• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.113-139
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to analyze the operating case of admission officer system of colleges and universities in USA, and to deduce its implications to Korean colleges and universities. In order to accomplish the purpose of this study, following methodologies were adopted: review on the related literatures, statistical data, and previous studies concerning admission officers of colleges and universities in USA, and in-depth interview with them. Historical and cultural background of university admission system of USA was analyzed. Case study on USA colleges and universities was divided with four parts such as determining factors of admission and admission methods, organization for admission affairs and its number of persons, work of admission officer and admission process, and cost of admission and salary. Implications to Korean colleges and universities were presented with three points such as overall implication, implication on materials for admission process, and implication on managing system of admission. Based on the analysis, discussion and implications, the conclusion and further suggestion of this study are as follows: First, actual authority of admission should be grant to admission officer. Second, not only non-curricular factors but also scholastic factors should be emphasized in role of admission officer. Third, education and training about work of admission officer and unification of criteria for admission should be held. Fourth, admission officers with various occupation background are needed. Fifth, work of admission officers should be extended to various work concerning university entrance. Sixth, cross-checking on marks of over two admission officers is needed. Seventh, in order to stabilize admission process, status of admission officer should be stabilized. Eighth, part-time admission officers are need to employ in season of admission. Ninth, authority of weighting high schools should be grant to admission officers in long term perspective.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.160
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 2009

2009년 정부가 발표한 대학입학사정관제 3단계 정착방안 중 1단계 입학사정관제 내실화 단계가 진행 중이다. 선택과 집중의 원칙에 따라 선도대학을 육성하고, 입학사정관 전문양성과정을 운영하여 입학사정관 인력풀이 안정적으로 확보될 수 있도록 하는 것이다. 현재 대학입학사정관 전문양성 훈련프로그램 지원기관으로서 5개 대학이 선정되었다. 입학사정관의 전문성과 신뢰성 확보를 위해 입학사정관 양성교육이 추구해야 할 방향을 논하고자 한다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.485-494
• /
• 2012

The role of admissions officers in universities is to evaluate applicants from a comprehensive perspective on the basis of diverse bases and materials for evaluation that include not only quantitative, but also qualitative information about applicants. Therefore, the crucial key to ensuring the success of the admissions officer system is to ensure the fairness of admission-related decisions and the integrity of individual admissions officers by urging them to render impartial evaluations based on professionalism and avoidance of bias. This study selected the major realm of the ethical education for admission officers on the basis or experts' opinions, and documentary research, and tried to secure the validity of the composed educational contents through the in-depth interviews and discussions with the incumbent admissions officers. The program must handle subjects that are intimately related to the actual experience of many admissions officers, and must be capable of inducing voluntary compliance from the officers. Therefore, the program suggested by this study focuses on three core areas of ethics: that is, 'interaction with society,' 'ethics and responsibilities involved in admission,' and 'legal obligations and roles of admissions officers.' To this end, it provides twelve sub-topics and learning materials. Providing this kind of ethical education programs for admissions officers will help not only to enhance the professionalism and ethical commitments of admissions officers, but also broadly to establish a fairer and more reliable admissions officer system.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1149-1157
• /
• 2013

In this study we compare academic achievements of college students admitted by admissions officer selection with those admitted by general selection. Two measurements of the academic achievements considered are GPA (grade point average) and relative ascending rank of GPA. By the comparison of the academic achievements, we would like to assess the effectiveness of the admissions office selection and then provide a basis for screening good students by that selection. The results of data analysis indicate that the academic achievements of admissions officer selection students tend to be lower than those of early general admission students and also those of regular general admission students tend to be higher than those of early general admission students.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.11 no.11
• /
• pp.4220-4227
• /
• 2010

Recently there have been many arguments about the admission officers system, but the majority of researches about admission officer has not focused student performance. We compared learning performances of students selected by admission officers and students selected by standardized test. We checked the marks of students at college entrance point and the average grade for their freshman year. Analyzing the data, we got two major findings. At the point of entrance, the students selected by admission officers had less performances. But the analysis of average grade for 1 year, there were no statistical differences between two groups of students.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.22 no.5
• /
• pp.857-866
• /
• 2011

