• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.187-220
• /
• 2020

Today, administrative legislation is becoming more and more important in that it not only sets the legal life relationship of the people in great detail and detail, but is closely related to the occurrence, extinction, and alteration of rights and obligations held by prisoners. In the United States, the types of administrative legislation are divided into substantive and interpretative regulations, so-called substantive regulations, which give prior notice and opportunity to comment on interested parties through formal or informal administrative procedures in accordance with Article 553 of the Federal Administrative Procedures Act. On the other hand, the interpretation regulation, which is "the regulation established by the Administration for the simple interpretation of statutes," does not require prior notice or comment because it does not affect the people's rights obligations. The Azar v. Allina Health Service, 587 U.S. 1804, 2019 ruling by the U.S. Constitutional Court, subject to this research paper, is about a dispute over a new decision to require Medicare to determine the amount of compensation for care providers that provide medical services for the poor, and should the regulations be regarded as substantive under the Administrative Procedures Act and should not be given a hearing or a simple internal process for processing. Given that the current administrative procedure law of our country stipulates the procedures for administrative pre-announcement through Articles 42.1 and 44.1, but that our courts have not judged violations of legislative pre-announcement procedures under the Administrative Procedures Act so far as to judge the illegality of administrative legislation, the dispute of the U.S. Constitutional Court will provide new implications for controlling legal orders beyond simple legal interpretation and has great significance in terms of readjustment of relevant regulations under future administrative procedures.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.54
• /
• pp.39-69
• /
• 2018

In $j{\ddot{u}}ngster$ Zeit wird eine Fiktion im Verwaltungsrecht als essentielles Instrument $f{\ddot{u}}r$ Deregulierung sowie Verwaltungsvereinfachung mehr und mehr ins Feld $gef{\ddot{u}}hrt$ und ihre Erweiterung gefordert, weil sie in der Regel auf das Zeitsparen durch Verfahrenswegfall zielt. In Deutschland $erh{\ddot{o}}hte$ sich eine Bedeutung der Genehmigungsfiktion, indem sie durch 4.Novelle des VwVfG, die bei der Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2006/123/EG $ben{\ddot{o}}tigt$ wurde, als ein allgemeines verwaltungsrechtliches Rechtsinstitut eingeordnet wird. In Korea gibt es $vielf{\ddot{a}}ltige$ Fiktionsmethode, $w{\ddot{a}}hrend$ im deutschen Recht die Fiktion lediglich darin besteh, nach Ablauf der festgesetzten Frist die Entscheidung bzw. den Verwaltungsakt anzunehmen. Die systematische und logische Festsetzung der Fiktionslehre in Korea ist erforderlich. Deshalb wird eine allgemeine Regel zur Fiktion durch eine Kodifikation des allgemeinen Verwaltungsgesetzes, wie VwVfG, gefordert.

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.9-11
• /
• 1992

• LP가스
• /
• s.86
• /
• pp.18-20
• /
• 2003

석유자원부공고 제2003 - 163호 석유사업법시행령을 개정함에 있어 이를 국민에게 미리 알려 의견을 수렴하고자 그 개정이이와 주요골자를 행정절차법 제41조의 규정에 의거 다음과 같이 공고합니다.

• LP가스
• /
• s.80
• /
• pp.56-56
• /
• 2002

석유사업법시행령을 개정함에 있어 국민에게 미리 알려 의견을 듣고자 그 취지와 주요내용을 행정절차법 제41조의 규정에 의하여 다음과 같이 공고합니다.

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.36 no.5
• /
• pp.5-19
• /
• 2016

산업통상자원부는 5월 26일 행정절차법 제46조에 따라 "고준위방사성폐기물 관리 기본계획(안)"(이하 '기본계획(안)')을 행정 예고했다. 이번 기본계획(안)은 미래 세대를 위해 고준위 방폐물을 안전하게 관리하는 방식과 절차를 담은 사실상 최초의 '중장기 안전 관리 로드맵'으로서, 사용후핵연료 공론화위원회가 고준위 방폐물의 안전 관리의 세부 절차와 틀을 제시한 "권고안"을 바탕으로 정부 차원의 기본 계획을 만든 것이다. 산업부는 이번 기본계획(안)에 대해 6월 중순경 공청회 등 의견 수렴을 거쳐, 7월경 총리주재 원자력진흥위원회를 거쳐 확정할 예정이다. 기본계획(안)은 현재에서 최선의 관리 방식을 선택하면서 현실적 대안도 감안한 것으로, 향후 여건 변화를 반영하여 5년 단위로 보완할 예정이며, 과학 조사, 부지 선정 등 투명한 절차를 담은 (가칭)"고준위방폐물 관리절차에 관한 법률"을 금년중 국회에 제출할 계획이다. 기본계획(안)은 미래 세대를 위해 고준위 방폐물을 안전하게 관리하는 방식과 절차를 주요 내용으로 담고 있으며 세부 내용은 다음과 같다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.25-43
• /
• 2019

