• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.7-18
• /
• 2004

From the results of an examination of the transition process of the site plan divided into 5 stages based on literature and materials relating to the Sangju Confucian School as well as the construction history, we can see the general transition flow as follows. The arrangement form of Sangju Confucian School shows the structures with both the sacrificial rites function and the learning function in the early period. This shows a large general flow where the form with the learning function structure at the front and sacrificial rites function structure at the back changed to a form where the learning function structure was positioned behind the boarding facilities, after which there was a transformation which left only the learning function (the form where the learning function structure was positioned in front of the boarding facilities). The type where the learning function structure is positioned in front of the boarding facilities is hard to find in the Yeongnam area, also, there are not many examples of the 2 story Myeonglyundang (hall of confucianism teachings) throughout the country Sangju Confucian School which possess the value of rarity is appraised as being a precious material showing another area characteristic in Sangju of the Yeongnam area. Also, during the late Chosun period the scale of the Dongseojae (boarding facility) was reduced and the appearance of Yangsajae can be said to be a typical example of confucian school constructions of late Chosun era.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.121-140
• /
• 2007

Seowon(書院) is a representing institution in Choseon Dynasty not only educationally but also politically and economically. Due to the artificial crackdown by Daewon-gun in 1871 and destruction by wars, it is difficult to restore and interpret the Seowon accurately at present. It is well known that the 'Basic Form' of the Seowon consists of an inner court, enclosed by the rear gangdang (lecture hall), dongseo-jae (east and west dormitory), and the front munlu (gate pavilion or upper story bower for relaxation), represented by so called 'front-dormitory rear-lecture-hall type', that is, 'jeonjae hudang(前齋後堂) type'. However, it is overlooked that this Basic Form is a product of Youngnam School located only in Youngnam area. A different form, of 'front-lecture-hall rear-dormitory type', or 'jeonndang hujae(前堂後齋) type' is located only in Gyeonggi, Hoseo and Honam area. It has been wrongly analyzed that the type is a result of the later period, emphasizing the memorial service rather than the lecture itself, and worshipping loyalists than Confucian scholars. Analysis encompassing each Seowon architecture has been mistakenly made by historians as "deterioration" of the original educational purpose of the Seowon from the early period to the later period. This paper raises the fact that the form of jeondang hujae type has been established since the early period of Seowon in the 16th Century. It has a unique order of space itself. Here, the lecture hall faces toward sadang (shrine). The inner court, enclosed by east and west jae and the lecture hall, becomes the outer yard of the shrine, and as a result two main spaces of the shrine and lecture area is merged into one. While the munlu of the basic type encloses the inner court of the main area, the munlu of jeondang hujae type is located at the vicinity area. This paper reinterprets the jeondang hujae type not as a form coming out of degenerated period but as a type that belongs to a different Confucian school, the area of Kiho, and concludes that the Seowon is a product of political struggles between the two schools and of the local economical situation. Each school has maintained his own type of form, therefore the remaining Kiho Seowon architecture can be reevaluated.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.42-54
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 장성 필암서원의 입지 형국 풍수지리 등 장소성에 담긴 의미경관적 요소와 서원배치에 따른 시지각적 공간구성에 담긴 미학성 독해를 위해 시도되었다. 고지도에 표기된 '필암서원', '필봉서원', '김하서서원' 등에서 보이듯 '필암'은 곧 '필봉'이며 이는 '김하서'라는 인식이 드러나고 있다. 서원의 배산 필암산(문필산)과 필암(붓바위)은 필암서원 장소정체성 구축의 핵심이며 하서 김인후의 상징으로, 연고성을 바탕으로 한 깊은 인걸지령(人傑地靈)의 관계로 엮여있음이 읽혀진다. 필암서원은 안산(案山) 없이 파노라믹한 '증산들'을 안대(案對)로 한 계거(溪居)의 입지특성을 보인다. 하서의 태생지인 맥동마을과 필암 그리고 '단봉함서형(丹鳳含書形)' 형국을 반영한 서원의 터잡기와 조형적 반영 그리고 건물 '이름붙이기'에서 드러난 필암서원의 액호(額號)와 각 건물의 당호(堂號) 또한 성리학적 가르침을 바탕으로, 자연과 인간이 하나 되는 천인합일(天人合一)의 인식 결과에 따른 기호경관적 특질은 여타 서원 보다 뚜렷하다. 확연루(누문)-청절당(강당)-진덕재 숭의재(재실)-우동사(사당)의 "전당후재형" 배치로 구축된 교접마당을 통한 중심성의 극대화는 필암서원 고유의 공간 프레임적 특성이다. 여기에 더하여 '유식공간과 제향공간내 경장각과 계생비 배치로 얻어진 내심 이동'을 통한 중심성의 강화' 그리고 '영역성의 강화를 위한 시설과 장치' 등에서 필암서원의 공간구성상의 경관짜임이 읽혀진다. 또한 '창호 구성을 통한 조망 중심성의 강화', ' "틀에넣기"와 중첩을 통한 시각적 투명성 확보' 그리고 '재실 툇마루 높이를 통한 위계성의 구현' 등의 시각구성상의 경관짜임을 통해 성리학적 사고를 바탕으로 한 질서와 미학성이 필암서원 조형에 논리적으로 구현되었음을 독해하였다. 이와 같이 경관 재구성을 통해 정리되고 새롭게 읽혀진 필암서원의 의미체계와 공간 및 시각구성상의 미학성은 결코 우연이 아닌 필연적 결과로, 장성 필암서원의 내적 충일을 높일 수 있는 요인이며 또 다른 자원기반이다. 본 연구를 통해 얻은 경관독해의 결과가 필암서원에 대한 이해 증진과 드러나지 않은 문화경관에 대한 감수성을 높이는데 기여할 것을 기대한다.