• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.128-136
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference of noise level according to noise measuring methods in the noisy working environments. Sound pressure level(SPL), equivalence sound level(Leq) and personal noise exposure dose(Dose) in the fifty-nine unit workplaces of the twenty-eight industries were measured and relating factors which were affected noise level were investigated. The results were as follows ; 1. The noise levels were $88.70{\pm}5.68dB(A)$ by SPL, $89.07{\pm}5.41dB(A)$ by Leq and $89.07{\pm}5.69$ by Dose. The differences of noise levels by three measuring methods were statistically significant(P<0.001) by repeated measure ANOV A. 2. Comparing with noise levels by general classes of noise exposure, noise levels of continuous noise were $89.14{\pm}5.19dB(A)$ by SPL, $89.45{\pm}4.65dB(A)$ by Leq and $90.04{\pm}5.09$ by Dose. Noise levels of intermittent noise were $87.90{\pm}6.52dB(A)$ by SPL, $88.40{\pm}6.63dB(A)$ by Leq and $90.10{\pm}6.80$ by Dose. The differences noise level of noise measuring methods by general classese of noise exposure were statistically not significant by repeated measure ANOV A. 3. Interaction between general classese of noise exposure and noise measuring methods for noise level was not statistically significant by repeated measure ANOVA. And the noise level by noise measuring methods were statistically significant by repeated measure ANOV A(P<.001) 4. Comparing with noise levels by unit workplace size, noise levels of large unit workplace were $90.73{\pm}5.87dB(A)$ by SPL, $91.32{\pm}5.50dB(A)$ by Leq and $91.82{\pm}6.06$ by Dose and noise levels of middle unit workplace were $88.31{\pm}5.26dB(A)$ by SPL, $88.41{\pm}4.83dB(A)$ by Leq and $89.69{\pm}5.05$ by Dose. And noise levels of small unit workplace were $94.89{\pm}4.10dB(A)$ by SPL, $85.35{\pm}4.11dB(A)$ by Leq and $86.87{\pm}4.98$ by Dose. The noise level differences of noise measuring methods by unit workplace size were statistically significant by repeated measure ANOV A(P<.05). 5. The noise level by noise measuring methods were statistically significant by repeated measure ANOV A(P<.001). But Interaction between workplace size and noise level measuring methods for noise level was not statistically significant by repeated measure ANOVA. According to the above results, there was a difference of the noise level among the three measuring methods. Therefore we must use the personal noise exposure dose using by noise dose meter, possible, to prvent occupational hearing loss in noisy working environment.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.103-114
• /
• 1999

본 연구에서는 외부조사 광자선에 대한 3차원 선량계산 알고리즘 모델을 개발하기 위한 기초 연구로서 기존의 2D 선량 계산 알고리즘을 확장시켜 비동일 평면 조사가 가능한 2.5D 선량계산 모델을 개발하였다. 이를 위해 3차원 치료계획 및 선량계산에 적합하도록 환자 및 조사빔에 대한 3차원 좌표계 시스템을 정의하고, 이들 간의 좌표변환식을 유도하였다. 선량계산 알고리즘으로는 "Clarkson-Cunningham" 의 2D 광자선량 계산 알고리즘을 3차원으로 확장시켜 정형 조사면 및 비정형 조사면에 대한 선량계산과 wedge filter에 대한 선량계산이 가능하도록 하였고, Batho 방식을 적용하여 비 균질 보정을 구현하였다. 선량계산의 정확도를 평가하기 위해, AAPM TG #23 에 제시된 절차에 따라 자료에 제시된 4MV 광자선에 대한 실험 값과 본 연구에서 계산된 결과를 비교한 결과, 정형조 사면에 대한 PDD(percent depth dose)는 buildup 영역을 제외하면 $\pm$1% 이내, 비정형 조사면의 경우 $\pm$3% 이내에서 실험값과 일치하였다. 또한, wedge filter에 대한 PDD 및 profile은 $\pm$3% 이내, 45$^{\circ}$ oblique 입사빔에 대한 선량은 $\pm$4% 이내에서 실험값과 일치하였다. 비균질 보정의 경우 Lung/water 경계에서 7% 과소 평가되었고, Bone/water 경계에서 3% 과대 평가되는 것으로 나타났다. 이들 결과를 종합해 볼 때, 비균질 보정을 제외하고는 비교적 정확하게 선량을 계산하는 것으로 평가되었다. 추후 대부분의 상용 2.5D 치료계획시스템 (radiation treatment planning system; RTP)들이 비균질 보정 방법으로 사용하고 있는 Equivalent TAR(tissue-air ratio) 방식을 구현시키고자 하며, 본 연구에서 구현된 선량계산 모듈을 교육 및 연구용으로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대 한다.것으로 기대 한다.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.313-320
• /
• 2022

