• 제목/요약/키워드: Antiemetic

검색결과 52건 처리시간 0.026초

Perioperative Hypertension Management during Facelift under Local Anesthesia with Intravenous Hypnotics

  • Chung, Ki Ho;Cho, Myeong Soo;Jin, Hoon
    • Archives of Plastic Surgery
    • /
    • 제44권4호
    • /
    • pp.276-282
    • /
    • 2017
  • Perioperative hypertension is a phenomenon in which a surgical patient's blood pressure temporarily increases throughout the preoperative and postoperative periods and remains high until the patient's condition stabilizes. This phenomenon requires immediate treatment not only because it is observed in a majority of patients who are not diagnosed with high blood pressure, but also because occurs in patients with underlying essential hypertension who show a sharp increase in their blood pressure. The most common complication following facelift surgery is hematoma, and the most critical risk factor that causes hematoma is elevated systolic blood pressure. In general, a systolic blood pressure goal of <150 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure goal of >65 mm Hg are recommended. This article discusses the causes of increased blood pressure and the treatment methods for perioperative hypertension during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods, in order to find ways to maintain normal blood pressure in patients during surgery. Further, in this paper, we review the causes of perioperative hypertension, such as anxiety, epinephrine, pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. The treatment methods for perioperative hypertension are analyzed according to the following 3 operative periods, with a review of the characteristics and interactions of each drug: preoperative antihypertensive medicine (atenolol, clonidine, and nifedipine), intraoperative intravenous (IV) hypnotics (propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine), and postoperative antiemetic medicine (metoclopramide and ondansetron). This article focuses on the knowledge necessary to safely apply local anesthesia with IV hypnotics during facelift surgery without the assistance of an anesthesiologist.

경피적 Scopolamine 부착제제가 경막외 Morphine 사용후 동반되는 구역과 구토에 미치는 영향 (Therapeutic Effect of Transdermal Scopolamine Patch on Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Epidural Morphine)

  • 우남식
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제2권2호
    • /
    • pp.194-197
    • /
    • 1989
  • Epidural morphine provides excellent analgesia for the management of postoperative pain, but nausea and vomiting are a commonly reported side effect. Scopolamine, a belladona alkaloid, is an effective antiemetic when nausea is induced by morphine. Transdermal scopolamine patches have the advantage of delivering a constant low dosage of the drug over a prolonged period. To evaluate the efficacy of prophylacitic transdermal scopolamine in reducing nausea or vomiting associated with postoperative epidural morphine analgesia, I studied 60 healthy adult patients. The patients were divided into 3 groups, each group consisting of 20 patients. Group 1; no scopolamine for control Group 2; transdermal scopolamine placebo patch Group 3; transdermal scopolamine patch All patients were anesthetized by epidural injection of 2% lidocaine 15 ml and 0.5% bupivacaine 10 ml with morphine 4 mg. A Comparison with the control group, the placebo group, and Group 3, indicated, that the transdermal scopolamine reduced the incidence of nausea or vomiting associated with postoperative epidural morphine analgesia (group 1; 35%, group 2; 25%, group 3; 10%). However there were no statistically significant differences between groups at a level of p>0.05.

  • PDF

생강추출물의 항위염 . 항궤양 작용 (Antigastritic and Antiulcerative Action of the Extract of Zingiberis Rhizoma)

  • 양원경;정춘식;정기화;김재완;이은방
    • 약학회지
    • /
    • 제36권2호
    • /
    • pp.173-179
    • /
    • 1992
  • The rhizoma of Zingiber officinale has been used as antiemetic, expectorants, stomachache relieving drugs and digestive accelerators. From the observation of antigastritic action of the methanol extract of the rhizoma, it was fractionated with hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and butanol, followed by bioassay on antigastritic and antiulcerative activity. The hexane and the chloroform fraction reduced significantly HCl ethanol induced gastric lesion at the dose of 370 and 210 mg/kg, p.o., respectively. On the gastric ulceration and gastric secretion in pylorus-ligated rats, the hexane fraction decreased the volume of gastric secretion and acid output, and also increased pH at the dose of 370 mg/kg, i.d.. It showed considerable curative ratio of acetic acid induced ulcer without inhibition of indomethacin induced gastric lesion. The methanol extract showed low acute toxicity with minimum lethal dose of more than 3000 mg/kg, p.o. in mice. In conclusion, Zingiberis rhizoma exhibited antigastric and antiulcerative activity which might be attributable to inhibition of gastric secretion. It is revealed that the active component may be present in the hexane fraction.

