• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.217-225
• /
• 2001

Any fracture passing through the socket of a teeth is compounded intraorally, even if the fracture is not displaced and the tooth is firm in its socket. Before the advent of antibiotic therapy the danger of infection in a compounded fracture posed severe problems in treatment. Infection is reduced by antibiotic therapy but prolonged use of antibiotics is not justified in an attempt to save a tooth which might eventually be sacrificed. There is still controversy in the management of third molar in mandibualr angle fracture, particulary in regard to their retention or removal at the time of fracture treatment. So we surveyed the 159 patients who were treated with open reduction of mandibular angle fracture containing third molar in fracture line, and compared with the postoperative infection rate depending on time intervals between injury and operation, eruption state of third molar, non-extraction or extraction of third molar related to eruption state, non-extraction or extraction of third molar related to condiition of third molar and its surrounding periodontium and were to propose treatment guidline of third molar in mandibular angle fracture The results obtained were as follows : 1. There were no statistical significance between the time from injury to operation and postoperative infection. 2. There were no statistical significance between eruption state of third molar and postoperative infection. 3. In case of retention of the third molar, there were no statistical significance between eruption state of third molar and postoperative infection, but in case of extraction, postoperative infection was high rate in complete impacted cases. 4. There were no statistical significance between non-extraction or extraction of third molar and postoperative infection depending on condition of third molar. There are no difference in infection rate statistically according to the time from injury to operation, eruption state and condition of third molar, but retention of third molar revealed lowered infection rate in completely impacted cases. By terms of the manegement of third molar, we should extract or preserve third molar in the line of the mandibular angle fracture according to possibility of infection.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.217-226
• /
• 2007

Purpose: Distraction osteogenesis is considered to take favorable effect on the TMJ and be beneficial to prevent the relapse after the mandibular advancement of Class II malocclusion patient. This is the report with literature review on the mandibular advancement in the patients showing preoperative condylar resorption and who need larger amount of advancement. Patients and method: Distraction osteogenesis using intraoral device was performed for three mandibular hypoplasia patients (one male and two females). All patients were adult over 18 years old. The patients showed condylar bony resorption preoperatively. The distraction was performed intraorally with modified SSRO. After 7 days of latency period, activation was performed at the rate of 1.0 mm/day with twice turn. The devices were removed after 4-8 month consolidation period. Results: Total advancement of mandible was average 13 mm. One patient showed openbite immediately after removal of distraction device. It took long time to guide the openbite with elastics. The comparison between cephalometries immediately after device removal and postoperative six month revealed average 3.4 mm relapse. This means that mandibular advancement with distraction osteogenesis needs overcorrection and elastic rehabilitation even after enough consolidation periods. Conclusion: Larger amount of mandibular advancement could be achieved with distraction osteogenesis in severe mandibular hypoplasia with condylar resorption. However, some relapse was found during the follow-up period and the over correction is considered to be needed. The effect of distraction osteogenesis seems to be investigated with long-term follow-up.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.70-75
• /
• 2000

본과에서는 하악에서 발생한 거대한 백악질-골성 섬유종에서 원발병소부위에 대한 광범위한 외과적 적출술 및 후방 장골이식을 통해 환자의 심미적, 기능적 안정성을 이루었으며 이환치아의 발거와 함께 술후 악간고정을 통하여 얇아진 하악하연부의 병적골절을 방지하였다. 현재까지 병소의 재발은 없고 양호한 결과를 보이고 있으며 향후 보철수복과 함께 지속적인 평가를 요할 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제53권1호
• /
• pp.39-45
• /
• 2015

하악골 연속성의 상실은 하악 기능의 균형과 대칭에 영향을 주며, 하악의 움직임에 변화를 유발하고 절제된 부위로 잔존하악골을 편위시킨다. 또한 연하, 발음, 하악의 운동, 저작, 호흡과 같은 다른 부분에서도 기능이상을 나타낸다. 하악골의 일부가 결손된 환자의 경우, 일반적으로 외과적 재건에 이어 보철적 수복이 이루어진다. 하지만 BRONJ (Bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the Jaw)와 같은 전신적 질환을 가진 환자의 경우, 외과적 재건의 적용에 제한이 있게 되고 전적으로 보철적 수복에 의지하게 된다. 다양한 보철적 방법이 하악의 변위를 최소화하고 저작 효율과 기능 및 심미를 개선하기 위하여 제시되었다. 가철성 국소의치로 치료 시, 입술, 뺨, 혀의 운동에 의해 측방 및 수평력이 발생하며 기능 인상을 통해 이를 최대한 줄여 주어야 한다. 또한, Twin occlusion을 사용하면 적절한 구순 및 협측의 지지를 얻으면서 교합관계의 형성을 가능하게 할 수 있다. 이 증례보고에서는 하악골 결손 증례에서 중립대 인상 방법과 twin occlusion을 통하여 기능적 심미적으로 만족할 만한 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하고자 한다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.266-275
• /
• 2008

저자들은 잔존 치조골의 흡수 및 위축으로 통상적인 임플란트 시술이 어려운 증례에서 하악골의 하악지에서 자가골을 채취하여 이를 증례에 따라 블록형 혹은 입자형으로 골 이식술을 시행하여 다양한 증례에 적용하여 비교적 만족할 만한 임플란트 식립 수술이 가능하였던 바 이를 문헌고찰과 함께 보고하며, 본 연구에서는 다양한 술식의 임상적 활용에 대해서만 보고하였으나 향후 이러한 증례들에 대하여 보다 장기적인 추적조사와 골 이식된 부위의 골 조직의 재형성 식립된 임프란트의 보철적인 기능과 장기적인 예후에 대한보다 체계적인 연구가 필요하리라 사료된다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.171-179
• /
• 1995

