• Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
• /
• v.30 no.12
• /
• pp.26-34
• /
• 2012

지금까지 간략히 살펴본 것처럼 심리학에서 연역추리를 연구하는 이론과 가정이 변화하고 있는데, 크게 네 가지 흐름으로 요약할 수 있다[2,6,7]. 가장 큰 변화는 연역 추리와 귀납 추리의 구분이 점차로 흐려지고 있다는 것이다. 두 번째 변화는 연역 추리를 이해하는 관점이 달라지고 있다는 점이다. 심리학에서 연역추리를 본격적으로 다루기 시작한 1960년대에는 사람들이 논리적인 사고를 하느냐에 관심이 모아졌다. 그러다 1980년대와 1990년대에는 연역추리를 하는 기제에 관한 심성 논리 이론과 심성 모형 이론 간의 논쟁이 치열하게 전개되면서 내용효과와 같은 실용적 요인들에 대한 연구도 많이 수행되었다. 그리고 1990년대 들어서면서 연역추리를 정보 획득의 관점에서 접근하는 확률적 접근, 연역 추리 과정을 heuristic 처리 단계와 분석적 처리 단계로 나누어 접근하는 이중 과정 이론이 등장하면서 기본적인 이론틀의 변화도 일어나고 있다. 세 번째 변화는 연역 추리를 문제 해결이나 의사결정과 같은 다른 인지 처리와 연결하려는 시도들이 진행되고 있다는 점이다. 마지막으로 심리학의 다른 분야에서와 마찬가지로 연역 추리에 관여하는 뇌 부위를 알아보는 뇌 영상 연구들이 점차 증가하고 있다. 이런 연구들의 결과로 연역 추리 과정에 대한 다차원적인 이해가 증진되고 다른 인지과정과도 연동되는 종합적 이해가 가능해질 것으로 예상한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.34 no.4
• /
• pp.375-383
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to find out how middle school students evaluate scientific information in terms of hypothetico-deductive reasoning. A total of 66 middle school students completed a paper-and-pencil test on scientific information evaluation and 14 of them were individually interviewed for triangulation. The test includes six topics related to scientific or pseudoscientific information, and questions about each topic were sequenced based on a hypothetico-deductive reasoning. The hypothetico-deductive process consists of three steps: identifying predictions made by explanations in the information, identifying data actually obtained, and determining the fit between predictions and data to judge the validity of the explanations. Data analyses have focused on students' response types at each step, whether students used hypoethetico-deductive reasoning, and students' preference to evidence types in making decisions. The middle school students in this study answered the questions in various ways based on how they used the information given or personal knowledge and beliefs. A small portion of students evaluated information based on hypothetico-deductive reasoning. These students tended to give priority to scientific data in determining the validity of the information. On the other hand, students who did not use hypoethetico-deductive reasoning tended to prefer first-hand experience in the decision. The results provide implications for science lessons and the curriculum for scientific literacy. Further research should include student evaluation of the validity of data and other types of reasoning.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 1988

본 연구의 목적은 Piaget의 인지발달단계(전조작 구체적 조작 단계)에 따른 자연과 개념획득에 효과적인 교수전략을 탐색하기 위한 연구로서, 첫째는 문헌연구를 통해서, Piaget의 인지이론을 기초로한 교육론과 개념학습을 위한 교수전략을 연구함으로써 전조작 단계의 어린이, 구체적 조작단계의 어린이에게는 연역적 교수전략보다 귀납적 교수전략이 더 효과적이며, 구체적 조작단계의 어린이에게는 초보적인 논리능력이 발달하므로 연역적 교수전략도 가능하며, 이 2가지의 인지단계가 복합돼 있는 국민학교 2학년 집단에게는 귀납적 교수전략이 보다 효과적일 것이라는 데에 이르렀다. 둘째로는 현장 실험연구로서 실제로 자연과 2학년의 한 단원을 연억 귀납의 교수전략의 단계에 맞추어 적용하였다. Piaget의 인지 발달 단계예 따른 자연과 개념획득을 위한 효과적인 교수전략을 탐색해본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 전조작 단계의 아동은 자연과 개념획득을 위해서는 연역적 교수전략보다 귀납적 교수전략이 더 효과적이다. 둘째, 구체적 조작단계의 아동에게는자연과 개념획득을 위한 교수전략은 귀납적 교수전략이 효과적이지만, 연역적 교수전략도 가능하다는 것이다. 이로써 국민학교 2학년 즉, 전조작 단계와 구체척 조작단계가 복합돼있는 집단에게는 연역적 교수전략보다 귀납적 교수전략이 보다 더 효과적이라는 것이다.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.205-208
• /
• 2002

본 연구에서는 영문 단어로부터 폰트를 분류하기 위해 연역적이고 국부적인 폰트 분류 방법을 제안한다. 이는 문자 인식 전에 한 단어에서 폰트를 분류하는 것을 말한다. 폰트 분류를 위해 활자 특성인 Ascender, Descender와 Serif가 사용된다. 입력 단어로부터 Ascender, Descender와 Serif가 추출되어 특징 벡터가 추출되고, 그 특징 벡터는 인공 신경망에 의해 입력 단어에 대한 폰트 그룹, 폰트 이름이 분류된다. 제안된 연역적이고 국부적인 폰트 분류 방법은 폰트 정보가 문자 분할기와 문자 인식기에 사용될 수 있게 한다 나아가, 특정 폰트에 따른 Mono-font 문자 분할기와 Mono-Font 문자 인식기로 구성되는 OCR 시스템을 구성할 수 있는 것을 가능하게 한다.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.141
• /
• pp.187-202
• /
• 2017

