• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제54권3호
• /
• pp.168-191
• /
• 2021

1997년부터 2015년까지 진행된 회암사지 발굴조사 중 2001년에는 4단지 문지에서 사천왕상을 장식했던 것으로 추정되는 소조편들이 출토되었다. 회암사 사천왕상은 대대적인 중창 불사가 있었던 여말선초에 4단지 문이 건립되면서 조성되었던 것으로 본다. 따라서 회암사 사천왕상은 조선시대 사천왕상의 연원과 관련하여 중요한 단서를 제공할 것이다. 이에 이 글에서는 양주 회암사지 4단지 문에 봉안되었던 사천왕상의 특징 및 도상과 조성 시기를 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 우선 출토 소조편을 천왕문에 봉안된 조선시대 사천왕상들과 비교하여 각 편의 대략적인 위치와 기능을 밝혔다. 또한 4단지 문지의 크기와 평면 형태를 조선시대의 다른 천왕문과 비교하여 회암사 사천왕상은 입상이었을 것이며 그 크기는 또 다른 입상인 법주사 천왕문의 사천왕상과 비례했을 것으로 보았다. 회암사 중창의 역사를 고려했을 때 4단지 문의 건립 완공 시기는 1376년과 1473년의 두 시기 중 하나로 볼 수 있고 회암사 사천왕상의 조성 시기 역시 이와 연동될 것이다. 따라서 이 글에서는 출토 소조편 가운데 화염형 장식편은 조선시대 사천왕상 보관의 일반적인 장식 요소로서 고려시대에는 나타나지 않는 점에 주목하였다. 이 편의 존재는 회암사 사천왕상의 조성 시기가 고려시대보다는 조선시대일 가능성을 높이기 때문에 유구 분석을 통한 건축사 연구에서도 4단지 문의 건립 시기를 대체로 15세기 후반으로 보는 의견을 근거로 제시하였다. 15세기 후반에 조성된 것으로 추정되는 회암사 사천왕상은 이후 조선시대 사천왕상의 도상에 영향을 미치는 하나의 새로운 전통으로서 정립되었다는 점에 그 역사적 의의가 있다. 이는 또한 거꾸로 4단지 문지의 건립 시기를 15세기 후반으로 보는 건축사학계의 의견에 하나의 근거가 될 수 있을 것이다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2014

The temple Hoeamsa(檜巖寺) was repaired by Naong(懶翁), and with this the power of the temple became far greater to be the greatest Buddhist temple during late Goryeo and early Joseon. Naong's reconstruction of Hoeamsa was originated from Jigong(指空)'s teaching 'Samsan Yangsu(三山兩水)'. But it is not clear whether Samsan Yangsu really meant Hoeamsa. By the way, after 14 years, Naong suddenly remembered this word and began to repair Hoeamsa in a large scale. From this, we can guess that Naong tried to give the contemporary Buddhism some change through the repair of Hoeamsa. But, as King Gongmin(恭愍王) the greatest supporter of Naong was suddenly assassinated, the political situation changed a lot and Naong also died unexpectedly. Naong's death brought out the critical sense to Hoeamsa and, in the process to resolve the crisis, the repair of Hoeamsa began to be justified through diverse religious factors. As these were expanded and developed on and one, Hoeamsa came to be honored as the most divine temple in Korea during the early Joseon dynasty. Furthermore, into the cause structure for the Naong's repair of Hoeamsa, the influence of Jajang was added through Odaesan Buddhism. As we can well understand, late Silla situation of Jajang and the late Goryeo of Naong were very similar and the both Buddhist leaders should have derived out some religious solution for them. In other words, both of them had a similar recognition in finding the religious solution for the contemporary crises. It becomes a way to understand the Hoeamsa repairing structure taken by Naong and his disciples. Therefore, by comparing the similar religious solution structures given by Jajang and Naong and by clearer understanding on Samsan Yangsu spirit, we can see the repair of Hoeamsa and the related aspects more accurately.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.7-19
• /
• 2014

The temple Hoeamsa(檜巖寺) was repaired by Naong(懶翁), and with this the power of the temple became far greater to be the greatest Buddhist temple during late Goryeo and early Joseon. Naong's reconstruction of Hoeamsa was originated from Jigong(指空)'s teaching 'Samsan Yangsu(三山兩水).' But it is not clear whether Samsan Yangsu really meant Hoeamsa. By the way, after 14 years, Naong suddenly remembered this word and began to repair Hoeamsa in a large scale. From this, we can guess that Naong tried to give the contemporary Buddhism some change through the repair of Hoeamsa. But, as King Gongmin(恭愍王) the greatest supporter of Naong was suddenly assassinated, the political situation changed a lot and Naong also died unexpectedly. Naong's death brought out the critical sense to Hoeamsa and, in the process to resolve the crisis, the repair of Hoeamsa began to be justified through diverse religious factors. As these were expanded and developed on and one, Hoeamsa came to be honored as the most divine temple in Korea during the early Joseon dynasty. Furthermore, into the cause structure for the Naong's repair of Hoeamsa, the influence of Jajang was added through Odaesan Buddhism. As we can well understand, late Silla situation of Jajang and the late Goryeo of Naong were very similar and the both Buddhist leaders should have derived out some religious solution for them. In other words, both of them had a similar recognition in finding the religious solution for the contemporary crises. It becomes a way to understand the Hoeamsa repairing structure taken by Naong and his disciples. Therefore, by comparing the similar religious solution structures given by Jajang and Naong and by clearer understanding on Samsan Yangsu spirit, we can see the repair of Hoeamsa and the related aspects more accurately.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.7-14
• /
• 2016

