• 제목/요약/키워드: AJCC

검색결과 132건 처리시간 0.022초

비인강암에서 AJCC와 Ho 병기 결정법에 따른 T병기의 비교 (A Comparison of T Classification of the AJCC and Ho Staging Systems for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma)

  • 이상욱;서인석;강미정;조석현;김경래;이형석
    • 대한두경부종양학회지
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.179-183
    • /
    • 2002
  • Objective: A comparison of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 1988 and 1997 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) classifications was made in terms of patient distribution and efficacy in predicting prognosis. Materials and Methods: Between Jan. 1981 and Dec. 1998, 60 cases of node negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. The extent of disease each patients restaged according to the 4th and 5th AJCC system and Ho system, respectively. Results: The overall and disease free 5-year survival rates were 61.1% and 62.6%, respectively. Among T classifications of 4th AJCC, 5th AJCC and Ho staging system were not observed significantly different in disease-free survival rates, respectively. Conclusion: We observed a better patient distribution with AJCC 1997 comparing to AJCC 1988. The new classification also attained better statistical significances among stages in the overall survival and disease free survival rates was needed.

비인강암에서의 AJCC의 새로운 병기 분류법과 기존 병기 분류법의 비교 (Comparison of New AJCC Staging System with OId AJCC Staging System in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma)

  • 홍세미;우홍균;박찬일
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제18권4호
    • /
    • pp.221-225
    • /
    • 2000
  • 목적 : 본 연구는 1997년에 개정된 비인강암에 대한 AJCC병기 분류법을 1992년의 분류법과 비교하여 새로운 병기 분류법의 신뢰성을 평가하고자 시행되었다. 재료 및 방법 : 1983년부터 1996년까지 서울대학교 병원 치료방사선과에 방사선 치료를 위해 내원한 185명의 조직학적으로 확진되고 원격전이의 증거가 없는 비인강암 환자들을 대상으로 하였다. 이들 환자들에 대하여 의무 기록과 전산화 단층촬영, 자기공명영상을 검토하여 1992년 병기 분류법과 1997년 병기 분류법에 따라 병기를 분류하였고 각 병기 분류법에 따라 생존율을 산출하였다. 결과 : 1992년 분류법과 1997년 분류법에 따른 5년 생존율은 병기 I에서 각각 100$\%$; 병기 II에서는 100$\%$ 와 68.8$\%$; 병기 III에서는 61.4$\%$ 와 63.8$\%$; 병기 IV에서는 61.1$\%$ 와 63.2$\%$ 였다. 각각의 분류법으로 산출한 5년 생존율은 각각의 병기분류법 내에서 병기에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였으나 양 분류법 간에는 병기 II를 제외하고는 통계학적인 차이는 없었다. 결론 : 새로운 비인강암의 AJCC 병기분류법은 이전의 1992년 분류법과 비교하여 신뢰할 수 있을 것으로 생각되나 더 많은 환자를 대상으로 임상적 연구가 진행되어야 할 것으로 생각된다.

  • PDF

Retrospective analysis of 8th edition American Joint Cancer Classification: Distal cholangiocarcinoma

  • Atish Darshan Bajracharya;Suniti Shrestha;Hyung Sun Kim;Ji Hae Nahm;Kwanhoon Park;Joon Seong Park
    • 한국간담췌외과학회지
    • /
    • 제27권3호
    • /
    • pp.251-257
    • /
    • 2023
  • Backgrounds/Aims: This is a retrospective analysis of whether the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) was a significant improvement over the 7th AJCC distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma classification. Methods: In total, 111 patients who underwent curative resection of mid-distal bile duct cancer from 2002 to 2019 were included. Cases were re-classified into 7th and 8th AJCC as well as clinicopathological univariate and multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log rank were calculated using R software. Results: In patient characteristics, pancreaticoduodenectomy/pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy had better survival than segmental resection. Only lymphovascular invasion was found to be significant (hazard ratio 2.01, p = 0.039) among all clinicopathological variables. The 8th edition AJCC Kaplan Meier survival curve showed an inability to properly segregate stage I and IIA, while there was a large difference in survival probability between IIA and IIB. Conclusions: The 8th distal AJCC classification did resolve the anatomical issue with the T stage, as T1 and T3 showed improvement over the 7th AJCC, and the N stage division of the N1 and N2 category was found to be justified, with poorer survival in N2 than N1. Meanwhile, in TMN staging, the 8th AJCC was able differentiate between early stage (I and IIA) and late stage (IIB and III) to better explain the patient prognosis.

