• Title/Summary/Keyword: 치유필드

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Normative Standards on Number of Users, Perceived Conflict, and Perceived Interference of Healing Experience by Types of Visitors at 'Healing Field' of 'Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest' (방문객 유형별 이용객수에 대한 규범적 평가기준, 혼잡지각과 치유경험방해 지각: '장성 편백치유의 숲'의 '치유필드'를 대상으로)

  • Kim, Sang-Oh;Kim, Sang-Mi
    • Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
    • /
    • v.32 no.2
    • /
    • pp.231-243
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study was conducted to determine and compare the perceived number of users (PNU) and evaluative standards for each type of visitors to "Healing Field" of Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest (JPHF). Data were collected from 158 samples selected by convenient sampling method from the users of "Healing Field" in JPHF during September 2017. Visitors to "Healing Field" consisted of 49.3% for recreation (VR), 15.3% for healing (VH), and 35.3% for both recreation and healing (VRH). Respondents' average PNU was 23.8 (median: 20.0), and the range of average PNU by visitor type was 21.1-27.8 (median: 20.0). Respondents' PNU showed low correlations with perceived crowding (PC) (r=0.23) and perceived interference of healing experience (PIHE) (r=0.20). There were no differences in the optimal number of users (ONU) of "Healing Field" among the types of visitors. The overall average ONU was 28.9(median: 25.0), and the range of average ONU by types of visitors was 25.4-31.4 (median: 25.0-27.5). The overall maximum acceptable number of users (MANU) was 38.1, and MANU for VR, VH, and VRH was 36.9, 32.0, and 38.0, respectively. Respondents' mean PC was 2.73 (SD: 3.26, 9-point scale) while mean PIHE was 3.26 (SD: 1.77, 9-point scale). The VRH group showed a higher PC and PIHE than the VR group. The group with greater PNU than ONU showed higher PC and PIHE than the other groups. Based on the results, this paper presented some managerial implications, discussed the limitations of the study, and suggested the further studies.

Effects of Different Types of Sounds on Visitors' Profile of Mood States (POMS) in a Healing Forest Area (치유의 숲에서 다른 유형의 소리가 방문객의 기분상태(Profile of Mood States: POMS)에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Sang-Oh;Kim, Sang-Mi;Park, Seung-Chan;Choi, Sol-ah
    • Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
    • /
    • v.30 no.3
    • /
    • pp.423-433
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study compared the effect of different types of sounds(no sounds, sounds of nature, music, and sounds of children playing) on profile of mood states(POMS) in a healing forest. Data were collected from 231 respondents selected from among visitors to the 'Healing Field' in 'Jangseong Chukryongsan Pyeonbaek Healing Forest' in October, 2012. Each respondent was exposed to one type of sound. The results showed that there were differences in POMS among the different sound treatment groups. Sounds of children playing showed negative effects on POMS. Unexpectedly, however, sounds of nature and musical sounds had no effects on POMS. These tendencies were consistently found not only for total mood disturbance score (TMDS) but also for POMS by factors (i. e. tension, anger, vigor, fatigue, confusion, depression). Perceived crowding level was positively correlated with TMDS(r=0.568) and POMS by factors (range: r=0.331 - 0.571). This paper discusses the research results and suggests several managerial implications.

'Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest(JPHF)' Visitors: Socio-demographic Characteristics, Use Patterns and Motivational Factors by Types of Visitors ('장성 편백치유의 숲' 방문객 유형에 따른 인구사회학적 특성, 이용행태 및 방문동기 요인)

  • Kim, Sang-Oh;Kim, Sang-Mi
    • Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
    • /
    • v.32 no.2
    • /
    • pp.203-214
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study was conducted to investigate the types, socio-demographic characteristics, use patterns, and visit motivations of visitors to "Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest (JPHF)." Data were collected from 216 samples selected by convenient sampling method using questionnaire survey between October and November 2016. Data obtained from 476 respondents of the same type of survey during the same period were partly used to examine the types of activities of visitors to the study site. The results showed that 77.0 percent of respondents were categorized as "visitor for recreation" (VR: Those who visit JPHF for the purpose of general recreational experiences such as appreciating landscapes, tourism, social interactions rather than better health or healing). On the other hand, only 10.3 percent of respondents were "visitor for healing" (VH: Those who visit JPHF for the purpose of better health or physical and mental healing). VH showed a higher level of visit experiences to JPHF than VR and tended to expect JPHF as "the place to enjoy calm and natural experiences" more than VR did. VH tended to visit JPHF "alone" more, and their group size was also smaller than VR. About 26.8 percent of all respondents were not aware that JPHF was the "healing forest," and VH showed higher awareness of it than VR. About 66.8% of respondents assessed the managerial and operating states of JPHF positively while only 6.2% assessed them negatively. There was no difference in the assessment of managerial and operating states between VR and VH. The visitors of JPHF showed the markedly high use in main forest roads (use rate: 47.4%) and "Healing Field" (use rate: 59.2%) of JPHF. Regarding the visit motivations to JPHF, VH showed higher importance on "quietude," "health," and "tension release" than VR while VR rated higher importance on "social interaction." The paper discussed the managerial implications, findings, limitations and further studies.