• Journal of architectural history
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.171-184
• /
• 2006

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.6 s.362
• /
• pp.77-109
• /
• 1999

경남지역 역사이래 구한말까지 지역중심도시였으나 근대화의 길에서 빗겨나간 1천년 역사도시 진주, 개화기부터 제3공화국까지 경남의 산업도시로서 지역발전에 중심역할을 다하고 있는 산업도시 마산, 그리고 정치적 결단으로 재빠르게 건설된 계획도시이며 경남도청소재지인 행정도시 창원. 각 도시가 살아온 배경이 너무나 다른 세 도시를 하나의 권역으로 묶어 논하기는 정말 어렵지만 경남 남부지역의 거점도시들로서 각 도시들이 띠고 있는 지역적 특성과 건축의 모습, 그리고 각 도시에서 지역적 특성들을 만들어내고 있는 지역건축가들을 개관한다. 아울러 경남 남부지역건축의 지역성은 가능한가에 대해 토론하며 지역의 정체성을 찾아보아 진주 ㆍ마산ㆍ창원으로 대표되는 경남남부 지역의 도시건축의 미래와 발전방향을 가름한다.

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.11 s.355
• /
• pp.57-57
• /
• 1998

대전의 근ㆍ현대 건축을 돌아보면 우리의 도시건축이 특정한 방향성이 전제되지 않은 채, 좌충우돌 격변의 시기를 겪어온 셈이라 할 수 있다. 좋게 말하면 다양한 경험을 축적할 수 있었던 시기라 할 수도 있지만, 그러한 긍정적인 시선이 정당화되려면 마땅히 그 원인과 결과에 대한 검토와 상철이 뒤따라야 옳은 일이라 여겨진다. 건축을 문화의 자산으로 보는 관점을 유지하면서 그간 우리는 무엇을 잃었으며, 무엇이 복원되어야 할 가치이며, 그 속에 잠재하고 있는 가능성을 구체적으로 점검하는 일이야말로 매우 시급한 과제가 아닐 수 없기 때문이다. 빅토르 위고의 지적처럼 역사는 책으로도 쓸 수 있다는 교훈을 되살려 보면서 우리 도시건축의 미래를 전망하기 위해서는 과거에 대한 이해가 급선무라 할 수 있을 것으로 보인다. 그것도 아주 가까운 과거에 대한 경시풍조는 이 시점에서 다시 한 번 경계해야 할 태도라 할 수 있을 것이다. 가까운 과거를 서구 근대건축의 완성도에 못 미친다는 편협 된 잣대만으로 그 가치를 평가하지 말고 여러 가지 다른 조건과 더불어 재조명함으로써 우리 고유의 가치를 재발견하는 작업을 서둘러 해야 할 일이라고 생각한다. 아울러 도시건축의 구체적인 현상으로서 현재 일어나고 있는 일상의 모습을 통해 우리 고유의 지역성이나 정체성을 재구성해낼 수 있는 가능성 또한 염두에 둘 일이 아닐 수 없을 것으로 보인다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.42-49
• /
• 2018

In this study, "Young Architects Program" pavilion architecture, where many formal, material, structural challenges were examined, was selected for an analysis of the regional expression of various culture in five countries in different continents. For comparative analysis, five criteria of evaluation, symbolic, tectonic, contextual, tactile, environmental, were set through an analysis of previous studies. Through these five criteria, the methods of regional expression of architectural concepts in five different countries were compared to indicate the characteristics of the different culture in same theme and type of pavilion architecture.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.43-46
• /
• 2012

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.34 no.5
• /
• pp.355-365
• /
• 2010

As a port city, Qingdao had been developed through the 4 stages during the first half of the 20th century. First stage is German Occupation period. In this period, the old downtown of Qingdao was formed and the existing architectural characteristics of Qingdao had been established. Second stage is the First Japanese Occupation period. Japanese transformed Qingdao into Japanese city and expanded city area to north and east. Third stage is Northern Warlords and the National Government period. In this period, Qingdao had been developed as an international city of world trade and vacation. Forth stage is the Second Japanese Occupation period. Japanese tried to change Qingdao as a military base for the invasion of the northern China.

• Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea
• /
• v.21 no.6
• /
• pp.119-128
• /
• 2019

The aim of this study is to examine the characteristics of facade expression designed by Kim. Han-sup, a key architect in the regional modern architecture movement in Gwang-ju and Jeonnam from the 1950's to 1960's. The study begins with the architectural background and thoughts of Kim. Han-sup through literature reviews and introduces an interview with Han. chong-un, a former college student and employee of Kim, which explains the aesthetic architecture that appeared in his design of facades that was reasonably applied to materials, technology, structure and function in line with the economically tough period in Korea. Furthermore, in order to investigate the characteristics of his facade expression, detailed analysis items will be derived from precedent studies. This study will attempt to conclude with statements that his aesthetic architecture can be defined as an emphasis on formative mass by contrasting between basic rectangular forms, implementation with detailed three-dimensional facade by extruding differently vertical and horizontal structural lines and with the pursuit of decoration through compartmental faces on his 12 representative architectural works.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.11 no.11
• /
• pp.107-115
• /
• 2013

The Old Town of Daejeon has significantly gone down due to population decrease and vacancy of buildings. To resolve these problems, it is necessary to develop revitalization measures with unique features, but it is also important to use historical and cultural resources from a certain point for the regeneration of local community. The Old Town of Daejeon has a number of industrial structures and architectural heritages that give character to the spaces, but most of them are being impoverished without any use although they have universal value. This study examined the standards to evaluate the importance and value of modern industrial heritages as historical resources that contributed to the development of local community and discussed case studies to review the value and use of industrial heritages that laid the foundation of Daejeon's development as a modern city to address the needs for urban regeneration through preservation and use of modern industrial heritages. Also, the limitations of administrative efforts were identified and the solutions were sought to address the needs to gather efforts with local government offices and the private sector. In conclusion, this study suggests an active and open policies to use cultural heritages through the use of modern industrial heritages for the revitalization of local communities based on the study of policies for the communication of urban users and community cultural spaces, preservation of landscapes including industrial heritages, and preservation in connection to social organizations and social companies, and that it is necessary to provide policies followed by efforts, i.e., to arbitrate the owners.

• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.121-132
• /
• 2019

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the meaning of architectural space of Alvar Aalto, which is based on architectural theories of periodic flows and the form of the space with the various elements applied to the works. Method: It analyzes the interrelationships of light, form and material in triangular composition by synthesizing the architectural vocabulary of Alvar Aalto from the viewpoint of modernism. Results: The architectural works of Alvar Aalto are centered on the combination of light, form, material, and space diversity, emphasizing social awareness and linking the human scale with the building environment. Conclusion: The structure of the Alvar Aalto is a synonym of nature and culture, society and individuals, standardization and diversity, universality and locality, intellectual and emotional, scientific and human psychological. It is possible to apply reciprocity elements to architectural spaces in a comprehensive manner while being different from each other in terms of rationality and immediacy.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.12-20
• /
• 2013

This aim of this study is to support the value criteria that citizen evaluate themselves it when they found modern heritages in their town. To understand the changing of value criteria for the cultural heritage, we have to begin from early 20 century that were, however, diversified after 80's. As a result, early they evaluated with the architectural and aesthetic value mainly, after they evaluated with the social-cultural value and academical value, and nowadays they try to include the economical value and educational value. So this study rearranged and divided that value with the preservation and using value. The preservation value include the historical value, aesthetic value, social-cultural value and academical value, and the using value include the economical value and educational value. The criteria, however, don't have the equal importance, This study try to redefine relative importance score with paired comparison. As a result, Historical value is proved that most important criteria, but aesthetic value got the score lower than social-cultural value, and similar with academical values. And in using values, economical value and educational value got the low score. It means that if some researcher insist about the importance of economical value, it should evaluate lower than preservation values. This study insist that we have to include diversified values and that values have relatives score. Actually, now we mostly evaluate with the architecture and aesthetic values about modern heritage, so we are losing a lot of modern heritage. If we include the diversified values, social-cultural, academical and educational value, we can conserve our important modern heritage and revitalizing town with tourism of historical heritage.