• Title/Summary/Keyword: 수입쿼터

Search Result 14, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

포커스-육용원종계 수급동향 및 전망

  • Korea Chicken Council
    • Monthly Korean Chicken
    • /
    • s.141
    • /
    • pp.85-87
    • /
    • 2007
  • 2005년 하반기 육용원종계 쿼터제가 사실상 붕괴된 이후 원종계 수입이 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 실제 2006년 총 수입물량은 141,600수로 지난해 109,200수 대비 29.7%가 증가했고, 올해 수입예정 물량도 195.000수에 달해 향후 종계 및 육계 수급불안이 예상된다. 이에 가금수급안정위원회는 지난 2월 8일 양계협회 회의실에서 4개 원종계사(삼화육종, 한국원종, 하림, 마니커)가 참석한 가운데 육용원종계 수급대책에 대해 논의하는 자리를 가졌다. 이날 회의에서 원종계 4사는 향후 종계 및 육계 수급안정 차원에서 원종계 감축이 필요하다는 데 공감대를 형 성했다. 그러나 이미 자체사용량과 판매처 등이 확정된 상태여서 향후 수급불안 문제를 어떻게 풀어갈 것인가가 관건이다. 본고는 이날 회의자료를 일부 발췌해 게재한 것이다.

  • PDF

월간닭고기

  • 한국위생계육산업협회
    • Monthly Korean Chicken
    • /
    • v.2 no.7 s.13
    • /
    • pp.2-8
    • /
    • 1996
  • 육류중 유해물질 검사 강화 - 육계 초기 사료제한 연구 - 잔류 항생제 정성검사 키트 개발 - 일본인 육류섭취량 증가추세 - 축산폐수 단속기중 강화 - 축산물 소비촉진 홍보대책 필요 - 사료용 부연료 할당관세 $2.5{\%}$적용 - 가금티푸스 예방약 개발 - 가금인플루엔자 방역대책 시급 - 종계 ND 발생지역 백신 프로그램 - 수입종란 외래질병 매개 가능성 - 안전축산물 생산운동연합회 발족 - 중국, 닭고기 산업 잠재력 무한 - 삼계탕 수출 급속 성장중 - 소비자 단체 임원 닭 생산현장 방문 - 산란노계 처리 계속 어려워 - 인도, 육계수입 규제완화 재검토 - 축산기자재 구입 외화자금 사용가능 - 미국, 도계전 급이중단 실험 - 러시아, 수입쿼터제 부과 - 호주, 브로일러 산업 지속적 성장 - 배합사료업체 사료원료 선물구매 기피

  • PDF

A study on the changes of the Screen quota system as a Film policy in Korea (한국의 영화정책과 스크린 쿼터제의 변천에 대한 연구)

  • Cho, Hee-Moon
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.7 no.5
    • /
    • pp.982-991
    • /
    • 2006
  • The screen quota system is one of the most controversial issues in the Korean film industry. There are two different points of view regarding the system. Some say it is highly effective to protect and nurture Korean movies. However, others argue that it hurts the duality of the Korean movies. The number of days, for which Korean movies have to play on local screens, has been reduced to 73, starting on July 1st, 2006. Actually, it is 50 percent fewer than the previous year. In facL Korea has implemented the screen quota. system two times. First, it was practiced from 1935 to 1945, during the Japanese colonial period. This was to regulate imported movies, especially American ones, as the Japanese government was to use movies for the political propaganda. In 1935, the number of foreign movies screened had to be less than three fourths of the total. And they gradually reduced the size by two thirds in 1936, and again by half in 1937. After the attack on Pearl Harbor when the Pacific War happened, Japan completely banned importing American movies in Korea. The reason why it regulated the imported foreign films is to increase the number of domestic movies, both Japanese and Korean. It was for making propaganda films fur carrying the war. The second practice of the screen quota is from 1967 to the present year. It was designed to boom the Korean film industry. However, the competitive power of Korean films has not been improved in spite of the practice of the system. Moreover, the film industry has gone through the depression. Korean film agencies have occupied the Korean film market thanks to the protection by government. The founding of the film agencies has been strongly regulated. So has importing foreign movies. Under the special protection like this, Korean film agencies have been enjoying the monopoly In the mean time, they have pursued income not by making quality movies but by importing foreign movies. As a result, cinema audiences turn away form Korean films and prefer foreign movies. Furthermore, the screen quota system hurts the relationship between film producers and distributors, imposing the duties only on theaters. In short, the screen quota system has satisfied neither film producers, theater runners, nor film goers. In other words. the excessive protection has weakened the competitive power of Korean film industry.

  • PDF

Macro Analysis on the Supply and Demand of New-coming Directors in the Korean Movie Industry over the Years (1971-2016) (신인 영화감독의 한국영화시장 진출에 대한 거시 분석)

  • Kim, Jung-Ho;Kim, Jae Sung
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.132-146
    • /
    • 2017
  • Over the years(1971 to 1987), only 20 Korean film production companies had been granted the exclusive rights to make Korean films in Korea and to import foreign films with a quota system. They had been making trashy Korean movies to secure import quotas of foreign films. Newcomer's entry of market had also been limited and the growth of Korean films through innovation had been hampered. In the same period, The annual number of Rookie director is 10, the portion of debut films of all Korean films is 10.62%, and the audience portion of debut is only 10.5% of Korean movie audience. From 2004 to 2016, total number of rookie directors is 874, and 61.72% of 1,416 directors who made his debut over the 46 years from 1971 to 2016. This is far more than the number of directors who debuted for the last 32 years. From 2004 to 2016, the annual number of rookie directors is 62.15 and their debut film occupies 39.58% of the total amount of Korean movies released and 32.8% of the audience number. Since the full opening of the domestic market to foreign films industries in 1988, the liberalization of independent film production in 1999, as a result of innovation of a competitive system, the Korean movies have been loved by audiences. However, there are concerns that the decline of the screen quota in 2006, the monopoly of the 4 major distributors, increase in indie movies and Semi-adult movies for VOD, could be the potential threat for future innovation in Korean cinema.