The architectural influence from the Yuan had impact on the Goryeo Dynasty in earnest during Yuan intervention period in the 14th century. The representative examples which were influenced by the Yuan architecture are the Eungjinjeon in Seongbulsa(成佛寺) temple, the ten-story stone pagoda of Gyeoncheonsa(敬天寺) temple site, the Bogwangjeon in Simwonsa(心源寺) temple, the Hoeamsa(檜巖寺) temple and so on. Notwithstanding the changes of relationship between two countries, it can be comprehended that there was a selective acceptance of the Yuan architectural peculiarities in Goryeo Dynasty. It means that the adoption of foreign culture in Korea has not been inevitable from the unilateral demand, but been autonomous by perceiving as the advanced culture. This tendency was maintained even though the government had been changed.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제50권2호
• /
• pp.4-25
• /
• 2017

양주 회암사는 고려말기부터 조선초기까지 왕실과 밀접한 관계를 맺으면서 크게 중창되어 대찰의 면모를 갖추었다. 특히 당대의 고승이었던 지공선사, 선각왕사 혜근, 무학대사 등과 인연을 맺으면서 여러 번 지속적으로 중창되었다. 이러한 요인들로 인해 회암사는 조선전기 불교계의 중심으로서 불교문화를 선도하는 사찰이 되었다. 이러한 회암사는 조선후기에 소실된 이후 1997년부터 여러 차례 발굴조사가 진행되었다. 회암사지에서는 막새기와, 평기와, 특수기와 등 다양한 유형의 기와들이 출토되었는데, 이중에서 막새기와는 시대적인 특징을 가장 잘 보여주는 유물이다. 그리고 다양한 범자 진언명 기와들이 출토되었다. 양주 회암사지에서는 다양한 유형의 수막새와 암막새가 출토되었는데, 이 중에서 우수한 제작기법으로 범자 진언이 새겨진 막새가 상당량 출토되었다. 범자 진언은 1자에서 9자까지 다양한 유형의 범자 진언이 새겨졌는데, 그중에서 정법계진언과 육자진언이 새겨진 기와가 가장 많이 출토되었다. 이 진언은 도량을 청정케 함과 동시에 조선시대 들어와 육자진언 신앙이 본격화되었음을 알 수 있게 한다. 그리고 회암사지에서는 편년을 분명하게 알 수 있는 범자 기와가 출토되어 다른 사찰 범자 기와의 편년 설정의 기준이 되고 있다. 이것은 회암사의 범자 기와를 제작한 와공들이 범자 진언에 대한 신앙과 이해가 높았음을 알 수 있게 한다. 그리고 조선시대 회암사 이후 대부분의 사찰에서 범자 진언명 기와가 사용된 것으로 보아 회암사가 우리나라 범자 진언명 기와의 제작과 활용에 있어서 새로운 전기를 마련해준 사찰이었다고 할 수 있다. 앞으로 다양한 방면에서 회암사지 출토 범자 진언명 기와에 대한 연구가 이루어지길 기대한다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.85-100
• /
• 2010

In this study, I investigated the function and the setting characteristics of 日type plan building ruins in the Hoe-amsa monastery site, that's renovated by Zen priest Na-ong(1320-76) in the later Goryeo Dynasty(918-1392), through the comparative research between China, Japan, and Goryeo in that time. The ruins of 日type plan building, located in the east side of Buddha hall ruins, is the ruins of Jungryo(衆寮). It was called as Jeondanrim, and the name can be seen from the record(天寶山檜巖寺修造記) of Yi-saek(李穡, 1328-96). It's name and the composition of plan is very similar to the Jungryo of Chinese and Japanese Zen monastery in 13th-14th century. And from it, we can see that, the priest Na-ong tried to introduce institution of Chinese Zen monastery, which he experienced during the time of study in China. But, the location of Jungryo in Hoe-amsa monastery is deferent from the Zen monastery of China and Japan, and it can be said as the setting characteristics of Hoe-amsa monastery in Goryeo Dynasty.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.45-65
• /
• 2008

Hoe-amsa temple was renewed by Zen priest Na-ong(1320-76) in the later Goryeo dynasty(918-1392), and he introduced the institution of Zen Buddhism temple of Yuan dynasty(1271-1368) in China. And in 13-14 century, many Zen Buddhism temple were built in east Asia, like China, Japan, Korea and so on. Hoe-amsa temple became to be ruined in the middle years of Joseon dynasty(1392-1910), and the ruin was excavated recently. The purpose of this study is to make a searching examination the history of Hoe-amsa temple by analyzing the historic records and excavation relics, and to clarify the function of Jeongcheong, east Bang-jang and west Bang-jang of Hoe-amsa temple, by comparative analysis with Bang-jang architecture of Zen Buddhism temple of Yuan dynasty. As the result of this study it can be said like follow. Hoe-amsa temple maintained the form made by priest Na-ong in spite of several times of repair in Joseon dynasty, and it was reflected in excavation relics of now. The Jeongcheon of Hoe-amsa temple was the space called Chimdang where the chief priest performed lectures and ceremony, the west Bang-jang was the living space of chief priest, and the east Bang-jang was lodging for honored guest. The architecture composed by Jeongcheong, east Bang-jang and west Bang-jang was the adaptation of institution of Bang-jang architecture of Zen Buddhism temple in Yuan dynasty, on the base of general architecture form of Goryeo dynasty.