• Journal of the Korean hospital association
• /
• v.22 no.11 s.209
• /
• pp.51-61
• /
• 1993

이 글은 지난 5월 현대병원경영연구소 주최로 개최된 병원최고경영자 경영사례발표세미나에서 발표된 내용을 녹음으로 취합하여 편집한 것이다.경영난에 고심하는 병원들에 참고 되기를 바라 게재하며, 현대병원경영연구소에서 녹취와 정리를 해주었다. -편집자-

• Journal of the Korean hospital association
• /
• v.22 no.7.8 s.206
• /
• pp.4-11
• /
• 1993

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.11
• /
• pp.267-276
• /
• 2015

This study divided hospital management performance as surplus and deficit, Liquidity, Growth, Turnover Ratios, Productivity, Operating Expense, Patient Care Performance and evaluate the relationship between profitability. In addition to providing a useful basis for seeking profitability and effective management measures based on the findings of the hospital has its purpose. The study period was 2013 to identify the hospital's financial performance as evaluation criteria, were selected for a total of 147 hospitals surveyed. In conclusion, the more profitable medical and hospital financial performance, results showed a higher rate. In addition to the factors affecting the profitability of the Salaries, Administrative Expenses, Material Costs was a major factor. To to enhance the future profitability of hospital care it is also important to increase revenue, but Salaries, the cost reduction-effective strategy for reducing Administrative Expenses may be required.

• Journal of the Korean hospital association
• /
• v.17 no.11 s.159
• /
• pp.4-8
• /
• 1988

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.9 no.6
• /
• pp.196-206
• /
• 2009

The profitability of a hospital refers to business administration results achieved through its medical care and other management activities during applicable fiscal year. This study focused on operating margin as a measurement index of hospital profitability, which is a genuine medical return obtained by subtracting medical expenses from medical profits achieved during business administration of hospital. Based on the index, this study could deduce certain factors on hospital profitability in terms of various indices affecting profitability. And based on those factors, this study sought to provide more useful reference materials which allow us to devise possible ways to improve hospital profitability. As a result, it was found that public hospitals attained lower profitability than private ones. To analyze profitability depending on each index, this study divided hospitals broadly into deficit group and surplus group. As a result, it was found that there were significant differences in hospital profitability between two groups depending upon relevant indices such as labor cost ratio, maintenance expense ratio, number of operations per medical specialist and medical instrument turnover. According to analysis on potential effects of relevant indices upon profitability, it was found that each index had its explanatory power ranging from 25% to 74.5% depending on given model.

• Korea Journal of Hospital Management
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.156-172
• /
• 2001

Financial ratio indicators of the 73 sample hospitals provided by the Korea Hospital Association in 1998-1999, together with the data by the Korea Health Industry Development Institute in 1007, were analysed to identify the financial structure and managerial performance of the profit/loss-making hospitals under the IMF. The major findings of this study were as belows. 1. Among the general characteristics, there was a statistical significance in the hospital location and the number of operating beds between profit-making hospitals and loss-making hospitals. 2. Financial ratio indicators of the profit-making hospitals were better than those of the loss-making hospitals. 3. Financial ratio indicators, including Liquidity, Performance Indicators and Growth Rate Indicators of profit-making hospitals, were better than those of loss-making hospitals except for Turnover Ratios under the IMF economic impasse.

• Korea Journal of Hospital Management
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.305-329
• /
• 1999

Financial ratio indicators of the 46 sample hospitals provided by the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, together with the survey data responded by the 57 sample hospitals, were analysed to identify the characteristics of the red-figured hospitals' financial structure, financial operational efficiency and management decision-making behavior, The financial characteristics identified through the analysis include high dependency to liabilities, high salary expenses and overhead costs, low profitability of the unduly large amount of fixed assets, and low managerial efficieny of inventory. The hospitals, in face of the IMF economic impasse, took the necessary decision-making and counter measures to cut down salary expenses, to increase the number of patient and medical revenue, and to reduce investment to fixed assets. Based on these findings this study suggested that the hospitals should take more active cost containment measures, financial structural reorganization, and developoment of the strategies that can contribute to increase of the number of patient and medical revenue and that do not. require much capital funds.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.11 no.11
• /
• pp.463-470
• /
• 2013

The objective of this study is to compare hospital performance between Local Government Hospitals and General Hospitals. To compare the result of the financial performance between two groups, there were significant differences in current ratio, Fixed ratio, total assets turnover, personnel expenses to gross revenues, management expenses to gross revenues, return on assets, operating margin. The significant impact relations of ROA(Return on Assets) were formed the total assets turnover, salaries, material costs, administrative expenses. Although two groups are the similar beds, most of LGH are in the red so the managers and local government must consider the financial efficiency of LGH.

• Journal of the Korean hospital association
• /
• v.31 no.2 s.276
• /
• pp.11-21
• /
• 2002

건강보험 재정위기는 장기적으로 누적되어 온 적자 요인에다 2000년 관리체계의 통합과 동시에 시행된 의약분업과 수가인상으로 일시에 재정수요가 집중되면서 발생하게 되었다는데 대한 분석에는 별다른 이견이 없다. 다만, 각각의 제도 변화가 어느 정도 영향을 미쳤는지에 대한 견해 차이를 갖는 정도이다.

• The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 2010

Purpose: In 2003, we decided to buy a PET/CT, at the time, it was the latest cancer diagnostic medical equipment. Equipment company was offered the marketing of collaboration operation because the highly cost of PET/CT. However, this hospital's choice was own purchase way. In this study we evaluated the collaboration operation way by post-mortem analysis to the current situation. Materials and Methods: From 2004 until 2008, five years, we investigate the revenue analysis the number of PET/CT cases about own purchase way and collaboration operation way according (ABC costing). Results: The year 2004, own purchase way is 4 billion 9 thousand 2 hundred million won in deficit, the collaboration operation way is 1 billion 1 thousand 7 hundred million won in deficit. The year 2005, own purchase way is 1 billion 5 hundred million won in deficit, collaboration operation way is 8 thousand 7 hundred million won in deficit. However, the year 2006, own purchase way is 5 billion 1thousand 3 hundred million won in surplus, collaboration operation way is 9 thousand 9 hundred million won in deficits. The year 2007 and 2008, revenue of own purchase way is more increased but the collaboration operation way is more decreased. From the year 2004 to 2008, subtotal of own purchase way is 10 billion 8 thousand 8 hundred won in surplus, sub-total of collaboration operation way is 6 billion 7 thousand million won in deficit. Conclusion: Own purchase way has been a big benefit occurs and to reflect the equipment price, the collaboration operation way became to deficit continues. In other words, the problem of collaboration operation way showed us. When you buy the high cost Equipment, consideration will be risk and economic analysis of variance, the appropriate of the initial investment cost, clinical diagnostic needs and etc.