  • PDF

생강의 약물대사효소 CYP3A4 저해 성분 (The Inhibitory Constituents from the Ginger on a Drug Metabolizing Enzyme CYP3A4)

  • 차배천;이은희;권준택
    • 약학회지
    • /
    • 제48권5호
    • /
    • pp.266-271
    • /
    • 2004
  • Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) is widely used as a common condiment for a variety of foods and beverages. In addition to its extensive utilization as a spice, the fresh or the processed rhizome is a useful crude drug in traditional Chinese medicine. It is considered to possess stomachic, carminative, stimulant, diuretic and antiemetic properties. Chemical studies on the pungent principles of ginger have been carried out by a number of investigators, and 6-gingerol and 6-shogaol as a major pungent substance have been isolated. In this study, the constituents inhibiting a drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4 from ginger were investigated. CYP3A4 is responsible for drug metabolism as heme-containing monooxygenases. As a result of experiment, 10-gingerol (lC$_{50}$ 5.75$\mu$M) isolated from EtOAc extract of ginger showed remarkable inhibitory activity compared to 6-gingerol ($IC_{50}$/ 14.56 $\mu$M) and zingerone ($IC_{50}$/ 379.63 $\mu$M). This paper describes the isolation, structure elucidation, and CYP3A4 inhibitory activity of these compounds. The structure of the compounds were identified by instrumental analysis such as LC-mass spectrometer and NMR.R.

Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ramosetron for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Decompression : A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Koo, Chang-Hoon;Ji, So Young;Bae, Yu Kyung;Jeon, Young-Tae;Ryu, Jung-Hee;Han, Jung Ho
    • Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
    • /
    • 제65권6호
    • /
    • pp.853-860
    • /
    • 2022
  • Objective : This prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic ramosetron administration against postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD). Methods : In this study, 100 patients undergoing MVD were randomly allocated to the control (normal saline, 2 mL) or ramosetron (ramosetron, 0.3 mg) groups at the end of surgery. The incidence and severity of PONV, need for rescue antiemetics, patient satisfaction score, duration of hospital stay, and the occurrence of adverse events were evaluated 48 hours post-surgery. Results : Data obtained from 97 patients were included in the final analysis. The incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the ramosetron group than in the control group throughout the 48-hour postoperative period (29.2% vs. 51.0%, p=0.028). A similar trend was observed with regard to PONV severity (p=0.041). The need for rescue antiemetics, satisfaction score, duration of hospital stays, and the occurrence of adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion : Prophylactic ramosetron administration reduced the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing MVD without causing serious adverse events. Thus, ramosetron use may improve patient recovery following MVD.

Safety of hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients

  • Taegyeom, Kim;Keoungah, Kim;Seungoh, Kim;Jongbin, Kim
    • Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
    • /
    • 제22권6호
    • /
    • pp.395-404
    • /
    • 2022
  • Hydroxyzine is one of the most popular oral sedatives used in pediatric dentistry. This study aimed to investigate the safety and possible side effects of sedation using hydroxyzine in pediatric dentistry. "Hydroxyzine," "Dental sedation," "Child," and "Safety" and their associated synonyms were searched using the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, KISS, KMBASE, and KoreaMed databases. Academic information and portals of DBpia and RISS were also perused. Altogether, 340 papers were found, among which a total of 24 papers were selected according to the detailed criteria. Nine studies used hydroxyzine as monotherapy, and 10 studies compared its safety when hydroxyzine used as multitherapy. In addition, seven studies employed a drug regimen wherein hydroxyzine was one of the components. All these studies revealed that the adverse events specific to hydroxyzine usage were drowsiness and dryness of the mouth, and that there were respiratory complications due to a synergistic reaction of hydroxyzine. Although classified as a histamine blocker, hydroxyzine with its sedative, antiemetic, anticonvulsant, and anticholinergic properties is an oral sedative available without serious adverse events, If the proper dosage of the drug is used and its synergistic effects with other drugs are ascertained in the route of administration.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia for oral and maxillofacial surgery

  • Apipan, Benjamas;Rummasak, Duangdee;Wongsirichat, Natthamet
    • Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
    • /
    • 제16권4호
    • /
    • pp.273-281
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common postoperative complications. Despite this, few papers have reported the incidence and independent risk factors associated with PONV in the context of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). Therefore, we sought to determine the incidence of PONV, as well as to identify risk factors for the condition in patients who had undergone OMFS under general anesthesia. Methods: A total of 372 patients' charts were reviewed, and the following potential risk factors for PONV were analyzed: age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, history of PONV and/or motion sickness, duration of anesthesia, amount of blood loss, nasogastric tube insertion and retention and postoperative opioid used. Univariate analysis was performed, and variables with a P-value less than 0.1 were entered into a multiple logistic regression analysis, wherein P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The overall incidence of PONV was 25.26%. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the following variables were independent predictors of PONV: age < 30 years, history of PONV and/or motion sickness, and anesthesia duration > 4 h. Furthermore, the number of risk factors was proportional to the incidence of PONV. Conclusions: The incidence of PONV in patients who have undergone OMFS varies from center to center depending on patient characteristics, as well as on anesthetic and surgical practice. Identifying the independent risk factors for PONV will allow physicians to optimize prophylactic, antiemetic regimens.

