• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.67-75
• /
• 2014

Architecture is not only coming out of the making of a building room but also contributing to the making of an urban room. "The inside is not a contradiction of the outside...architecturally opened". (De Carli, 1967) The urban room is felt as a sense of rapport between building and city because architecture makes the building room closed simultaneously open toward the city. Architecture exists between both rooms. There is the possibility of integrating, by the conception of interior, architecture and urbanism and thus, the possibility of giving a theoretical ground to Interior Architecture/Design; "all architecture is interior architecture". (Ottolini, 1996) It is in line with the idea of the "Fusing: Landscape/Urbanism/Architecture". (Holl, 2009) The paper deals with, through literature review, a possibility of the fusing: Interior/Architecture/Landscape/Urbanism. The first site explores the meaning of the urban place as a thing, which gives a possibility of combining the building interior and the urban interior. The second site illustrates the idea of the urban interior for dwelling. The urban interior is definitely a place of dwelling to keep human inhabitancy, which takes place in a united interior of the building interior and the urban interior. The third site clarifies the idea of the urban interior. While the building interior gives human being with the private stage, the urban interior provides him with the public stage of city life. The two different interiors constitute an interior world for his trajectory of dwelling. The last site traces the conceptual development of the urban interior. The trace comes to a conclusion that architecture, landscape, and urbanism can be unified by the conception of interior and the urban interior is an object of "Interior Architecture/Design". This paper is theorized as a twofold singular of the building interior and the urban interior. Ultimately, it is relevant to the theoretical principle of fusing interior/architecture/landscape/urbanism, and aims at offering a departing point to consider the urban interior as an object of "Interior Architecture/Design" and for the future studies of the urban interior.

• 고문화
• /
• 2호
• /
• pp.11-25
• /
• 1963

• 고문화
• /
• 20호
• /
• pp.51-55
• /
• 1982

• 건축사
• /
• 3호통권180호
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 1984

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.43-56
• /
• 2015

Researches on the pit dwellings in the Joseon Dynasty era have been constantly conducted in the archeology field since the beginning of the 2000s. Most of the related researches in the past have been on the classification and chronological record of dwelling types in archeology, but architectural researches on the dwelling history that is connected from the prehistoric age to the Joseon Dynasty era are insufficient. There are no big differences between the excavated pit dwellings of the Joseon Dynasty era and those of the prehistoric age, so pit dwellings were considered to have been used as dwellings for common people until the Joseon dynasty era. This fact is confirmed by the frequency and density of pit dwellings. In this research, what space composition of the pit dwellings that are equipped with the Korean floor heating system is shown according to the plan types was examined and the development and transition process from pit dwellings to Folk houses were analyzed and their correlations with the Folk houses of the Joseon Dynasty era were examined. The Folk house form did not start with the form of the house on the ground but originate from the introduction of Ondol, the Korean floor heating system, to pit dwellings. As the Korean floor heating system is used, the room and kitchen space are composed in the pit dwelling, and the kitchen is expanded to the one that separates the fireplace for cooking to avoid heating that is unnecessary for the summer season. As the size of the dwelling was getting bigger, the division of the space is made by the pillars that support the interior space. Also, the dwelling is expanded into a single row house and a double row house according to the progress direction of Ondol. In other words, the pit dwellings in the Joseon Dynasty era develops with making up diverse floors through the combination and expansion of Ondol and kitchen according to the dweller's convenience and life style and surrounding environment. This research is significant in the sense that it helps understand the formation and development process of our traditional Folk houses and fills the gap between the pit dwellings, which have been dealt with inadequately, and traditional Folk houses in the Korean dwelling history.

• 보존과학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.411-416
• /
• 2012

이 연구의 목적은 백제 풍납토성 화재주거지(라-8호)에서 출토된 탄화목의 방사성탄소연대 분석을 통하여 풍납토성의 축조연대를 규명하는 것이다. 탄화목에서 10년 간격으로 채취된 6개의 연륜에 대한 방사성탄소연대를 위글 매치한 결과, 최외각 연륜의 ${\pm}2{\sigma}$ 연대(95.4% 신뢰구간)가 A.D. 190~280년으로 산출되어 이 주거지가 3세기 초중반에 형성된 것을 알 수 있었다. 이 연대는 주거지형태와 토기양식으로 추론된 고고학적 편년과 일치되는 결과이다.

• 한국농촌건축학회논문집
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 2012

This study is to establish the dwelling principle and architectural characteristics of Powhatan Indian Community in Eastern part of North America. To find a pattern and dwelling principle of town building and housing, I have researched both site survey of Powhatan at Jamestown Settlement in Virginia and a related references of North America Indian. In addition of study, I have tried to understand their life style in 17C, a spatial characteristics of space composition, and a using materials of Yehakin which means Powhatan's house in the exhibition hall of Jamestown Settlement. The results of this paper are as follows: First, the form of Powhatan house is like a longhouse which has two types that are oblong and rectangular house. Usually they had lived in the style of oblong house. Second, there are three patterns to set up the semi-permanent settlement of Powhatan, which are circle-type, street-type, and free-type of village. Third, the fire place of interior space that is most importance element to heat and cook is put it into the center of room, and the other beds and shelves are arranged by the side of wall which is covered of rush matt.

