• Industry Promotion Research
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.97-108
• /
• 2022

This paper examined the impact of financing structure on the innovation efficiency of SMEs by constructing an econometric model using panel data of SMEs listed on the SME board from 2010 to 2020 as the research sample. The innovation efficiency of SMEs was measured by the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), the relationship between financing structure and innovation efficiency of SMEs was examined with the help of the Tobit model, and the corresponding heterogeneity analysis was conducted. Finally, the robustness of the model was tested. It was concluded that the effects of debt and equity financing on the quantitative efficiency of innovation were non-linear and mainly showed an inverted "U" shaped relationship. For innovation quality efficiency, bond financing could positively contribute, while equity financing negatively inhibits. Finally, the corresponding advice was given.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Studies
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.203-233
• /
• 1996

본고(本稿)는 우리나라, 미국 그리고 일본의 장외시장에 등록된 기업의 특성을 업종별, 규모별, 소유자별, 주가 수준 및 상승률 등의 측면에서 살펴보았다. 우리나라의 주식장외시장 등록기업의 자본금 규모는 매우 적어 거래소 시장에 상장된 기업의 평균 자본금 규모의 1/8수준에 머물고 있으며 주가 수준도 매우 낮은 것으로 조사되었다. 첨단기술집약형 벤처기업이 많이 상장되어 있는 미국과는 대조적으로 우리나라 장외시장에는 건설업 및 금융업 관련 기업이 많이 등록되어 있다. 그리고 장외시장 등록기업의 평균주가는 거래소 상장기업의 절반 수준에 머물고 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 미국의 장외시장에 등록된 기업은 주로 정보기술 (소프트웨어 및 하드웨어), 통신, 의약품, 생명공학 등의 업종과 관련한 기업이 많으며 또한 금융업(은행 및 보험 포함)과 관련된 기업도 많은 것으로 조사되고 있다. 그리고 NASDAQ시장에서 주가 상승률 등의 기준에서 좋은 성과를 나타내고 있는 기업도 대부분 컴퓨터 및 생명공학 관련 기업인 것으로 밝혀졌다. 특히 지난 5년 동안 높은 주가 상승률을 기록한 기업의 조사에서 상위 10개 기업에 NASDAQ시장 기업이 5개나 포함되어 있기도 하여 미국의 장외시장은 투자자들에게 고수익을 제공하는 시장으로서도 충분히 인식되고 있다. 그런데 미국에 비해 장외시장이 기업의 자금조달 창구로서 그 역할이나 기능이 미흡한 일본의 장외시장은 도소매업 및 서비스의 기업이 많이 등록되어 있어 미국의 현황과는 대비를 이루고 있다. 자본금 규모면에서 보면 10억엔에서 20억엔에 해당되는 기업이 가장 많으며 장외시장 등록기업의 소유자별 분포를 주식수 기준으로 보면 사업법인과 금융기관이 소유하고 있는 비율이 49.5%를 시현하고 있다. 그리고 주가 수준은 1,000엔과 3,000엔 사이에서 주로 형성되고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.48 no.4
• /
• pp.189-208
• /
• 2023

This paper analyzed the dynamic conditional correlation between the Korean ETS market, energy market and stock market. This paper conducted an empirical analysis using daily data of Korea's carbon credit trading price, WTI crude oil futures price, and KOSPI index from February 2, 2015 to December 30, 2021. First, the volatility of the three markets was analyzed using the GARCH model, and then the dynamic conditional correlations between the three markets were studied using the bivariate DCC-GARCH model. The research results are as follows. First, it was found that the Korean ETS market has a higher rate of return and higher investment risk than the stock market. Second, the yield volatility of the Korean ETS market was found to be most affected by external shocks and least affected by the volatility information of the market itself. Third, the correlation between the Korean ETS market and the stock market was stronger than that of the WTI crude oil futures market. This paper analyzed the correlation between the Korean ETS market, energy market, and stock market and confirmed that the level of financialization in the Korean ETS market is quite low.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.143-170
• /
• 2006

We explore how stock returns and volatility have been impacted by securities market stimulating and controlling plans during the 1980-2004 period, using return analysis, event study, and BFL tests. First, we examine effectiveness of the stimulating plans for a depressed market and the controlling plans for an overheated market with respect to different firm sizes and industries as well as the whole market. KOSPI, large-sized, finance, and manufacturing company stock prices significantly rise following stimulating plans, implying that the plans are quite effective. Controlling plans also seem effective as stock prices stop rising and tend to decline following the plans. Second, we test whether securities market plans have any further impact with respect to fun sizes and industries in addition to the impact on the entire market. Only large-sized stocks show additional response to stimulating plans, while small-sized, electrical-electronic equipment, distribution, and manufacturing industries are further impacted by controlling plans. Third, the results of BFL tests show that volatility does not change around the announcement dates of stimulating and controlling plans. It appears that securities market plans have no impact on volatility. Only stock returns respond to the plans.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.53
• /
• pp.20-20
• /
• 2004

• The Safety technology
• /
• no.141
• /
• pp.16-17
• /
• 2009

• Journal of the Korean hospital association
• /
• v.31 no.5 s.279
• /
• pp.25-33
• /
• 2002

• Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.249-256
• /
• 2002

• Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.151-161
• /
• 2000

• Proceedings of the Korean Environmental Sciences Society Conference
• /
• 1998.04a
• /
• pp.86-89
• /
• 1998