Both angiography and interventional procedures accompanied by angiography provide many diagnostic and therapeutic benefits to patients and are rapidly increasing. However, unlike general radiography or computed tomography using the same X-ray, the amount of radiation is quite high, but the dose range can vary considerably for each patient and operator. The high sensitivity of the lens to radiation during cerebral angiography and neurointervention is already well known, and although there are many related studies, it is insufficient to easily reduce radiation in diagnosis and treatment. In this situation, in particular, by adding three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) to the existing two-dimensional (2D) angiography, it is now possible to make an accurate diagnosis. However, since this 3D-RA acquires images through projection of more radiation than before, the exposure dose of the lens may be higher. Therefore, we tried to analyze whether the radiation dose of the lens can be reduced by moving the lens out of the field range by adjusting the table height and magnification ratio during the examination using 3D-RA. The surface dose was measured using a rando phantom and a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (PLD) and the radiation dose was compared by adjusting the table height and magnification ratio based on the central point. As a result, it was found that the radiation dose of the lens decreased as the table height increased from the central point, that is, as the lens was out of the field of view. In conclusion, in 3D-RA, moving the table position of about 2 cm in height will make a significant contribution to the dose reduction of the lens, and it was confirmed that adjusting the magnification ratio can also reduce the surface dose of the lens.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제30권1_2호
• /
• pp.83-95
• /
• 2018