The aim of this paper is to clarify the difference between the concept of deduction-induction and Aristotle's concept of syllogismos-epagoge. First, Aristotle does not use the expression 'invalid syllogismos'. But a valid deduction is distinguished from a invalid deduction in modern logic. Second, from Aristotle's point of view syllogismos is paralleled by epagoge. Because syllogismos is equivalent to epagoge in logical form. But a disturbing lack of parallelism exists between deduction and induction by which the standards for establishing inductive conclusions are more demanding than those for deductive ones. Third, instructors in introductory logic courses ordinarily stress the need to evaluate arguments first in terms of the strength of the conclusion relative to the premises. Accordingly, students may be told to assume that premises are true. But Aristotle does not assume that premises are true. A syllogismos start from the conceptually true premise and a epagoge start from the empirically true premise.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.6
• /
• pp.839-851
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze the science reasoning differences of elementary school students' science writing. For this purpose, science writing activities and analysis frameworks were developed. Science writing data were collected and analyzed. Third to sixth grade elementary students were selected from a middle high level elementary school in terms of a national achievement test in Seoul. A total of 320 writing materials were analyzed. The results of the analysis were as follows. Science writings show science reasoning at 52 % for $3^{rd}$ grade, 68% for $4^{th}$ grade, 85% for $5^{th}$ grade, and 89% for $6^{th}$ grade. Three types of scientific reasoning such as inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning, and abductive reasoning appeared in science writing of the third to sixth graders. The abductive reasoning appeared very low in comparing with inductive and deductive reasoning. Level three appeared the most frequently in the science writing of the elementary students. The levels of inductive and deductive reasoning in science writing increased according to increasing grade and showed statistical differences between grades. But the levels of abductive reasoning did not show an increasing aspect according to increasing grade and also did not show statistical differences between grades. The levels of inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning of the 3rd grade was very low in comparing with the other grades.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.225-234
• /
• 2007

This research was conducted with an intention to develop a teaching program that possesses a goal of elevating higher thinking ability within the science class and to investigate its effect. The hypothetico-deductive teaching model was developed and its' program was designed to be directly put into the practical use, and apply it in class. The application of the hypothetico-deductive teaching program had a positive effect in the improvement of students' creative thinking ability and critical thinking ability. And it had a positive influence on scientific attitudes. After completing the program the opinions of the students who participated in this research by a poll were gathered and analyzed. The students felt uneasy and had a lot of difficulties during the program activity because they had to keep on thinking newly, critically, and scientifically, but they admitted that they gained the ability to think on their own when the program was completed.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.261-282
• /
• 2021

This study identified the meaning of mathematical justification and its characteristics for middle school math gifted students. 17 middle school math gifted students participated in questionnaires and written exams. Results show that the gifted students recognized justification in various meanings such as proof, systematization, discovery, intellectual challenge of mathematical justification, and the preference for deductive justification. As a result of justification exams, there was a difference in algebra and geometry. While there were many deductive justifications in both algebra and geometry questionnaires, the difference exists in empirical justifications: there were many empirical justifications in algebra, but there were few in geometry questions. When deductive justification was completed, the students showed satisfaction with their own justification. However, they showed dissatisfaction when they could not deductively justify the generality of the proposition using mathematical symbols. From the results of the study, it was found that justification education that can improve algebraic translation ability is necessary so that gifted students can realize the limitations and usefulness of empirical reasoning and make deductive justification.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.19 no.9
• /
• pp.307-316
• /
• 2021

This study aims to explore the effects of deductive FFI and inductive FFI in L2 learners' grammatical achievement and their reaction to the grammar instruction. 84 students were placed into three groups: 29 given deductive FFI(DG), 28 receiving inductive FFI(IG), and 27 with traditional instruction(CG). All students completed pre/post tests and questionnaires, and took a delayed post test 9 weeks after the treatment. For statistical anlayses of all the quantitative data, a one-way ANOVA, paired samples T-test, and repeated measures ANOVA were performed. The results indicated that both deductive and inductive FFI affected learners' grammatical achievement and their achievement was sustained over time. Deductive FFI was more effective than inductive FFI, whereas the IG students more positively changed their attitudes and perceptions to the grammar instruction. These findings of the study imply that FFI should be valued in an Korean EFL classroom, which would contribute to further longitudinal research for its sustainability.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.8
• /
• pp.137-150
• /
• 1999

본 연구의 목적은 아동들의 수학 교과에 대한 정의적 특성과 수학적 문제 해결력, 추론 능력간의 상호 관계를 구명하고, 이러한 관계들은 아동의 지역적인 환경에 따라 차이가 있는지를 분석하는 것이다. 본 연구를 통하여 얻은 결론은 다음과 같다. 정의적 특성의 하위 요인 중 수학적 문제 해결력과 귀납적 추론 능력에 대한 설명력이 가장 높은 요인은 수학교과에 대한 자아개념인 것으로 나타났으며, 연역적 추론 능력에 대한 설명력은 학습 습관이 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. _그리고 귀납적 추론 능력이 연역적 추론 능력 보다 수학적 문제 해결력에 대한 설명력이 더 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 수학적 문제 해결력과 귀납적 추론 능력은 지역별로 유의한 차가 나타났으나 연역적 추론 능력은 지역간 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다.