The role of admissions officers is to evaluate the overall qualification of applicants, which consists of various qualitative and subjective metrics The core requirement of admissions officers is not only assessment of students' qualification based on the application but also verification of the data stem from the various sources. The issue for fairness on selection is the crucial agenda for the whole process of university entrance. The educational program aimed on the enhancement the expertise of admissions officers is required to guarantee the fair selection of whole evaluation process. In this paper we developed educational training program for admissions officers of J university. The 9 core dimensions of curriculum is presented to train admissions officers and the stepwise requirements of achieving each subject's goal are defined.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.12 no.6
• /
• pp.508-517
• /
• 2012

Admissions officer system was introduced in an effort to reject the score-oriented competition and select students on the basis of their individual potential and capacity. The admissions officer system, which was first introduced into the college entrance examination for the 2008 school year in Korea, has been operated by expanding the recruiting level up to 11.8% of the number of the students to be admitted by all colleges. The aim of this study is to analyze the performance of the admissions officer system by analyzing the true picture of school life led by the students singled out through admissions officer screening, and further to inquire into the substantial plan to support the students, who were selected through the admissions officer system, for their successful college life while displaying their potential and capacity As a result of doing research on this, it was found that the freshmen selected through admissions officer screening showed more positive responses in all measurement variables this study selected, such as school adaptability, school satisfaction, and career maturity, learning attitude than other students screened in a different way; in addition, school adaptability and school satisfaction came out as significantly high variables statistically. However, they showed insufficiency in the attitude in class from the behavioral aspect in learning attitude. This study made a suggestion that it's necessary for systematic support and management program to be mapped out and provided in order for the students selected through admissions officer screening to improve their learning attitude as they inspire themselves with school adaptability and school satisfaction.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1359-1368
• /
• 2013

An "admission officer system" has been introduced for the purpose of changing the paradigm from the "current admission system". This is because the current admission system mainly reflects the scholastic ability test (SAT) score regulating student selection for entering university. The admission officer system focuses on not only the students' school records but also, their potential. In addition, this system lets the university screen the students according to its own founding philosophy. One feature of the admission officer system is to cultivate men of ability by caring for the selected students consistently. Typically, students are selected by an admission officer system according to document screening which includes curriculum and non-curriculum scores, discussions, and interviews. On the other hand, the admission officer system might create a lack of objectivity in the way a student is selected because of the admission officer's own subjectivity. In this study, an algorithm in which the admission officer system can maintain the objectivity on student selection is presented. This is so that the student does not experience any disadvantage from the process of the admission officer system.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.169-178
• /
• 2017

The main objective of this paper is to study if the admission officer system is settled down successively. We compare two groups, one admitted by the admission officer system and the other admitted by the usual system in terms of school life satisfaction, academic achievement and career status after graduation. In this paper, 404 students, who had graduated in 2016 and had data on three indices were analyzed by mean difference test and Chi-squared test. The analysis results show that there are no differences between two groups statistically. The main factor on the career status after graduation is the academic performance rather than the admission system. This means the H university, which has been chosen as the leading university for the admission officer system since 2008, has settled down the admission officer system successfully.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.391-398
• /
• 2012

This study is to investigate the perceptions of high school teachers on the evaluation criteria of the college admission officer interview system and to suggest approaches to improve the interview system. The survey results of teachers' perceptions are the following. First, for 'potential' criteria, teachers consider challenging spirit and students' initiatives are important evaluation criteria. For 'personality' criteria, they contemplate that responsibility, community spirit and flexibility to resolve conflicts are important values. Further, views of life and creativity also need to be seriously considered in the screening process. Second, their satisfaction with the college admission officer system was relatively high (9.34 points). Last, in order to improve the interview screening system, teachers assert that the process to secure fairness is required. Based on the results, suggestions were made for ensuring expertise of college admission officer and improving the alternative policy of the admission officer interview system.