This study analyzed the problem of the time difference of medicine price cut in Korea according to the administrative and judicial process and sought to present the amendment in the related law to achieve substantial fairness. We considered unfairness of medicine price cut caused by the administrative and judicial process in three situations, the approval-patent linkage system, realistic differences in the practice of administration and suspension of price cut execution. Based on it, we reasoned out the solution to get substantial fairness in the administrative and judicial process of medicine price cut in Korea. Although each step of the administrative and judicial process is lawful and reasonable, the time difference of medicine price cut according to the administrative and judicial process can result in damages or windfall to both of pharmaceutical company and National Health Insurance Service. In the present legal system of Korea, it is unable to be correct. Thus, we present the amendment to correct the damages and windfall when it happens.

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.270
• /
• pp.114-120
• /
• 2015

식품의약품안전처는 '의약품 표시 등에 관한 규정'을 일부 개정함에 그 취지와 주요 내용을 국민에게 널리 알려 의견을 구하고자 '행정절차법' 제46조에 따라 행정 예고한다고 밝혔다. 이번 개정은 의약품 식별표시 등록 근거를 상향 입법하는 약사법 개정 등에 따라 의약품 낱알식별표시 방법, 등록절차 등 식별표시 제도 운영에 필요한 사항은 총리령으로 정하고 신청 자료의 검토 등 세부사항은 고시에서 정하는 등 관련 규정을 정비하기 위해 마련됐다. 또 용기 또는 포장에 상호 등의 기재요령 및 식별표시 제외대상 확대 등 제도 운영에 따른 미비점을 개선 보완하려는 것이다. 주요 내용으로는 ${\triangle}$의약품 식별표시 등록 근거를 상향 입법함에 따라 하위 규정 정비 ${\triangle}$의약품의 용기 또는 포장에 상호 등의 세부 기재방법 마련 ${\triangle}$식별표시 제외 대상 확대 등이다. 본 고에서는 주요 내용을 살펴보도록 한다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.42 no.4
• /
• pp.239-262
• /
• 2011

The Korean government's recent large-scale termination and modification of welfare benefits revealed a procedural problem under the National Basic Living Security Act. Under the Act, welfare recipients have a legal right to make complaints only after the termination or modification is enforced; the Act fails to provide the recipients with an opportunity for a hearing before termination or modification, and this creates serious threats to the recipients, whose livelihoods are dependent on welfare benefits. Korean jurisprudence has adopted the due process of law principle. The principle originated from the due process in US jurisprudence, and Korea has applied it broadly to any government actions that restrict individuals' constitutional or legal rights. This paper reviews the termination or modification procedure under the Act with the lens of the due process principle and criticizes that the current law is not in compliance with the principle. In supporting that such termination and modification procedure infringes on welfare recipients' protected rights, this paper discusses two theories as to what rights are protected. First, termination or modification of welfare benefits can be considered as deprivation of property. The 'property' theory may be weak under Korean jurisprudence, because the concept of property under the Korean Constitution is narrowly construed. Second, this paper relies on the constitutional provision that recognizes "the right to a life worthy of human beings," which requires the State to guarantee minimum standard of living for all. As welfare recipients are deemed to receive benefits as a right under the Constitution, any deviation from the minimum requirement would constitute a violation of constitutional rights. In any case, termination or modification of welfare benefits that are concretized under the Act should be protected under the due process principle, because the principle would cover any government actions that restrict established legal rights. This paper argues that the procedural due process requires the recipients be guaranteed an opportunity to have a hearing before the termination or modification is enforced. An independent decision-maker should hear the proceedings, and the recipients should have an option to orally present their opinions in front of the decision-maker. The hearing process under the Administrative Procedures Act of Korea offers elements that would satisfy these procedural requirements. Thus, this paper concludes that the National Basic Living Security Act should be amended to adopt the hearing process under the Administrative Procedures Act in its termination and modification procedure.

• Monthly Korean Chicken
• /
• s.149
• /
• pp.97-99
• /
• 2007

농림부는 축산물가공처리법 시행령을 개정함에 있어 그 개정 취지와 주요 내용을 국민에게 미리 알려 의견을 듣고자 지난 10월 25일 행정절차법 제41조의 규정에 의해 다음과 같이 공고했다.