• The Optical Journal
• /
• s.148
• /
• pp.41-43
• /
• 2013

광학 전문기업 해성옵틱스가 지난 11월 6일 한국거래소 코스닥시장에 상장됐다. 한국거래소 서울사옥 홍보관에서 열린 이날 기념식은 해성옵틱스 이을성 대표를 포함해 한국거래소 최홍식 부이사장, 코스닥협회 김원식 부회장, 우리투자증권 IB사업부 정영채 대표 등이 참석한 가운데 진행됐다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is, as to verify the effect of IR announcements, the IR activity to look at the usefulness. In previous study, they found that the IR announcement leads to reductions in information asymmetry, effect to positive stock price. This study examine the abnormal returns between group by corporate characteristics. The data used in this study are daily stock market returns taken from the KOSDAQ listed company with IR announcements during the 2005-2012 year(8 year). We find that follows. First, the capital market is accepted IR activity as the positive information. Second, abnormal returns of small company is higher than big size that. We show the difference of abnormal returns between the venture company and general company, the venture company's high. The abnormal returns of corporate with high ownership is above the group of low ownership. Additionally, consider interaction by firm characteristics, we show the interaction between firm size and business type. The result of two-way ANOVA is that venture corporate with big size are more abnormal returns than others. Also, we demonstrate that firm location is the factor of difference on information effect in venture firm.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.121-156
• /
• 2010

Back-door-listing can be viewed both as M&A and an alternative to IPO. If IPO is an access to the capital market through regulations, back-door-listing would be the way of entering the market through trading. Back-door-listing can be a better choice considering the common wisdom that regulations hinder the functioning of free market system. One would, however, prefer IPO, for the informational asymmetry isless severe in case of IPO. This paper examines if IPO is superior to back-door-listing as to the informational efficiency. The excess buy-and-hold returns of the Kosdaq back-door-listing firms are estimated over the three-year-period since the event. They are compared against the excess buy-and-hold returns of the Kosdaq IPO firms over the same period of time. The results confirm this paper's prediction that IPO should be more information-efficient. Both IPO and back-door-listing firms start with high short-term excess returns and end up with long-term under-performance. However, back-door-listing firms show more significantly damaging long-term results. Furthermore, back-door-listing firms record poorer accounting results over the research period. These results imply that there exists fad at the time of both events and, in case of back-door-listing, this fad is reinforced by the possibility of window dressing.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2011.05b
• /
• pp.765-768
• /
• 2011

최근 건설경기의 난국 속에서 많은 건설기업들이 경영상의 어려움에 처해 있다. 본 연구에서는 코스피 코스닥 상장 건설기업들을 대상으로 ANP와 DEA 결합 모델을 이용하여 기업의 경영 효율성 분석을 실시한다. DEA 모형에 쓰이는 투입 및 산출 요소의 결정은 ANP 모형의 중요도 분석을 통하여 결정함으로써 기존의 방법보다 효율성 분석 결과의 신뢰도를 제고하였는데, 효율성 분석결과 비효율적 그룹에 대해서는 효율적 그룹으로의 이동을 위한 벤치마킹 대상과 개선을 위한 효율성 수치를 제공한다. 또한 연구의 결과로 나온 기업별 효율성과 주가와의 상관관계를 분석한다. 본 연구에서는 코스피 상장 건설기업 36곳과 코스닥에 상장된 건설기업 21곳인 총57개 기업을 대상으로 기업의 효율성을 평가하였는데, 효율성 분석결과 CCR 효율성이 1인 기업은 4개 기업, BCC 효율성이 1인 기업은 7개 기업, 규모의 효율성이 1인 기업은 4개 기업 이었으며 각각의 효율적 그룹군 기업과 주가와의 상관관계는 CCR, BCC 모형 모두에서 0.7 이상의 강한 양의 상관관계를 나타냈다.

