• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.501-535
• /
• 2017

이 연구는 한국 학계가 그간 많은 성장을 일구어 왔음에도 질적 수준에 대해서 지속적인 비판을 받고 있는 현 상황에 의문을 갖고 연구를 시작하였다. 최근 연구의 질적 수준 제고를 위해 연구개발 성과평가 제도가 전면적인 변화를 겪고 있음에도 정작 한국 학술연구의 질적 수준 문제가 어떠한 양상으로 나타나고 있는지 과학적인 증거를 제시하고자 하는 노력은 지금까지 매우 미흡했다. 이에 이 연구에서는 한국 연구의 양적 성장과 질적 성장 간의 괴리가 어떠한 양상으로 나타나는지 가시적인 일면을 제시하기 위하여 한국 연구자가 포함된 모든 SCI 논문을 수집하고 이를 대학, 출연연, 기업, 해외기관, 기타 소속 저자로 구분하여 양적 추세와 피인용횟수 추세를 비교하고자 하였다. 분석결과 해외기관 소속 저자와 국내기관 소속 저자 간에 유의미한 수준의 피인용횟수 격차가 나타나고 있으며, 이러한 격차는 시간의 흐름에 따라 해소되지 않고 있는 것을 확인하였다. 또한 분야별로 격차가 다르게 나타나 생화학 분자생물학이나 신경과학 신경학 등의 분야에서 피인용횟수의 격차가 보다 높게 나타나고 있었다. 이러한 결과는 최근 한국 공공연구 영역에서 전면적으로 일어나고 있는 질적 평가체제로의 전환 움직임에 대해서 그 세부적인 설계와 차등 요건의 적절성에 대해 다시 한 번 생각해볼 수 있는 계기를 제공한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.290-307
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to analyze the research trends related to qualitative research on science education, to provide basic data of qualitative research on science education and to select the direction of follow-up research. The subject of the study is the level of Korean Citation Index (KCI-listed, KCI listing candidates), that can be searched by the key phrase, 'qualitative research', 'science education' in Korean language through the RISS service. In this study, the Descriptive Statistical Analysis Method is utilized to discover the number of research articles, classifying them by year and by journal. Also, the Sementic Network Analysis was conducted to the frequency of key words, Centrality Analysis throughout a variety of research articles using krkwic and Ucinet6.0. The results show that first, 138 research papers were published in 14 journals from 2005 to 2017. Second,, the analysis showed the highest frequency of appearance keyword in each article, 'elementary school teacher', 'gifted student', 'science teacher', 'class' were higher than others. third, according to the results of the whole Network Analysis, 'Analysis', 'elementary school', 'class' were analyzed as a highly influential node. And 'Comparison', 'inquiry', 'recognition', 'gifted students' were not close to the center of network. Fourth, keywords that appear in all sections are analysis, gifted students, and elementary school students, and can be analyzed continuously based on studies, lessons or recognition, and characteristics. Based on the results of this study, we explored the past and present of the study subjects related to the study of science education quality and discussed future direction of study.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2014.01a
• /
• pp.173-176
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 청소년 범죄로 인해 교정시설(소년원)에 수용되어있는 청소년을 대상으로 비행 또는 범죄의 원인을 질적인 차원에서 분석함으로써 청소년비행의 예방이 되는 방안을 찾고자 하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 '재사회화 과정'이라는 의미를 도출하고 깊이 있는 이해를 도모하기위해 질적연구 방법인 현상학적 연구방법에 의해 소년원에 수용된 청소년의 재사회화 과정을 분석하였다. 연구결과 의미 있는 진술 34개를 도출하였고 14개의 중심의미를 조직하였다. 14개의 중심의미는 소년원 생활, 재적응하며 살아가기, 내 외부지원, 깨닫고 달라지기 라는 4개의 주제로 범주화 하였다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.14 no.9
• /
• pp.19-29
• /
• 2016

This study analyzes life experiences and prospects of poverty/welfare exit of the poor with work ability utilizing Mixed methodology. Based on Sequential Exploratory Design, it qualitatively analyzes 3 waves of qualitative panel data linked to Korea Welfare Panel Study(KWPS) and presents life changes of 14 poor in the context of their prospects of welfare/poverty exit. Then it proposes hypotheses on the role of education, household economy expectation, self-esteem in the prospects of poverty/welfare exit following the sequential exploratory design to quantitatively test qualitative findings utilizing KWPS(7th). The outcomes of the Structural Equation Model(SEM) suggest that household economy expectation plays mediating role between education and the prospects of welfare/poverty exit. This implies that anti-poverty policy needs to consider a psychological approach to enhance household economy expectations of the poor as well as other material support.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.481-494
• /
• 2017

Tasks of multiple solutions have been said to be suitable for the cultivation of mathematical creativity. However, studies on the fact that multiple solutions presented by students are useful or meaningful, and students' thoughts while finding multiple solutions are very short. In this study, we set goals to confirm the qualitative differences among the multiple solutions presented by the students and, if present, from the viewpoint of mathematical creativity. For this reason, after presenting the set of tasks of the two versions to eight mathematically gifted students of the second-grade middle school, we analyzed qualitative differences that appeared among the solutions. In the study, there was a difference among the solution presented first and the solutions presented later, and qualitatively substantial differences in terms of flexibility and creativity. In this regard, it was concluded that the need to account for such qualitative differences in designing and applying multiple solutions should be considered.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.377-394
• /
• 2009

There are some limitations in the existing bibliometric methods to satisfy the various requests of the interest parties including researchers, managers, policy makers to identify 1) which research group or researcher is the key player, and the overall trends of the particular technological sub-fields, 2) which research groups, institutions or countries mainly use their research outputs, 3) what are the spin-offs from research outputs to some scientific and technological fields, 4) in which levels they are when comparing their quantitative and qualitative research outputs to those of other competitive institutions. It is essential to develop new informetric indicators and methodologies in order to satisfy stakeholder's various demands and to strengthen qualitative analysis in measuring research performance. This study suggested informetric indicators such as article quality index, citation impact index, international cooperation index, excellent article production index and methodologies including citation analysis, text mining.

