• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.51
• /
• pp.257-257
• /
• 2018

Xinxu(新序) was published in Korea by 1492. Among the existing editions, the editions that can confirm the realities are the collections of Keimyung University, the Korean Studies Central Research Institute, Kyonggi University, Hujodang(後彫堂), and the National Assembly Library of Japan. The Keimyung University's precious book is the 'first published book', and the old book is the 'later published book' which covers pages 69-70 and 71-72 of the first published book. It is the 'later published book' that has the same side inscribed. The second books, the Central Research Institute of Korea Studies and the Kyonggi University Collection are the first published books, and the Hujodang and the National Assembly Library of Japan are on pages 9-10, 63-64, 87-88, 107-108. The corresponding side is the 'later published book'. Comparing the editions, it can be concluded that the existing editions of the previous editions have been withdrawn two times, and in the latter editions, the existing editions of four editions can also be confirmed to have been edited three times. In this paper, the literature based on the existing editions was studied and features of the Korean edition were presented. First, we examine the types of paragraphs. In principle, the text is composed of '11 lines and 18 characters', but on the actual version, the number of characters is shown in the table. In the Korean edition of the Joseon dynasty, a blank space appears in the original text. The erroneous letter in the Joseon book was identified the reason for the error was explained in detail.

• 중국학논총
• /
• no.63
• /
• pp.1-28
• /
• 2019

This study set out to examine the variant forms in the Korean block-printed edition of YouYangZaZu(酉陽雜俎)n terms of modifications of writing forms, increase and decrease of strokes, shortening and lengthening of strokes, connection and interruption of strokes, replacement of Pyeonbang(偏旁), and changing structures and positions. The study also aims to investigate the frequent uses and characteristics of variant forms. The findings show that the variant forms of YouYangZaZu(酉陽雜俎) include characters in some parts. There are 1,500 variant forms in the Korean block-printed edition of YouYangZaZu(酉陽雜俎)ith numerous characters of both various modifications and increasing or decreasing strokes based on the same characters. There are mixed uses of block letters and variant forms throughout the book from a single form to ten different forms of a character.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.3-23
• /
• 1996

This study is to purposed to analyze the publications printed by some provincial governors during their government positions at Young Nam province in the ]ate Chosun Dynasty. To examine the characteristics of the publications, the data used are some original transcripts and the related materials that include publication information in their prefaces from currently usable original transcripts and woodblock catalogs such as Lupango(누판고). The results showed that the publications were most commonly printed in the Youngnam Province and the reason of the publication was to collect their ancestors' works at their posts. From the kd, we can recognize the social situations and backgrounds in the Young Nam Province during the time.

• 중국학논총
• /
• no.70
• /
• pp.109-138
• /
• 2021

本硏究在'韓·中·日《酉陽雜俎》的同一个異體字中, 對三個版本中共同使用的327个相同或相似的字進行了"筆形的變型·筆形的增减·筆劃的短縮及延長·筆劃的連結及中斷·偏旁的代替·構造及位置的變化"的比較, 由此逐項抽查, 相互攀比對。在'韓·中·日不同《酉陽雜俎》版本中特異的異體字'項目, 三個版本中獨特的異體字按照"筆形的變型·筆劃的增减·筆劃的短縮及延長·筆劃的連結及中斷·偏旁的代替·構造及位置的變化等進行了比較, 由此在不同版本中相互提取了不同版本的比較項目。'在朝鮮簡本《酉陽雜俎》之異體字的多用及特點'項目中, 在對朝鮮簡本《酉陽雜俎》中大量使用異體字及其特征進行分析的同時, 還與唐代前後文字的形態進行了相互比較。

• Journal for History of Mathematics
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.181-222
• /
• 2020

《Xiangming Suanfa》 is a mathematics text published in 1373. The preface and postscript of the block books 《Xiangming Suanfa》 in the Joseon Dynasty were published as they had been in the original text from China. It can be considered to be based on 《Xiangming Suanfa》 was published in Mingjingtang. The five different block books which is published in Korea, possessed in Yonsei University Library, Sanghuh Memorial Library of Konkuk University and the National Library of Korea, were compared. Through recension-correction of the text, this thesis is intended to help researchers in utilizing the research by providing fine print.

