• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 1999.10a
• /
• pp.540-542
• /
• 1999

본 논문에서는 기업내의 지식활동 주체들이 지식경영을 실천하는데 필수적인, 지식에 대한 가치평가 기준을 제시한다. 이 평가기준은 기업의 경영전략적 모형의 구조에서 도출하였다. 지식경영의 궁극적 목적을 기업의 경영전략의 실현으로 파악하여, 지식의 가치를 기업의 사명, 비전, 경영목표 및 경영전략 등이 형성해내는 기업의 경영전략적 모형안에서 찾았다. 기업의 경영전략적 모형의 구조안에서, 업무처리 지식에 대한 가치측정은, 이 구조가 제한하는 단일지식에 대한 완성도와 복잡도로 평가하였다. 그리고 기업의 경영방향에 관련된 지식의 가치는, 그 구조요소들 사이의 중요도와 연관성으로 평가하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.40 no.2
• /
• pp.299-314
• /
• 2006

This study suggests evaluation criteria for the web-based question-answer databases provided by major Korean search portals. In particular, this study suggests evaluation criteria for the relevance of question titles, entire questions, and answer's. The evaluation criteria for the qualify of answers are also developed. Based on these criteria. evaluation of documents from Naver Knowledge-in are performed. The results of this study can be implemented to the development of test collection of question-answer databases. The implications for system designers and web content providers are discussed.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.1 s.140
• /
• pp.78-80
• /
• 2005

한국데이터베이스진흥센터는‘지식정보자원관리사업’을 통해 구축된 지식정보 DB의 품질을 점검해 보기 위해, 매월 1종의 DB를 선정해 품질을 평가하고, 그 결과를 2005년도‘DB 서비스 평가’기획 시리즈로 연재한다. 특히 이번 기획 평가는 사용자 관점에서 DB품질을 조명해 보는 만큼, 지식정보 DB의 활용도 극대화를 위한 실천적 대안 마련에 도움이 될 수 있을 것이라 기대한다.

• Proceedings of the CALSEC Conference
• /
• 1999.07a
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 1999

지난 몇 년간 기업의 핵심자산으로서 지식에 대한 중요성이 증대하면서 지식경영에 대한 관심이 고조되어 활발한 연구가 진행중에 있다. 그러나 현실적으로 국내 기업들의 지식경영 현실이 어떤지, 지식경영을 수행하고 있는 기업에 대한 진정한 평가를 위한 지표가 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 이를 체계적으로 평가하기위한 기업지식화 지표의 개발은 매우 시급한 문제이다. 기업지식화 지표의 개발은 첫째, 지식경영과 관련된 학문의 기존 문헌 분석을 통해 지표개발을 위한 요인을 찾아내고 둘째, 이러한 요인에 대한 구체적인 평가 방법을 도출하고 셋째, 실증적 서베이를 통해 기업들의 지식화 현황을 분석한다. 마지막으로 분석된 국내 기업들의 지식화 현황을 통해 국내기업들의 지식경영 문제점들을 도출하고, 각 요인에 대한 향후 발전전략 및 세부 실천방안을 제시하는 단계로 진행된다. 지식경영을 위한 기업지식화 지표의 개발은 국내 기업들의 지식경영 현황을 분석하여 기업들이 어떤 노력을 기울여야 하는지를 보여주는데 그 목적이 있다. 또한 각 지표에 대한 성과를 높이기 위한 구체적인 실천방안을 마련함으로써, 현재 이론적인 수준에 머물러 있는 지식경영을 실질적으로 기업에서 핵심전략으로 채용할 수 있는 발판을 마련할 수 있다. 이를 위한 첫단계로 본 연구에서는 지식경영을 위한 통합 프레임웍을 바탕으로 기업의 지식경영 현황 측정을 위한 기업지식화 지표를 개발하고 이를 통해 국내 기업지식화 현황을 진단 평가하는 효과적 방법을 제시 하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.327-332
• /
• 2003

This paper is to outline a methodology for establishing the fair market value of knowledge assets that may be associated with a going-concern business enterprise and identify the elements of knowledge assets and provide the basic concepts for valuing thorn Within this contort we will identify the nature of some of the more common or well-know forms of knowledge assets, discuss the normal relationship of these forms of knowledge assets to the monetary and tangible assets of a business enterprise from an investor's perspective.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.3 no.4 s.12
• /
• pp.104-113
• /
• 2002

