• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2022년도 봄 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.31-32
• /
• 2022

The construction industry has more safety accidents than other industries. Although there have been more attempts to reduce safety hazards in the industry such as the enforcement of the "Serious Accidents Punishment Act (SAPA)", construction accident has not been reduced enough. In this study, analysis of safety risk factors has been made through Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)-based topic modeling. Risk analysis in construction site would be improved with natural language processing and topic modeling.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제58권
• /
• pp.59-98
• /
• 2013

Risk of loss is a term used in the law of contracts to determine which party should bear the burden of risk for damage occurring to goods after the sale has been completed, but before delivery has occurred. Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), there are four risk of loss rules, in order of application. First, it is agreement that is the agreement of the parties controls. Second, the breaching party is liable for any uninsured loss even though breach is unrelated to the problem. Hence, if the breach is the time of delivery, and the goods show up broken, then the breaching rule applies risk of loss on the seller. Third, the delivery by common carrier other than by seller is necessary: Risk of loss shifts from seller to buyer at the time that seller completes its delivery obligations; If it is a destination contract, then risk of loss is on the seller; If it is a delivery contract, then the risk of loss is on the buyer. Fourth, if the seller is a merchant, then the risk of loss shifts to the buyer upon buyer's receipt of the goods. If the buyer never takes possession, then the seller still has the risk of loss. This paper discusses problems of risk of loss under the American law. Specifically, this paper focuses on the interpretation of UCC sections and analysis of various cases. By comparing, also, UCC and Korean law, the paper proposes some implications of risk of loss issues for Korean law.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.338-343
• /
• 2013

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) as a delivery method fully capitalizes on an integrated project team that takes advantage of the knowledge of all team members to maximize project outcomes. IPD is currently the highest form of collaboration available because all three core project stakeholders, owner, designer and contractor, are aligned to the same purpose. Compared with traditional project delivery approaches such as Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Design-Build (DB), and CM at-Risk, IPD is distinguished in that it eliminates the adversarial nature of the business by encouraging transparency, open communication, honesty and collaboration among all project stakeholders. The team appropriately shares the project risk and reward. Sharing reward is easy, while it is hard to fairly share a failure. So the compensation structure and the contingency in IPD are very different from those in traditional delivery methods and they are expected to encourage motivation, inspiration and creativity of all project stakeholders to achieve project success. This paper investigates the compensation structure in IPD and provides a method to determine the proper level of contingency allocation to reduce the risk of cost overrun. It also proposes a method in which contingency could be used as a functional monetary incentive when established to produce the desired level of collaboration in IPD. Based on the compensation structure scenario discovered, a probabilistic contingency calculation model was created by evaluating the random nature of changes and various risk drivers. The model can be used by the IPD team to forecast the probability of the cost overrun and equip the IPD team with confidence to really enjoy the benefits of collaborative team work.

• 한국전산구조공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전산구조공학회 2005년도 춘계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.607-615
• /
• 2005

In this study ship collision risk analysis is performed to determine the design vessel for collision impact analysis of the bridge. Method I in AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications is a semi-deterministic analysis procedure for determining the design vessel. Method ll which is a more complicated probability based analysis procedure is used to select the design vessel for collision impact. The AF allocation by weights seems to be more reasonable than the pylon concentration allocation method because AF allocation by weights takes the design parameter characteristics quantitatively into consideration although the pylon concentration allocation method brings more economical results when the overestimated design collision strength of piers compared to the strength of pylon is moderately modified. Therefore more researches on the allocation model of AF and the selection of design vessel are required.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.444-450
• /
• 2013

Public private partnership (PPP) procurement was introduced into Singapore in 2003, and 10 PPP projects was successfully completed and have been in operation. The objective of this study is to identify the critical risk factors and risk allocation preferences for PPP projects in Singapore. To achieve this objective, a comprehensive literature review was carried out and 42 risks were identified and grouped into three meta levels, i.e. macro, meso and micro levels. The questionnaire survey produced 48 completed questionnaires from 48 different contractors. The survey results indicated that 23 risk factors had significantly high criticalities and that four macro-level risks, four meso-level risks and two micro-level risks were among the top 10 risk ranking. "Lack of support from government", "availability of finance" and "construction time delay" were perceived as the top three critical risks. Also, the result implied that micro-level risks had a higher criticality mean score than macro-level and meso-level risks. The findings of this study help both public and private sectors to better understand the risks and their allocation in PPP projects, providing valuable information for organizations that intend to participate in PPP projects in Singapore.

