• 대한통합의학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.45-54
• /
• 2018

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Action-observational training program on gait and balance of patients with hemiplegia. Method : The subjects of this study are patients with hemiplegia; 10 patients who agreed with this research, were picked up. Participants were divided randomly into equal groups: experimental group that applied to action-observation training for at least 30 minutes/day for 6 weeks and control group that underwent general task-oriented training. Gait and balance were measured 10 meter walk test(10MWT), gait speed, berg balance scale(BBS) and timed up and go(TUG). The intervention were compared by measuring before and after. Result : There were significant improvements in the subscales of the gait and balance test of those who practiced with the Action-observational training program, while the control group showed no significant changes. Conclusion : Therefore, Action-observational training program is effective in improvement of to improve the gait and balance in patients with hemiplegia.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2017년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.594-597
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 만성뇌졸중 편마비 환자에게 적용한 동작관찰 훈련이 보행과 균형에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구에 동의한 만성 뇌졸중 편마비 환자 4명중 동작관찰훈련을 시행한 실험군 2명 일반과제지향훈련을 시행한 대조군 2명에게 총 4주간 하루 30분씩 훈련하였다. 훈련효과를 알아보기 위해 훈련전 보행은 10m검사를 시행하였고 균형은 버그균형척도로 검사하고 훈련 후 다시 재측정하였다. 이에 동작 관찰 훈련군이 일반과제지향훈련군에 비해 보행과 균형에서 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 이에 동작관찰훈련이 만성뇌졸중 편마비환자의 보행과 균형에 효과적인 프로그램임을 알 수 있다.

• 대한통합의학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 2018

Purpose : This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of an task oriented training program combined with action-observation on balance and gait ability of patients with chronic stroke. Method : The subjects of this study were 30 patients with hemiplegia who agreed to participate and were picked up. Participants were randomly divided into equal groups; namely, an experimental group that underwent task oriented training combined with action-observation for at least 30 minutes/day for 6 weeks and a control group that underwent general task-oriented training. Patients' balance was assessed using the Sway Length, Sway Area and Limit of Stability test. In addition, gait ability was assessed using the 10 Meter Walking Test to measure the taken to walk 10 meters. Gait time and speed taken to walk 10 meters were used to examine gait ability. Results : There were significant improvements in the subscales of the balance and gait ability test of those who participated in the action-observational training program, while the control group showed only significant changes in the evaluation items of the sway length in eyes opened condition and gait time. Conclusion : Therefore, Action-observational training program effectively improved the balance and gait ability in patients with stroke.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2018년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.576-579
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 만성뇌졸중 환자에게 적용한 동작관찰 과제지향 훈련이 균형 및 보행능력에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구에 동의한 만성 뇌졸중환자 30명중 동작관찰 과제지향훈련을 시행한 실험군 15명과 일반 과제지향훈련을 시행한 대조군 15명에게 총 6주간 하루 30분씩 훈련하였다. 훈련효과를 알아보기 위해 훈련전 균형은 BT4로 검사를 시행하였고 보행능력은 10M검사를 실시하였다. 이에 동작관찰 과제지향 훈련군이 일반과제 지향훈련군에 비해 균형과 보행능력에서 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 이에 동작관찰 과제지향훈련이 만성뇌졸중환자의 균형 및 보행능력에 효과적인 프로그램임을 알 수 있다.

• 대한물리의학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.133-140
• /
• 2016

PURPOSE: This study's aim was to investigate the effects of an action observational training in subactue stroke patients with moderate impairment. METHODS: 22 participants (men=13, women=9) with hemiparesis were randomly assigned to action observation training group or task-oriented training group. Patients in both group underwent a patient-specific multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Participants in the action observation group (mean age, $62.78{\pm}9.85$) were asked to watch the video scene, in the knowledge that they would then attempt to perform the same movement task after watching. The control group (mean age, $61.49{\pm}8.64$) practiced the same tasks, without watching the video. To evaluate upper limb function, the upper extremity part of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity and the Box and Block Test were used. The modified Barthel index was used to assess ADLs, and the modified Ashworth scale were used to assess spasticity in the upper extremity. RESULTS: The action observational training group exhibited greater changes in the Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity (P<0.05; 95% CI, 0.929 - 6.403), the Box and Block test (P<0.05; 95% CI, 0.086 - 5.913), and the modified Barthel index (P<0.01; 95% CI, 2.483 - 12.627) between groups. And the modified Ashworth scale (P>0.05; 95% CI, -0.402 to 0.624) did not show significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that action observational training may be more helpful to improve upper-extremity function than physical training only in subactue patients with moderate impairment after stroke.