• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.67-74
• /
• 2007

The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique among task related techniques(motion & time study, job redesign, physical environment improvement) for improving work efficiency in shipbuilding enterprise. This study consists of several principal steps. The first step is to design critical criteria in evaluating work efficiency in ship-building enterprises. The second step is to develop sub-criteria of the critical criteria. The third step is to develop a four level AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) structure using the critical criteria, sub-criteria and techniques among task related techniques. The fourth step is to develop the pairwise comparison matrix at each level of AHP structure, which was based on survey data collected at the H heavy industry. And the last step is to select the most effective technique among task related techniques using AHP analysis. The result of AHP analysis has shown clear difference in priority among task related techniques in terms of work efficiency of the shipbuilding enterprise: The reduction of normal time is more important than the reduction of allowance time in improving of the work efficiency. Motion & time study is the most important technique for the reduction of normal time, and physical environment improvement is the most important technique for the reduction of allowance time as well.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.401-416
• /
• 2003

본 연구에서는 데이터베이스평가요소 중요도를 산출하기 위해 AHP기법 활용에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 먼저 데이터베이스 평가를 위해 적용 가능한 기법들을 살펴본 후 데이터평가요소 일부를 AHP기법을 이용하여 중요도를 산출하였다. 그 결과 AHP기법을 활용할 경우 평가요소의 중요도를 상대적으로 평가할 수 있었다. 이런 연구결과는 앞으로 특정목적에 따른 상대적인 DB평가에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2011

There are many countermeasures collected by field experts, safety managers with their subjective decisions, without analysis. Subcontractor does not know which one of those can be more defective countermeasures. More weighted countermeasures should be taken for subcontractor's economical aspects. But there are almost no measures with useful weight so that subcontractors can select some as they need more effective even though there are not many measures at construction sites. AHP technique has been introduced into the analysis of counter measures for subcontractor. Countermeasures which car collected from field-experienced safety engineers have been weighed with frequency rate saying how many responders selected. And then, they are analyzed by AHP Technique for making out relative important level of the countermeasures, by each step such as Direct, Indirect, Management level, and policy level, quantitatively. AHP level in the study is composed of two stories, not three stories, in order to make respondents easier when they are asked. At least 15-year-experienced expert are asked for AHP questionnaire.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.53-64
• /
• 2009

AHP is widely used in various fields owing to its simplicity and clarity. However, it has the problems of reliability of panel's judgement and the assumption that each panelist's ability is equal. In this paper, we propose a reliable AHP method using Delphi technique, which aims to incorporate the relative expertise of panel and to increase their consensus. The method is called the Modified Delphi-AHP. We apply the method to analyzing the demand for lectures of Management of Technology.

• 한국품질경영학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국품질경영학회 2006년도 추계 학술대회
• /
• pp.31-37
• /
• 2006

The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique from task related techniques(motion & time study, job redesign, physical environment improvement) for improving work efficiency in shipbuilding enterprise. This study consists of several principal steps. The first step is to design critical criteria in evaluating work efficiency in shipbuilding enterprises. The second step is to develop sub-criteria of the critical criteria. The third step is to develop a four level AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)structure using the critical criteria, sub-criteria and techniques from task related techniques. The fourth step is to develop the pairwise comparison matrix by each level of AHP structure, which was based on survey data collected at the H heavy industry. And the last step is to select the most effective technique from task related techniques using AHP analysis. The result of AHP analysis has shown clear difference in priority among task related techniques in terms of work efficiency of the shipbuilding enterprise: The reduction of normal time has more importance than the reduction of allowance time, motion & time study techniques are most important for the reduction of normal time, physical environment improvement is most important for the reduction of allowance time as well.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 2006