• 한국지형학회지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.99-111
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 대전분지에 있어서 청동기시대에서 원삼국시대로의 이행과정에서 나타나는 주거지의 지리적(또는 지형적) 입지환경 변화와 그 원인을 밝히는 것이다. 이를 위하여 (1) '유적그룹(또는 주거지밀집유적)의 주거지 총수 비교'그리고 (2) '두 시대의 주거지를 모두 포함하고 있는 특정유적에서 주거지 총 수 비교'로 구분하여 시대변천에 따른 주거지의 표고, 경사도, 용수하천거리 및 용수하상비고 측면에서 입지환경을 상호 비교하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 개별 인자의 변화를 보면, 표고는 상승했으며, 경사도는 증가했다. 용수하천거리는 소급하천의 경우 감소 내지 증가했으며, 중급하천의 경우 거의 차이가 없거나 증가했다. 그리고 용수하상비고는 소급하천의 경우 증가했으며, 중급하천의 경우 증가 내지 감소했다. 2. 개별 인자를 상호 비교하면, 경사도, 표고 및 용수하상비고의 증감이 대체로 유사한 경향을 띠며, 특히 경사도의 증가가 표고와 용수하상비고의 증가에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 용수하천거리의 증감은 경사도, 표고 및 용수하상비고의 증감과 다른 경향을 나타내는 것으로 나타났다. 3. 이상으로부터 대전분지 내에 분포하는 저구릉의 미지형적 특성(예 : 경사도 특성)과 저구릉을 둘러싸고 있는 풍부한 수계환경이 서로 맞물려 당시의 주거지 입지선정에 영향을 미쳤다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 특히 당시 거주민들에게 주거지 입지 선정시 '경사도와 용수하천거리'가 '표고와 용수하상비고'에 비해 상대적으로 중요한 주거지 선정 인자였던 것으로 밝혀졌다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2000

In this study, we analyze space alternation, which is shown pre-development and post-development in the reconstruction apartment. We point out problems in terms of the city and dwelling environment, and in looking for drawing up a plan for improvement as well. As a result of our research, we offer some important observations and conclusions. Ourdoor space of the site after the reconstruction caused inconvenience to the residents due to the plan for high-storeys, high-density, And the building shape and arrangement provide changeable conditions form line figures to variable figures due to courtyard patterns. The courtyard space changes into a parking area ; therefore the outdoor site gives worse circumstances.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제35권
• /
• pp.28-56
• /
• 2002

There is no definite theory, which archeologists have believed to be built either for the protection or ceremonial purpose, of enclosure historical site exhibited from Bronze Age to Samhan era in Korea. The main conditions of choosing right enclosure were natural levee-backswamp-plateau, which all found in village on a hill. For this reasons Kimhae Daesoeng-dong enclosure discovered in 2001 is not an exception, and therefore this enclosure has been believed to be a beginning point of the farming society. In Korea there have been 2 types of enclosure. One is that enclosure entirely surrounds whole historic site itself and the other is that enclosure partially does. Although Kimhae Daesoeng-dong historic site has been discovered only part of it, it's not believed to have the first type-which surrounds the whole enclosure historic site In this research, 3 developing steps of enclosure historic site were defined. Enclosure surrounds only a part of the historic site is 1st step. Enclosure surrounds all around the site is 2nd step. The site discovered with big round clay pottery and developed into multiple enclosure is 3rd step. Since some researches have not been accomplished, the hypothesis above was suggested to have a better understanding of the development of enclosure historic site. The purpose of enclosure has been separately explained for the protection or for the ceremony. It is difficult to assert that excavation sites could be applied to only one of two purposes. But it is possible that both purposes of enclosure such as protection and as division from ceremonial area could be applied together. Kimhae Daesoeng-dong enclosure was shown for the purpose of division from ceremonial area. But we can not ignore that since Kimhae Daesoeng-dong enclosure exposed to the Sea and dwelling area was not shown from village hill, it would be probably for the protection. However enclosure of Gujibong village area in Daesoeng-dong had used for ceremonial purpose since the Bronze Age, even this enclosure would be possible to play an important role of being a center of legend of Gaya foundation. Many unsolved questions are still lying ahead. The enclosure was used for a short time, even if dwelling area was found in and out of enclosure, there were no differences between them, and although duplicate and triplicate enclosure were found, we could not sure which were before and after. Also we could not confirm the type of enclosure with location condition which was the flat land or the top of hill on floodplain. We should not divide the types of enclosure historic site due to differences from cross section of stratum. And I expect that we will have much data such as distribution of enclosure historic site in Yeongnam area where is concerned with origin and diffusion of Japan and China.