• 공원문화
• /
• s.11
• /
• pp.39-42
• /
• 1979

• 공원문화
• /
• s.6
• /
• pp.6-8
• /
• 1977

• 공원문화
• /
• s.8
• /
• pp.39-42
• /
• 1978

• 공원문화
• /
• s.60
• /
• pp.40-49
• /
• 1994

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.39 no.5
• /
• pp.12-20
• /
• 2011

Parks and green spaces have various functions for improving urban physical and social environments. Urban parks and green space planning have been applied in this study for the purpose of enhancing the urban environment. The most popular method for urban parks and green space planning is incrementing the quantity of parks and green spaces. However, it may not be possible to designate new parks and green spaces in a large city because of the difficulty of obtaining land. This study explores how urban parks and green space planning produces better quality urban environments without having to designate new parks and green spaces. The study evaluates existing parks and green spaces according to the satisfaction of the users. This evaluation could be a useful tool for those planning urban parks and green space systems. The study was performed in Tama Newtown, Japan, within two districts with two distinct characteristics of park systems: concentration and equality arrangement forms. For comparison, on-site questionnaires were used, with 319 residents in the area responding to the study. The data was collected and analyzed, using t-test, factor analysis, and multiple regression methods. The study found there was no difference in satisfaction factors be tween the two districts. However, differences were found within each of the districts, depending on parks and green space components. For example, the quality of green space was the most important factor for the district with a planned concentration arrangement form of parks and green spaces, but, separation of the pedestrian and vehicular systems was the most important factor in the district with a planned equality arrangement form of park system. Factors affecting the satisfaction of parks and green spaces that were common between the two sites were: accessibility, quality of park, quality of green space, and separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffics.

• 공원문화
• /
• s.31
• /
• pp.34-35
• /
• 1985

• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.02a
• /
• pp.249-249
• /
• 2005

• Proceedings of the Korean Environmental Sciences Society Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.343-344
• /
• 2003

일본의 국립공원정책을 참고하고 본 연구의 결과를 통하여 세 가지 측면에서 나타나는 문제점에 대한 개선방안을 제시해보면 첫 번째 보전적인 측면은 용도지구 및 공원구역의 전면적인 재조정, 두 번째 이용적인 측면은 교통, 주차시설의 확충 및 도로체계의 재조정, 자연학습공간의 설치 및 환경교육(해설) 프로그램의 개발, 세 번째 관리적인 측면으로 도립공원 재원확보, 관리 인력의 증원 및 전문 인력의 배치 등을 들 수 있다. 나아가 공원구역의 전면적인 재조정으로부터 지역주민들의 의견수렴을 충분히 거친 후 자연보존지구에 대한 보존대책을 수립한 다음 도립공원 해제방안도 적극적으로 고려하여야 할 것이다. 그러나 보다 중요한 것은 일본의 환경정책을 예로 들었듯이, 환경보전적 측면에서 오히려 역행하고 있는 현행 우리나라 자연공원 정책이 전환되어야 한다는 것이다. 이에 환경보전적 측면을 중시한 자연공원법의 조속한 개정과 생물다양성을 관점으로 한 자연공원정책이 전개되어야 할 것이다.

• 공원문화
• /
• s.41
• /
• pp.23-27
• /
• 1988

1967년 우리나라에 국립공원제도가 도입실시된 이래 20년동안 전국의 국립공원은 주무부처인 건설장관으로부터 각시.도지사가 관리권을 위임받아 해당 시장.군수에 의해 실질적으로 관리돼 왔었다. 1970.9.9 설악산, 1980.8.8. 내장산 그밖의 자연공원에 케이블카가 시설된것도 잘아는 일, 또한 탐방객이 많은 공원일수록, 심지어 대가람의 코밑에까지 집단시설등 용도지구가 설계되고 용돼 왔다. 내장산의 내장사 지구의 경우는 12년전 관리소에서 2.7km 떨어진 아래로 집단시설지역을 변경, 강제이주시킨후 그자리에 "케블카" 를 시설했고, 철거된 잔디녹지가 음성적인 상가로 둔갑되어가도 관리소로선 잡상근절책을 세우지 못한채 작년 8월 국립공원관리공단에 인도됐다. 이와 같이 대부분의 공단관리소들은 지자단분가 물려준 어려운 숙제를 넘겨받아 큰시련을 겪고 있다. 그당시는 심묵또는 양해가 됐던 똑 같은 문제도 공단이 관리를 맡은이후 부터는 몹시 따갑게 비판해 오고 있다. 사사건건제동을 걸고 있는듯 하기고 하고 어차피 해결해야할 문제들도 많아 노출된 것부터 하나하나 단편적일지라도 파고들어 소리의 진의를 듣고 냉정한 대비책을 세워야 한다고 본다.

• Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
• /
• v.36 no.3
• /
• pp.318-326
• /
• 2022

The Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) recommends that 17% of the land be designated as a protected area to counter global environmental problems. Korea also realized a need to designate protected areas according to the international level and explain the significance of designating protected areas. Accordingly, studies on ecosystem services are required. In Korea, the protected areas are designated as national parks, provincial parks, and county parks by hierarchy under the Natural Parks Act. However, as priority was on political and administrative aspects, research on ecosystem service value evaluation and habitat management were concentrated in national parks, and provincial and county parks were relatively neglected. Therefore, more studies on provincial and county parks are necessary. In this study, habitat quality for Gajisan Provincial Park, where there were few studies on habitat management and ecosystem service valuation, was evaluated using the InVEST Habitat Quality model among the InVEST models. The analysis results were compared with 16 mountainous national parks. The results showed that the habitat quality value of Gajisan Provincial Park was 0.83, higher than that of the surrounding areas. The analysis of habitat quality in three districts showed 0,84 for the Tongdosa and Naewonsa districts and 0.83 for the Seoknamsa district. By use district, the nature conservation district, the natural environment district, the cultural heritage district, and the park village district had the highest habitat quality value in that order. Compared with the existing habitat quality analysis results of national parks, Gajisan Provincial Park showed naturalness at the level of Mudeungsan National Park. These results can be used as objective data for establishing policies and management plans to preserve biodiversity and promote ecosystem services in provincial parks.