• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.170-177
• /
• 2013

Total elbow arthroplasty is still in its infancy compared with other arthroplasties, such as knee or hip arthroplasties. Implant design has been evolving with clinical experiences; however, there are only limited data on the long-term clinical outcome of elbow arthroplasty in the literature. The design of total elbow prostheses can be divided into three categories: linked (constrained or semi-constrained), unlinked (unconstrained), and convertible types. The choice between an unlinked (unconstrained) implant and a linked (semi-constrained) implant depends on joint stability and adequacy of the bone stock. Linked elbow arthroplasty has provided high patient satisfaction, and pain relief thanks to proper patient selection, advancement of implant design, improvement in cement techniques, meticulous surgical technique, and appropriate postoperative rehabilitation. Concerns remain about the use of this implant in young or high-demand patients. This article focuses on the linked (semi-constrained) prostheses, which provides an overview of the current state of linked total elbow arthroplasty.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.183-189
• /
• 2007

Introduction: While uncommon, humeral head osteonecrosis is an indication for arthroplasty when the humeral head collapse is advanced. The current authors report the short-term clinical results of 7 hemiarthroplasties to treat humeral head osteonecrosis. Materials and Methods: This study focused on 7 reconstructed shoulders of 5 patients whose humeral head osteonecrosis was treated with hemiarthroplasty. The postulated causes were alcohol-induced (4 cases) and steroidinduced (3 cases). The minimum follow-up was 12 months. This study compared the preoperative and postoperative shoulder pain, range of motion, and ASES scores. The postoperative patient satisfaction was assessed. Results: The level of pain during exercise was reduced from a preoperative average of 7.6 to a postoperative average of 1.9. The range of motion, in terms of forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation, improved from preoperative averages of $105.7^{\circ}$, $80^{\circ}$, and $22.1^{\circ}$ to postoperative averages of $146.6^{\circ}$, $139.3^{\circ}$, and $44.3^{\circ}$, respectively. The ASES scores increased from a preoperative mean of 39.0 to a postoperative mean of 84.1. The patients' ratings of the outcomes were excellent (5 cases) and good (2 cases). Conclusions: These short-term results indicate that hemiarthroplasty is a reliable treatment method for humeral head osteonecrosis improving shoulder pain, range of motion, and patient satisfaction.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2004.03a
• /
• pp.52-52
• /
• 2004

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.44-50
• /
• 2011

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of the tumor prosthetic replacement and osteosynthetic fixation for pathologic fracture of skeletal metastatic lesion of the proximal femur. Materials and Methods: From 1994 May to 2009 May, medical records of 22 patients who underwent tumor prosthetic replacement with tumor resection (group 1) and 15 others (16 hips) who underwent osteosynthetic fixation without tumor resection (group 2) were reviewed. The mean age of overall patients were 59 (group 1) and 60 (group 2). Mean follow up periods were 23 and 11 months. The oncological and functional results were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system, 1993. The statistical evaluation was assessed with Log rank test and t-test. Results: The mean survival periods were 24 months in group 1 and 11months in group 2. The 1 year survival rates were 86% in group 1 and 50 % in group 2, and 2 year survival rates were 29.7% in group 1 and 9.4% in group 2. The mean MSTS functional score were 26.4 (19-30), 87.9% in group 1 and 15.3 (10-23), 51.0% in group 2. Conclusion: The results of tumor resection and prosthetic replacement in selected cases was better than osteosynthetic fixation without tumor resection for metastatic bone tumors around proximal femur in oncological and functional aspects.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.140-145
• /
• 2008

After limb salvage operation becomes popular, reconstruction method of epi-metaphyseal osteosarcoma is relatively standardized though it may be operator's matter of preference. Most limb salvage techniques presently used are prosthesis reconstruction and osteoarticular allograft. In the case of prosthesis, it is very stable and shows good postoperative functional score, however, finally, it has a weak point of requirement for removal procedure due to failure. In the long run, allograft reconstruction has a good merit. But, it has a weak point of difficulties in securing the demanded size and shape. Allograft reconstruction should be performed only in the case of safe margin and established indication. In limb salvage operation, intercalary reconstruction is useful method in diaphyseal osteosarcoma, however, in metaphyseal osteosarcoma, the indication is not confirmed. We treated 17 year old osteosarcoma patient with localized in the tibial medial condyle with proximal medial condylectomy and pasteurized bone reconstruction in the conviction of safe surgical margin. We report this case because we guess if this procedure may be applied to premature patients, despite failure hemiarthroplasty can be tried successfully.