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.63-74
• /
• 2021

Objectives :This paper analyzes the newly discovered manuscripts of the Sanghanjijangdo(傷寒指掌圖). A bibliographic study was carried out to examine the contents and the background of publication. Methods : First, a bibliographical analysis of the Joseon text was conducted. Next, the contents of the composition were compared with the Yuanand early Ming publications of China. Results : 1. The Joseon publication was published based on the original publication from the Yuan period. The Sanghanjijangdo has been cited in several medical texts from early Joseon such as the Euibangyuchwi and Hyangyakjipseongbang. 3. The background for publication of the Sanghanjijangdo is as following. First, it is an introductory text for beginners of Shanghan[cold damage] studies. Second, its contents do not conflict with the specialized Shanghan text that was used as the textbook for the royal physician examination. Third, it contains many Shanghan formulas that could be composed of domestic drugs only. Conclusions : The Sanghanjijangdo could be described as an introductory text for beginners of Shanghan studies that contributed to the expansion of the base of Shanghan studies in 15c mid-Joseon. Publication of this book clearly shows that Shanghan studies in early Joseon was practiced within the scopes of practicality and localization of medicinals.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.17-27
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this these is aiming at making an investigation on the existing local publications which were including woodblock catalogs in the early Choson Dynasty and analysing the bibliographical matters. The overall findings of this study can be summarized as follows : First of all, publications contained in the woodblock catalogs are composed of 1292 titles. With the exclusion of 278 titles duplicated in Yongnamch' aekp'an-gi(221 titles) and Tong-gyongjapki(57 titles), there are one thousand fourteen titles in the woodblock catalogs in Kosach' waryo(989 titles) and Yongnamch' aekp'an-gi (25 titles). Secondly, publications which are included in woodblock catalog and being handed down to the present are composed of 160 titles. Excepting 43 titles which are duplicated in the woodblock catalogs containing Yongnamch' aekp'an-gi(33 titles) and Tong-gyongjapki(10 titles), there exist 117 titles. Thirdly, looking at the publications handed down to the present on the basis of location, 10 titles were published in five areas in Kangwon-do, 45 titles in 17 regions in Kyonsang-do, 33 titles in 10 areas in Cholla-do, 4 titles in 4 different areas in Chungchong-do two different areas in Pyongan-do, 1 titles in one area in Hamgyong-do, the other titles in three regions in Hwanghae-do.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2003.08a
• /
• pp.367-375
• /
• 2003

본 논문은 중국 송대의 서산 진덕수가 선대 유가서에서 심학에 관계되는 여러 성현의 격언을 순차적으로 모아 찬한 성리서인 $\boxDr$심경$\boxUl$에 대한 서지적 연구이다. 16세기 이후 조선의 주요 성리서의 하나로 간행 보급되었던 $\boxDr$심경$\boxUl$에 대해, $\boxDr$심경$\boxUl$ 찬자와 간행 및 $\boxDr$심경부주$\boxUl$의 간행 경유와 $\boxDr$심경$\boxUl$의 국내유인 과정을 살펴보고, 책판목록 상의 판본과 현존 판본을 조사하여, 책판목록 상의 판본을 지역적으로 나누어 살펴보았으며, 현존 간본 현황을 분석하여 판본 종수를 기술하였다.

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.203-221
• /
• 2013

Objectives : The Major Essentials of Huangdi's Internal Classics Plain Questions (黃帝內經素問大要, MEHP) is one of the late-Chosun's literate physician Lee Gyoojoon (李圭晙, 1885-1923)'s main work, which is known to have logically proofread the Huangdi's Internal Classics Plain Questions (黃帝內經素問, HP). This study aims to examine two elements of the text: (1) the types of MEHP currently in circulation; (2) the types of publications of HP to be the MEHP's original script. Methods : In this study, basically bibliographical analyses of the form and contents was utilized about the types of MEHP and HP. However, to compare the sentences and phrases between prints, I've used 20 examples that Qian Chaochen (钱超尘) had proposed in his preceding studies. Also, regarding Lee Wonse (李元世)'s proofreading on the MEHP in 1999, I've used interviews of his students. Results : First, I've discovered that there are three versions MEHP in circulation: the woodblock printed version; Lee Wonse's handwritten version; Lee Wonse's proofreading version; and confirmed that Lee's proofreading version should be regarded as good version of MEHP. Also, I've discovered the possibility of other types of printed versions of the MEHP in existence, which is considered Lee's handwritten version's original draft. Second, I've confirmed that the original script of HP, which Lee Gyoojoon utilized for MEHP, is indeed not Gu Congde (顧從德) printed version HP, however, is the Chosun's bureau for military drill (訓練都監) printed version HP. Conclusion : Through this study, I've provided strong evidence that Lee Gyoojoon's MEHP is a unique and original research completed within the traditional realm of Korean medicine, which possesses the universality of Eastern Asian medicine represented by Huangdi's Internal Classics (黃帝內經).