Morphine 정주를 이용한 술후 통증 조절시 진토제 일회 정주의 지속적 항오심 및 항구토 효과 (Continuous Antiemetic Effects of Single Intravenous Injection of Antiemetics during Postoperative Pain Control with Morphine)

  • 최기선;안치홍;박성식;임동건;백운이;박진웅
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.42-47
    • /
    • 1997
  • Background : This study was designed to evaluate the continuous effects of single intravenous injection of antiemetics on nausea and vomiting during continuous morphine injection for postoperative pain control. Methods : Prior to the study, we divided patients into two major groups according to the type of surgery performed intra-abdominal(Open: O) and non intra-abdominal(Close: C). When patients regained orientation after routine general anesthesia, enflurane-$O_2-N_2O$, we injected bolus dose of morphine and started continuous injection of morphine for postoperative pain control(Group I; Control). After bolus injection and just before continuous injection, we injected single dose of droperidol(Group II) or ondansetron(Group III). Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, pain score and symptom-therapy score were checked at 10 minutes, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36 hours after continuous morphine injection. Results : The pain score of group III was lower than group II(10 min.) and group I(24, 36 hours) in the open group. Symptom-therapy score of group III(10 min., 4, 24 hours) and group II(10 min.) were lower than group I in the open group. In the close group, symptom-therapy score of group III(8 hours) was lower than group I. Conclusions : Single intravenous injection of antiemetics have a tendency of lowering symptom-therapy score for 36 hours in spite of their relatively short elimination half-life.

  • PDF

술후 경막외 Morphine으로 인한 오심 및 구토에 대한 경막외 Droperidol과 Metoclopramide의 효과 비교 (Comparison of Epidural Droperidol and Metoclopramide for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Epidural Morphine)

  • 박진우;이상화;정순호;최영균;신치만;박주열;김영재
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제11권1호
    • /
    • pp.86-90
    • /
    • 1998
  • Background: There are no controlled studies assessing the effect of metoclopramide and droperidol administered epidurally for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. This study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of continuous epidural metoclopramide and droperidol in reducing nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. Methods: Ninty patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery were randomly assigned to one of three study groups; Group A(n=30) patients received continuous infusion of epidural morphine(6.0 mg/day) following a bolus loading dose of 3.0 mg; Group B(n=30), epidural mixture of morphine and droperidol(5.0 mg/day) following a bolus loading dose(morphine 3.0 mg, droperidol 1.5 mg); Group C, (n=30), epidural mixture of morphine and metoclopramide(20 mg/day) following a bolus loading dose(morphine 3.0 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg). For the 24 postoperative hours, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, degree of pain, level of sedation and other adverse effects were evaluated. Results: Incidence of nausea and vomiting, and number of patients who required antiemetic therapy were significantly less in Group B and C than in Group A(P<0.05). Patients in Group A and C were less sedated than those in Group B. Conclusions: We conclude metoclopramide is more effective than droperidol for postoperative nausea and vomiting due to its lower of sedative effect.

  • PDF

Can Granisetron Injection Used as Primary Prophylaxis Improve the Control of Nausea and Vomiting with Low-Emetogenic Chemotherapy?

  • Keat, Chan Huan;Phua, Gillian;Kassim, Mohd Shainol Abdul;Poh, Wong Kar;Sriraman, Malathi
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.469-473
    • /
    • 2013
  • Background: The purpose of this study is to examine the risk of uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among patients receiving low emetogenic chemotherapy (LEC) with and without granisetron injection as the primary prophylaxis in addition to dexamethasone and metochlopramide. Materials and Methods: This was a single-centre, prospective cohort study. A total of 96 patients receiving LEC (52 with and 42 without granisetron) were randomly selected from the full patient list generated using the e-Hospital Information System (e-His). The rates of complete control (no CINV from days 1 to 5) and complete response (no nausea or vomiting in both acute and delayed phases) were identified through patient diaries which were adapted from the MASCC Antiemesis Tool (MAT). Selected covariates including gender, age, active alcohol consumption, morning sickness and previous chemotherapy history were controlled using the multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: Both groups showed significant difference with LEC regimens (p<0.001). No differences were found in age, gender, ethnic group and other baseline characteristics. The granisetron group indicated a higher complete response rate in acute emesis (adjusted OR: 0.1; 95%CI 0.02-0.85; p=0.034) than did the non-granisetron group. Both groups showed similar complete control and complete response rates for acute nausea, delayed nausea and delayed emesis. Conclusions: Granisetron injection used as the primary prophylaxis in LEC demonstrated limited roles in CINV control. Optimization of the guideline-recommended antiemetic regimens may serve as a less costly alternative to protect patients from uncontrolled acute emesis.