• 대한족부족관절학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.11a
• /
• pp.50-50
• /
• 2008

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2003.11a
• /
• pp.175-180
• /
• 2003

상완골 근위부 골절의 치료를 위해서 실시하는 상완골 두 치환술은 고난도의 수술이다. 그러나 수술 수기에 만전을 기하고 골절을 위해서 특별하게 고안된 치환물을 사용하면 통증을 해소되는 것은 물론이며 대부분의 견관절 기능도 회복이 가능하다고 생각한다. 또한 보다 좋은 결과를 얻기 위해서는 치환물과 수술 수기 등에 대해서 지속적인 개선이 매우 중요하다고 생각한다.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 1997.05a
• /
• pp.137-138
• /
• 1997

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.54 no.4
• /
• pp.317-326
• /
• 2019

Purpose: To compare and analyze the rate of prevention of two venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in patients with artificial joint arthroplasty and hip joint fracture. Proper prophylaxis for preventing thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery is significant because of this fetal complication. Materials and Methods: This study compared and retrospective analyzed the rate of prevention using the medical records and radiographs of patients who underwent orthopedic surgery from March 2009 to February 2011 according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines and from March 2012 to February 2014 according to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. Results: The guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis have been applied to patients with artificial joint replacement and hip joint fracture, the compliance rate of the ACCP guidelines was 56.0% before surgery, 67.0% after surgery with chemical prophylaxis, and 80.5% with mechanical prophylaxis. In addition, the compliance rate of the AAOS guidelines was 74.1% with chemical prophylaxis, and 88.3% with mechanical prophylaxis, which was higher than the ACCP guidelines. The compliance rates of mechanical and chemical prophylaxis before and after surgery of the ACCP guidelines, and the compliance rate of mechanical and chemical prophylaxis of the AAOS guidelines were compared and analyzed. The results revealed statistical significance (p<0.05) before and after total knee replacement arthroplasty and hip joint fracture internal fixation and total high risk orthopedic surgery. Conclusion: Raising the compliance rate of prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in high risk orthopedic surgery is necessary and people should follow the guidelines for a unified direction depending on which situation they are in.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2007

최근에 스포츠 손상이 증가하고 관절경을 이용한 치료가 발전하면서 조기에 더 적극적인 치료를 하는 추세이다. 또한 방사선 소견에 비하여 관절경하에서는 연골이 불안정하거나 분리되어 있는 경우도 있으므로 기존의 수술 적응증보다는 좀 더 광범위하게 관절경 검사 및 수술적 치료가 요구된다고 생각한다. 치료 방법을 하면 $1.5cm^2$ 이하의 병변을 가진 50세 이하의 환자는 관절경을 이용하여 변연 절제술, 연골하 천공, 연마, 미세 골절술, 소파술 등의 방법으로 치료할 수 있다. 같은 방법으로 50세 이상의 $3cm^2$ 이하의 병변을 가진 환자 중 mosaicplasty와 자가 연골 세포 이식술을 적용할 수 없는 환자에서 시도해볼 수 있다. $1.5\sim3cm^2$의 병변을 가진 50세 이하의 환자, 그전의 관절경적 치료로 실패한 경우에는 자가골 연골 이식 또는 자가 연골 세포 이식술을 이용하여 치료해야 한다. $3cm^2$ 이상의 병변을 가진 50세 이하의 환자는 자가 연골 세포 이식술이나 동종 골 연골 이식을 이용하여 치료하며, 50세 이상의 환자는 관절 고정술이나 족근 관절 인공치환술을 고려하는 것이 바람직하다.