• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제1권
• /
• pp.77-102
• /
• 1970

The writer discusses about the value of the two-volume Chuchih $Ch'unch\hat{e}ng$ in the Toyo Bunko in terms of its history and contents. The book is an incomplete reprint without preface. However, it has no error in its contents through the three elaborate revisions. The writer defines the book as a scientific and religious work. The author shows in the first volume his hypothesis, analysis, and conclusion, of the order of the things in the universe and in the second volume tries to prove the God's existence and Divine Providence. The proofs presented are related to the scientific thoughts of the West in the 17th century.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.163-176
• /
• 2004

This study is on the characteristics of SoAUiBang(小兒醫方-pediatrics). Through this study, the characteristics of SoAUiBang(小兒醫方-pediatrics) can be organized as the following: First of all, with the issue of first edition and authorship, SoAUiBang(小兒醫方-pediatrics) was written by MongAm(夢菴) ChaeGyuHeon(崔奎憲), and it is definite that it was first published in 1912 at GwangHakSeoPo(廣學書鋪) Secondly, the fact that SoAUiBang(小兒醫方-pediatrics) shows clear distinction in various aspects from previous pediatrics books has great academic value. As such, SoAUiBang(小兒醫方-pediatrics) maintained the form of Oriental Medicine and at the same time, took in the changes of the times.

• 중국학논총
• /
• 제61호
• /
• pp.181-202
• /
• 2019

Huangying-er黃鶯兒 is regarded as one of Feng Menglong's folk song books such as Guazhi-er掛枝兒, Shange山歌, and Jiazhutao夾竹桃. However, preceding researches criticized Huangying-er as 'a fly in the ointment' for laughing at pitiable female entertainers and harming the spirit of edification. In response, there has not been a detailed research on basic items such as editions, compiler, and written time. Thus, this study tried to shed new light on bibliographic information of Huangying-er. To discuss the bibliographic information of Huangying-er, this study organized and supplemented the 8 editions featuring Huangying-er in Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty periods. Most of these editions have signature of 'Fubaizhuren浮白主人' or 'Fubaizhaizhuren浮白齋主人'. After organizing the existing theories, this study came to support the theory claiming that the complier is Feng Menglong himself. Also, in reference to the works related to Huangying-er, this study concluded that Huangying-er was complied before compilation of Guazhi-er and Shange, the middle of the Wanli萬曆 reign period.

• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.65-78
• /
• 2012

Found on the 19th century, GuiLinGuBon can have more several unique features than the other extinguish editions. GuiLinGuBon has been Receiving attention, because it contains both and 's contents, as well as it consistt of 16 books to the same as the preperce, and then it analyzed the chapter on Wending Disease(溫病) and Liuyin Disease(六淫病) in detail which is not written in current book, and gives several clues to solve many questions that caused the controversy. This thesis is the study the GuiLinGuBon on the overall composition and the prescriptions for the overall analysis to book configuration, herbs configuration, 8 method(八法) according to the prescribed frequency, SinNongBonChoGyong(神农本草经) according to the herbs of the SamPum(三品) classification and statistical processing GuiLinGuBon the specific features were analyzed.

• 한국한의학연구원논문집
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2010

Lee Gyujun put forward Buyang as core medical tenet, which has been one of the prominent medical theories since around the first decade in the 20th century. He wrote two major medical books except for small kinds: Somundaeyo(素問大要) and Uigamjungma(醫鑑重磨). Until recently, studies on that theory have tended to focus on examining Somundaeyo. However, study on Uigamjungma is equally as important and is to be done as that on Somundaeyo. This is because the former is rather clinically oriented as the latter is theoretical so that the two is twins of one medical theory, in other words the other side of a coin. There are four versions of Uigamjungma editions: the first edition in 1922 by wooden block; one with annotation and Korean translation by Park Heesung; one edited and manually transcribed by Lee Wonse(李元世); and Daesung publisher's in 2000. Lee Gyujun revised medical theories, prescription, and herbology extracted not only from Donguibogam(東醫寶鑑) as well known wide, but also from Bangyakhappyeon(方藥合編) and Gyengakjeonse(景岳全書), based on the Buyang Theory(扶陽論).

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.97-116
• /
• 2014

이 연구는 명나라 영락제의 명으로 편찬한 <사서대전>의 유포와 우리나라에 전래 된 이후 복각 간행된 판본에 대해 분석한 것이다. 명나라 영락제가 황위를 찬탈한 이후 태조의 유훈을 받든다는 명분을 들어 호광(胡廣) 등에게 편찬하도록 칙명을 내리자 불과 10개월만인 영락 13(1415)년 9월 완성되었다. 그 후 명나라 내부(內府)에서 간행한 대전본(大全本)은 세종 대에 모두 3차에 걸쳐 전래되었다. 세종은 명나라에서 입수된 제1차 전래본을 저본으로 세종 9-10(1427-1428)년 사이에 경상도, 전라도, 강원도 3도 지방에서 각각 분담하여 판각을 완료하였다. 조선에 전래된 이후 유포 현상을 조사 분석한 결과, 명 전대본(大全本)을 그대로 복각한 판본이 조선에서 대략 18회 이상 간행되었으며, 그 중 현재 50종만이 남아 있다는 사실이 밝혀졌다. 이 현존본 50종을 대상으로 분석한 결과, 대체로 임란으로 서적이 급속도로 망실되었기 때문에 이를 시급히 보충하기 위해 주로 서적의 수요가 시급했던 경기와 경상 지방을 중심으로 집중적으로 간행 보급되었던 것으로 파악하였다.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.33-44
• /
• 2017