• 충청수학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.343-349
• /
• 2013

The optimal portfolio selection problem under inflation risk is considered in this paper. There are three assets the economic agent can invest, which are a risk free bond, an index bond and a risky asset. By applying the martingale method, the optimal consumption rate and the optimal portfolios for each asset are obtained explicitly.

• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.25-36
• /
• 2015

Objective : This study aims to evaluate a risk of bias by Risk of Bias tool and RoBANS(Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Study) tool for clinical trial papers proving treatment effect of herbs to alopecia and provides the newest reason of effectiveness of herbs to alopecia. Methos : Data were collected through electronic database including NDSL, KISS, KMBASE, Koreantk, OASIS, KoreaMed, KISTI, Pubmd, Cochrane CENTRAL and CINAHL. Two experts in Oriental Medince assessed risk of bias of randomized controlled trials by Cochrane group's Risk of Bias tool and non-randomized controlled trials by RoBANS tool after searching, reviewing and selecting papers. Results : Total number of selected trials is 20 including 4 randomized controlled trials, 13 non-randomized controlled trials and 3 case reports. This study evaluates the risk of bias of 17 papers including 4 randomized controlled trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials except 3 case reports by risk of bias tool and RoBANS tool. All papers of randomized controlled trials are evaluated unclear for random sequence generation and allocation concealment as there are no word on them. And all papers of non-randomized controlled trials are evaluated unclear for blinding of outcome assessments and relatively low for others. Conclusion : We must try to specify concretely methods of allocation concealment after planning and practicing it for reducing a selection bias in randomized controlled trials. Also report a reason of missing value and blinding outcome assessments. And we have to agonize and mention methods of blinding of researchers for reducing a detection bias in non-randomized controlled trials.

• 한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.283-290
• /
• 2016

최근 과학 기술이 발전함에 따라 복잡한 문제를 해결하기 위하여 고성능의 계산 자원이 필요하게 되었다. 이러한 요구를 충족시키기 위하여 지역적으로 분산되어 있는 이질적인 고성능 컴퓨팅 자원을 하나로 묶어 거대한 시스템을 구성하는 그리드 컴퓨팅에 대한 연구가 활발하게 이루어지고 있다. 하지만 제한된 자원 안에서 최대한의 결과를 얻어내기 위한 프로세스, 실시간 작업의 총 실행시간을 정확하게 예측할 수 있는 스케줄링 정책이 미흡한 실정이다. 이러한 문제점을 해결하기 위해, 본 논문에서는 시스템 효율성 증대를 위한 시스템 구조, 프로세스를 도출하고, 그리드 컴퓨팅 기반의 작업 방법론 도출, 자원(Agent)의 작업에 대한 문제점을 효율적으로 관리할 수 있는 위험 정책 모듈, 자원 할당 및 문제되는 자원들을 재할당 할 수 있는 스케줄링 기법 및 할당 기법, 자원(Agent) 모니터링을 효율적으로 관리할 수 있도록 그리드 컴퓨팅 기반의 위험 관리 시스템을 제안하였다.

• 대한기계학회논문집A
• /
• 제38권10호
• /
• pp.1179-1184
• /
• 2014

일반적으로 신뢰도 배분은 시스템 개발 초기단계에 시스템의 신뢰도 목표 값을 하위 모듈에 배분하기 위해 사용된다. 본 연구에서는 KTX 승강문 시스템의 목표 신뢰도를 하위 모듈에 배분하기 위해 Comprehensive 배분방법을 제시한다. Comprehensive 배분방법은 시스템의 신뢰도를 배분하기 위해 각 모듈에 대한 고장의 중요도, 작동시간 비율, 위험도, 복잡도, 고장률, 수리/정비성, 개발완성도, 사용환경 가혹도, 신뢰도 달성비용의 평가항목을 고려한다. 승강문 시스템의 목표 신뢰도를 만족하기 위해서 시스템을 구성하는 4 가지 모듈의 $B_{10}$ 수명을 제시한다.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.61-82
• /
• 2020

The security risk management used by some service providers is not appropriate for effective security enhancement. The reason is that the security risk management methods did not take into account the opinions of security experts, types of service, and security vulnerability-based risk assessment. Moreover, the security risk assessment method, which has a great influence on the risk treatment method in an information security risk assessment model, should be security risk assessment for fine-grained risk assessment, considering security vulnerability rather than security threat. Therefore, we proposed an improved information security risk management model and methods that consider vulnerability-based risk assessment and mitigation to enhance security controls considering limited security budget. Moreover, we can evaluate the security cost allocation strategies based on security vulnerability measurement that consider the security weight.