The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique from AMT (Advanced Manufacturing Technologies) and IMP (Innovative Management Practices) for improving manufacturing performance in shipbuilding enterprises. The research consists of several principal steps. The first step is to design critical criteria in evaluating manufacturing performance in shipbuilding enterprises. The second step is to develop sub-criteria of the critical criteria. The third step is to develop a four level AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) structure using the critical criteria, sub-criteria and techniques from AMT and IMP. The fourth step is to develope the pairwise comparison matrix by each level of AHP structure, which was based on survey data collected at the H heavy industry. And the last step is to select the most effective technique from AMT and IMP by using AHP analysis. The results of AHP analysis did not show clear difference in priority between techniques of AMT and IMP in terms of manufacturing performance of the shipbuilding enterprise. Thus, each critical criterion was assigned modified weights and examined the priority change of techniques by conducting performance sensitivity analysis.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제101권3호
• /
• pp.434-442
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 우리나라의 조림성공 이후 산림자원의 증가에 따른 국산재 공급 확대를 위한 정책방안을 제시하기 위하여 수행하였다. 국산재 공급 확대를 위한 효과적인 정책을 도출하기 위하여 델파이 기법과 AHP 분석을 수행하였다. 델파이 기법 분석결과 제시된 정책에 대해 AHP 분석을 수행하여 우선순위를 도출하였다. 설문조사에서는 국산재의 생산, 유통 그리고 소비 부분으로 구분하여 설문하였다. 분석결과, 목재생산을 위한 임도 및 고성능임업기계 도입 등의 목재생산 인프라 구축(.239), 권역별 목재 수집 단지 조성 및 활성화 정책(.202) 그리고 공공건축물에 대한 국산재 의무사용 등의 소비촉진 정책(.126)이 우선순위가 높은 정책으로 도출되었다.

• 한국측량학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.199-206
• /
• 2002

대부분의 노선선정에 있어서 GSIS의 적용은 노선선정시 고려되는 토지이용, 토공량, 지가등 몇 가지의 기본자료를 선택하여 데이터베이스를 구축하고 구축한 데이터를 분석하여 노선선정 방안을 제시하고 있다. 그러나 이러한 방안은 노선선정시 고려되는 다중인자들에 대한 복합적인 고려가 미미한 단계라고 할 수 있다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위하여 GSIS를 이용하여 최적노선 선정시 다중의사 결정 지원 및 노선선정 절차의 표준화를 시도하여야 한다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 도로의 최적 노선선정시 AHP기법을 이용하여 다중인자의 정량화를 시도함으로서 노선선정에 이용되는 자료가 효율적으로 제공되어 최적의 노선선정이 되도록 하였다. AHP기법을 적용한 결과 종래의 노선선정시 다중인자들의 경중률을 임의로 적용하던 것보다 합리적으로 최적노선을 선정할 수 있었다.

• 대한인간공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한인간공학회 1998년도 춘계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 1998

Recently, consumers are tend to purchase the user-centered designed product using interface enginnering and human factors techniques. Therefore, it is important that the designer's requirements should be analyzed focused on the human machine interface. This paper described the interface usability evaluation technique(suvjective evaluation) for the interface between user and product. This methodology is the integrated interface usbility evaluation method AHP and Conjoint Analysis. AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a multicriteria decision model to give priority after expressing hierarchically for decision making problem. Conjoint Analysis enduavors to unravel the value, or partworths, that consumers place on the product or service's attributes from experimental subjects' evluation of profiles based on hypothetical products or services. A new usability test methodology proposed by this paper includes techniques jointed both consistency test by AHP and experimental subjective evaluation of profiles by Conjoint Analysis for evaluating the user's emotion and impression.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.201-218
• /
• 1999

The article contains an introduction of possibility of applying Multi-Attribute Utility Theory(MAUT) for priority setting of R&D projects. MAUT is compared with AHP, which is widely used recently. These two techuiques are applied to set priorities of R&D projects In a Government-funded Research Institute. Six criteria are chosen from consultation with decision makers. They are composed of 1) validity as representative projects, 2) possibility of resource mobilization, 3) spillover effect of developed technologies, 4) possibility of success, 5) scope of participation and 6) clarity of research goal. To set priorities of R&D projects, SMART(Simple MultiAttribute Rating Technique) and DVM(Difference Value Measurement) out of many MAUT methods are used to design the utility function and to determine the weights among criteria. The aggregation model is additive on the assumption the criteria are independent. AHP executes pairwise comparisons for criteria and alternatives. From the results of the case study, the results and theoretical characteristics are compared.