목 적 : 폐암의 호흡동조방사선치료(Respiratory Gated Radiotherapy, RGRT)계획수립 후 표적 주변에 위치하고 있는 정상장기의 경우에는 움직임과 용적변화가 고려되지 않은 상태에서 선량평가가 이루어지는 경우가 많다. 본 연구에서는 적응형방사선치료(Adaptive Radiotherapy, ART)에서 많이 사용되는 변형영상정합(Deformable Image Registration, DIR)을 이용하여 호흡동조방사선치료 시 특정 위상에서의 정상장기의 움직임을 반영한 4차원-선량평가를 진행하였으며, 3차원 선량평가와의 차이를 연구하였다. 또한, 폐암의 치료계획평가 시 환자 호흡에 따른 정상장기의 움직임과 용적변화에 대한 분석 및 고려가 필요한 지 알아보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 호흡동조방사선치료를 받은 폐암 환자 10명을 대상으로 하였다. Eclipse(Ver 13.6 Varian, USA)로 최고 위상 CT영상에 그려진 구조물을 모든 위상영상에 Propagation($Eclipse^{TM}$)이나 Segmentation Wizard($Eclipse^{TM}$)의 메뉴로 동일하게 설정하였으며, Center-to-Center 방식으로 구조물의 움직임 및 용적을 분석하였다. 또한, 4차원 선량평가를 위해 VELOCITY 프로그램(VELOCITY Ver 4.0, Varian, USA)을 이용하여 각 위상의 영상과 선량분포를 최고 위상 CT영상에 변형하였으며, 선량을 합산하여 정상장기의 4차원 선량평가를 실시하고, 3차원 선량평가와 비교분석을 하였다. 또한, 4차원 선량분포의 검증을 위해 $QUASAR^{TM}$ Phantom(Modus Medical Devices)과 $GAFCHROMIC^{TM}$ EBT3 Film(Ashland, USA)을 사용하여 4차원 감마분석을 시행하였다. 결 과 : 들숨과 날숨 구간의 움직임은 우측 폐가 축 방향 $0.989{\pm}0.34cm$로 가장 컸으며, 척수가 측 방향 -0.001 cm로 가장 작았다. 30~70 % 구간의 움직임은 식도가 축 방향 $0.52{\pm}0.21cm$로 가장 컸으며, 척수가 전후방향 $0.013{\pm}0.01cm$로 가장 작았다. 용적은 우측 폐가 33.5 %로 가장 큰 변화율을 보였다. 3차원 선량평가와 4차원 선량평가에서의 PTV 선량균질지수(Conformity Index, CI) 값과 처방선량지수(Homogeneity Index, HI) 값의 차이는 각각 최대 0.076, 0.021, 최소 0.011, 0.0으로 평가되었다. 정상장기의 경우 4차원 선량평가에서 0.0045~2.76 % 차이를 보였다. 모든 환자의 4차원 감마통과율은 평균 $98.1{\pm}0.42%$로 확인되었고, 모두 기준 95 %를 통과하였다. 결 론 : 모든 환자의 PTV 선량균질지수 값은 4차원 선량평가 시 더 유의한 값임을 확인할 수 있었으며, 처방 선량지수는 두 선량평가에서 차이를 보이지 않았다. 호흡에 의한 움직임이 고려된 4차원 선량분포에서 PTV 경계부분이 채워져 3차원 선량분포에서보다 선량이 더욱 균질한 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 정상장기의 4차원 선량평가에서 0.004~2.76 % 차이가 있었으며, 척수를 제외한 모든 정상장기에서 두 평가방법의 차이유의를 확인할 수 있었다. 정상장기의 3차원 선량평가 시 과소평가가 이루어 질 수 있다는 사실을 본 연구를 통해 알 수 있었으며, 호흡에 의한 정상장기의 선량변화가 예상되는 경우 변형영상정합을 이용한 4차원 선량평가를 고려할 수 있을 것이다. 변형영상정합을 이용한 4차원 선량평가는 환자의 호흡에 의한 정상장기의 움직임과 용적 변화를 반영하는 조금 더 현실적인 선량평가방법이 될 것이라고 사료된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권13호
• /
• pp.5259-5264
• /
• 2014

