• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.92-103
• /
• 1995

Since the late of 1960,s, the improvement of science inquiry skills has been one of the most important goals in secondary science education. To achieve this goal, it is essential to develop a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating science inquiry skills. The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating science inquiry skills for high school students. The instrument is developed through R & D procedure, which includes two field trials of the instrument. This study has formed a clear definition of the elements of science inquiry skills (formulating a hypothesis, controlling variables, designing an experiment, numeric calculation, graphing experimental data, inference, determining relationship, determining causalities, predicting experimental results , drawing a conclusion, formulating a generalization or model), and established the goals of assessment and developed the items of assessment. The instrument, Test of Earth Science Inquiry Skills, consists of 33 items which measure 11 science inquiry skills. There are content-free items for each science inquiry skills. This study has selected 11 science inquiry skills which are considered appropriate for being evaluated by paper-and-pencil test with SIEI (Hur,1984). The content validity of items, objectivity of the scoring keys and clarity of the items were checked by six experienced specialists in science education. At the same time, the two field trials has been executed and produced the reliability of the instrument, item difficulty index, and the effectiveness of distracters. The first field trial was performed using a sample of 304 high school students, and the second one using a sample of 872 high school students. Because the content validity is 84 % and the reliability (K-R 20) is 0.84, the developed instrument in this study is considered valid and reliable. The difficulty index is 49.4 %, answer ratio 59.1 %, the discrimination index 0.47 and the effectiveness of distracters evenly distributed, which also suffice the criteria of good instrument. The developed instrument in this study can diagnosis the well-developed science inquiry skills and the ill-developed science inquiry skills of the students, and trace the degree of the improvement of science inquiry skills.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.549-558
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a Nursing Competency Scale in Simulation (NCSS) for nursing students. Methods: A preliminary version of the NCSS of 14 items was derived from the literature. A panel of seven experts reviewed the preliminary version for content validation and developed 15 items scale. A convenient sample of 195 nursing students completed the survey and two evaluators measured the performances of nine teams in a simulation scenario with NCSS. The data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, independent t-test and Cronbach's alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used in order to estimate the degree of inter-rater reliability. Results: An exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that two factor structures of the NCSS explained 51.1% of the total variance. Two factors were named psychosocial skills and cognitive and psychomotor skills. The mean scores of NCSS between third and 4th grade were significantly different providing support for its known-group validity. Cronbach's alpha was .90 and ranged from .79 to .88. The overall ICC for inter-rater agreement was 0.89 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.98). Conclusion: This scale shows preliminary evidence for validity and reliability. It could be a useful instrument for measuring learning outcome in simulation for nursing students' clinical competency.

• 임상간호연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.13-28
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This study was conducted to develop standards ensuring nursing process-based fluid intake/output and tube care, and to develop a performance measurement tool evaluating the level of care according to the standards, and finally to determine validity of the standards and the tool. Methods: The standards and the tool were reviewed by a panel of experts and refined based on the panel's suggestions. Validity of the standards and the tool were examined using a survey of 293 hospital nurses. Results: The mean validity scores of the performance measurement standards and the tool were 3.86 and 4.02, respectively, out of 5.00. So the performance measurement standards and the tool in this study were found to be acceptable in evaluating quality of nursing care for fluid intake/output and tubes. Conclusion: This result indicates that the performance measurement standards and the tool developed in this study are valid instruments to monitor and improve quality of nursing care for fluid intake/output and tube interventions, such as intravenous catheters, nasogastric tube and urinary catheters.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.255-264
• /
• 1996

