• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Broadcast Engineers Conference
• /
• 2019.11a
• /
• pp.134-136
• /
• 2019

본 논문에서는 사람의 내면상태 인식을 위한 상호작용 체계 구축을 위하여 사람의 감정 데이터를 효과적으로 수집하기 위한 프로토콜을 제안하고, 프로토콜에 따라 수집된 데이터에 대한 분석 및 결과를 제시한다. 감정 데이터 수집 프로토콜의 개발은 기존 문헌과 시스템 리뷰를 통한 감정분류체계 수립, 분류체계에 따른 감정 유발 영상 수집 및 신뢰도 확보, 감정 데이터 수집을 위한 인간 대상 실험 절차 구축 및 타당도 확보의 단계로 이루어졌다. 수집된 사람의 실시간 감정 데이터는 기계학습을 통한 감정 분류 연구의 기준으로 활용이 가능하다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.178-191
• /
• 1999

More than twenty methods were suggested for Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) in the field of safety analysis for Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). However, there is still a high uncertainty on the analysis and a difficulty in performing HRA. New methods and approaches are under studying to overcome such limitations of current HRA. This paper presents some results of study to analysis limitations of current HRA in viewpoint of user, i.e., HRA analyst. The limitation analysis was based on 89 human error events modeled in a Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) project for NPPs in Korea. Total 17 specific limitations were identified and categorized into seven groups. Important analysis has also been undertaken to assess the order of priority among those limitations. Finally, seven requirements with priority ranking were generated for an advanced framework and methodology of HRA.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.135-138
• /
• 2006

사용자 모델링을 위해서는 사용자의 성향 및 행위 등의 다양한 정보를 수집하여 분석에 이용한다. 하지만 사용자(인간)로 부터 얻은 데이터는 기계나 환경에서 수집된 데이터 보다 패턴을 찾기 힘들어 모델링하기 어렵다. 그 이유는 사용자는 사용자의 현재 상태와 상황에 따라 다양한 결과를 보이며, 일관성을 유지 하지 않는 경우가 있기 때문이다. 사용자 모델링을 위해서는 분산되어 있는 데이터에서 노이즈를 선별하고 연관성 있는 데이터를 분류할 수 있는 기술이 필요하다. 본 논문은 사용자로 부터 수집된 데이터를 k-NN(Nearest Neighbor) 기법을 이용하여 노이즈를 선별한다. 노이즈가 제거된 데이터는 의사결정나무(Decision Tree)방법을 이용하여 학습하였고, 노이즈가 분류되기 전과 비교 분석 하였다. 실험에서는 홈 인테리어 학습 컨텐츠인 DOLLS-HI를 이용하여 수집된 학습자의 데이터를 이용하였고, 생성된 학습자 모델링의 신뢰도가 높아지는 것을 확인하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
• /
• v.38 no.6
• /
• pp.72-78
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this paper is to derive a quantified approach for Operator Manual Actions (OMAs) based on the existing fire Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) methodology developed by the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI). The existing fire HRA method was reviewed, and supplementary considerations for OMA quantification were established through a comparative analysis with NUREG-1852 criteria and the review of the existing literature. The OMA quantification approach involves a timeline that considers the occurrence of Multiple Spurious Operations (MSOs) during a Main Control Room Abandonment (MCRA) determination and movement towards the Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) in the event of a Main Control Room (MCR) fire. The derived failure probability of an OMA from the approach proposed in this paper is expected to enhance the understanding of its reliability. Therefore, it allows moving beyond the deterministic classification of "reliable" or "unreliable" in NUREG-1852. Also, in the event of a nuclear power plant fire where multiple OMAs are required within a critical time range, it is anticipated that the OMA failure probability could serve as a criterion for prioritizing OMAs and determining their order of importance.