• Monthly Korean Chicken
• /
• s.132
• /
• pp.29-31
• /
• 2006

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.6
• /
• pp.445-454
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of the financial structure of pharmaceutical companies on R&D investment. 358 pharmaceutical firms listed in the KOSDAQ market from 2000 to 2012. Financial statements and comments in general and internal transactions were extracted from TS-2000 of the Korea Listed Company Association (KLCA), and data related to stock price was extracted from KISVALUE-III of NICE Information Service Co., Ltd. STATA 12.0 was used as the statistical package for panel analysis. The summary of the findings and the interpretation of the significance of this are as follows: First, the shareholding ratio of major shareholders and foreigners had a positive influence on R&D investment. Second, the ratio of outside directors had a negative influence on R&D investment. Third, the shareholding ratio of institutional investors did not have a significant influence on R&D investment.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.11
• /
• pp.487-493
• /
• 2019

This study examines the ratio of R&D expenses in intangible assets for pharmaceutical companies, and determines whether these expenses affect the firm value among companies listed on the KOSDAQ. The research subjects included annual R&D expenses of 39 pharmaceutical companies listed on the KOSDAQ between 2011 and 2017. The survey was achieved via "Panel Data Model" with "Tobin Q" as an independent variable, and the ratio of R&D expenses in intangible as a dependent variable. Results of the study conclude that the ratio of R&D expenses in intangible assets of KOSDAQ pharmaceutical companies negatively influence the Tobin Q (Enterprise Value). A large proportion of intangible assets indicates increased R & D investment, and the operating profit is likely to be low due to the high debt ratio, thereby negatively impacting the enterprise value. This study further investigates whether the existing researches are based on researches that identify the total value of R & D expenditure. Results determine a significant relationship between enterprise value and R & D expenditure.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.21-37
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this article is to analyze the relationship between corporate firm performance and large shareholder ownership. We use the individual firms listed in KOSDAQ and implement the ordinary least squares regression analysis. Our empirical analysis shows that the relationship between large shareholder ownership and market performance is not in accordance with the preceding studies supporting U type. We document, however, that the empirical analysis shows that the relationship between large shareholder ownership and accounting performance is similar to the reverse U type. A robustness test is implemented to generate a more acute analysis. The robustness test shows that the large shareholder's shareholding of 0-50% supports the interest convergence hypothesis; however, more than 50% of the shareholding shows that the large shareholder ownership is not significantly related to the accounting performance.

• Korean small business review
• /
• v.41 no.2
• /
• pp.51-78
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to classify unlisted companies' entering method into stock market and to find out a advantageous choice between IPO and SPAC. The research samples are two types(79 IPO companies and 46 SPAC companies) of 125 companies. Which were being listed in the KOSDAQ market from 2010 to 2017. The analysis results are as follows. At first, after analyzing the impact of well known variables such as asset size, company history and number of employees to select listing methods. I found that the variables of asset size and company history have a significant negative (-) effect on the SPAC variable. Secondly, the debt ratio variable has a significant positive (+) effect on the SPAC variable. Third, it was found that the ratio of profitability variables, such as operating income to sales have a systematically positive (+) effect on the SPAC variable. Fourth, I analyzed the impact of the largest stockholder in unlisted companies on the selection of listing methods. I found that the largest stockholder are systematically having a positive (+) effect on SPAC. The result means that unlisted companies that chose SPAC have the larger shareholder shares that are relatively higher than the unlisted companies that chose IPO.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.239-270
• /
• 2017

This paper examines the relationship between ownership structure and the intensity of R&D expenditures of a firm by analyzing the panel data composed of 553 manufacturing firms in KSE(Korea Stock Exchange) and KOSDAQ listed firms for the period of 2007-2014. The major findings are as follows; (1) Regarding the relationship between CEO stockholding and R&D intensity, we find the inverted-U shape relationship in KOSDAQ firms, consistent with the theoretical discussion and empirical studies on U.S. firms. The result suggests that management stockholding reduces agency problem at the R&D margin. On the contrary, the insignificant result in KSE firms seems to be due to the scant stockholding of most 'non-owner' CEOs. (2) Regarding the relationship between the largest shareholder's portion and R&D intensity, KSE firms exhibit negatively significant relationship, suggesting the existence of serious agency problem between the largest shareholder and the minor shareholders. This agency problem seems to be alleviated in KOSDAQ firms mainly because the founders with technology expertise are still in charge of the business. (3) Foreign investors seem to fail in effectively encouraging R&D expenditures in either KSE or KOSDAQ listed firms. This study contributes to the existing literature by showing for the first time that ownership structure affects R&D activities in different ways between KSE and KOSDAQ firms.