정상적으로 일상생활을 영위하는 사람들을 대상으로 스트레스 수준을 가늠하고, 스트레스에 대한 조정기전을 밝히고자 하는 목적으로 개발된 사회 심리적 건강 측정 도구(PWI)의 신뢰도 및 타당도를 평가하기 위하여, 의과 대학생을 대상으로 4주간격으로 두 차례의 설문 조사를 실시하였다. 내적 일치도를 나타내는 Crohnbach's $\alpha$계수가 0.93의 값을 보였다. 4주의 간격을 둔 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 1차조사의 성적과 2차조사의 성적 사이 Pearson상관계 수가 0.72의 값을 보였다. 탐색적 인자 분석을 통해 고유값 1이상의 인자는 13개였다. 인자의 수를 4개로 지정하여 주축인자법과 직교 회전법으로 분석하여 인자 구조를 비교한 결과 첫번째 인자는 거의 일치하였으나, 3번째와 4번째 인자는 거의 일치하지 않았다. 확증적 인자분석을 통해 선행 연구의 4인자 모형과 이 연구의 탐색적 분석 결과에 나타난 4인자 모형의 적합도를 구한 결과 RMR값이 0.1미만인 것을 제외하고는 모든 적합도 지수가 부적합하게 나왔다 각 인자를 측정 변수로 간주하고 그 하부에 이론 변수로서 단일 인자가 존재하는 것으로 구성한 일차원적 단일 인자 모형에 대한 적합도는, 비록 이 모형이 오차 항의 상관성을 지닌 것이긴 하나 적합한 지수를 많이 보여, PWI가 2차원적 측정 구조를 가졌을 가능성을 제시하였다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.175-182
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 환자의 중증도 분류 및 인체 주요 장기의 상태 예측을 위하여 APACHE II(Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation) 기반 CDSS 도구인 CAOPI(Computer Aided Organ Prediction Index) 시스템을 제안한다. 기존 ICU 환자의 중증도 평가방법은 APACHE II를 이용하여 특정 시점의 중환자 위험도를 특정한 시점 데이터를 이용하여 산출하는 방식이었으나, 실시간으로 변화하는 환자의 상태에 맞춰 조치를 취하는데는 한계가 있다. CAOPI 시스템은 중환자실에 입실하는 환자들의 질병 중증도를 정확히 분류하고, 환자의 사망예측 뿐만 아니라장기 상태를 시각화 하여 위험도를 수치화 하였다. 또한 위험도를 특정 장기별로 구분하여 담당의 사가 환자의 상태에 맞는 맞춤형 응급조치를 취할 수 있도록 설계 및 개발 하였다.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.131-145
• /
• 2013

The purposes of this research are : to analyze biotop type and carry out conservation value assessment in study areas, Daegu Science Park national industrial complex; to supply basic data for the landscape ecological planning; and to improve the application of assessment model with the development of Biotop Value Assessment Tool (B-VAT). The result is as follows. First of all, the field survey showed 434 species of flora and 220 species of insecta. According to the result of biotop type analysis in the biotop classification system with field survey, 13 biotope groups and 63 biotope types were classified. In the map of biotop type classification, readjusted farmland biotop(FA) was prevalent and forest biotop(E) was shown to the southeast side of the site. Next, according to the first assessment with B-VAT, total 19 biotop types including natural river(BA) with abundant plants had I grade and total 16 biotop types such as vegetable garden adjacent to river(BC) had V grade. In terms of the second assessment, we analyzed total 30 areas, total 82 areas, respectively, which had special meaning for the conservation of species and biotop(1a, 1b) and which had meaning for the conservation of species and biotop(2a, 2b, 2c). This research will be a basic data, which can solve the damage problem systematically and control it landscape-friendly with biotop classification and assessment which we developed. In particular, we expect that biotop value assessment tool(B-VAT) with GIS will be a great contribution to popularity compared with the value model by complicated algorism such as adding-matrix, weight and equal distribution. In addition, this will save the time and improve the accuracy for hand-counting.

• 재활치료과학
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.71-80
• /
• 2016

목적: 본 연구는 뇌졸중으로 인한 편마비 환자를 대상으로 거울치료의 임상적용 가능성 및 효과를 제시하는 데에 목적이 있다. 연구방법: 2005년 1월부터 2016년 1월까지 국외 학술지에 게재된 논문을 PubMed를 통하여 검색하였다. 포함기준과 배재기준을 고려하여 최종적으로 9개의 논문을 대상으로 분석하였다. 결과: 거울치료의 효과를 알아보기 위한 중재방법으로는 손목과 손의 단순한 움직임과 과제기반 거울치료가 사용되었다. 중재효과를 알아보기 위해 상지기능, 일상생활동작, 신체적 상태, 삶의 질 평가도구가 사용되었다. 상지의 기능은 근위부보다 원위부에서 더욱 효과가 있고, 일상생활동작에서도 유의한 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났으나, 삶의 질에서는 실험군과 대조군 사이에 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 연구를 통해 임상 치료사들은 대상자의 특성에 따라 거울치료를 적절하게 사용할 근거를 찾을 수 있을 것이라 생각된다. 하지만 다양한 거울치료의 프로토콜로 인해 효율적인 적용방법을 확인하는 데 어려움이 있었다. 앞으로는 거울치료의 효과를 극대화 할 수 있는 체계화된 치료 프로토콜이 개발되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.225-235
• /
• 1994