위암에서 새로운 제8판 AJCC 병기 분류의 임상적, 조직 병리학적 시사점 (Clinicopathologic Implication of New AJCC 8th Staging Classification in the Stomach Cancer)

  • 김성은
    • Journal of Digestive Cancer Reports
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.13-17
    • /
    • 2019
  • Stomach cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in the world. The incidence of stomach cancer is declining worldwide, however, gastric cancer still remains the third most common cause of cancer death. The tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system has been frequently used as a method for cancer staging system and the most important reference in cancer treatment. In 2016, the classification of gastric cancer TNM staging was revised in the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) edition. There are several modifications in stomach cancer staging in this edition compared to the 7th edition. First, the anatomical boundary between esophagus and stomach has been revised, therefore the definition of stomach cancer and esophageal cancer has refined. Second, N3 is separated into N3a and N3b in pathological classification. Patients with N3a and N3b revealed distinct prognosis in stomach cancer, and these results brought changes in pathological staging. Several large retrospective studies were conducted to compare staging between the 7th and 8th AJCC editions including prognostic value, stage grouping homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients globally. The main objective of this review is to evaluate the clinical and pathological implications of AJCC 8th staging classification in the stomach cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Concurrent Radiotherapy for Patients with Stage IB Gastric Cancer: a Subgroup Analysis of the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Phase III Trial

  • Kim, Youjin;Kim, Kyoung-Mee;Choi, Min Gew;Lee, Jun Ho;Sohn, Tae Sung;Bae, Jae Moon;Kim, Sung;Lee, Su Jin;Kim, Seung Tae;Lee, Jeeyun;Park, Joon Oh;Park, Young Suk;Lim, Ho Yeong;Kang, Won Ki;Park, Se Hoon
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • 제18권4호
    • /
    • pp.348-355
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: We aimed to discuss the roles of radiation and chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with staged IB GC who were enrolled in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stomach tumors (ARTIST) trial. Materials and Methods: Among the 458 patients who were enrolled in the ARTIST trial, 99 had stage IB disease. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP, n=50) or chemoradiotherapy (XPRT, n=49). Survival analyses were performed in accordance with the AJCC 2010 staging system. Results: According to the AJCC 2010 system, stage migration from IB to II occurred in 71% of the patients; 98% of the T2 N0 cases were reclassified as T3 N0, and 42% of the T1 N1 cases were reclassified as T1 N2. When comparing survival outcomes between the XPRT and XP arms for stage IB cancer (AJCC 2002), no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 arms was found. (median 5-year DFS, not reached, P=0.256). The patients classified as having stage IB cancer (AJCC 2002) and reclassified as having stage II cancer (AJCC 2010) exhibited worse prognoses than those who remained in stage IB, although the difference was not statistically significant (5-year DFS rate, 83% vs. 93%). When we compared 5-year DFS in 70 patients with stage II (AJCC 2010), the addition of radiotherapy to XP chemotherapy did not show better outcome than XP alone (P=0.137). Conclusions: The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of stage IB GC (AJCC 2002) warrants further investigation.

국내·외 중환자간호 연구의 동향 분석: 양적 연구를 중심으로 (Comparison of Domestic and International Research (1992-2011): Intensive Care Nursing Studies)

  • 최은희;장은희;최지연;이소정;서효경;박경숙
    • 성인간호학회지
    • /
    • 제27권4호
    • /
    • pp.384-396
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the approaches, methods and questions asked in intensive care unit studies published in Korean journals and the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) from 1992 to 2011. Only quantitative studies were reviewed. Methods: A total of 144 studies published in four Korean Journals and 521 studies published in American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The most frequently used research design reported in Korean journals were surveys (83.5%), protocol development (10.1%), and randomized controlled trials (6.2%). In AJCC, the most frequently reported design was survey research (90.4%) and randomized controlled trials (16.1%). The most frequent nursing intervention reported in the AJCC was tube care (10.8%), and in Korean journals the intervention of suctioning (10.8%). In Korea, nurses were more likely to study instrument measurements (31.0%) and positioning (13.5%). In reported studies in the AJCC there were more reports on emotional support, exercise, and measurement research. Conclusion: There is overlap in the type of studies between the two countries in term of study design, whereas the types of nursing problems studied differed in United States and Korea. The result suggests that there were gaps and those more diverse studies and physiological measurements are needed.

Comparison of the Differences in Survival Rates between the 7th and 8th Editions of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: a Single-Institution Study of 5,507 Patients in Korea

  • Kim, Sung Geun;Seo, Ho Seok;Lee, Han Hong;Song, Kyo Yong;Park, Cho Hyun
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • 제17권3호
    • /
    • pp.212-219
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose: The aims of this study were to compare the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manuals on tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging systems and to evaluate whether the 8th edition represents a better refinement of the 7th staging system, when applied for the classification of gastric cancers. Materials and Methods: A total of 5,507 gastric cancer patients, who underwent treatment from January 1989 to December 2013 at a single institute, were included. We compared patient survival rates across the disease groups classified according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC TNM staging systems. Results: Stage migration was observed in 6.4% (n=355) of the patients. Of these, 3.5% (n=192) and 2.9% (n=158) of patients showed a higher stage and lower stage, respectively. According to the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging criteria, the 5-year overall survival rates of the patients with stage IIIB and IIIC showed a significant difference (40.8% vs. 20.2%, P<0.001) whereas no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rates were observed according to the 7th edition criteria (37.6% vs. 33.2%, P=0.381). Conclusions: Restaging stage III cancers according to the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM classification criteria improved survival rate discrimination, particularly, in institutes where the stage III patients were not distinctly categorized.