• Proceedings of the KSR Conference
• /
• 2010.06a
• /
• pp.2048-2051
• /
• 2010

Almost all companies have paid much attention to the safety management ranging from maintenance to operation even at the stage of designing in order to prevent accidents, but fatal accidents continue to increase throughout the world. In particular, it is essential to systematically prevent such fatal accidents as fire, explosion or leakage of toxic gas at factories in order to not only protect the workers and neighbors but also prevent economic losses and environmental pollution. In addition, HRA may be used to detect the human errors which may cause accidents or trace back to any mistake on the part of workers. Usually, HRA technique is used in association with other risk assessment techniques. Moreover, it can serve to enumerate the human errors which may occur during operation or down-time or correct the existing system to reduce the mistakes. This work focuses on the coincidence of human error and mechanical failure for management of human error, and on some important performance shaping factors to propose a method for improving safety effectively of the process industries.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Telematics and Electronics
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.37-52
• /
• 1980

Recent industrial processes have been complicated and automated. In order to improve the system reliability and solve the limitation of human ability, the necessity of alarm analysis or fault diagnosis has been rapidly grown, A "dictionary" made by a sequence computer programming has been developed as one of the mothods for fault diagnosis in the chemical industrial processes and its usefulness has been proved through the experiment. It also suggests a way to simplity the recent alarm system being complex.g complex.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.112-118
• /
• 1998

Human errors performed during the operations have a dominant portion of the accidents. But the systematic human error evaluation methodology universally accepted is not developed yet. One of the difficulties in performing human reliability analysis is to evaluate the performance shaping factors which represent the characteristics and the circumstances in the discriminate manner. For assessing a specific human action more exactly, it is necessary to consider all of the PSFs at the same time which make an effect on the human action. In this paper, dynamic influence diagrams are introduced to model simultaneously their effects on the specific human action. And the human actions and their subsequent PSFs are categorized and classified as the complementary works. A new human error evaluation methodology using influence diagrams is developed. This methodology involves the categorization of PSFs and the PSFs quantification. The applied analysis results for the example task are shown for representative purposes. It is shown that this approach is very flexible in that it can be applied to any kind of actions.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.98-103
• /
• 2003

Based on ASME probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and NEI PRA peer review guidance, we evaluate a human reliability analysis (HRA) in probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for Korea standard nuclear power plants, Ulchin Unit 3&4, to improve it performed at under design. The HRA for Ulchin Unit 3&4 is assessed as higher than Grade I based on ASME PRA standard and as higher than Grade 2 based on NEI PRA peer review guidance. The major items to be improved identified through the evaluation process are the documentation, the systematic human reliability analysis, the participitation of operators in the works and review of HRA. We suggest the guidance on the identification and qualitative screening analysis for pre-accident human errors and solve some items to be improved using the suggested guidance.

• Science of Emotion and Sensibility
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.403-410
• /
• 2007

The most common method in the psychological measuring method for measuring user's emotions is to indirectly measure the user's emotion by using adjectives, called emotional words. The previous research, in order to observe user's emotional changes while they interact with a product, has extracted some emotional words and representative emotions, and made a set of subjective evaluation scale. In addition to adjective checklists, self-report questionnaire-type scales have been extensively used to assess user's emotions. This research suggested a self-report questionnaire-type scale using the representative emotions and a set of subjective evaluation scale made in the previous research. Also the reliability of the suggested self-report questionnaire-type scale was confirmed through the analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Therefore, the self-report questionnaire-type scale extracted through this research can be used in various ways to measure a user's user's emotions naturally expressed while using a product.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.7
• /
• pp.325-336
• /
• 2018

The aim of this study was to provide fundamental information on the validity and credibility of the Korean geometric psychological assessment (GEOPIA) by investigating the degree of relation between the GEOPIA and the MBTI. Data was collected from 331 subjects aged 19 to 70, residing in Seoul, Gyeonggi Province, Jeolla Province, or Gyeongsang Province. Participants completed the GEOPIA and the MBTI during the period of May to September 2017. The study calculated Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ to verify the tests' validity and reliability through SPSS. For the relational analysis between the results of the tests, we conducted a one-way analysis of variance on the first group of the GEOPIA's personality types, and the Scheffe Test if significant relationship was found. The study found that the circle type was predisposed to ESFJ, the triangle type to ESTJ, the rectangle type to ISTJ, and S type to INFP. Higher scores of feeling (F) and perceiving (P) corresponded to circle and S types, thinking (T) and judging (J) for triangle and rectangle types, extroversion (E) for circle and triangle types, and introversion (I) for rectangle and S types. These confirmed the substantial relations between the GEOPIA and the MBTI.