Background: CT based brachytherapy allows 3-dimensional (3D) assessment of organs at risk (OAR) doses with dose volume histograms (DVHs). The purpose of this study was to compare computed tomography (CT) based volumetric calculations and International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference-point estimates of radiation doses to the bladder and rectum in patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). Materials and Methods: Between March 2011 and May 2012, 20 patients were treated with 55 fractions of brachytherapy using tandem and ovoids and underwent post-implant CT scans. The external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose was 48.6Gy in 27 fractions. HDR brachytherapy was delivered to a dose of 21 Gy in three fractions. The ICRU bladder and rectum point doses along with 4 additional rectal points were recorded. The maximum dose ($D_{Max}$) to rectum was the highest recorded dose at one of these five points. Using the HDRplus 2.6 brachyhtherapy treatment planning system, the bladder and rectum were retrospectively contoured on the 55 CT datasets. The DVHs for rectum and bladder were calculated and the minimum doses to the highest irradiated 2cc area of rectum and bladder were recorded ($D_{2cc}$) for all individual fractions. The mean $D_{2cc}$ of rectum was compared to the means of ICRU rectal point and rectal $D_{Max}$ using the Student's t-test. The mean $D_{2cc}$ of bladder was compared with the mean ICRU bladder point using the same statistical test. The total dose, combining EBRT and HDR brachytherapy, were biologically normalized to the conventional 2 Gy/fraction using the linear-quadratic model. (${\alpha}/{\beta}$ value of 10 Gy for target, 3 Gy for organs at risk). Results: The total prescribed dose was $77.5Gy{\alpha}/{\beta}10$. The mean dose to the rectum was $4.58{\pm}1.22Gy$ for $D_{2cc}$, $3.76{\pm}0.65Gy$ at $D_{ICRU}$ and $4.75{\pm}1.01Gy$ at $D_{Max}$. The mean rectal $D_{2cc}$ dose differed significantly from the mean dose calculated at the ICRU reference point (p<0.005); the mean difference was 0.82 Gy (0.48-1.19Gy). The mean EQD2 was $68.52{\pm}7.24Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ for $D_{2cc}$, $61.71{\pm}2.77Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ at $D_{ICRU}$ and $69.24{\pm}6.02Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ at $D_{Max}$. The mean ratio of $D_{2cc}$ rectum to $D_{ICRU}$ rectum was 1.25 and the mean ratio of $D_{2cc}$ rectum to $D_{Max}$ rectum was 0.98 for all individual fractions. The mean dose to the bladder was $6.00{\pm}1.90Gy$ for $D_{2cc}$ and $5.10{\pm}2.03Gy$ at $D_{ICRU}$. However, the mean $D_{2cc}$ dose did not differ significantly from the mean dose calculated at the ICRU reference point (p=0.307); the mean difference was 0.90 Gy (0.49-1.25Gy). The mean EQD2 was $81.85{\pm}13.03Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ for $D_{2cc}$ and $74.11{\pm}19.39Gy_{{\alpha}/{\beta}3}$ at $D_{ICRU}$. The mean ratio of $D_{2cc}$ bladder to $D_{ICRU}$ bladder was 1.24. In the majority of applications, the maximum dose point was not the ICRU point. On average, the rectum received 77% and bladder received 92% of the prescribed dose. Conclusions: OARs doses assessed by DVH criteria were higher than ICRU point doses. Our data suggest that the estimated dose to the ICRU bladder point may be a reasonable surrogate for the $D_{2cc}$ and rectal $D_{Max}$ for $D_{2cc}$. However, the dose to the ICRU rectal point does not appear to be a reasonable surrogate for the $D_{2cc}$.

• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2002년도 Proceedings
• /
• pp.121-122
• /
• 2002

The main principle of radiation therapy is to deliver optimum dose to tumor to increase tumor cure probability while minimizing dose to critical normal structure to reduce complications. RTP system is required for proper dose plan in radiation therapy treatment. The main goal of this research is to develop dose model for photon, electron, and brachytherapy, and to display dose distribution on patient images with optimum process. The main items developed in this research includes: (l) user requirements and quality control; analysis of user requirement in RTP, networking between RTP and relevant equipment, quality control using phantom for clinical application (2) dose model in RTP; photon, electron, brachytherapy, modifying dose model (3) image processing and 3D visualization; 2D image processing, auto contouring, image reconstruction, 3D visualization (4) object modeling and graphic user interface; development of total software structure, step-by-step planning procedure, window design and user-interface. Our final product show strong capability for routine and advance RTP planning.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2016