Knowledge Management(KM), represented as a way to sustain or gain competitive edge in domestic construction companies since late 1990s economic fluctuation, whose priority is to transform individual tacit knowledge into explicit organizational one. Also, accompanied by academic researches, they come to turn their interests on KM leveling and its results. However, they went too far to KM results without commenting what their KM capabilities are and where they should lead. Thus, this research work suggests a leveling model for KM, especially construction company, whose role is to diagnose which parts they should be encouraged or how to strengthen their present capabilities.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.24 no.1 s.63
• /
• pp.55-74
• /
• 2007

The purposes of this study are to examine the influences of appraisal and reward on the activities of knowledge management and to search the strategies for effective appraisal and reward system to activate the knowledge management. The results of covariance structural analyses indicate that appraisal has a significant direct effect on reward and knowledge creation as well as a significant indirect effect on knowledge sharing via reward and knowledge creation. Reward has a significant direct influence on knowledge sharing. Knowledge creation also significantly affects knowledge sharing. Based on the results, the potential implications of effective appraisal and reward system to activate the knowledge management are discussed.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.515-518
• /
• 2002

KM(Knowledge Management) is factor more paradigm of period than survival factor. Stewart, Sveiby etc., a scholar was Present to definition, knowledge classification and measurement method. KMS(Knowledge Management System) was made by scholar theory. But, it is hardly adapt to construction industry. Because it is have property that construction industry have one product, recieve-industry etc. Therefore, we must knowledge classification and measurement method that property of construction industry. So, we can effectively manage to knowledge of construction industry. And, knowledge of construction industry will evaluate according to property. Measure method of construction company will find through benchmarking that measure method of construction company is analyze to case.

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.300-305
• /
• 2007

재무성과와 지식자산을 함께 관리할 수 있는 통합적 성과평가 방법을 도입함으로써 미래 기업가치를 제고시킬 수 있는 필요성이 증가하고 있다. 국제적인 추세에 발맞추어 본 연구의 목적은 지식자산 평가에 대한 기존 연구와 Kaplan & Norton이 주창(1992)한 균형잡힌 성과기록표(Balanced Score Card : BSC)를 이용하여 지식자산 평가 지표 개발과 이러한 평가를 위해 Saaty가 개발한(1980) 계층적 분석과정(Analytic Hierarchy Process : AHP)방법론을 적용한 평가모델을 제시하고, 국내 A은행을 대상으로 지점을 평가하는 연구를 수행하였다.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.113-135
• /
• 2004

This paper defines appraisal items and weights of the items for the purpose of developing an appraisal instrument that objectively measures employee's effectiveness of knowledge contribution. Deductive research is used for the development of appraisal items and delphi method for the development of weights of the items. In the deductive research the term, "effectiveness of knowledge contribution" is first defined. Then knowledge contribution activities are classified as "dimension of explicit contribution" and " dimension of tacit contribution" due to the characteristics of knowledge. Each dimension is divided again by components. The dimension of explicit contribution is divided according to the content of knowledge, and the dimension of tacit contribution is divided according to the extent of tacitness of knowledge contribution. The total components of dimensions are 7. The dimension of explicit contribution is composed of factual knowledge and procedural knowledge. The factual knowledge is made up of "procedural knowledge outcome" and "other factual knowledge". The procedural knowledge is made up of "procedural knowledge manual" and "lessons-learned procedural knowledge". The dimension of tacit contribution is composed of "agency", "model" and "Q&A". The basic framework for measuring 7 components of knowledge contribution is quantitative and qualitative approach. This paper is premised on the assumption that the outcomes of employee's knowledge contribution activities are recorded in the knowledge management systems in order to evaluate them objectively. The appraisal items are defined as follows: at the dimension of explicit contribution, in quantitative approach, "the upload number" or "performance number", and in qualitative approach, other employee's "referred number" and other employee's "content and format satisfaction evaluation"; at the dimension of tacit contribution, "demanded number of performance" After the development of appraisal items by the deductive method, delphi method was used for the analysis of the weights of the items with the total degree of knowledge contribution, 100. This research does not include the standard marks of the appraisal items. It is because when companies apply this appraisal instrument, they could use their own standard appraisal marks of the appraisal items considering their present situations and companies' goals. Through this almost desert-like research about the appraisal instrument of employee's knowledge contribution effectiveness, it proposes a cornerstone in the research field of appraisal instrument, which provides a standard for employee's knowledge contribution appraisal, and appraisal items that make organizational knowledge to be managed more systemically in business sites.