Introduction to Medicine (Euihak-Ipmun), written by Lee Chun of the Ming Dynasty, is a comprehensive medical book brought to Joseon in the 1600s. It directly influenced many medical books written in the Joseon Dynasty of the same period, and became a major citation document of Dongui-Bogam. Introduction to Medicine became a major text for medical education in 1834 and has since been used as a clinical primer of Korean medicine. This article first examines the Joseon's era published version of Introduction to Medicine using documentation of the Diary of the Royal Secretariat (Seungjeongwon Ilgi), and a woodblock list. Based on these investigations, the reviewer examined the existing versions of the book, and focused on various characteristics for comparison. This article reveals facts which include : 1) All editions of Introduction to Medicine published at the present office are published by Jeolla-do provincial office (Jeolla-Gamyeong). 2) The first edition was published before 1636. 3) A finely produced version (Jeongganbon) was published around 1760. 4) The Jeongrijache-iron type publication was published around 1801.

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.193-196
• /
• 2008

최근에 "내경(内经)"의 연구(研究)가 이론연구(理论研究)에 편중되어서 그 내용(内容)이 문자훈고(文字訓詁), 판본류전(版本流傳), 음양오행(陰陽五行), 장상학설(藏象學說), 체질학설(體質學說), 병인병기(病因病機), 병증방약(病證方藥), 치칙치법(治則治法), 양생(養生)의 많은 분야를 섭렵하고 있으나,각가학설(各家學說)의 측면에서 "내경(內經)"을 연구한 사람은 비교적 적다. "내경(內經)"은 한 사람의 손에서 나온 것이 아니며, 한 시대의 저작(著作)도 아니고, 상당한 시간 동안에 많은 의가(醫家)들의 경험(經驗)이 집결(集結)되어 편집됨으로써 각가학설(各家學說)의 성질(性質)을 띄고 있다. 비록 그렇다 하더라도 "내경(內經)"의 각편(各篇)의 경문(經文)에 종합된 이론 체계는 그 일치성이 있으나, 구체적인 관점에서 같지 않은 것이 적지 않은데, 몇 가지의 학술관점(學術觀點)은 모두 고대의가(古代醫家)들의 귀중한 경험(經驗)의 결정(結晶)으로서 옛날부터 중점적으로 연구(研究)하였다. 각가학설(各家學說)의 측면에서 "내경(內經)"을 연구하면 중의학(中醫學)이 후세(後世)에 발전(發展)한 중(中)에 약간의 내용상의 불일치를 설명하는데 유용하고,여러 학술이론과 각종 학술류파(學術流派)의 형성(形成), 발전(發展) 과정(過程)을 심도 있게 이해하는 할 수 있어서 이론과 임상의 측면에 많은 도움을 준다.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.57-70
• /
• 2018

Much research has already been done on Donguibogam. However, comparison of specific characters was not done because researchers found it difficult to compare different editions of the text in one place. Recently, important editions have been published on the Internet, making comparison possible. In this paper, researchers compare eight editions Donguibogam, including the original edition published in 1613 and seven other editions corrected by the Naeuiwon (Joseon Dynasty National Medical Center). The comparison results were summarized and tabulated. The results of the comparison are analyzed and presented in this article as a chart. The result of comparing the characters and the analyzed graph were in agreement. The authors propose that all written and electronic publications of Donguibogam should refer to other editions implied, quoted or referenced within the text and including with proper citations, and reference the original and first edition. Inadequate referencing will pollute future knowledge of this foundational text of Traditional Korean Medicine and may result in perpetration of mis-information. Based on accumulated knowledge and study of historical Korean Medicine texts, the Namsan edition made a mistake in the editing process. The year of publication of Gabsul-yoengyoeng-gegan Edition needs to be studied again and corrections made where appropriate.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.169-236
• /
• 2007

${\ll}$Bangyakhappyeon(方藥合編)${\gg}$ was written by Hwang Do-Yeon (黃度淵) and his son Hwang Pil-Soo (黃泌秀) in the late days of Chosun Dynasty, when the country was in a state of social confusion by the first introduced western civilization and invasion of the foreign powers. In response to this situation where realistic knowledge and solution was of importance than theological review, Hwang and his son wrote the book to satisfy the needs. The book, ${\ll}$Bangyakhappyeon(方藥合編)${\gg}$ furthered new publishment of abstract asian medical science in a more compact form, emphasizing more realistic means of it. This new publishment were a significant counter-measure to cope with the inflow of practical western medicine, which the move has moreover enhanced popularization of Han Medicine(韓醫學). After reviewing ${\ll}$Bangyakhappyeon(方藥合編)${\gg}$ in xylographical approach, I have acquired conclusions as below.