Concidering environmental education as an ultimate resolution for environmental problems, we conducted a study focusing on affective matters. An instrument was developed to evaluate attitudes of elementary and middle school students toward environmental problems. To develop a reliable Likert-type evaluation instrument scale with which emotional intensity could be judged, mean, standard deviation, response frequency distribution, discrimination index, reliability were calculated. As a result, 21 statements for recognition level and 14 statements for behavioral level were made(The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the instrument was .786). This instrument was used to evaluate 5th and 6th grade elementary school students and 1st and 2nd grade middle school students(total number of subjects was 980). The result of this survey can be summarized as follows. 1. Students recognized the seriousness of environmental problems but they did not behave in such a manner as to prevent it. 2. As a result of t-test, behavioral level score of elemenatary school students was significantly higher than that of middle school students(p<.001). 3. This study showed that there was a significant correlation between the recognition level score and the behavioral level score(r=.386, p<.001). 4. Two-Way ANOVA was used to analyze that there was any significant difference according to grade and sex. The results were as follows. (1) No significant difference was found in total score. (2) On recognition level, female students' score was signigicantly higher than that of male students(p<.01). (3) On behavioral level, higher-grade students' score was lower than that of lower-grade-students (p<.001).

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.33-41
• /
• 1982

본(本) 논문(論文)에서는 도로교통망(道路交通網)의 기하구조(幾何構造)를 정의(定義)하는 파라메타를 측정(測定)할 수 있도록 해석적(解析的) 접근방법(接近方法)을 개발(開發)하였다. 이를 위하여 시설수준상(施設水準上)의 계급(階級)을 갖는 격자형(格子形)의 도로망(道路網)을 선택(選擇)하였으며 통행(通行)의 기종점(起終點)이 균등(均等)히 배치(配置)된 동시에 통행거리(通行距離)의 분포(分布)가 기점(起點)의 위치(位置)에 독립(獨立)인 균질(均質)의 도시평면(都市平面)을 가상(假想)하였다. 본(本) 논문(論文)의 목적(目的)은 통행(通行)과 건설(建設)에 따른 도로(道路)의 총비용(總費用)을 최소화(最少化)할 수 있는 도시간선도로(都市幹線道路)의 최적간격(最適間隔)을 구(求)하는 데 있으며 여기에서 통행배분(通行配分)은 Wardrop의 제(第) 1 원칙(原則)에 입각(立脚)하였다. 본(本) 논문(論文)에서 제시(提示)된 방법(方法)은 효율적(効率的) 교통망(交通網)을 위한 일반화(一般化)된 접근(接近)의 틀이라고는 할 수 없으나 대안(代案)의 설정(設定)과 평가(評價)에서는 기본도구(基本道具)로 사용(使用)될 수 있으며 통행(通行)의 O-D 패턴과 비용(費用)의 크기가 주어지는 경우 적어도 질적(質的)인 측면(側面)에서 도시간선도로(都市幹線道路)의 최적간격(最適間隔)에 대한 개요(槪要)를 밝힐 수 있다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.313-323
• /
• 2007

Purpose: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with cardiovascular disease in Korea has rarely been studied, mostly due to the lack of a psychometrically validated disease-specific instrument. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a cardiovascular specific-HRQOL questionnaire (CD-QOL). Method: The CD-QOL was developed and validated as follows; item generation, pilot study, and psychometric tests. Patients were recruited from three-university hospitals. The patients were asked to complete the preliminary questionnaire comprising the content-validated items, SF-36, and CES-D. The NYHA and KASI classifications were used to classify the functional performance of the patients. The data was analyzed using correlation, factor analysis, multidimensional scaling, multitrait/multi-item matrix, ANOVA, and Cronbach's alpha. Result: Preliminarily, thirty-nine items were generated. Factor analysisextracted a five-factor solution with a total of twenty-two items. One item was deleted based upon the MDS. The remaining items were moderately correlated with the subscales of the SF-36 and associated with depression measured with the CES-D. The mean scores of patients in NYHA and KASI class I were significantly higher than those in NYHA and KASI class II or/and III, which suggested patients with better functional performance were likely to have a better HRQOL. Cronbach's alphas of the total and subscales were all greater than 0.70. Conclusion: The CD-QOL is a easily applicable instrument with excellent psychometric properties of content, criterion, factorial, convergent, and known-groups validity, and internal consistency reliability in Korean patients with cardiovascular disease.