목 적 : 폐암 환자의 CBCT와 4D-CBCT를 이용한 영상촬영 시 인접 장기에 미치는 방사선량을 비교 평가해 보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 본 실험을 진행하기 위해 인체모형팬텀(Anderson Rando Phantom, USA)을 이용하였고, 선량측정 위치는 주요 장기가 위치하는 단면에 광유도발광선량계(Opitcally Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter, OSLD) 1~6개를 부착하였다. 인체내부의 주요 장기를 표현하기 위해 전산화단층촬영(Lightspeed GE, USA)을 하였다. 선형가속기(CL-IX)와 선형가속기(Truebeam 2.5) thorax 모드에서 인체모형팬텀 폐 하부 기준으로 CBCT 방사선량을 측정하였고, 추가적으로 선형가속기(Truebeam 2.5) thorax 모드에서 4D-CBCT 방사선량을 측정하여 기존 CBCT와 비교 하였다. 각각 3회 반복 측정하여 평균값을 얻었다. 결 과 : CBCT로 촬영한 평균 흡수선량 측정치는 CL-IX의 경우 폐 2.505 cGy, 심장 2.595 cGy, 간 2.156 cGy, 위 1.934 cGy, 피부에 2.233 cGy 이었으며, Truebeam의 경우 폐 1.725 cGy, 심장 2.034 cGy, 간 1.616 cGy, 위 1.470 cGy, 피부에 1.445 cGy 이었다. 4D-CBCT 촬영 시 폐 3.849 cGy, 심장 4.578 cGy, 간 3.497 cGy, 위 3.179 cGy, 피부에3.319 cGy 이었다. 조직 가중치와 방사선 가중치를 고려한 평균 유효선량 값은 CBCT의 경우 CL-IX에서 폐 2.164 mSv, 심장 2.241 mSv, 간 0.136 mSv, 위 1.668 mSv, 피부 0.009 mSv 이었고 Truebeam의 경우 폐 1.725 mSv, 심장 1.757 mSv, 간 0.102 mSv, 위 1.270 mSv, 피부에 0.005 mSv 이었다. 4D-CBCT에서는 폐 3.326 mSv, 심장 3.952 mSv, 간 0.223 mSv, 위 2.747 mSv, 피부에 0.013 mSv 이었다. 결 론 : 폐암 환자의 CBCT 촬영 시 Truebeam보다 CL-IX 장비에서 받는 선량이 1.3배 정도 더 높게 나왔으며, Truebeam 장비에서 CBCT 보다 4D-CBCT에서 환자가 받는 선량이 2.2배 정도 높게 나왔다. 하지만 4D-CBCT는 환자의 움직임이 큰 경우나 호흡동조 영상유도방사선치료 시 좀 더 정확한 방사선 치료를 할 수 있어 선택적으로 사용하는 것이 타당 할 것이다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.130-136
• /
• 2021

Purpose: The Halcyon radiotherapy platform at Groote Schuur Hospital was delivered with a factory-configured analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) beam model for dose calculation. In a recent system upgrade, the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm was installed. Both algorithms adopt fundamentally different approaches to dose calculation. This study aimed to compare the dose distributions of cervical carcinoma RapidArc plans calculated using both algorithms. Methods: A total of 15 plans previously calculated using the AAA were retrieved and recalculated using the AXB algorithm. Comparisons were performed using the planning target volume (PTV) maximum (max) and minimum (min) doses, D95%, D98%, D50%, D2%, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI). The mean and max doses and D2% were compared for the bladder, bowel, and femoral heads. Results: The AAA calculated slightly higher targets, D98%, D95%, D50%, and CI, than the AXB algorithm (44.49 Gy vs. 44.32 Gy, P=0.129; 44.87 Gy vs. 44.70 Gy, P=0.089; 46.00 Gy vs. 45.98 Gy, P=0.154; and 0.51 vs. 0.50, P=0.200, respectively). For target min dose, D2%, max dose, and HI, the AAA scored lower than the AXB algorithm (41.24 Gy vs. 41.30 Gy, P=0.902; 47.34 Gy vs. 47.75 Gy, P<0.001; 48.62 Gy vs. 50.14 Gy, P<0.001; and 0.06 vs. 0.07, P=0.002, respectively). For bladder, bowel, and left and right femurs, the AAA calculated higher mean and max doses. Conclusions: Statistically significant differences were observed for PTV D2%, max dose, HI, and bowel max dose (P>0.05).

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권11호
• /
• pp.4717-4721
• /
• 2014

