therefore could reduce the confusion of the order of elements. ISBD Consolidated edition as an international standard would make various rules to maintain the uniformity, but also respects the bibliographic practices of individual countries. Therefore, each country must revise its own rule to conform the ISBD Consolidated edition as well as reflect its unique situation. In Korea, since KCR4 was developed based on the previous edition of ISBD, it should be revised to confirm to the ISBD Consolidated edition. Therefore, this study is expected to contribute to the revision of KCR4.

A study on the material designation in library cataloging (목록에서의 자료종별표시에 관한 연구)

  • 이창수
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.25
    • /
    • pp.377-404
    • /
    • 1996
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate material designation in library cataloging and to suggest General Material Designation (GMD) and Specific Material Designation(SMD) in Korean. A summary of the study follows. In library cataloging, methods of indicating the type of material are : (1) color-coding, (2) media code as part of the call number, (3) material designation in physical description area or note area, (4) GMD and SMD. GMD is a term indicating the broad class of material to which a bibliographic item belongs. SMD is a term indicating the special class of material to which a bibliographic item belongs. GMD was listed in parenthesis following the title proper before AACR1975 code, but currently it is listed in square brackets after the AACR1975 code. AACR2 was the standard cataloging rule in GMD and SMD terminology. It is suggested that GMD be used in Korean for graphic material, sound recordings, drawings, microform, multimedia, videorecordings, manuscripts, photographs, slides, printed music, motion pictures, printed texts, objects, braille, cartographic materials, computer files and transparenies.

  • PDF

A Study on the Characteristics and Bibliographic Description with ISBD(CR) (ISBD(CR)의 특성과 서지기술에 관한 연구)

  • 김정현
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.34 no.3
    • /
    • pp.147-167
    • /
    • 2003
  • Due to rapid internet supply and the increase of electronic resources including network resources, there has been a sudden change in cataloguing fields. To deal with rapid changes, IFLA revised cataloguing rules for electronic and continuing resources; ISBD(ER) and ISBD(CR). This study is to analyze activities of IFLA and ISBD(CR), expecially in regards with concepts of continuing resources, new categories of bibliographic materials, major or minor changes in title proper, basis of the description, material specific area, definition of a new terminologies, changes in AACR2R 2002 revision and MARC 21 coding, and issues concerned with revision of KCR 4 and KORMARC.

  • PDF

A Study on the Separation of Descriptive Levels for Enhancing the Applicability of BIBFRAME (BIBFRAME 적용성 향상을 위한 기술 수준 구분에 관한 연구)

  • Yim, Suin;Lee, Seungmin
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.54 no.3
    • /
    • pp.165-186
    • /
    • 2020
  • Although BIBFRAME is recognized as a new bibliographic standard that can replace the existing MARC structure, the vastness of the descriptive items shows many limitations to be applied in library communities. Thus this study proposed separating the descriptive levels of BIBFRAME as a way to enhance the applicability of BIBFRAME. The descriptive level of BIBFRAME was divided into three stages: core, standard, and detailed levels based on the bibliographic area of ISBD 2011. This separation was semantically implemented using RDF/RDFS syntax. The levels of description in BIBFRAME was defined as Class Granularity and Class Element, and the Property Relation was defined for the linkage between the Classes defined and the BIBFRAME. By applying this syntactic structure, the relationships between the BIBFRAME descriptive items separated by each descriptive level could be linked with each other. This approach is expected to ensure applicability in the creation and sharing of bibliographic data using BIBFRAME.

Comparative Analysis on Descriptive Rules of RDA and KCR4 (RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구)

  • Park, Jin-Hee
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.40 no.2
    • /
    • pp.111-138
    • /
    • 2009
  • The Joint Steering Committee represented final draft of RDA that can be replaced for AACR3 on November third in 2008. RDA is aiming at standard of international cataloging rules fo the purpose of providing the bibliographic description and the access point of all media, and when it will be realized, KCR4 4th edtion have to revised to following up it. This study analyzes both cataloging rules of RDA and KCR4 in each area of KCR 4th edition. As a result, it present the points to take into consideration as revising KCR4.

  • PDF

Comparative Analysis on the Cataloging Rules of the Monographic Publications in KCR4 & KCR3.1 (KCR4와 KCR3.1의 단행본관련 목록규칙에 관한 비교분석)

  • Kang Mia-Hye
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.38 no.3
    • /
    • pp.141-157
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study campares and analyzes the cataloging rules of the monographic publications included in the 4th edition of the Korean Cataloging Rules(KCR) & the 1st revision of the 3rd edition of the KCR. Especially it focuses on the different rules applied for the same specified areas, such as Title & Statement of Responsibility Area, Edition Area, Material Specific Details Area, Publication. Distribution, Etc., Area, etc. As a result, this analysis can be useful for cataloging monographic publications and so that the KCR4 will remain a viable standard for bibliographic description and access into the future.