• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.245-254
• /
• 2006

While orofacial pain or various dental factors are generally considered as the primary cause of unilateral chewing tendency, there exist several studies indicating that dental factors did not affect the preferred chewing side. The aim of this study was to examine difference of occlusal scheme between the subjects with and without chewing side preference. The difference between the chewing and non-chewing sides in the unilateral chewing group was investigated as well. Computerized, T-Scan II system was used for occlusal analysis. 20 subjects for the unilateral chewing group (mean age of $25.25{\pm}2.84$ years) and 20 subjects for the bilateral chewing group (mean age of $27.00{\pm}5.07$ years) were selected by a questionnaire on presence or absence of chewing side preference and those with occlusal problem or pain and/or dysfunction of jaw were excluded. T-Scan recordings were obtained during maximum intercuspation and excursion movement. The number of contact points, relative occlusal force ratio between right and left sides, tooth sliding area and elapsed time throughout the maximum intercuspation were calculated. Elapsed time for excursion was also investigated. The results of this study shows that the unilateral chewing group had the smaller average tooth contact areas compared with those of the bilateral group (p<0.005). In the unilateral chewing group, the contact areas of non-chewing side are smaller than those of chewing side (p<0.005). The contact areas on their preferred sides were not significantly different with those of right or left side of the subjects without chewing side preference. There was no significant difference in the elapsed time during maximum intercuspation and lateral excursion, the sliding areas and relative of right-to-left occlusal force ratio between the two groups. From the results of this study, it is likely that individuals prefer chewing on the side with more contact areas for efficient chewing.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.107-119
• /
• 1993

저자는 다양한 저작방법에 따른 전측두근과 교근의 좌우균형성을 규명하기 위하여 정상 성인 27명을 대상으로 습관성 저작시, 양측 규칙 저작시, 우측 규칙 저작시 및 좌측 규칙 저작시에 근활성도와 근전도 power spectrum을 컴퓨터를 이용한 근전도 시스템을 이용하여 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 습관성 저작시 우측 전측두근 및 교근 모두 좌측에 비하여 높은 근활성도를 보였다. (p<0.05). 2. 양측 규칙 저작시 우측 교근은 좌측에 비하여 높은 근활성도를 보였으나 (p<0.05), 전측두근에서는 좌우측 근활성도의 유의한 차이가 없었다. 3. 우측 규칙 저작시 우측 전측두근 및 교근 모두 좌측에 비하여 높은 근활성도를 보였다. (p<0.05) 4. 좌측 규칙 저작시 좌측 교근은 우측에 비하여 높은 근활성도를 보였으나 (p<0.05), 전측두근에서는 좌우측 근활성도의 유의한 차이가 없었다. 5. 저작시 전측두근고 교근의 중간주파수 경사도는 좌우측에서 유의한 차이가 없었다.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.34 no.1
• /
• pp.15-30
• /
• 1996

저작은 치아, 악골, 저작근 뿐만 아니라 근 신경계, 고위 중추까지 복합적으로 관여되는 기능적 행위이다. 저작 형태는 다양한 모양을 가지나 두 가지 전형적인 군, 즉, 전방에서 관찰 시 그 양상이 수직적이며 절단 (chopping) 운동을 하는 군과 주로 측방으로 이루어지며 연마 (grinding)를 하는 군으로 나눌 수 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 저작 형태의 차이가 교합면 마모에 미치는 영향을 조사하는 것이다. 두개 하악 관절과 저작 습관에 이상이 없으며 교합면에 수복물이 없는 치과 대학생으로 하악 운동 궤적 기록기를 이용하여 상기의 전형적인 2가지 저작 형태를 보이는 각 15명씩을 피검자로 선택하였다. 각 피검자에 대한 임상 검사를 통해 ordinal scale로 교합면 마모의 등급을 조사하여, 평균 치아 마모도와 부위에 따른 치아 마모도를 비교 조사하였다. 각 피검자에 대한 인상 채득 후 모형을 제작하고 arbitrary scale로 교합면 마모의 등급을 조사하여, 평균 치아 마모도와 부위에 따른 치아 마모도를 비교 조사하고 저작측과 비저작측 마모를 비교 조사하였으며 수평 마모면과 수직 마모면을 비교 조사하였다. 1. 평균 치아 마모도는 ordinal scale로 측정하였을 때, 절단형과 연마형간에 유의할 만한 차이가 없었다.(p >0.05) 2. 부위에 따른 치아의 마모도는 ordinal scale로 측정하였을 때, 절단형과 연마형간에 유의할 만한 차이가 없었다.(p >0.05) 3. 평균 치아 마모도는 arbitrary scale로 측정하였을 때, 절단형에 비교하여 연마형에서 높은 마모도를 보였다.(p<0.05). 4. 절단형에 비교하여 연마형은 arbitrary scale로 측정하였을 때, 구치부에서는 높은 마모도를 보였으며 전치부에서는 유의할 만한 차이가 없었다(p<0.05) 5. 구치 평균 치아 마모도와 부위에 따른 치아의 마모도는 균형측에서 절단형과 연마형간에 유의할 만한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p>0.05). 6. 전치 평균 치아 마모도와 부위에 따른 치아의 마모도는 수평 마모면과 수직 마모면 비교시, 절단형과 연마형간에 유의할 만한 차이를 보이지 않았다.(p>0.05)

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.25 no.3 s.50
• /
• pp.311-321
• /
• 1995