Background: Dosimetric comparison of two dimensional (2D) radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) based dose distributions with high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitry radiotherapy (ICRT) for carcinoma cervix, in terms of target coverage and doses to bladder and rectum. Materials and Methods: Sixty four sessions of HDR ICRT were performed in 22 patients. External beam radiotherapy to pelvis at a dose of 50 Gray in 27 fractions followed by HDR ICRT, 21 Grays to point A in 3 sessions, one week apart was planned. All patients underwent 2D-orthogonal and 3D-CT simulation for each session. Treatment plans were generated using 2D-orthogonal images and dose prescription was made at point A. 3D plans were generated using 3D-CT images after delineating target volume and organs at risk. Comparative evaluation of 2D and 3D treatment planning was made for each session in terms of target coverage (dose received by 90%, 95% and 100% of the target volume: D90, D95 and D100 respectively) and doses to bladder and rectum: ICRU-38 bladder and rectum point dose in 2D planning and dose to 0.1cc, 1cc, 2cc, 5cc, and 10cc of bladder and rectum in 3D planning. Results: Mean doses received by 100% and 90% of the target volume were $4.24{\pm}0.63$ and $4.9{\pm}0.56$ Gy respectively. Doses received by 0.1cc, 1cc and 2cc volume of bladder were $2.88{\pm}0.72$, $2.5{\pm}0.65$ and $2.2{\pm}0.57$ times more than the ICRU bladder reference point. Similarly, doses received by 0.1cc, 1cc and 2cc of rectum were $1.80{\pm}0.5$, $1.48{\pm}0.41$ and $1.35{\pm}0.37$ times higher than ICRU rectal reference point. Conclusions: Dosimetric comparative evaluation of 2D and 3D CT based treatment planning for the same brachytherapy session demonstrates underestimation of OAR doses and overestimation of target coverage in 2D treatment planning.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.17-23
• /
• 2008

목 적: 선형가속기에 부착된 온보드영상장치(On-Board Imager)를 이용한 콘빔CT (Cone Beam Computerized Tomography)는 환자의 셋업 오차 확인 및 보정, 장기 및 표적의 움직임 확인이 용이한 장점이 있는 영상유도방사선 치료 장비이다. 하지만 촬영 시 받게 되는 imaging dose는 2차 암 발생위험의 원인이 된다. 이에 본 저자는 촬영조건(mAs)을 변화시킨 4가지 촬영 mode로 피부선량과 영상 품질을 비교 평가하여 적정한 촬영 mode를 제시하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 인체 모형 팬톰(RANDO phantom)을 사용하여 열형광선량계(TLD-100, Harshaw)를 두부, 흉부, 복부로 나누어 각 부위별로 8개씩 위치시킨 후 4가지의 촬영 mode (A: 125 kvp 80 mA 25 ms, B: 125 kvp 40 mA, 25 ms, C: 125 kvp 80 mA 10 ms, D: 125 kvp 40 mA, 10 ms)로 피부선량(skin dose)을 각각 3회씩 측정한 후 그 평균값을 얻어 평가하였고 catphan 504 phantom을 이용하여 장비 제조사의 영상 품질 정도관리 protocol에 따라서 각 촬영 mode 별 영상품질(image quality)을 비교 분석하였다. 결 과: 피부선량을 측정한 결과 두부에서는 A mode: 8.96 cGy, B mode: 4.59 cGy, C mode: 3.46 cGy, D mode: 1.76 cGy였고, 흉부는 A mode: 9.42 cGy, B mode: 4.58 cGy, C mode: 3.65 cGy, D mode: 1.85 cGy가 복부에서는 A mode: 9.97 cGy, B mode: 5.12 cGy, C mode: 4.03 cGy, D mode: 2.21 cGy의 값으로 측정이 되었다. 이는 A mode를 기준으로 약 B mode는 50%, C mode 60%, D mode는 80%의 선량 감소를 나타내었다. 영상품질 평가 항목인 HU reproducibility, Low contrast resolution, Spatial resolution (high contrast resolution), HU uniformity를 분석한 결과 모든 촬영mode에서 장비제조사에서 제시하는 tolerance 이내의 값으로 평가되었다. 결 론: 콘빔CT에 있어서 좋은 영상품질을 유지하면서 imaging dose를 줄이는 것은 중요하다. 이에 본 실험결과를 바탕으로 하여 soft tissue가 관심영역일 경우는 A mode로 두부 촬영 시 bone이 관심영역일 경우 D mode가 일반적인 경우에는 B, C mode가 적용 가능하리라 생각된다. 또한 콘빔CT촬영으로 인해 증가되는 2차 암 발생위험은 낮은 mAs의 촬영조건을 선택함으로써 줄일 수 있을 것이다.