The conservative treatment of the condylar fracture has been used for a long time because of its simplicity, good prognosis and less complication. Traditionally the conservative treatment has been carried out by maxillomandibular fixation using arch bar and wire. But a simplified technique of maxillomandibular fixation introduced here is a procedure that 4 bone screws are placed above the apecies of the maxillary and mandibular canines and then ipsilaterally placed maxillary and mandibular bone screws are linked by a loop of wire each other. This procedure has several advantages compared with the traditional maxillomandibular fixation method. 1) it provides simplicity for the operators. 2) it sustains maxillomandibular fixation more rigidly compared with arch bar technique. 3) it keeps stable maxillomandibular fixation in the region of the anterior teeth so that anterior open bite tendency can be remarkably minimized. 4) it does not injure the periodontal tissue because the teeth are not engaged and causes less discomfort to the patient. 5) it decreases the possibility of operator's AIDS infection through inadvertent skin puncture. 6) it is highly recommended for the patients whose teeth are available for maxillomandibular fixation. The two male patients were diagnosed as bilateral condylar and symphyseal fracture of the mandible. They restored stable occlusion and functional mandibular movement only by a simplified technique of maxillomandibular fixation.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.334-345
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative stability and relapse according to 2 different fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies in mandibular prognathic patients. Tweenty one patients with Class III dental and skeletal malocclusion who were treated with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were selected for this retrospective study. We classfied the patients into two groups according to the fixation methods of bony segments after osteotomies. Group W (n = 10) had the bone segments fixed with nonrigid wire and Group S (n = 11) had bicortical screws inserted in the gonial area through a transcutaneous approach. Cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively, immediate postoperatively and more than six months postoperatively in each patient. After tracing the cephalometric radiographs, various parameters were measured. Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean posterior sagittal setback amounts of the mandibular symphysis was 8.6 mm in the wire group and 6.79 mm in the rigid group, Six months postoperatively, the wire group had 33.1% relapse of the mandibular symphysis and 22.8% in the rigid group relapse. Both groups experienced changes in the orientation and configuration of the mandible. It is thought that Rigid screw fixation is a more stable method than nonrigid wire fixation for maintaining mandibular setback after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제33권5호
• /
• pp.435-439
• /
• 2011

Ameloblastoma is an aggressive benign odontogenic epithelial tumour that may arise from the enamel organ, remnants of dental lamina, or the lining of an odontogenic cyst. It is usually categorized into solid or multicystic, unicystic, and peripheral types. Treatment ofameloblastomas include conservative methods such as marsupialisation, enucleation, and curettage; and radical treatments such as marginal or segmental resection. Radical treatments have resulted in lower recurrence rates; however, may also encounter esthetic, functional, and reconstructive problems. Unicystic ameloblastoma has been considered less aggressive and a lower recurrence tendency. Thus, many authors have recommended conservative treatment in cases of unicystic ameloblastoma. An 11 year-old boy presented with displaced second and third molars by luminal unicystic ameloblastoma in the mandible. Cyst enucleation, curettage, and third molar extraction were done. No signs of recurrence or esthetic problems such as facial asymmetry were seen radiologically and clinically, up to 8 years 2 months postoperatively.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.254-261
• /
• 2009

저자들은 상악골 구치부에서 잔존 치조골의 흡수 및 상악동의 함기화로 인하여 통상적인 임플란트 시술이 어려운 증례에서 하악골의 하악지에서 자가골을 채취하여 이를 분쇄한 후 이종골과 부피비로 약1:1로 혼합하여 상악동 골이식술을 시행하고 동시에 임플란트를 식립하여 비교적 만족할만한 결과를 얻었기에 이를 문헌고찰과 함께 보고하며, 향후 이러한 증례들과 다른 골이식재를 사용한 증례들에 대하여 보다 장기적인 추적조사와 골이식된 부위의 골조직의 재형성, 식립된 임프란트의 보철적인 기능과 장기적인 예후에 대한 보다 체계적인 연구가 필요하리라 사료된다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.173-177
• /
• 2010

In 1942, Stafne described 35 "bone cavities" at the angle of the mandible. They appeared as unilocular, well-circumscribed, round or elliptical radiolucencies located below the inferior dental canal and between the angle of the mandible and first molar tooth. Since 1942, these lesions have been frequently described under various terms: aberrant or ectopic salivary gland; static or latent or idiopathic defect, cavity or cyst; mandibular salivary gland inclusion; lingual mandibular cavity; and Stafne's cyst, defect or cavity. Usually they were asymptomatic, with a predilection for men between age 50 and 70 years, and almost unilateral. At surgical exploration, they appeared as concavities on the lingual cortex and contained salivary gland tissue, often in continuity with the submandibular gland. In 1957, Richard and Ziskind were the first to report the appearance of a Stafne's cyst in the premolar region. Contrary to posterior defects, the anterior defects are difficult to diagnose clinically because the mandibular canal is not present, and the unilocular radiolucency can be confused with other cysts (radicular, residual, odontogenic, lateral periodontal,etc). The purpose of the present report is to describe an unusual case of Stafne's cyst in the anterior region of the mandible in 58-years-old woman.