• Korean Journal of Forensic Psychology
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.223-251
• /
• 2021

Statement analysis is a technique that examines the credibility of a statement by scientifically analyzing problems and psychological characteristics that appear in the content of the statement. The statement analysis report is prepared, submitted, and used for legal judgments when there is a suspicion of sexual abuse for children(under 13 years of age) and persons with disabilities since it is usually difficult to secure physical evidence nor eyewitnesses. However, the criteria for evaluating the quality of a statement analysis report or testimony are not available in Korea. Although forensic experts and professional organizations in North America and Europe are providing recommendations and guidelines for preparing forensic assessment reports, qualitative analysis research studies for forensic reports revealed a number of problems such as missing or poorly described essential information and lack of logical connection between evaluation results and forensic opinions. Therefore, forensic evaluation guidelines and forensic reports submitted to the courts in the United States, as well as the Structured Quality assessment of eXpert testimony (SQX-12) developed in Sweden were examined to suggest the Korean version of quality evaluation criteria for statement analysis report and testimony. This criteria can be used to improve effectiveness of forensic reports within criminal justice system and used as a guideline to assess the quality forensic reports or expert testimony prepared by experts. However, this criteria do not guarantee the reliability of the statement itself.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.35
• /
• pp.157-177
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this paper is to examine the important characteristics of the qualitative research methods and to analyze application of these methods in the field of family therapy. First, general characteristics of qualitative research methods and typical features of qualitative research designs are described. Second, contents related with meanings, adequacy, and application process of qualitative research methods in the field of family therapy are discussed. Third, cardinal issues that could hinder the development of qualitative family therapy research are reviewed. Qualitative research methods provide a scientific and systematic way of looking at family therapy holistically. These methods may add new dimensions to qualitative research in the field of family therapy and thus increase its diversity. The versatility of qualitative research methods is a good match for examining the complexity and the diversity of family forms and experience. Therefore, qualitative research methods has the potential to advance the science and practice of family therapy and that family therapy researchers have the potential to advance qualitative research methods. Implications for the development of qualitative research methods in the field of family therapy in Korea are suggested.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.59 no.1
• /
• pp.275-300
• /
• 2007

This study explores the trends and implications of social welfare qualitative research in Korea. The results are follows. At present, social welfare qualitative research is entering in the quickening period. The characteristics of configuration of social welfare qualitative research in Korea are overwhelming inferiority in post-positivism and heuristics, wide differences between universities in metropolitan area and in local area at the aspect of amounts of qualitative research products, rapid increase in the interests of qualitative research in doctoral candidates, and distinguishment of doctoral candidates as a leader group in qualitative research. The results of critics of qualitative researches are follow: 1) initiative of naturalistic interpretism 2) inclination of methodicism 3) poorness of critical themes 4) propensity in grounded theory. These trends of social welfare qualitative research in Korea, in spite of the limits, have various implications: 1) Trying to critics of social welfare knowledge based on positivism and formation of opposing discourse to positivism 2) diversification in paradigm of inquiry 3) spread of narrative thinking of social welfare phenomenon.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.55
• /
• pp.55-81
• /
• 2003

This paper attempts to analyze the trend of research methods in Korean social welfare research and discuss utilities of qualitative research methods in broadening and deepening social welfare knowledge body in Korea. First, this paper examines research methods of 538 research articles published in Korean Journal of Social Welfare from the volume one in 1979 to the volume 51 in 2002. It has the following results: (1) non-empirical research articles were dominant in the 1980s; (2) empirical research articles have been dominant since the middle of the 1990s; and (3) research articles utilizing qualitative methods have appeared rarely since the end of the 1990s. Second, this paper examines the characteristics and the types(phenomenology, grounded theory, ethno-graphic approach, narrative inquiry etc.) of qualitative research methods. Third, this paper discusses (1) fitness between practice in social welfare discipline and qualitative research methods and (2) utilities of qualitative research methods in broadening and deepening knowledge body of Korean social welfare. In discussing the fitness, this paper focuses that qualitative research methods fits with the needs of social welfare discipline regarding broadening and deepening our understandings about social phenomena related to practice, and (2) qualitative research methods fits the needs of social welfare discipline regarding developing endogenous knowledge. In discussing the utilities, this paper focuses that qualitative research methods can be more properly utilized for social welfare research because there are coincidences in basic assumptions and perspectives of both qualitative research methods and social welfare practice. Finally, this paper highlights that 'many ways of knowing' exist in social science and it should be considered more sincerely in the arena of Korean social welfare research in order to more solidly develop the knowledge body of social welfare and practice in Korea.