폐암환자 생존분석에 대한 TNM 병기 군집분석 평가 (Accessing the Clustering of TNM Stages on Survival Analysis of Lung Cancer Patient)

  • 최철웅;김경백
    • 스마트미디어저널
    • /
    • 제9권4호
    • /
    • pp.126-133
    • /
    • 2020
  • 병원에서는 폐암 환자의 최종병기를 기준으로 치료방침 및 예후를 결정하고 있다. 폐암 환자의 최종병기는 미국 암 연합회(AJCC)에서 제공하는 TNM 분류방법을 바탕으로 7단계로 나누어 진단된다. 이런 접근 방법은 환자의 치료, 예후 및 생존일 예측 등 다양한 분야에서 사용하기에 한계가 있다. 이 논문에서는 데이터 과학적 접근을 통해 T, N, M병기를 사용하여 생존일수별 환자집단을 나눌 수 있는지 알아보기 위해 비지도 학습 중 하나인 군집분석(Clustering)을 진행한 후 군집분석의 결과를 Cox비례위험모형을 사용하여 비교 하였다. 환자들의 최종병기를 사용하지 않고, T, N, M병기 정보만 사용하였을 때 생존시간 예측정확도가 더 높은 것을 확인하였다. 특히, AJCC의 최종병기 7단계와 같이 군집의 개수를 7로 설정했을 때보다 군집의 수를 축소하거나 확장했을 때 T, N, M 병기 군집분석을 통한 생존시간 예측정확도가 향상하는 것을 확인하였다.

두경부암 병기 설정의 최신 변화: AJCC 암 병기설정 매뉴얼8판 (Update of Head and Neck Cancer Staging in the 8th Edition Cancer Staging Manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer)

  • 홍현준
    • 대한두경부종양학회지
    • /
    • 제33권2호
    • /
    • pp.9-15
    • /
    • 2017
  • The recently released the $8^{th}$ edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual introduces significant modifications from the prior $7^{th}$ edition. In this paper, the contents of the new changes in the decision of cancer of the head and neck is summarized except changes in staging of skin and thyroid cancer. In addition to the 8th edition, 1) Addition of extracapsular involvement in metastatic lymph nodes (N category) 2) Oral cancer T classification change, 3) Staging of the pharyngeal cancer was divided into 3 chapters: high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), non HR-HPV associated OPC and hypopharynx cancer (HPC), and nasopharynx cancer (NPC) 4) Changes in T and N classification in NPC, 5) In the case of cancer of unknown primary, P16-positive case is defined as HR-HPV related OPC, and EBV-positive case is defined as NPC. The process that led to these changes highlights the need to collect high-fidelity cancer registry-level data that can be used to confirm prognostic observations identified in institutional data sets. Clinicians will continue to use the latest information for patient care, including scientific content of the 8th Edition Manual. All newly diagnosed cases through December $31^{st}$ 2017 should be staged with the 7th edition. The time extension will allow all partners to develop and update protocols and guidelines and for software vendors to develop, test, and deploy their products in time for the data collection and implementation of the 8th edition in 2018. The 8th edition strikes a balance between a personalized, complex system and a more general, simpler one that maintains the user-friendliness and worldwide acceptability of the traditional TNM staging paradigm.

Treatment Outcome for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Developing Country: University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia from 2003-2010

  • Wong, Yoke Fui;Yusof, Mastura Md;Ishak, Wan Zamaniah Wan;Alip, Adlinda;Phua, Vincent Chee Ee
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제16권7호
    • /
    • pp.2903-2908
    • /
    • 2015
  • Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common cancer as estimated from worldwide data. The incidence of HNC in Peninsular Malaysia was reported as 8.5 per 100,000 population. This study was aimed to determine the treatment outcomes for HNC patients treated in the Oncology Unit of University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). Materials and Methods: All newly diagnosed patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) referred for treatment to the Oncology Unit at UMMC from 2003-2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment outcomes were 5-year overall survival (OS), cause specific survival (CSS), loco-regional control (LRC) and radiotherapy (RT) related side effects. Kaplan-Meier and log rank analyses were used to determine survival outcomes, stratified according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. Results: A total of 130 cases were analysed. Most cases (81.5%) were at late stage (AJCC III-IVB) at presentation. The 5-year OS for the whole study population was 34.4% with a median follow up of 24 months. The 5-year OS according to AJCC stage was 100%, 48.2%, 41.4% and 22.0% for stage I, II, III and IVA-B, respectively. The 5-year overall CSS and LCR were 45.4% and 55.4%, respectively. Late effects of RT were documented in 41.4% of patients. The most common late effect was xerostomia. Conclusions: The treatment outcome of HNSCC at our centre is lagging behind those of developed nations. Efforts to increase the number of patients presenting in earlier stages, increase in the use of combined modality treatment, especially concurrent chemoradiotherapy and implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy, may lead to better outcomes for our HNC patients.