This study was undertaken to investigate the distribution of the chewing side preference and variations in the maximum bite force and facial morphology according to chewing side preference since unilateral chewing may cause morphologic and functional anomalies. 50 dental students who had no signs or symptoms of masticatory system and Angle's Class I relationship in posterior segments were selected, and divided into two groups, that is, 25 in bilateral chewing group(19 male and 6 female) and 25 in unilateral chewing group(10 male and 15 female). Maximum bite force was estimated ana posteroanterior cephalogram were measured ana statistically analyzed. The results were as follows : 1. Their were more students with bilateral chewing side preference($68\%$) and unilateral chewing side group consisted of right side preference($68\%$) and left side preference($32\%$). 2. There was no significant difference in the strength of max. bite force between the right and left side in bilateral chewing group. The bite force of the chewing side nab greater in the unilateral chewing group but less in the non-chewing side compared to those of bilateral chewing group with Bo significant difference. Max. bite force of chewing side was greater than that of non-chewing side in the unilateral chewing group(Female p<0.05). Max. bite force of males was about twice in that of females in both groups(p<0.05). Max. bite force of chewing side of the unilateral chewing group was similar to that of the bilateral chewing group, but that of non-chewing side was less than that of the bilateral chewing group. 3. In comparison of the facial morphology, there was no statistically significant difference in the size between the right and left side of the bilateral chewing group and between chewing and non-chewing side of the unilateral chewing group.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.167-176
• /
• 2006

Recent studies have shown that there are significant increasing facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional imaging. This study use panorama view and PA cephalograph that were low in price and make good use in dentistry. For this study, 35 persons without remarkable malocclusion were selected, they had panorama view and PA cephalograph, make written questionnaire about facial asymmetry cognition and masticatory pattern. Data obtained were statistically processed by the SPSS Windows program and the results of this study were as follows: 1. There were significant difference between Rt and Lt. on Co-Go, Co-Ag, Co-Go-Ag, Go-Me- Ag. 2. In panorama view, There were significant difference between Rt. and Lt Co-Ag that chewing right side, Rt. and Lt. Co-Go that chewing left side, 3. In PA cephalograph view, There were significant difference in Rt. and Lt. Cg-Go, Rt. and Lt. Co-Ag that chewing right side, Rt. and Lt. Cg-Go that chewing left side 4. There were significant difference in Rt. and Lt. Co-Go, CO-si-CR, go-ME-Ag that cogniting facial asymmetry.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.319-328
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess treatment effect of physical therapy on experimentally-induced masseter muscle fatigue by two parameters of muscle stiffness and elasticity. Three physical therapeutic modalities inducing electroacupunture stimulation therapy(EAST), Microwave diathermy and low-level laser therapy(LLLT) were compared. 10 healthy volunteers with normal occlusion (mean age of $26.3{\pm}1.16$ years, M:F=1:1) were participated in this study. All subjects were asked to chew gum on the right side until they felt pain(more and VAS 5 (0 to 10)) and their masseter muscles were examined with a tactile sensor in order to evaluate changes of stiffness and elasticity according to gum chewing and three physical therapeutic modalities. Subjective discomfort or pain was self-estimated by VAS as well. Unilateral gum chewing increased stiffness and decreased elasticity only on the chewing side but VAS increased on the both sides(p<0.05). EAST or Microwave diathermy greatly decreased stiffness and VAS and increased elasticity(p<0.05) but LLLT did not exhibit significant difference. From the results of this study, it is concluded that both EAST and Microwave diathermy have favorable effect on stiffness and elasticity of muscles and pain relief while effect of LLLT is not reliable. In addition, experimental unilateral gum chewing compromises stiffness and elasticity of masseter muscles only the chewing side while subjective discomfort or pain can be felt on the both sides.

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1993.12a
• /
• pp.17-19
• /
• 1993

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.10b
• /
• pp.625-627
• /
• 2004

최근 MPEG-4를 이용한 멀티미디어 응용이 활성화되고 있으나 아직까지는 단방향의 멀티미디어 스트리밍 전송이 대부분이다. 본 논문에서는 일반 사용자의 요구 사항을 서대 측에 전송할 수 있도록 하는 양방향의 멀티미디어 전송을 위한 시스템 설계에 대해 기술한다. 이 시스템은 서버측의 MPEG-4 컨텐츠를 클라이언트에서 키워드를 이용하여 원하는 부분의 내용을 검색하여 스트림 전송해서 받을 수 있도록 한다 검색하고자 하는 키워드를 입력하면 해당 키워드의 장면트리구조에서 검색된 위치에서부터 MPEG-4 파일을 재생할 수 있는 것이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 키워드 입력 인터페이스를 포함하는 MPEG-4 저작 도구의 구성이 대해 소개한다.

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1995.12a
• /
• pp.41-42
• /
• 1995

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 1986

Numerous studies have been reported on the movement of the jaw during chewing. However, there is still much controversy. The purposes of this study were to observe the jaw movement during mastication and to provide the information in prosthodontic treatment and diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder. The author analyzed the time and characteristics of the masticatory movement during chewing using mandibular kinesiograph in 24 subjects, 17 males 7 females, age of 22-27 without orofacial problems. The obtained results were as follows: The duration of single chewing cycle was $515{\pm}87msec.$. Comparing the three phases of the chewing cycle (opening, closing, centric pause), the closing phase had the longest duration, and the centric pause had the shortest duration. The maximal laterotrusive movement of the mandible druing chewing was $3.5{\pm}1mm$. The maximal mediotrusive movement of the mandible during chewing was $1.0{\pm}0.7mm$. The maximal vertical velocity of the mandible during chewing was $120{\pm}28mm/sec.$ in opening phase, and $109{\pm}21mm/sec.$ in closing phase.